The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7590RESOLUTION NO. 7590 A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN APPLICATION FOR $1.5 MILLION TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION FOR THE PUEBLO MUNICIPAL PARKING STRUCTURE AND DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER AS THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE TO ACT IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPLICATION WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 7424 authorized the submittal of an application to the Economic Development Administra- tion (EDA) for the Public Works Assistance under the Authority of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended, and authorized the President of the City Council to execute same. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PUEBLO, COLORADO, that: SECTION 1: The application to the Economic Development Administra- tion for Public Works Assistance under the Authority of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, and made a part hereof by reference, including all the understandings and assurances contained herein, is hereby approved. The City Manager is hereby designated as the City's Authorized Representative to act in connec- tion with the Application and authorized to provide such additional information as may be required by EDA. SECTION 2: The funding for match of the Application will come from the City of Pueblo's General Fund and /or any other financial arrange- ment approved by the City Council. INTRODUCED: March 27, 1995 BY: SAMUM CORSENTINO COUNCIL PERSON APPRO D: PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTEST �/. / ,. ► 1 al .1 _ffTY CLERK PUEBLO MiJNICIPAL PARKING STRUCTURE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION r SUBMITTED TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION FEBRUARY 17, 1995 r , Form ED--101P (Rev. 12/91) CIS No. 0610 -0011; Approval Expires October 31, 1994 APPLICATION FOR OMB Approval No. 034S ` FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2. GATE SUBMITTED ApjsllGanl Identdler 1. TYPE OF SUBMISSION: f. DATE RECEIVED BY STATE Applrcabon P reapp /;Cation ❑ Construction t71 Con str uc tion =i a. DATE RECEIVED By FEDERAL AGENCY State Apphcatlon ICenlohei FeCerat Ioent,her Scott McInnis :Rep. Scott McInn;q ❑ Non-Construction ❑ Non`onstruction IS. ESTIMATED FUNDING: it. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE OADEA 17772 PAOCESS7 S. APPLICANT INFORMATION a Federal f 00. a TES THIS PREAPPLICATION APPI.ICATION WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO TP-E Legal Name. Organ,ralronal Una STATE EXECUTIVE O 12772 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON ' City of Pueblo De artment of Planning & Developmen e Stne f Address (give city. county, state. and tip code) 1 City Hall Place Pueblo, CO 81003 Pueblo County Name and telephone numtxr of the person to be contacted on matters Involving this OPPl2ation (Dive area Code) James F. Munch, Planning Director_ . (719) 543 -6006 ' 00 ❑ OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW r e Oth S a. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IEINI: 8 4 — 6 0 0 T. TYPE OF APPLICANT: (enter apprropoate Jolter in Dos) V A State H Independent School oi st. 00 11. IS THE APPLICANT DELINOVENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT7 0 6 1 5 B County I State Controlled Institution of Higher Learning g TOTAL f 2,500 ,000 00 C. Mum c.pal J Pnvate University D. Township K. Indian Tripe IN THIS APPLICATION AREA.PPLICAr10N ARE TRUE AMC CORRECT. THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DVLY B. TYPE OF APPLICATION: a Typed Name of Authonled Representative ® New ❑ Continuation O Revision E. Interstate L. Individual City Council Presiders 19- A - C Signature 1 Avthor.led Represe ve 11 Revision, enter appropriate lelterfs) In box(es): ❑ F Intermunicipal M Profit Organization G Special O.Stnct N Other (Specify) ` "• revrouf III SNo Vsapre A Increase Award B Decease Award C Increase Dvtatlon PrescrSCed by OMB Circular A -102 D Decrease Duration Other (specify): B. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY: U. S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration 10 ASS STANCE OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC 1 e 3 0 V V 11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANTS PROJECT: TITLE: Pueblo Municipal Parkin; Structure ,. 12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT (Cities. Counties. states. SIC.): City of Pueblo •. � 11. rn V�V �LIr r HVnYnL »IVnAI VIi1w1Y1� Vr. Start Date Ending Date a. Applicant 0 : p Project NA NA Rep. Scott McInnis :Rep. Scott McInn;q IS. ESTIMATED FUNDING: it. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE OADEA 17772 PAOCESS7 a Federal f 00. a TES THIS PREAPPLICATION APPI.ICATION WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO TP-E . - 1,500,000 STATE EXECUTIVE O 12772 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON D A ant f 1 ,0 00,000 00 DATE e Stne f 00 p NO ❑ PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E O 12272 - - d local f 00 ❑ OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW r e Oth S Do - I ProOram Income f 00 11. IS THE APPLICANT DELINOVENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT7 ❑ ve 11 *Yes. attach an e.Diana Iron ❑ N D ' g TOTAL f 2,500 ,000 00 18. TO T'►rE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION AREA.PPLICAr10N ARE TRUE AMC CORRECT. THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DVLY r AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH rNE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED a Typed Name of Authonled Representative p Title c Telephone nvmper Joyce R. L City Council Presiders 19- A - C Signature 1 Avthor.led Represe ve a Dale S-gned ` "• revrouf III SNo Vsapre Standard Form 421 lh£V 1 -88) PrescrSCed by OMB Circular A -102 r PART fI - PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PROJECT APPROVAL INFORkLATION r 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a summary description of the project and define Project Description all major components (include lengths, widths, sizes, etc.). attached as Exhibit II -1 See instructions. 2. ENTERPRISE ZONE Will this project be located in an enterprise ZY Yes /7 No If yes, - zone that has been state or federally designated or for which such designation has been requested? a State /X7 designated /X7 Federal dT designation requested 3. OTHER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE Has there been or will there be any Federal assistance received or requested /7 Yes /X7 No If Yes, Other Federal for this project other than what is listed Assistance attached as in Part III -B? Exhibit II -3 4. FEDERAL DEBARMENT Is the applicant currently debarred from receiving /7 Yes d7 No If Yes, Federal Debarment any type of assistance from any Federal department Explanation attached as or agency? Exhibit II -4 R - - SUKMARY PROJECT BUD I•unds Requested from the Economic Development Administration I TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT (a) (b) REMARKS: r� Form ED -101P (Rev. 12/91) -3- I A 1 -B 8UD i �FOR�t�77;,� FUNDISC FROM OTHER FEDERAL SOURCES 1. Other-Federal Funding: sources) (e.g. Fm HUD, ARC, etc.) a , b, Assistance Awarded ; Date approved or requested 0 c. Loan A:ount ; Date approved or requested d. User funding for capita costs (e.g. from other malcr receral 0 facility affecting the project) Date funds received , or requested 2. Total of Other Federal Funding (add lines b., c., and d. and enter this amount in Item 2, Part 11I -A of the Su:r,mary Budget) Note: If funds from another Federal Agency will be used to match the Federal Share of this application, please submit evidence that such use is authorized. Section A - Needs for and Objectives of this Assistance L ocation Give the location of the project site, including boundaries, and briefly describe the geographical scope of the project's service area. Attach .Raps (site, toning, service area, etc.) marked to show the location of the project components within the project area. See instructions for explanation of required map Location and geographical scope exhibits. Note that orieinal maps must be included attached as fxhibit IV -A -1 in all copies of the preapp lcation submitted to EDA. 7M Maps attached as Exhibits I1' -A -la thru IV -A -le 2. A rea nconomtc DescriDtion ana seeas Discuss briefly the area's economic history /evolution. Identify the major sectors of the area's present -day economy (coal mining, soybean farming, automobile part manufacture, etc.). Describe other components of the area's economic mix including natural and agricultural resources, complementary industrial and commercial activities, large governmental or educational facilities, local research and development efforts, and area transportation operations. Discuss changes or stagnation in the above components that have led to economic distress; cite the distress factors (e.g., disturbing population changes, high unemployment rates, low incomes, dangerous trends in business starts /failures); and relate to the area's economic needs. 9-X Area Economic Description and Needs attached as Exhibit IV -A -2 Imoact a. Narrative rrovi e a narrative explanation of how the project will help to alleviate the area's economic needs; e.g., reduce outmigration, relieve excess demand on existing facilities, create long -term job opportunities, increase incomes, improve the area's potential for economic growth, promote opportunities for establishment or expansion of industrial or commercial facilities, create construction job opportunities, or primarily benefit the long -term unemployed and members of low- income families. Also describe how the project relates to the area OED? (if not a PWIP project). Narrative attached as Exhibit IV -A -3a b. Businesses Jobs Investments List businesses that have made eom.ritments or have displayed intent to locate or expand in the area as a result of this project. Also show the number of private - sector jobs that will be created or saved and the amount of new capital investment that will be made. Use preprinted form, Page 9 -- Identification of Businesses, Permanent Jobs, and Private Investments attached as Exhibit IV -A -3b )rm ED -101P (Rev. 12/91) ''' Y]rt 1 Sect cm A - \CGds for and �':)1CCt C tn:s �;sslstance - Ccntlnutd c. AD011 cant s Estisa :e of Froiect Po :e,tial ,. t the project has eeve I opr..ent pos s i :, ;I sties beyond the firms listed in Exhibit IV -A•3b c- if there is no degree of certainty regarding business commitment or intent, provide the following based on your estimate of potential impact of the facility. Do not count the is : - and private investment already shun in Exhibit IV -A -3b: (I) Estimate how many jobs could be created in the project area as a result of the facility: ( 2 ) Estimate how much private investment could be made in the project area as a result c the development: $ (3) Estimate how many ) to obtain the above potential impact: yrs. - (d) Explain your estimates for project potential. / 7/ Applicant's Explanation or Estimate of Project Potential attached as Exhibit IV- A -3c(4) d. Cor..s:ructicn Emolov,ment ( Comolete for PWIP Proposals Onlv: Otherwise Check NA.) 1 i:ew „any cat's after a Grant Approval will it take to oegtn prefect construction? days (2) Estimate the project's labor intensity. On -site labor costs $ divided total project cost equals I labor intensity. (3) !umber of construction jobs created: ( ») Explain your stra:egy for using local labor on project construction. Z77 Ecployment Strate -y attached as Exhibit IV- A•36(•i N A Section B - inaustrtal Parks ,. (Complete for Industrial Park Proposals Only; Otherwise Check NA.) }g'U NA 1. cxistin¢ Incustrial ark /Si :e /_7 NA Where an existing industrial park /site will be expanded by this project to provide additional acreage, what is the: Existing Park /Site Sire usable acreage ,. Existing Occupancy Raze S 2. Pr000sed Industrial Park /Site Provide the acreage of marketable industrial park /site land to be developed or improved as a res-.;: of this EDA project. For existing parks being expanded, how many acres are being added: acres 3. Other Park /Site Occucancv Rates Discuss the occupancy rates and character of other "Developed Industrial Parks /Sites" within a Prescribed Area. "Developed industrial parks /sites" are lands that are ready for facility construction and occupancy, and have the necessary infrastructure in place, such as access road's, water and sewer and do not include industrial toned land that will require major public works improvements before plant construction is possible. a. For cities with populations under 50,000, if any developed industrial parks /sites exist wi - .hi- a 25 mile radius of the industrial park /sites to be served by this project, identify existing parks /sites, their acreage, occupancy rates, types of firms, and number of people employed on -site. If developed space is vacant, indicate whether it is suitable for heavy or light industry, vertical or horizontal development. Describe the environment of existing parks /sites, and their accessibility to transportation and markets. Include a map indicating the other industrial parks /sites located in the prescribed area. Discuss the quality of available space and reasons for availability of existing space at other sites. /7 Industrial Park Survey attached as Exhibit IV -B -3a b. For cities with populations of 50,000 or over, the prescribed area for reporting industrial park /site information may be less than a 15 mile radius. Check with the Economic Development Representative for the area or the appropriate EDA Regional Office for guidance. Explain the rationale for the prescribed area chosen and provide the same types of information as requested in a. above. 1 Industrial ?ark Sur.•ev attached as Exhibit IV -3b 2191) arc �eetion B - n..ustr1al ?arks - Cont1nue i, lndustri�l Park !!arketing Organisation Preparedness ~ a, What organisation will market the industrial park /site? b, Discuss the organi:ation's ability to market the park /site: abilities and experience of director and staff; hiring /retention of a professional staff or plans for training marketing volunteers; plans for business development and business retention; any financial incentive package to attract prospects; any ongoing funding source to support marketing efforts; cormuntty support for industrial development. /7 Industrial Park Marketing Strategy attached as Exhibit IV- 13 -:b Section C - Ownership /Operations and Maintenance /Legal Information I Will the applicant owh and retain title to kjiye s / / o If No, Explanation attached all project facilities and the underlying land? as Exhibit 1V -C -1 2. Will the project facilities be mortgaged or /7Yes X37so If :'es, Explar,atica attaches: otherwise used to secure any sort of financing? as Exhibit IV -C -2 3. Will the applicant retain responsibility for A -Awes / /So operation and maintenance of all project facilities? 4. Explain the financial arrangements for the operation and r..aintenance of the prapcsed facility. If the applicant will not retain responsibility for operation and maintenance, identify the operator and discuss the proposed terms for operation and maintenance. Explanation attached as ,. Exhibit IV -C -4 S ection D - sngineering . Has an engineering leasiallity analysis been performed for this project? !. v(No If Yes, Feasibility Analysis ,• attached as Exhibit 1V -D -1 2. Are there any known or anticipated problems which could delay prompt construction and /%Yes o If Yes, Explanation attached completion of the project (e.g., soil conditions, as Exhibit IV -D -2 easement acquisition, permits, material shortages, etc.)? • -3. If the project assists the construction or modification of a wastewater treatment facility =Yes /%,o If No, Explanation attached or a sewage interceptor or collector system, as Exhibit 1V -D -3 is the community's existing wastewater treatment facility currently in compliance with its Federal and state discharge permit? - Explain the basis for project cost estimate and attach p: inary maps or dr, showing the proposed construction or modification. Explanation atta i as Exhibit IV -D -4 S ection E - tvrl Rig;.. Will the project provide employment tor: Minorities &Yes /7:;o Females :9VYes /7. will the project provide business opportunities for firms owned by: Minorities A7Yes / % ~' Females J{Yes / /So ' Identify minority populations in the area and discuss how these groups will share in the Explanation attached as Exhibit IV -E -3 -- project's benefits, e.g., provision of job opportunities, essential services. Are there pending charges of discrimination �97_.Yes / 7s0 - on file against the applicant? M ice-- ( fie• ✓. / 9 ' Section r • Envtrcnmenta 1, kill the assistance requested have an ir.ract / %Yes X?CSo or effect on the environment? 1. Hasa Federal or State Environmental /_7Yes X77So If yes, EnvircnTental Ass .4ssessrer.t or :.r. ?act Statement t eon meat or Impact Stater.,er,t prepared for this project? attached as Exhibit IV -F•: l 3. Have the Federal and state environmental agencies, e.g., the U. 5. Fish and Wildlife Service, ;he + Environmental Protection Agencv, the U. S. .4r my Corps of Engineers, the Nat iCnal Marine Fisheries Service, the state historic preservation officer, the stave air and water quality regulatory ages: and the Coastal -one Management Office been contacted concerning this project? 1, so, attach resp as Exhibit IV -F -3 ». Are any facilities under your ownership, lease, / AZT; If yes, Explanation attach cr supervision that are to be utiIi:ed on this r as 'Exhibit IV -r" -» . project either listed or under consideration for listing on EPA's List of Violating Facilities? S. will there be any toxic or hazardous materials, I %Yes XN7So if ves. Explanation attache waste or asbestos associated with this project? — _ as Exhibit IV -F -5 . 6. Is the proposed site located in, near or / 1�0 adjacent to any area contaminated with hazardous or toxic wastes? 7. Identify any potential environmental prcblems due to either the nature of the project or its local.. and attach site pho:cs with the exact site location indicated. If yes, explanation attached as Exhibit IV - 7 - 7 . a. will an historic property /building or an historic district be affected? / Yes & b. Will project be located in or adjacent to a wetland area? /_7 Yes /Xi c. hill project be located in or near a floodplain? 1 Yes d. Will the project require expansion of existing water or sewage treatment plant? I Yes e. Will the project be constructed on, in, or near a river, ocean, lake, etc.? / % Yes 157' f. Will the project affect an underground water source, i.e., be located over a "sole source aquifer" or recharge area? I_7 Yes /W g. Will the project be located on or near a landfill? /`7 Yes /3 h. If the project is in an urban area, are there any schools, hospitals, or other institutions in the immediate vicinity which might be affected (e.g., noise, traffic, etc.)? /7 Yes - 7 i. will this project require a toning change? /7 Yes /}{7 j. Will the project result in a change in "present" laid use (e.g., agricultural to industrial)? / Yes /Fa k. Will a public hearing for this project be required? / Yes 1. Has there been adverse public opinion on the proposed project over "environmental concerns "? /7 Yes / w n. Wi11 the project be located on or near prime or unique farmlands? /7 Yes �vI , n. hill the project be located in a designated 100 -year flood ha-ard area? /7 Yes / - o. kill the project be located near a designated geological feature? / / Yes / 3ectten G - Sonre ocation 1. hill any industrial or commercial user of the project transfer jobs from another area of the /7 Yes - 7so If yes, Explanation attached United States to the project area? as Exhibit IV -G•l 11 O 0 co C N N N 0 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE IDENTIFICATION OF Economic Development Administration BUSINESSES, PERMANENT JOBS, AND PRIVATE INVESTMENTS EXPECTED IN THE PROJECT AREA AS A RESULT OF THE PROJECT (See Instructions on Reverse Side) Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 TIMING Existing Jobs Saved or Retained Jobs Created — Jobs Created After 2 Years, But 0 - 2 Years After No More Than 5 Years Alter by the Project Project Approval Project Approval (a) (b) (c) Private Private Private Jobs Saved/ Investments Jobs To Be Investments Jobs To Be Investments Business Name and Type of Product /Service Degree of Certainty Retained (No.) To Be Made (Dollars) Created (No.) To Be Made (Dollars) Created To Be Made (No.) (Dollars) PUEBLO CONVENTION CENTER AND INTRA- FINANCIAL CORP. RADISON HOTEL B 170 $10 MILLIO HOTEL; $6 MILLION CONFERENCE CENTER QUAL MED HEALTH INSURANCE A M X iT D w Cr USCOMM•DC 88.59049 $M Plans for Health February 16, 1995 Cathy Green Senior Planner City of Pueblo Planning Department 211 E. "D" Street Pueblo, CO 81003 Dear Ms. Green: ['urb6% o,SWO3 800A �28 _ r ,,, ,- I W-34 This letter is to inform you of QualMed's present intent to maintain a significant presence in the downtown Pueblo area. As you are aware, QualMed's operations have expanded significantly since we moved into the facilities that we currently occupy. However, efforts for future expansion have been severely constricted due to the unavailability of adequate parking for our employees. Should you have questions or need further clarification, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Keith Hovland Executive Vice President Finance and Administration KH /smb FORM CD-611 UNrTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS; DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS AND LOBBYING Applicants should refer to the regulations cited below to determine the certification to which they are required to attest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing this form. Signature on this form provides for compliance with certification requirements under 15 CFR Part 26, "Govemmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)" and "Govemmentwide Requirements for Drug -Free Workplace" and 15 CFR Part 28, "New Restrictions on Lobbying." The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of Commerce determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement. 1. DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS As required by - Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, and implemented at 15 CFR Part 26, for pro- spective participants in primary covered transactions, as defined at 15 CFR Part 26, Sections 26.105 and 26.110 - (1) The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three -year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or perform- ing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, mak- ing false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three -year period preceding this ap- plication/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. 2. DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS Alternate I. Grantees Other Than Individuals As required by the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implemented at 15 CFR Part 26, Subpart F, for grantees, as defined at 15 CFR Part 26, Sections 26.605 and 26.610 - A. The grantee certifies that it will or will continue to provide a drug -free workplace by: (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; (b) Establishing an ongoing drug -free awareness program to inform employees about — (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (2) The grantee's policyof maintaining a drug -free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and em- ployee assistance programs; and (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be en- gaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will — (1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; (e) Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such con- viction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to the Director, Office of Federal Assistance, Office of Federal Assistance and Man- agement Support, HCHB Room 6054, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant; (f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; USCOMM DC 91 -7115 E. 0.- -12372 PROCESS (SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT) As of July 1, 1994, the Colorado State Clearinghouse has i discontinued the Intergovernmental Review System. To verify this or for questions regarding this action, please contact: Margaret Dubas, Staff Assistant Division of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver, CO 80203 (303) 866 -2156 4 . C. i s � rE of August 29, 1994 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economic Development Administration Reply To: Joyce R. Lawrence President, Pueblo City Council City of Pueblo 1 City Hall Place Pueblo, Colorado 81003 Dear Joyce, I am contacting you in reference to your recent preapplication for $1,500,000 in Economic Development Administration(EDA) funds to construct a parking structure in downtown Pueblo. I want to keep you informed about the progress of your proposal. EDA had committed all available funding to other projects for fiscal year 1994 when your preapplication was received. The Denver Regional Office is currently holding your project for consideration for fiscal year 1995 funding. The new fiscal year will begin October 1, 1994. The Denver Regional Office will consider projects as soon as EDA receives new budget funds and each region receives an allocation of those funds. You will be notified in writing about the final status of your project. Thank you for your interest in the Economic Development Administration. Please contact me at 303 - 844 -4902 if you have any questions. Sincerely, J John Zender Economic Development Representative EXHIBIT II -1 r The City of Pueblo with the assistance of the Economic Development Administration is developing an economic redevelopment strategy for Pueblo's central business district. Every study prepared by the City of Pueblo with assistance from EDA including the current OEDP, has r identified a parking structure as critical to the success of economic redevelopment in downtown. Recent studies by both CHMEll and Walker Parking Consultants show that with the completion of Pueblo's $16 million downtown hotel and conference center, and with normal growth of the parking demand within the "service area," downtown will face a parking shortage of 430 spaces. This number is conservative since it assumes a fair amount of shared parking at the conference center and it does not include parking requirements for a new riverwalk project planned for 1996. The City of Pueblo is proposing a three phased construction of a parking structure and 8000 square feet of private sector retail and service space. The lot is located between Grand Avenue, Court Street and West 2nd, West 3rd Streets. Phase one, for which we are requesting EDA assistance, will be the construction of a ramp and two tiers of parking on one half of the site, resulting in 383 structure spaces and 138 surface spaces for total of 521 spaces. Phase two will be the construction of two tiers over the remainder of the site for an additional 300 spaces for a total of 821 spaces. Phase three will remove a row of parking and construct a flexible shell space of up to 8000 square feet which can then be leased out for private sector retail and service establishments. The soon to be developed hotel/convention site has acted as an informal parking lot for many years; and with the recent growth exhibited by various sectors in the downtown area, this informal parking lot has become widely used. Due to the pending construction, this land will no longer be available for use. Walker Parking/Engineering Consultants have calculated, using a shared parking analysis, that the proposed hotel/condference facility will require 549 parking spaces. Of these, 284 can be provided on site. The balance 265 spaces must be provided off site. These parking spaces can either be provided by the new parking structure or the convention users may displace cars in nearby private lots forcing the relocation of those cars to the new parking " structure. Due to timing, phasing, and coordination of the hotel/conference center and related parking, it will be difficult to aggressively develop additional downtown property without resolving our parking issues. Therefore, we are requesting EDA assistance to construct phase one of the above referenced parking structure. 4 V r ► r r' EXHIBIT IV -A -1 The proposed parking facility will be located between West Second and West Third Streets and between Grand Avenue and Court Street; a square block where surface parking is currently located. The parking facility will provide the required 265 off site parking spaces required by the new hotel/confernece center, relieving parking pressure for the downtown businesses located between West 1st and West 3rd Streets and Court and Main Streets. Many employees in this area are currently informally parking on the vacant land at West 1 st and Main Streets where construction of a new hotel and convention center will begin in September of 1995, and on lots currently proposed for lease for conference center users. Although informal, when parking on this site is lost to construction of the hotel and convention center, a parking shortage will result. The proposed parking facility would accommodate additional parking needed for the convention center. The "service area" for the proposed structure includes six city blocks including the hotel/conference facility and a broad mix of downtown uses. A majority of the "service area" r encompasses the former retail core of the central business district. The recently completed Central Pueblo Framework Plan, funded in part by the EDA, identifies this area as a future employment center which has been born out by the location of Qual Med within the "service area ". Recently completed parking studies indicate that the "service area" for the parking facility will r have a deficit of 174 spaces at build -out of central downtown. The "service area" build -out, when added to the conference facility deficit of 265 spaces, will produce a deficit of 430 spaces. Phases I and II plans for developing the parking structure on the Court Street site will add the r 430 additional spaces required to meet the parking deficit. Phase I, for which we are requesting EDA assistance, will provide only the 265 deficit off site parking spaces required for the hotel/confernece center. Downtown businesses located outside the "service area" will be served r by the existing public and private parking lots at West 4th and Main Streets and West 4th Street and Santa Fe Avenue. r � r r `_ .> • EXHIBIT IV -A -2: SUMMARY OF PUEBLO ECONOMIC TRENDS A lack of diversity in the Pueblo economy has adversely effected growth in the community. This is not a recent development, but has played a role in the development of Pueblo for at least the past three decades. The impact of this trend, however, did not fully manifest itself until the early 1980's, when severe layoffs in the local steel industry Caused major dislocations within the Pueblo economy. In 1931, the Pueblo metropolitan area unemployment rate was 10.0 percent; in 1932, it had climbed to 16.6 percent. During the past ten years, Pueblo has made considerable progress in diversifying its economy with the ` addition of over 3,000 jobs at the Pueblo Memorial Airport r Industrial Park:, and the Matrix;x: Marketing firm, among others. Despite these efforts, Pueblo still lags behind the Colorado State, and National economies, both in terms of its unemployment rate, and level of prosperity. In 1993, Pueblo's annual unemployment rate was 7.7 percent, compared to 5.2 percent for the State of Colorado, and 6.3 percent, Nationally.. The 24 month unemployment rate for strictly the City of Pueblo during the period ending March 31, 1994 was 7.9 percent, compared to 7.1 percent for the U.S. The City of Pueblo's five- average unemployment rate was 7.7 percent, compared to the National rate of 6.3 percent. In 1939, per capita income for the City of Pueblo was 70.5 percent of the U.S. value. These trends are depicted in the accompanying graphs. Even prior to the 1980's, Pueblo had difficulty in sustaining economic growth. From 1960 to 1970, the population of the City of Pueblo grew by 7.2 percent; from 1970 to 1980, by 4.0 percent; ,. and from 1930 to 1990, it decreased by 3.0 percent. The 1990 Census enumerated a population of 98,640 persons living in the '-- City of Pueblo. A 1992 estimate by the Bureau of the Census shows a population of 98,552. The composition of employment in Pueblo has changed dramatically daring the past dozen years. In 1931, manufacturing comprised 17.5 percent of total Pueblo jobs; by 1936, this had fallen to 10.7 percent; by 1993, it had risen slightly to 11.4 percent of total area employment. The Services, and Whole5ale/Retai1 e . sectors of the economy presently comprise the largest share of employment, followed by Government. These changes are depicted in the table below: r ^ r - 1 - r . COMPONENTS OF EMPLOYMENT (Jobs by Place of Work) Pueblo Metro Area, CO SOURCE: Colorado Department of Labor & Employment, Labor Market Information. Important local manufacturers (those with 250 or more employees) produce steel products, computer equipment and peripherals, commercial air conditioning equipment systems .. and water chillers, and tortilla products. A large segment of services sector emmployment is a ccou nted for by two regional hospitals which serve Southern Colorado. Pueblo also serves as a wholesale and retail trade center for a MUlti_ r_ounty region. Major public sector employers in Pueblo include the two school districts, serving the City of Pueblo and Pueblo County, the Colorado Mental Health Institute (State Hospital); City and County government; the University Of Southern Col orado, and Pueblo Community College. r The proposed project is located in the southern portion of Pueblo's central business district. Historically, this area (as defined by Census tract no. 7) has witnessed declining retail sector employment. Between 1972' and 1982', retail employment decreased by 54.7 percent, from 2,290 employees to 1,038 worE::ers, based on statistics compiled by the Bureau of the Census Major Retail Centers program. Unfortunately, this program was discontinued subsequent to 1982, but a locally conducted survey Suggests that retail employment continued to decline during the 1932-1987 period. It is believed that services sector employment may also have seen a loss, but perhaps, not of as great a magnitude as retail employment. The Pueblo central business district has experienced population loss for at least thirty years. In 1960, this area's population was =,121 persons. By 1990, it had shrUllk to 1,346 inhabitants. Eased on the 1990 Census, 45.6 percent �- of the area residents were living in poverty, compared to 21.6 percent for the entire City of Pueblo, and 13.1 percent, Nationally. The CBU Unemployment rate, as determined by the 19 81 198 �— 199 Mining -- -- Construction 4.1�: 5.1% 4.6 Manufacturing 17.5 10.7 11.4 Transport., Communications, & Utilities 7.4 5.9 4.8 Wholesale & Retail Sales 21.7 24.6 24.5 Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 4.3 4.6 3. 8 Services 20.9 24.1 28.7 Government 24.1 25.0 22.2 ------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL 100. 0 100.0 100. 0 SOURCE: Colorado Department of Labor & Employment, Labor Market Information. Important local manufacturers (those with 250 or more employees) produce steel products, computer equipment and peripherals, commercial air conditioning equipment systems .. and water chillers, and tortilla products. A large segment of services sector emmployment is a ccou nted for by two regional hospitals which serve Southern Colorado. Pueblo also serves as a wholesale and retail trade center for a MUlti_ r_ounty region. Major public sector employers in Pueblo include the two school districts, serving the City of Pueblo and Pueblo County, the Colorado Mental Health Institute (State Hospital); City and County government; the University Of Southern Col orado, and Pueblo Community College. r The proposed project is located in the southern portion of Pueblo's central business district. Historically, this area (as defined by Census tract no. 7) has witnessed declining retail sector employment. Between 1972' and 1982', retail employment decreased by 54.7 percent, from 2,290 employees to 1,038 worE::ers, based on statistics compiled by the Bureau of the Census Major Retail Centers program. Unfortunately, this program was discontinued subsequent to 1982, but a locally conducted survey Suggests that retail employment continued to decline during the 1932-1987 period. It is believed that services sector employment may also have seen a loss, but perhaps, not of as great a magnitude as retail employment. The Pueblo central business district has experienced population loss for at least thirty years. In 1960, this area's population was =,121 persons. By 1990, it had shrUllk to 1,346 inhabitants. Eased on the 1990 Census, 45.6 percent �- of the area residents were living in poverty, compared to 21.6 percent for the entire City of Pueblo, and 13.1 percent, Nationally. The CBU Unemployment rate, as determined by the 1990 Census was 2'_. '. percent. The area contiguous to the proposed project continues to undergo major changes: key to the revitalization of downtown Pueblo are a hotel /conference center, construction of which is slated to begin this Summer, and the proposed Historic Arkansas River Project (HARP ), which should enhance retail development of downtown Pueblo. A senior citizens apartment complex is scheduled to be completed later this year, and may beqin to stem the trend of population out - migration experienced since 1960. In 1992, GualMed, Inc., a Health - Maintenance Orqanization located its corporate offices one bloc= East of the project. This firm presently employs 178 workers, and has a projected employment capacity of approximately 2 00 at the current location. Expansion of the facility to an adjacent location is feasible, however. A more complete assessment of the changes in this area, as they relate to the impacts of the project are discussed in the following section. r ^ 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% a� a� 10.0% CIO x B.0 6.0% 4.0% 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 Year Pueblo 3. SOURCE: Colorado Department of labor & Employment. AVERAGE ANNUAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATE Pueblo, Colorado State, and U.S. PER CAPITA INCOME: 1969-1989 (Current $) $16, 000 $14. 000 v o $12. 000 c $10, 000 c o. W v $8, 000 n. $6. 000 o. U s. $4, 000 a, a $2. 000 $0 PER CAPITA INCOME: 19 6 9 -19 8 9 (Constant 1969 $) $4. 500 $4, 000 a, o $3, 500 U c $3" 000 m C $2. 500 (. a °L $2, 000 co m $1, 500 U y $1. 000 CL $500 $0 1969 1979 1989 Year =City of Pueblo =Colorado State ® U.S. SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1969 1979 1989 Year ® City of Pueblo M Colorado State M U.S. SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of the CenSL:� EXHIBIT IV -A -3a Problem Parking is an essential element in the fabric of any downtown area People do not come downtown simply to park. Without an adequate supply of easily accessible and affordable parking, many people will not choose downtown shops and businesses as the first choice for their patronage. Accessible and affordable parking is likewise, a high priority for those considering the possibility of locating new, or expanding existing businesses in an urban area. Unfortunately, in Pueblo as in many other cities, privately developed parking lots are either designed to serve a specific building or use or they tend to be located on vacant land as an interim use. In either case, privately developed parking facilities normally do not serve the broader downtown public parking need. As redevelopment occurs, the property owners build on the vacant land and the parking usually is lost. The proposed structure represents a major step away from that type of site - specific, market driven parking development strategy. The City has an opportunity, and a responsibility, to locate public parking facilities to serve both the existing and anticipated parking demand to support continued downtown development. Several parking generators sharing parking faculties will reduce development and operating costs, will reduce the amount of land in the downtown area devoted to parking purposes, and will enhance economic opportunities in downtown. Pueblo, like other cities transitioning out of a severe economic decline, is struggling with financing many projects that were postponed until an economic recovery could strengthen municipal revenues. The City of Pueblo does not have the funds needed to construct 100% of a parking structure. The bonds sold to finance the new city government center are being financed out of a .003 sales tax which does not generate deficit funds to construct the necessary parking. The city of Pueblo doubled its monthly parking rates from $10.00 to $20.00 as of January 1995 and the economy is still too weak to generate an income stream necessary to finance a new parking structure with revenue bonds. Our experience has shown that parking must continue to be subsidized in Pueblo. When the price of parking went to $20.00, market value, employees again began using short term parking on the streets which is essential customer parking for businesses and results in increased enforcement problems. Background A downtown parking structure is part of the ongoing economic development program for downtown Pueblo. A large part of Pueblo's economic development program has been a result of plans sponsored by EDA planning funds. In 1985 the "Economic Dislocation Adjustment Strategy, Pueblo, Colorado" recommended downtown development as a key to the economic recovery of Pueblo. Following the report's recommendations, Pueblo began to diversify its economic base by encouraging development in the downtown area. The downtown can now claim many accomplishments including: . 1.. A successful small business incubator 2. The successful renovation of a historic district in downtown. 3. The renovation of older downtown buildings for large corporate headquarters such as Qual Med. 4. Approval in a general election to fund and proceed with plans for a downtown hotel and conference center. 5. The completion of final design plans for a downtown riverwalk project. This is an impressive beginning, however future completion and expansion of these projects relies on our ability to satisfy the increasing demand for parking. Parking is a significant component in good access to Pueblo's downtown, without which many of our redevelopment plans could be stalled or turned down by the voters. Economic Impact It is felt by the downtown merchants, as well as the city officials and planners for the City of Pueblo, that a parking structure in the identified centralized location is the missing link in our downtown redevelopment strategy and would directly benefit the following: 1. $16 million Hotel/Conference Center attendees and workers The parking structure is located 2 blocks from the site of the new hotel/conference center. The hotel/conference center, when completed, will have 170 employees and will require an additional 265 spaces not provided for on site. 2. Large employers in the downtown business district The parking structure is located in the primary employment area of downtown. One of downtown's largest employers, Qual Med, is aggressively looking to develop strategic alliances but cannot expand in downtown if they cannot find additional parking for employees. (Please see letter with exhibit IV -A -3b) 3. Downtown Retailers As the central business district has evolved form a retail area to the service sector both public and private parking lots have changed from short term retail uses to long term office uses. In response, many of the downtown retailers have been forced to acquire and demolish downtown structures for their own parking needs. This has resulted in a net loss in available space for additional downtown development. This parking is considered transitional and may disappear when market forces change. The proposed structure will not only serve shoppers, it will also free up close -in parking in other parts of downtown by providing parking for the all -day users such as tourists and employees. Phase three of the parking structure will provide up to 8000 square feet of flexible retail space that could be leased to the private sector. 4. Ice Arena Users and Shoppers: In 1986, 60 of the 240 spaces within the subject parking lot were reserved for monthly parkers, the remainder were available to the ice arena and shopping public. In 1995 the lot is completely reserved for monthly parking and is over sold. This has resulted in a net loss of 180 spaces for special events at the ice arena and downtown shoppers. 5. Tourists The parking structure is located on the proposed downtown circulator loop, less than three blocks from the site of the riverwalk project, which is expected to draw large numbers of visitors. Employment The project will directly benefit the hotel/conference center which will create 170 new jobs in downtown Pueblo. The project will also facilitate the expansion of existing businesses located ` adjacent to the site and will provide an additional incentive for new businesses to locate near the facility. As noted above, Qual Med, Inc., a major employer downtown is located near the project site. The available parking adjacent to their offices (both for employees and clients) is almost fully utilized; therefore, expansion of their facility at this location is limited at this time. The proposed parking facility will improve ease of access for downtown businesses and allow for future expansion. Two other large buildings, which are currently experiencing high vacancy rates are located within one block of the facility. Both of these buildings are in excellent structural condition and could readily be converted into office space. Availability of ample parking within their proximity may very well be an inducement for businesses, which could potentially employ several hundred workers. Supportive Documents Pueblo's downtown projects and improvements along with their economic benefits are outlined in another EDA report entitled the "Strategic Economic, and Physical Development Plan for Downtown Pueblo, Colorado." In the chapter on parking, this report warns that "...when the majority of the downtown projects are completed, Pueblo can expect to see a parking shortage of approximately 900 spaces." And in a 1994 Downtown Transportation Study, the final report stated, "Over the long term, it will probably be necessary to consider multi -level parking development to obtain adequate capacity in a prime location. A mid -block location also would be desirable to avoid disrupting large stretches of retail street frontage. One potential location for such a parking facility would be on existing parking lots in the block bounded by 2nd/3 rd/Court/Grand." In Pueblo's Strategic Plan, which was submitted for a Federal enterprise community designation, a parking structure with linkages to a transit center and day -care center was listed as a downtown strategy for economic development. The Pueblo Renaissance Project, a private sector business organization whose purpose is to promote downtown redevelopment, has organized a task force to look at new parking ` possibilities. They identified the location specified in this application as the most accommodating location for a parking structure. In Pueblo's Overall Economic Development Program (OEDP), adopted in 1992, a downtown parking garage was the sixth project listed under "Priority No. 2, Community Facilities and Services." With the implementation of many projects listed in the OEDP, the parking structure will move up on the project list in this year's update. EXHIBIT IV -C -4 The City of Pueblo's Department of Transportation will operate and maintain the parking structure through its regular operation and maintenance scheduling budget. a . EXHIBIT IV -D -4 Costs were estimated from Walker Parking Consultants/Engineers, Inc., Denver, Colorado, phone: 303 - 337 -2634. PHASE ONE: ITEM UNIT COST NUMBER COST Structure $5553/ space 383 $2,126,799.00 D esign Fees 6% const. fees 127,607.94 Geotechnical report $6,000 6,000.00 Survey $6,000 6,000.00 Inspection $6,000 6,000.00 Contingency 10% total cost 227,240.69 TOTAL $2,499.647.63 r , 4.. r r � 521 SPACES 300 SPACES RETAIL CITY OF PUEBLO P ARKING STRU CTURE ISOMETRIC VIEW LOOKING NORTH 9:YWIRIT IV n d EXHIBIT IV-E-3: MINORITY POPULATION The project is located within Census tract no. 7, however, it could be expected to provide benefits to the residents of tract 13, located just South of the site. Minority demographics for these two tracts, and for the City of Pueblo are depicted in the table below: MINORITY POPULATION (1990 Census) TRACT 7 TRACT 13 CITY OF PUEBLO No. Pct. No. Pct. No. Pct. White, Non-Hispanic 664 49.3 330 49.6 56,451 57.2 Black, Non-Hispanic 48 3.6 15 2.3 1,932 2.0 Amer. Ind., Eskimo, Aleut 17 1.3 8 1.2 484 0.5 Asian & Pacific Islander 5 0.4 1 0.2 504 0.5 Other, Non-Hispanic 5 0.4 0 -- 300 0.3 Hispanic 607 45.0 312 46.7 38,969 39~5 TOTAL: 1,346 100.0 666 100.0 98,640 100.0 SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census Tracts, Pueblo CO. Although this area near the project site has experienced population loss, the project may offer some employment opportunities to area residents. This area has chronically had a high rate of I unemployment. Benefits of the project would include the creation of several hundred jobs as a by product, and these would be expected to have a distribution both adjacent to the project location, and the Pueblo community, as a whole. k'A "31 "'T/// 4 up ! A to / I AI I u41 zy / f / �ez9, i a• f - � - i - r 310. °m� �� ° .f (U4T - ' V� � I I I.lr' I I�.�I •I l� � J .P. Itliy � \W. } \1� �� I 11 C, I � �wl ol �I •� � '`III �l "1. �i` 1111 � � a.• � 1 l 1 k;R,r ue ' I gl I i ) ,�I� J( �1.� I ►� `I v y �� xE F} _�� L,��I 7 �n ■ I�, a � <a /a 1 t, ` r' � •• , $� I J I / 1 L .. I � r I � �i: fl I. f . �/ ` 41 i Azsi 1 (�I '� I •I A li �`r� l � I t.I ue I 079 I i I 1 � r •. � � ; I � - � �� L lkh �, LAN_ •� � � �� , � Vf 7 1 I Jl %'�v,n_�If •„l ��•�• �1 ,' •I - L �° ��_�VVV y J ,J I Ih II I� \�� • I. .1 l 2 -t II. - •�.... :.• 3.1''1" F Ti I. i► II ,� + II.:JIN I : u. PRO:JE CT -SIT-E _ Ir III U _ _ _�' .;: �_ _ �I �tl � �/ i. :• .. _. .. II ,r If., IC I I l� �,. � 0 lit. .ta+ 3 Z /DJRIN. <'.. �i r4 \� s, i �,• 'a+., 'v I .�Lle',r t�.NO <� a. • • �. TP o _r • • �. ' Y • tl .I " -; F." '^ t ". rl \ I i - s atin �KASAS 1e•rNa ,an tl7} \'% � 1?IiD 11W EEU IIt b4 w. �is36 3`i � � r5o{ITHEAST Pu 0v"G\ Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey QJ 6 Control by USGS and NOS /NOAH 1 z SCALE o 174 0 �gwP Topography by photogrammetric methods Irom aerial mN loop o loon z000 n,x> GN photographs taken 1954 and 1957. Field checked 1961 F - FI s o J Polyconic projection 1927 North American datum _ 1z• L - - - - - t C I - = y 10,000 foot grid based on Colorado coordinate system, south zone o •1 6• na MILS CONTOUR INTERVAL. 1000 -metre Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks, 3 LS / NATIONAL GEODETIC VER7ICAI zone 13, shown in blue Red tint indicates areas in which only landmark buildings ale shown UTM GRID AND 1974 MAGNETIC NORTN FInQ red dashed Ii 'I'd sell f, and Held lin, where DECLINATION At CENIEN OE S-11 lyIN• rally vi•:ih11• nn alNial plN ilnln.I;IIIti Ihi•, ildlNm ........I 41•II I IIIC AIAI. 1'I.M 1`I ITV IVIIII NAIII 1 N Ai n. i .. i. .. ,,, i ...,i ., i. iI „. .. . :. , i. i, II •:All II. II .. �111N I.. 11� 11 ..1 N:II. I•I I.MII: vi AM in K r m Co > rm V 0 to 0 ffl. 40 -n 0>0 C:) 0 0 - Z 0 0 CD 2c 0 CD 4= rc PUEBLO MUNICIPAL PARKING STRUCTURE FINAL APPLICATION r SUBMITTED TO r THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT _ . ADMINISTRATION r . MARCH 27, 1995 r - 4 s r 4 . ♦, 4 r i Ismail Form ED -101A (Rev. 12/91) OM No. 0610 -0011; Approval Expires October 31, 1994 OMB Approval No. 0348 -0043 AFtOUI PA I lury r 2. DATE SUBMITTED Applicant Identifier FEDERAL ASSISTANCE MARCH 21, 1995 1. TYPE OF SUBMISSION: 3. DATE RECEIVED BY STATE State Application Identifier Application Preapplication CO Construction ❑ Construction 4. DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY Federal Identifier ❑ Non - Construction ❑ Non - Construction S. APPLICANT INFORMATION Legal Name. THE CITY OF PUEBLO, COLORADO Organizational Unit HOME RULE CITY Address (give City, county, state, and zip code) Name and telephone number of the person to be contacted on matters involving this application (give area code) NO. 1 CITY HALL PLACE JAMES F. MUNCH, PLANNING DIRECTOR PUEBLO, CO 81003 DEPT. OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (719) 543 -6006 i. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN): 7. TYPE OF APPLICANT: tenter appropriate letter in box) 8 4 — 6 0 0 0 6 1 5 A. State H Independent School Dist. B County _ . 1. Slate Controlled Institution of Higher Learning C Municipal J. Private University IL TYPE OF APPLICATION: . D. Township K. Indian Tribe X) New ❑ Continuation ❑ Revision E. Interstate L. 'Individual ❑ F Intermunicipal M Profit Organization If Revision, enter appropriate letter(s) in box(es): D G Special District N. Other (Specify) _ A. Increase Award B. Decrease Award C Increase Duration D Decrease Duration Other (specify): S. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY: ` U. S. Department of Commerce Economic - Develo ment.Administration to ASSISTANCE NUM ER: DOMESTIC ..� : ,1 1 ■ -- 3 0 - 0 11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT; TITLE: PUEBLO MUNICIPAL PARKING STRUCTURE 12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT (Cities, counties, states, etc.) `CITY OF PUEBLO, COLORADO 13. PROPOSED PROJECT: 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: Start Date Ending Date a Applicant : b Project 6/95 - 9/96 THIRD THIRD 15. ESTIMATED FUNDING: 16. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS? a YES THIS PREAPPLICATIONIAPPLICATION WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO THE a Federal $ 00 1 , 50 STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON DATE___.___ b. Applicant $ 1, 120,359 00 c State S .00 b NO E3 PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E O. 12372 d Local $ .00 ❑ OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW e Other $ .00 I Program Income 3 .00 17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINOUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? Yes If 'Yes,' attach an explanation. No q TOTAL = 2 ,62 0 ,359 .00 is. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATIONiPREAPPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED a e A Autor R p re ritative LEWIS y Hd Q ii'ed L Y b Title CITY MANAGER N A G E R c Telephone number 719/584 -0800 d Signature of Authorized Representative a Date Signed A C 3/21/95-. U „ Standard Form 424 (REV 4 -tie1 V Prescribed by OMB Circular A -102 r Part II - Project Description and Project Approval n ormation Update Preapplication lntormation, Part 11, Items 1 -4, only if necessary. (See Special Agency Instructions, p. -2.) S. Metropolitan Area Review Process Does the project involve the construction within a metropolitan statistical area of .. ahosp airport, library, water supply /7 Yes /)(7 No and distribution facilities, sewage and waste treatment works, highways, transportation .. facilities, water development or / If Yes, Metropolitan OR /_7 Metropolitan land conservation projects? Area Comments attached Area Comments as EXHIBIT II -Sa Not Available If Yes, application was made available to the appropriate areawide agency and /_7 If Yes, Applicant's OR /_7 60 Day Certifi- units of general local government _ Statement on Metropolitan cation attached for review on - - -Area 6iiments -at tached as EXHIBIT II -Sc Date as EXHIBIT II -Sb �- 6. Economic Development Center Projects Only; Otherwise Check Not Applicable Provide a statement from the Economic Development District. organization which states that the ' project has been reviewed by that organization and that:'.:(a) The'project willi further. the objectives stated in'the of-the District In which it is to•be located; (b) 'it will enhance the .. economic-growth potential of'.the District �or' result in additional long -term employment !-.'• opportunities commensurate with the amount o_K Federal financial assistance regue and _. _.. _ _ -the amount of Federal ^ assistance requested is reasonably related to the size, population and economic needs of the District. / Not Applicable /�] Statement- attached as EXHIBIT II - 7. Displacement - Will the project to be assisted r cause the displacement of /7 Yes Z No -.If Yes, Number of individuals, families, businesses 'Individuals Businesses or farms? Families Farms ' /_ If Yes, Complete p. 17, Calculation ` _- of Estimated Relocation-and Land Acquisition -- Expenses, and attach as EXHIBIT II -7 8. Applicant's Jurisdiction Does the project site extend beyond the Applicant's jurisdictional area? /_7 Yes LV No If Yes, comments on the project are required from either the governmental unit with jurisdictional authority ` over the involved area, or from the /_7 If Yes, Multi- Jurisdictional Comments unit having authority over attached as EXHIBIT II -8 the entire project area. 9. Appropriate Applicant r• Is the applicant a special - purpose unit of government (such as a Port /_7 Yes ZY7 No ` Authority, Water and Sewer District)? If Yes, a statement is required from the r parent local or State government / If Yes, Statement from Parent Local or State explaining why the applicant is the better Government as to why Special Purpose Unit of qualified agency to make this application Government is the Proper Applicant attached and administer the proposed project. as EXHIBIT II -9 r.. Form ED -1O1A (Bev. 12/91) -3- Part II - Project Descri tion and Project Approval P ro ormation - - Con t1nue 10. Local Government Comments Has the appropriate unit of local government been requested to review and comment on the project? /)j7 Yes / NA (Required of special - purpose units of government, public or private nonprofit organizations and / If Yes, Local Government Comments Indian tribes only) attached as EXHIBIT II -10 r art III - Budget Update Preapplication Budget Information, Sections III -A and III -B, only if necessary. (See Special Agency Instruction, p. 2.) Section III -C - Local Share Information 1. Sources of Local Share Identify-sources Local Shave and �• �-_- attach appropriate. .letters . from your fiscal officer, private "finan`cial institution, other: investor, ;or,lender, 3 x, f, -,;cI: t as appropriate. . If there is 'a noncash y, y{ ; ,K_ . , , z•,� contribution,•e what.this., ;, LF Source of Local Share and contribution will consist of ;, ,;:; -, Resolution attached as EXHIBIV III- C -1 ;!^ 2. Availability of Local Share If cash is not immediately available, specify the actions completed to date. and those actions remaining to make cash avai•1- able: _ •Indicate also 'the'•period of tune that will be required after execution /_7 NA of the grant agreement to obtain the funds. Also address any interim financing arrangements, if necessary:' If cash is immediately available, check ._ "Not Applicable." ZF Explanation attached as EXHIBIT III -C -2 3. Are there any restrictions on using any of the Local share for this / Yes ZJ .. project? _7 If yes, Explanation attached as EXHIBIT III -C -3 4. E.D.D. Bonus Only for Applicant requesting a 10% Economic Development District bonus grant; ` Otherwise Check of pp ica e) Provide a statement from the Economic Development District Organization which states that: (a) the project is located in a designated Redevelopment Area in a designated District, (b) the desi nated Redevelopment Area is participating in the economic development activities of the District, �c) the District endorses the project, and (d) the project is consistent with the District OEDP. f Not Applicable Statement attached as EXHIBIT III -C -4 r - L Form ED -101A (Rev. 12/91) -4- .- .. ection - - Bond or Other Indebtedness Information If the applicant plans to finance any portion of this project through the issuance of bonds or other instruments of indebtedness, provide information on the following; otherwise enter "NA." /—] NA 1. Identify the type of on or other instrument of indebtedness i.e., general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, bond anticipation notes) and identify the security to be provided for the proposed debt. CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION . State the statutory authority r the issuance o said bonds or instrume t o In a to ness, The statutory authority for the issuance of the Certificates off` rticipation is Article XX, Section 6 of the Colorado Constitution and powers enumerated in the City Charter of the City of Pueblo, Colorado. 3. Indicate the statutory limitations on the proposed bonds or instruments of indebtedness with respect to the following areas: (a) Maximum term: 20 Years t (b) Maximum interest rate: 9 ; OR /7 No Maximuml (c) other pertinent limitations: FINANCING IS SUBJECT TO RECEIPT OF AN UNQUALIFIED TAX - EXEMPTION OPINION {FROM NATIONALLY— RECOGNIZED BOND COUNSEL. } ; ( ; ,✓ 0 4. Does a State agency have to clear or approve the proposed debt? / Yes /X7:No = `Z If Yes, identify the agency and.briefly explain its authority:, S. Is an election require 1 , to authorize the proposed debt? /7 Yes /_X7No ti ; If Yes, answer the following: a. What is the plurality required for passage? r b. When may such an election be held? 6. Have all conditions precedent to r bond sale been met? / Yes X7 No /=7 If Yes, Preliminary Bond Counsel Opinion attached as EXHIBIT III -D -6 Form ED -101A (Rev. 12/91) -s- - r ♦ (. � ( __.l (. __. (... _ � f _.... � r ♦ f \ (__. l f. _1 I ♦ r ♦ f � r ♦ r ♦ t ! T 1 f 0 3 M 0 O_ N .o I Section III - E OMB Approved No. 0348.0041 BUDGET INFORMATION -Construction Programs NOTE: Certain Federal assistance programs require additional computations to arrive at the Federal share of project costs eligible for participation. if such is the case you will be notified. Standard Form 424C ( 4.88) Prescnbed by OMB Circular A-102 COST CLASSIFICATION a . Total Cost b C o Participation ble c. Total Allowable Costs (Column a -b) 1. Administrative and legal expenses S O 00 S 00 $ 0 .00 2. Land, structures, rights -of -way, appraisals, etc. $ 0 00 S .00 S .00 O 3. Relocation expenses and payments S 00 $ .00 S .00 0 0 4. Architectural and engineering fees $ 133 ,819 .00 S .00 s 133 ,819 .00 5. Other architectural and engineering fees S 12 000 s 00 S .00 S 12 000 � 00 6. Project inspection fees S .00 S .00 S .00 6 OOO > 6 OOO > :.. ::::::...........:::.:.......:.::..::::......: :::::::::::::.::::::::� :::::::: ;;:::::::::::::.:::::::::. t ::............. k. ..... .... ........................... 017'' ............................... •:::•:::•:. ....• .........:•:::•::•::;•::.. . B. Demolition and removal S .00 S .00 S .00 9. Construction s 2,230,325 00 s .00 S 2,230,325 .00 10. Equipment $ .00 S .00 S .00 .::•M41fC�lfi�!R�Dtfi:::: :::: ?`• : .. . .. ................ . . :::: :::: ::: ::: :: :: :: :::: " :: .: ::...... .`•: ' t)D :: 3':: is r: : >:' ::: :: 12. SUBTOTAL (sum of lines 1 -11) S .00 $ .00 S .00 I 13. Contingencies S . 238,214` "� do $ '. f .00 S 238,214 .00 14. SUBTOTAL S .00 S _ - - .00 S .00 15. Project (program) income S` .00 $ ° .00 S .00 16. TOTAL PROJECT COSTS (subtract 815 from 8 14) S 2,620 ,359, oo F s . : .00 S 2,620 .00 . FEDERAL FUNDING - ) •y 17. Federal assistance requested, calculate as follows: Enter eligible costs from line 16c . Multiply X 5 L 3 X (Consult Federal agency for Federal percentage share). Enter the resulting Federal share. 11 500,000 S 00 i n Standard Form 424C ( 4.88) Prescnbed by OMB Circular A-102 Part IV - Program Narrative and Compliance Requirements Section IV -A - Needs for and Objectives of this Assistance F' Update Preapplication Information, Part IV, Section A, Item 1 -3, only if necessary. (See Special Agency Instructions, p. 2.) 4. T ourism or Recreation Projects F Does the project involve tourism or /7 Yes LV No recreation facilities? /7 If Yes, Tourism Comments attached as EXHIBIT IV -A -4 S. Health-Related Facilities Does the project involve health - related /7 Yes No (See Special Agency Instructions, p. 2.) facilities? S . Title Opinion 1 If Yes, Health Comments sites, rights -of -way and /or easements which are necessary for the project and certifying that the attached as EXHIBITS IV -A -5a and IV -A -5b Site Description and Title Opinion 6. Sk ill TraininR Facilities attached as EXHIBIT IV -C=5 Does the project involve the /7 Yes &7 No ` If the applicant does not have acceptable construction or-renovation of a -- • - -. -.. _ . ,�, - -_. -.- Skill training center ?. /7 If Yes, - Skill Training Facilities Comments legal interest. attached as EXHIBITS IV4-6a and IV -A =6b A7 NA F7 Title Acquisition attached as _ Section IV B Industrial Parks F- Update Preapplication Information, Part IV, Section`B, -Items'- ,'only if`necessary.;� ,. Agency Instructions, p. 2.) ... a a copy of the agreement between the ` S. Privately Owned Industrial Park or Sites applicant and the entity that will /X7 Yes /7 No ' Does the project serve an industrial ./7 Yes /7 No F park or site which is privately owned? 17 Operation and Maintenance (Refer to instructions, page 36.) - /_' If Yes, Ownership Information and as EXHIBIT IV -C -7 Agreements or Statement-of Purpose attached as EXHIBIT iV -B -S ' Section IV- - Ownership Operation and Maintenance Legal Information . .. Update Preapplication Information, Part IV, Section C, Items 1 -4, only if necessary. (See Special Agency Instructions, p. 2.) , S . Title Opinion Attach an opinion from Applicant's lega•l,counsel describing the legal interest, applicant has in the sites, rights -of -way and /or easements which are necessary for the project and certifying that the estate or interest is legal and valid. Site Description and Title Opinion attached as EXHIBIT IV -C=5 6. T itle Acquisition If the applicant does not have acceptable legal interest, free of all liens and encumbrances, for all sites, rights of way and /or easements necessary for the project, explain how and when such ._ legal interest will be obtained. Specify the legal authority of applicant to acquire necessary legal interest. A7 NA F7 Title Acquisition attached as EXHIBIT IV -C -6 F- 7. Operation and Maintenance Agreement Will operation and maintenance responsibilities ... be retained by the applicant? If No, attach a a copy of the agreement between the applicant and the entity that will /X7 Yes /7 No ' operate and /or.maintain the project. _ 17 Operation and Maintenance Agreement attached F _ as EXHIBIT IV -C -7 I Forth ED--101A (Rev. 12/91) -7- r- `- Section IV -C - Ownership /Operation and Maintenance /Legal Information - Continued 8. Le al Obstacles re t ere any legal obstacles including litigation, pending or threatened, which might affect the construction, financing or operation of /-7 Yes /X7 No the project? If Yes, attach an opinion — — from legal counsel. /_7 Legal Obstacles attached as EXHIBIT IV -C -8 9, Nonprofit and Special-Purpose Units of overnment (To be completed by all Nonprofit and Special- Purpose Units of Local Government Applicants. States, Indian tribes or General- Purpose Unit of Local Government Applicants are not required to submit this information and should enter "NA" for items in this section.) Zy NA a. Exact legal name of Applicant: b. Date of organization or incorporation: c. rove a ' specific chapter an section citations to any constitutional or..statutory authority under r -which the Applicant-was-organized: - _ Attach 8 certified copy,.of the Charter rticles O Incorporation, "By -laws or Other Organization document Of Applicant. If such document is set out in State code or Constitution,- provide•legal citation in lieu of a copy. - - Nonprofit organizations should attach a current certificate of good standing. /_7 Organization Documents attached ,• as EXHIBIT IV -C -9d e. Attach a copy of the specific chapter and section s 'o constitutional, statutory and charter authorities or court decisions empowering the Applicant to construct, - — finance, own, maintain and operate the proposed project in the manner contemplated in the application. If such document is set out in the State code or Constitution, provide the legal citation in lieu of a copy. / Legal Authority attached as EXHIBIT IV -C -9e f. Is the project subject to an election /7 Yes / or does the right of referendum exist? If Yes, attach a copy of the specific statutory or other legal authority. / Election /Referendum Requirements attached as EXHIBIT IV -C -9f g. If there are any rights of eminent domain or condemnation which can be exercised by Applicant to implement this project, applicant's attorney must furnish an opinion. /"7 NA / Eminent Domain Opinion attached as EXHIBIT IV -C -9g F_. Will any proposed charges be subject to regulation by any public authority? /_7 Yes /7 No If Yes, state by whom, and cite specific Constitutional, statutory or charter authority: i. Attach a list of the current corporate officers and directors, identifying their / - 7 Corporate Officials List attached as own major business affiliations, if any. EXHIBIT IV -C -9i j. If any persons were engaged to expedite this ._ application, attach a certified list of the / NA /_7 Expediters List attached names and the fees paid to any such persons. as EXHIBIT IV -C -9j (See Instructions) Form ED -IOTA (Rev. 12/91) r ., . ,. - -• Part I - Section D - Engineering Update Preapplication Information, Part IV, Section D, Items 1 -4, only if necessary. (See Special Agency Instructions, p. 2.) P roject Development Time Schedule Number ot days a ter Award of rant for: Completion of design 90 days Start of construction 150 days Construction Period 7 months r 6. Architect/Engineer ` The /g7 actual / proposed Architect /Engineer is ,. Name: WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS /ENGINEERS, INC. - -+ Address: 2530 S. PARKER ROAD (Zip) J . _ ..AURORA, CO 80014 _ Phone _ (03) 337 -2634 If,the A/E is not an official or employee of the Applicant, explain..the A/E selection process and attach a copy of the -_ .. -. _-_.A /E - agreement : or "proposal . -. 4 (In-house /? NA A /E) ._ 11V A/E Selection Process and A/E Agreement or'Proposal attached ; as EXHIBIT- IV -D -6 a ort ` rovi a an Architect /Engineer Report /3(7 A/E Report attached as " EXHIBIT IV -D =7 8. Fair User Char Information TT - Ue total a era grant assistance .- (excluding Appalachian Regional Commission participation or Economic Development District "Bonus ") exceeds 50% of the total estimated project cost, complete "Fair User Charge Information." M NA /^7 Fair Use Charge Information, complete Page 21 and attach ,_. as EXHIBIT IV -D -8 9. Does the project involve public or ' privately owned land adjacent to or in the vicinity of a Federally owned or operated airfield? /_] Yes X No 1 - 7 If Yes, Airfield FAA Comments attached as EXHIBIT IV -D -9 Electric/Gas Does time priTject include facilities for the generation, transmission or distribution of electrical energy, or for the production or transmission of gas (natural, manufactured or mixed)? /_7 Yes /X7 No ..w 1 - 7 If Yes, Electric Gas Comments _ attached as EXHIBITS IV- D- 10a, -b. -c 11. Real PropertX Appraisals oes the project scope include the acquisition of land or other real property? /7 Yes /77 No If yes, are appraisals available? 1 Yes /_7 No L7 Appraisals attached as EXHIBIT IV -D -il Fonn ED -101A (Rev. 12/91) -9- Part IV, Section E - Civil Rig is r Update Preapplication information, Part IV, Section E, Items 1 -4, only if necessary. (See Special �- Agency Instructions, p. 2.) 5. Has the applicant and /or other identitiable parties as prescribed in "EDA Civil Rights Guidelines" been the subject of any unresolved issues, or negative ` determinations issued within the past two years, arising from civil rights compliance reviews, complaints, lawsuits or other allegations of discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, handicap or age? / Yes / 7 No ` If Yes, Civil Rights Report is required M If Yes, Civil Rights Report attached as EXHIBIT IV -E -S 6. All applicants must submit Employee and Payroll Data for Current and Projected Workforce. /7 Applicant's ED -612, preprinted (Equivalent Form ED -612 is preprinted on page 23 form, p. 23, completed and of this application.) attached as EXHIBIT IV -E -6 the applicant or an "Other arty' creates or saves .. fifty or more jobs as a result of EDA assistance, the Applicant must submit its Affirmative Action Not Applicable" 7 Applicant's AAP attached Plan(s) (AAP) and /or the Other Party's AAP. (Applicant) ^.`; as EXHIBIT IV -E -7a (See "EDA Civil Rights Guidelines "). Not Applicable /J7-Other Party's AAP attached (Other Party) 'as * EXHIBIT .IV -E -7b 8. Applicants must sub orm - ,- urren,t an ' Projected Employee Data," from all 'Other /_7 Not Applicable Parties"_ who will create .and /or ; save fifteen or<more jobs as .a result of EDA,assistance ' - /X7 Other Party's ED -612, preprinted form, to the project. page 23, completed and attached as EXHIBIT IV -E -8 v . 9. Applicants must obtain and sub as exh to this application an "Assurances of Compliance with Civil Rights and Other_ Legal Requirements" form ` from all Other Parties who will be creating - saving 15 or more jobs as a result of EDA /_7 Not Applicable (Neither a, b nor c applies) - assistance -- to the - project, - and -either: _ _... (a) are *specifically cited in the application M Other Party's Assurance of Compliance, r . as a project beneficiary; or (b) are located or preprinted form, p. 27, completed and will locate in an industrial park to be assisted attached as EXHIBIT IV -E -9 by this project. Also, (c) if the project serves an industrial park or site which is neither owned nor operated by the applicant, Applicants must obtain and submit an "Assurances of Compliance with Civil Rights and Other ,Legal Requirements" form from the 4 non - applicant owners /operators.' W ill minorities b d isplaced b y th e project. - /—] Yes /)( No F7 if Yes, Explanation attached .. as EXHIBIT IV -E -10 Part IV, Section F - Environmenta Update Preapplication Information, Part IV, Section F, Items 1 -7, only if necessary. (See Special `- Agency Instructions, p. 2.) 8. If a e eral or State Environmental Impact Statement for this project has not been prepared and submitted to EDA (See Preapplication Part IV, Section F, Item 2), the Applicant must submit an Environmental Narrative. Refer to Application .. Instructions, Page 38, for this Item. /_7 Federal or State Environmental Impact Statement previously submitted or F Environmental Narrative attached as EXHIBIT IV -F -8 ,. 9. SHPO Review Has the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) been provided with a detailed project description? IV Yes /7 No /7 If Yes, SHPO Comments or Notification Letter attached as EXHIBIT IV -F -9 F orm ED -IOTA (Rev. 12/91 1 U - Part IV, Section G - Nonrelocation Update Preapplication Information, Part IV, Section G; Item 1, only'if7iecessary. (See;Special Agency Instructions, p, 2.) - Applicant's Certificate 2. Each Applicant . must execute the Applicant's Certificate. of Nonrelocation. -The Certificate is preprinted as•pages'19- 30.of..this application and must - be attached ,as. HIBIT IV -G -2 .• Employer's-Certificate, 3. The Applicant is ~required to obtain an executed Employer • 's`Certificate of Nonrelocation from each employer located aocating within the project oun ar es. s erti Cate is:prepr nted as pages 31 -32 of this application. Note Applicants are not required to submit Employer's Certificates of Nonrelocation to EDA, but must maintain a file of such certificates for inspection as may be requested by the Government. a.. Form ED -101A (Rev. 12/91) -11- Part IV, Section F- Environmental - Continued ,.. 10. Flood Plain and Flood Hazard Insurance Information e er instructions, page 41). Yes No .. a. Is the project in a designated 100 -year flood hazard area? 1_7 b. Is the project site located in a flood plain? / E7 /7 Flood Plain Information attached as EXHIBIT IV -F -10b C. Is the project safe or will it be protected from flooding? &7 /7 d. Is flood insurance available? /17 /7 F e. Has flood insurance ever been purchased? 17 /&7 Part IV, Section G - Nonrelocation Update Preapplication Information, Part IV, Section G; Item 1, only'if7iecessary. (See;Special Agency Instructions, p, 2.) - Applicant's Certificate 2. Each Applicant . must execute the Applicant's Certificate. of Nonrelocation. -The Certificate is preprinted as•pages'19- 30.of..this application and must - be attached ,as. HIBIT IV -G -2 .• Employer's-Certificate, 3. The Applicant is ~required to obtain an executed Employer • 's`Certificate of Nonrelocation from each employer located aocating within the project oun ar es. s erti Cate is:prepr nted as pages 31 -32 of this application. Note Applicants are not required to submit Employer's Certificates of Nonrelocation to EDA, but must maintain a file of such certificates for inspection as may be requested by the Government. a.. Form ED -101A (Rev. 12/91) -11- PART V ASSURANCES - CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS NOTE CERTAIN OF THESE ASSURANCES MAY NOT BE APPLICABLE TO YOUR PROJECT OR PROGRAM. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE AWARDING AGENCY. FURTHER, CERTAIN FEDERAL �- ASSISTANCE AWARDING AGENCIES MAY REQUIRE APPLICANTS TO CERTIFY TO ADDITIONAL ASSURANCES. IF SUCH IS THE CASE, YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED. As the duly authorized representative of the applicant I certify that the applicant r 1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance, and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non - Federal share of project costs) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application. 2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, and if appropriate, the State, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the assistance; and establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives. 3. Will not dispose of, modify the use of, or change the terms of the real property title, or other interest in the site and facilities without permission and instructions from the awarding agency. Will record the Federal interest in the title of property in accordance with awarding agency directives and will include a covenant in the title of real property acquired in whole or in part with Federal assistance funds to assure nondiscrimination during the useful life of the project. -. 4. Will comply with the requirements of the assistance awarding 'agency with regard to the drafting, review and approval of construction plans and specifications. S. Will provide and maintain competent and addquate engineering supervision'at the construction site to ensure that the completed work conforms with the approved �• 'plans and.specifications and will 'furnish progress reports and such other. information as�may be required by the assistance awarding agency I or State."_` 6. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency. 7. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions �- for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain. 8. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C, SS 4728 -4763) relating to prescribed standards for merit systems for programs funded under one of the nineteen statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F). r 9. Will comply with the Lead -Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. SS 4801 et sec .) which prohibits the use of lead based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures. 10. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to non - discrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88 -352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. SS 1681 -1683, and 1685 -1686) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; and Section 112 of P.L. 92 -65 which prohibits sex discrimination in PWEDA programs; (c) Section SO4 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. S 794) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. SS 6101 -6107) which -. prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 93 -255), as amended, relating to non - discrimination on �- the basis of drug abuse; (f) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91 -616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) SS S23 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. 290 dd -3 and 290 ee -3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse ►- patient records; (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. S 3601 et seq.) as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other non - discrimination provision in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is beingg made; and (j) the requirements of any other non - discrimination Statutes) which may apply to the application. r Form ED -101 A (Rev. 12/91) -12- r Part V - Assurances (continued) 11. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91 -646) and Title IV of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (P.L. 100 -17) which provides for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of Federal and federally assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases. 12. Will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. SS 1501 -1508 and 7324 -7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. 13. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis -Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. SS 276a to 276a -7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. S 276c and 18 U.S.C. S 874), the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. SS 327 -333) regarding labor standards for federally assisted construction subagreements. 14. Will comply with the flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) I of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) requires .. recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchaser flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and' acquisition is 110,000 or more. I 15. Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality control' measures under'.the., National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91 -190) and Executive Order' (E.O.) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to E.O. 11738 ;`; - (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to E.O. 11990; (d) evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with E.O. 11988; (e) assurance of project consistency .. with the approved State management program developped under the Coastal Zone:. : Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. SS 1451 et se q.5; (f) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation - Flans under Section 176(c):of :the Clean., Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. S 7401 et sea.); (g) protection'of underground sources of drinking water under the Sa a Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, (P.L. 93 -523); (h) protection of endangered species under the-Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (P.L. 93 -205); (i) assurance of project compliance with all existing environmental laws and policies in accordance with the Environmental Quality Improvement Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 4374); (j) protection of navigable waters, fish and wildlife under the Federal Water Pollution 'Control Act, as amended, (33 U.S.C. 1251, et sea.); (k) improvement of solid and hazardous waste management in accordance wit�urce Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6901); (1) control of noise under the Noise Control Act of 1972, as amended, (P.L. -574); (m) provisions for hazardous substances cleanup and emergency response pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 9601 et se g.); (n) conservation and management of fish and wildlife, particularly nongame, under the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 2901 et seq .); " (o) preservation of prime farmland for agricultural purposes under the ar rmland Protection Policy Act of 1981 (7 U.S.C. 4201 et seq .); (p) protection of the natural resources pursuant to the Coastal Barrier Resources Act of 1982, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 3501 e seq .); (q) protection of marine environment under the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, as amended, P.L. 92 -532; (r) regulation of testing and processing of chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act, as amended, P.L. 94 -469; and (s) protection of all species of Wildlife resources and their habitat under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended, P.L. 89 -72. 16. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. SS 1271 et�se .) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. 17. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470), E.O. 11593 (identification and preservation of historic properties), and the Archaeological ._ and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 469a -1 et seg .). 18. Will cause to be performed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984. 19. Will operate and maintain the facility in accordance with the minimum standards as may be required or prescribed by the applicable Federal, State and local agencies for the maintenance and operation of such facilities. Form ED--101A. (Rev. 12/91) -13- i.-. Part V - Assurances (continued) 20. Will require the facility to be designed to comply with the "American Standard Specifications for Making Buildings and Facilities Accessible to, and Usable by, the Physically Handicapped," Number A117.1 -1961, as modified (41 CFR 101 - 17.703). The applicant will be responsible for conducting inspections to insure compliance with these specifications by the contractor. 21. (Not a licable to State and Local Governments) In consi eration o making a grant an or loan requested by an Applicant which is a business enterprise, for this project, it agrees that for a period of two years after disbursement by EDA of said grant and /or loan or any part thereof, it will not employ or tender any office or employment to, or retain for professional services, any person who, on the date of such disbursement, or within one year prior to said date, shall have served as an officer, attorney, or agent or employee of EDA occupying a position or engaged in activities which EDA has determined involves discretion with respect to the granting of assistance under the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended. 22. Will give and will require employers who are Substantial Beneficiaries of public works assistance (as defined at 13 CFR 309.10) '-and contractors or subcontractors by.13 CFR 305.54) to give preferential consideration, wherever possible, to the longterm unemployed and underemployed, residing in the project area, in connection with the project assisted by EDA. (See Instructions). 23.' - Will comply, or_has already complied with the requirements of the Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988 (P.L. 100- 690, V, Subtitle D; 41 U.S.C. 701 et as .),and 15 CFR Part 26 (55 FR 21678;,5/25/90) which ,requires applicants 4a for Federal assistance to` certify that :-they will provide'drug free workplaces., 24.' Will comply, or has.already complied with the.requirements of New Restrictions on Lobbying (P.L.`101 -121, ,Section *319)' and `15 CFR Part ,28 (55 FR 6736- 6748, ^ 2/26/90) which imposes requirements regarding use of Federal/ ,. nonfederal funds for lobbying activities. 25. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws, Executive Orders, regulations and policies governing this program. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL A- - ______TTTLE CITY MANAGER CITY OF PUEBLO, COLORADO SUBMITTED MARCH 21,,1995 r ^ Form ED -IOTA (Rev. 12/91) -14- EXHIBIT CHECKLIST r• This checklist identifies all the Exhibits in the Preapplication, the Application and /or ..,. Instructions. Those with Asterisks ( *) are preprinted fo nns. The Exhibit number refers to the part- section -item in the preapplication or application. Check the items and Exhibits submitted r . (or updated). ' III -C -1 Source of Local Share *Preapplication p. 1 -7 /X/ *Application P. 1 -II *III -C -le /X/ *Assurances p. 12 -14 ` /X/ *Exhibit Checklist P. 15 -16 Requirement III -C -If PART I -A - SPECIAL AGENCY INSTRUCTIONS Contributions /X/ I -A -4a Executive Order 12372 ` including letters on Interim Notification Letter Clearance Construction Financing, if I -A -4b Letter from Single Point of III -C -3 Restrictions on Local Share /X /''III -C -4 Contact Economic Development, District I -A -S Copy of,Governing Body Organization III -D -.6 Preliminary Bond - Counsel Resolution Opinion /X/ PART II - PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION PART IV - PROGRAM NARRATIVE AND COMPLIANCE R EQUIREMEN TS PART H IV Section Project Description o this 1Cssistance IV -A -1 Project Location Statement IV -A =1a' II - 3 Other Federal Assistance IV -A -lb Plat Maps II -4 - Explanation of Federal ' �- Topographic Map - Debarment - Federal Emergency Management / / II -Sa - Metropolitan Area..Comments IV -A -le Project Service Area Map 'II -'Sb Applicant's Statement on r.. Needs Metropolitan Area Comments Impact Narrative *IV -A -3b II -Sc 60 Day Applicant Certification /X/ II -6 Statement from Economic r IV- A -3c(4) Applicant's Explanation of Development District Estimate of Project Potential IV- A -3d(4) Organization (Economic Works Impact Program only) Development Center Projects Tourism Comments IV -A -Sa Health and Human Services and only) r / / *II -7 Calculation of Estimated IV -A -Sb Comments on Proposed Health Relocation and Land ` IV -A -6a State Vocational Education Acquisition Expenses Comments II -8 Multi- jurisdictional Comments Center II -9 Statement from Parent Local or State Government as to why Special Purpose Unit of r Government is the Proper Applicant II -10 Local Governments Comments r (Required of special purpose units of local government, public or private nonprofit organizations, and Indian r tribes only) PART III - BUDGET *III -A Summary Project Budget *III -B Budget Information - Other Federal Funding I R J /X/ III -C -1 Source of Local Share Letter(s) and Resolution *III -C -le Request to Reduce or Waive the Non- Federal Share Requirement III -C -If Appraisals of In -Kind Contributions /X/ III -C -2 Availability of Local Share, including letters on Interim Construction Financing, if applicable III -C -3 Restrictions on Local Share /X /''III -C -4 101 Bonus /Endorsement from Economic Development, District Organization III -D -.6 Preliminary Bond - Counsel Opinion /X/ *III -E- Detailed Project Budget PART IV - PROGRAM NARRATIVE AND COMPLIANCE R EQUIREMEN TS PART H IV Section A - Needs for and Objectives o this 1Cssistance IV -A -1 Project Location Statement IV -A =1a' Zoning Maps IV -A -lb Plat Maps IV -A -lc U. S. Geological Survey Topographic Map IV -A -ld Federal Emergency Management Agency's Floodplain Map(s) IV -A -le Project Service Area Map IV -A -2 Area Economic Description and Needs IV -A -3a Impact Narrative *IV -A -3b Identification of Businesses, Permanent Jobs and Private Investments IV- A -3c(4) Applicant's Explanation of Estimate of Project Potential IV- A -3d(4) Employment Strategy (Public Works Impact Program only) IV -A -4 Tourism Comments IV -A -Sa Health and Human Services and State Health concurrence on proposed Health facility IV -A -Sb Comments on Proposed Health Facility IV -A -6a State Vocational Education Comments IV -A -6b Comments on proposed Skill Center Form EU -101-A (Rev. 12/91) -15- 1 111 ®11.:1. r r r ° r 4 . r r r 4 .. r r Form ED -101A (Rev. 12/91) PART IV Section B - Industrial Parks Airfield FAA Comments; IV -B -3a Industrial Park Survey for Statement of Compatibility Other Industrial Sites with airfield land -use plan (population under 50,000) (for projects near federal IV -B -3b Industrial Park Survey for airports) Other Industrial Sites a. Electric /Gas Comments (population of 50,000 or over) b. Statement on Unavailabil- IV -B -4b Industrial Park Marketing ity of Private Financing Strategy c. Regulatory Determinations IV -B -5 Privately Owned Industrial on Competition with Park /Sites Information, Public Utilities Identification of Owners and Property Appraisals Agreements or Statement of Section E - Civil Rights Purpose Comments on Minority Area PART IV Section C - Owners /0 ?ration Served an ormatio aintenance ega n Comments on Civil Rights IV -C -1 Ownership of Facilities Complaints IV -C -2 Mortgages Applicant's Employee Data IV -C -4 ., Operation /Maintenance Plan /X/ IV -C -5 Site Description and Title Applicant's Affirmative Opinion Action Plan (AAP) IV -C -6 Title Acquisition Other Party's AAP - _.. IV -C -7 Operation and Maintenance 1 Other Party's Form ED -612 /X/ Agreement Other Party's Civil Rights IV -C -8 Legal.-Obstacles Assurances PART IV Section -"9""- Non ro'it and Explanation of Minority V Un ec �overnm Displacement n Information Part IV Section F - Environmental IV -C -9d Copy of Applicant's Environmental Impact Statement Organization Documents Environmental Agencies IV -C -9e Legal Authority Responses IV -C -9f Election /Referendum Environmental Protection Requirements Agency's List of Violating IV -C -9g Eminent Domain Opinion Facilities IV -C -9i List of Corporate Officials Toxic or Hazardous Waste Data IV -C -9j List of Expediters `Potential Environmental . PART IV Section D - Engineering Problems IV -D -1 Engineering Feasibility Environmental Narrative /X/ Analysis Site Photos IV -D -2 Anticipated Problems Aerial Photos, if available IV -D -3 Federal Discharge Permit Historic /Archeological Survey IV -D -4 Preliminary Drawings or Site Public Hearing Transcript or Plans Explanation IV -D -5 Project Development Time Environmental Permits Received /X/ Schedule /X/ IV -D -6 Architect /Engineer Selection Officer Comments or Process and Architect /Engineer Notification Letter Agreement or Proposal /X/ IV -D -7 Architect /Engineer Report IV -D -7g (1) Water Pollution Control /X/ *IV -G -2 Certification (2) Construction Permits /X/ *IV -D -8 Fair User Charge Information Form ED -101A (Rev. 12/91) IV -D -9 Airfield FAA Comments; Statement of Compatibility with airfield land -use plan (for projects near federal airports) IV -D -10 a. Electric /Gas Comments a -c b. Statement on Unavailabil- ity of Private Financing c. Regulatory Determinations on Competition with Public Utilities IV -D -11 Property Appraisals Part IV Section E - Civil Rights IV -E -3 Comments on Minority Area Served /X/ IV -E -5 Comments on Civil Rights Complaints /X/ *IV -E -6 Applicant's Employee Data (Form ED -612) IV -E -7a Applicant's Affirmative Action Plan (AAP) /X/ IV -E -7b Other Party's AAP - _.. /X/ *IV -E -8 Other Party's Form ED -612 /X/ *IV -E -9 Other Party's Civil Rights Assurances IV -E -10 Explanation of Minority Displacement Part IV Section F - Environmental IV -F -2 Environmental Impact Statement IV -F -3 Environmental Agencies Responses IV -F -4 Environmental Protection Agency's List of Violating Facilities IV -F -S Toxic or Hazardous Waste Data IV -F -7 `Potential Environmental . Problems /X/ IV -F -8 Environmental Narrative /X/ IV -F -8bi Site Photos /X/ IV- F -8bii Aerial Photos, if available IV- F- 8(j)ii Historic /Archeological Survey IV- F- 8(o)ii Public Hearing Transcript or Explanation IV- F- 8(r)ii Environmental Permits Received /X/ IV -F -9 State Historic Preservation Officer Comments or Notification Letter IV -F -10b Flood Plain Information Part IV Section G - Nonrelocation IV -G -1 Nonrelocation Explanation /X/ *IV -G -2 Applicant's Certificate of Nonrelocation /X/ *IV -G -3 Employer's Certificate of Nonrelocation (to be retained on file by the Applicant) -16- W ° SCEDD EXHIBIT II -6 212 W. 13th St. • P.O. Box 1900 • Pueblo, Colorado 81002 • (719) 545 -8680 March 8, 1995 Mr. Lew Quigley City Manager City of Pueblo 1 - 1 ,City - Hall Place - f, �, r �. , • i f Pueblo, CO 81-003 .' Dear Mr. Quigley` r This letter is wntten to fulfill the requirements of Part II, item 6 of th c e appliation * being madeto the Economic Development Administration seeking support for the proposed aowntown =� ~ r _ , structure. This project will, clearly, further the objectives statedin'the SCEDD `OEDP: Indeed the primary : objective of the dtstnct. �A 6 OEDP is to expand and dive'rstfy the economy. For Pueblo County, l expansion of the.tourism industry has ong'bebn recognized as an impo Cant aspecf bf this L diversification The proposed project;will.enhance the attractiveness of the new Pueblo y Convention Center, m turn enhanctng convention and tounsin trade' m the County_; Since Pueblo County and the City of Pueblo are the economic _ "centers of gravity" in the District, we believe the project will also improve opportunities throughout the District to the heretofore often overlooked tourism industry. Tourism development has been an important development issue for several years. Indeed, the South Central Tourism Council, with which SCEDD cooperated throughout its history, was the model for the statewide effort led to the establishment of six tourism regions in 1988. The Pueblo County section of the OEDP specifically included the parking structure project. It,was 4 identified in the complete revision of the OEDP undertaken in 1992. Last year, as part of the F updating process, Pueblo County representatives requested the parking structure project be moved to number two on the priority listing under Community Facilities, just behind the Convention Center project. These are, of course, companion projects and the requested movement of the parking structure project to a higher priority was based on the activity in the . past couple of years to get the Convention Center project completed. Finally, the amount of federal assistance requested is clearly - reasonable. This improvemeint reflects a relatively small federal participation when compared to the large public investment in the Convention Center and the even larger private investment in the associated hotel. SOUTHERN COLORADO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Mr. Lew Quiqley Page Two March 8, 1995 r - " This project has been reviewed by the Board of Directors of the Southern Colorado Economic Development District several times over the past years. They supported the pre - application when it was submitted, and also support this application. _ . As always, if there are any questions or you need further information, please feel free to call. t � J A, < r 'S y a l� `i x / . r�> - r✓ ( � �, z rj T ° z , f .): r i - _.-.' ... �-.. -. -,+.. . _. ;} -�( � �. \ -�' r .'•'??� 1. .'� r Y Y+- - ' � ...r / 'J a ;avid . G_nmes^ 1 � �s "ft = Ex'ecutive pirector- �. - ; fi� ' E" _ S r _ E% t t 7 z '( � !:t \'� /.i l""�� 7-• '-:v �. <_� �- � �t��sc � k� - +�'.__ i" \ 't -. G ' >y� r •� _ .� / - �� .; � 1 � r � )/ _� r � -.:/ ! ?l - f _ r I� iii. J � / ` � � � .�: a ,/ ,`'� z ,� -i�� 1 j.'_i�� r • Mar 21,1995 02:33PM FROM Lewis, de Rozarto an E X H 1 B 1 T 24481088 P. �• 11I - r Lewis, de Roza & Co. Investment banking �'... 595 K.•vrrt,•.•nA \Ir,•.•r Incorl+nr ;u«1 s% Ii • r Dviivcr, C0 80Z02-- 1914 l 101► 2%.05(hi MX)) Lbi• IN4L ( 103) 140:5185 FAX March 21, 1995 Mr. John 'Lender Economic Development Representative U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration 1244 Speer Boulevard, Room 632 ` Denver, Colorado 80204 RE: The City of Pueblo, Colorado Public Parking Facility Grant r . Dear Mr. 7_ender: Pursuant to the grant application being submitted by the City of Pueblo for E.D.A. funding of a new public parking facility, please accept this letter in response to "Section IiI - C - Local Share" of the grant application. " As the City's Financial Advisor, I am responsible for the planning, structuring, marketing and 4 funding of the City's capital improvement projects requiring long -term financing. I have been associated with the City for approximately eighteen years as its investment banker. The City intends to issue tax - exempt Certificates of Participation to fund its local share of the project costs. The net proceeds of this financing is expected to be approximately $1.1 - million. 'These Certificates will he authorized by the City of Pueblo, Colorado Municipal Building Corporation, a Colorado non - profit corporation. These Certificates are intended to be sold to a consortium of local financial institutions on a private placement basis in April of this year. The proposed financing will also be authorized by the City Council of the City pursuant to an ordinance expected to be introduced at its regular meeting on April 10. 1995. ` Finally, the financing is expected to be accompanied by an unqualified legal opinion of r nationally recognized bond counsel firm of Kutak, Rock, Denver, Colorado. At this time, the financing is expected to close on or about June 1, 1995; however, this financing will only close if the City has reasonable assurance that the E.D.A. share will be awarded to the City r by the date of the Certificate closing. r Mar 21, 1995 02 :33PM FP.OM Lewis, de P.ozario and Co. TO 91719542524481088 Page 2 March 21, 1995 1T you have any questions or cummcnts, pleasc du not licsitatc to cell me at any time. Your consideration of this grant application is appreciated very much. P.03 TOTAL P.03 D U CD O FAY / Lc=l D ° Mo City of Pueblo OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER Denver:Regional Office 1244 Speer Boulevard, Room 670 Denver, CO 80204 ` Dear John: This letter is to inform the'Economic Development r Administration of the City of Pueblo's ability to finance the $20,359 difference between the Construction Cost Estimate and the $1.1 million dollars to be issued through tax- exempt Certificates of Participation to fund the local share of the project costs. Sincerely, ewis A. Quigley, City Manager LAQ /sw r' r r EXHIBIT IH -C -2 Availability of Local Share The actions taken to date to fund the local share of this project cost include the preliminary r approval by the City Council of the issuance of Certificates of Participation. The City is familiar with this form of tax - exempt financing as it has been used in the past to finance the municipal golf course, a public works garage, movable equipment and computers. The City Council is expected to authorize the proposed financing at its regular meeting on Monday April 10, 1995 with the first reading of the ordinance. Following publication requirements of the City's Charter, a public hearing and final consideration of the ordinance is expected to occur the evening of April 24, 1995. All ordinances then are required to be subject to a referendum "fora period of thirty day "s after .final reading, therefore, =the ordinance is "expected to take effect on or about May 25, 1995. At this time, the closing is scheduled to occur on Thursday June 1, 1995. , The Certificate closing is subject to the E.D.A funding, an unqualified counsel opinion and a successful purchase of the securities by qualified and accredited financial institutions pursuant to a R private placement. - r 4 - r r r r - r - r March 17, 1995 SCEDD EXHIBIT 212 W. 13th St. • P.O. Box 1900 • Pueblo, Colorado 81002 • (719) 545 -8680 _ Mr. Lew Quigley _ City Manager _ ;,- of Pueblo ' ?'J / ' ' • � 7 C F ' F �� r� :.� J ,.k '` 11 s'• -? * 7 k . J X ..t` , 1..CityHallPlace ! �,. ti •�� ry _�t . i,i a � i �'`✓j':��'t;,+ j - +� ? \ 1 � L^ Pueblo CO'81003 ... - v Dear Mr. Quigley jj ✓ - - rt - 4 i � t �(1, (� /, it.. t \ r �)�!` ii' �/ 1rt3 ct } r, r This'letter is Written to fulfil the requirements of Part III; =Section C, item 4 of the application r.L . the'E onoinic 1C. \. •'7 d !.•:..J �.,1 f S �.` 1 i:' .; -fit -.. �•- P.7 being made o c Development Am i i nistraton ` for * undmg to support fhe downfowri ' r parking facility The following comments'apply. a- '' � t' i`t .�• �ji � 5 : .4' �l `��. c::a �-t {. � . �r .•t'. y � ` -•t ,!� ;1r _ � +l_ i s T proj he ect is located in a designated Redevelopment Area in a designated Economic 1 �4 j v 1: t� - DevelopmentDistrict , b. The designated Redevelopment Area,= Pueblo long been an active participan t in the economic . development'activrties of the Economic Development District. c. The Economic'Deve'lopment District does; indeed, endorse this project. -_ , d. The project is wholly in accord with the approved Overall Economic Development Program for the Economic Development District. As always, if there are any questions or if you need further information, please feel free to call. Sincerely, David . Grimes Executive Director SOUTHERN COLORADO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT r Mar 23,1995 10 :31AM FROM Lewis, de P.ozario and Co. TO 91 719542624481008 . P.02 Lewis, de Rozario & Co. ina�rl+lrrate�i Investment Banking 5, 5evcuu•emh 51r.•e Nuin• 1400 Ocnvcr, C0 80202.3IJ 14 k] 3) 296•111/10 INCA) 228.1842 110.1) 200.5185 F,\N March 23, 1995 Mr. John Zender Economic Development Representative a.1.S. i)epartment of Commerce Economic Development Administration 1244 Speer Boulevard, Room 632 Denver, Colorado 80204 • RE: The City of Pueblo, Colorado Public Parking Facility Grant Dear Mr. 7.ender: To further support and substantiate the grant application being submitted by the City al' Pueblo, 1 have been asked by the City to provide to you additional information at it relates to the financing of the City's local share. As the City's Financial Advisor, please know that the proposed financing is expected to be issued in conjunction with a legal opinion from nationally recognized bond counsel. The opinion is expected to certify that the financing; is validly issued, eni and tax - exempt from federal and state taxation. This opinion will make the bonds marketable along with the pledging; of certain city revenues for purposes of repayment of the debt. We have a very high level of assurance that the funding can be obtained in a timely and responsive manner, If you have any additional questions or comments, please don't hesitate to call me here in Denver. Sincerely, W. Scott Peterson Vice President cc: Cathy Green, Planning Department, City ul' Pueblo r Lewis Quigley, City Manager, City of Pueblo TOTPL P.02 r MAP, 21 '95 i1:29AN WALKER, PAPK'Itr3 CONSULTANTS DNVP.. P.2 /2 City c)f Pueblo Parking Structure- Schpine E. ;; � + �•rr• s',;•: �'' n,' Geotechnical Report 6,000 Survey • J.J nspection 6,00 ,G•1j $2,382,144 Onntinaencv 10.0% +,ii. 2 ,.2 .i eve r QUAN,: Demolition and Clearing 1 L.S. 20,000 ea. 20,0001 Earthwork 1 L.S. 2:5,000 ea. 25,0001 Landscaping 1 L.S. 20,000 ea. 20,000 Misc Civil and Sitework 1 L.S. 25,000 ea. 25,000 Foundations 1 L.S. 200,000 ea. 200,000 Retaining walls 3,500 s.f. 10,00 /s.f. 35,000 Slab -on -grade - 87,500 s. f, 3.50 A f. 306,250 Precast Concrete 56,250 s.f. 9.7b As. f. 548,438 Concrete Topping 56,250 s. f. 1.50 /s. f- 84,375 P/C Panels w/ Masonry 6,000 s. f. 25.00 /s. f. 150,000 Miscellaneous Metals 1 L.S. 9,000 ea. 9,000 Stairs and Gore Walls 4 LS. 20,000 ea. 80,000 Elevators and Core Walls 1 L.S. 4 .5,000 ea. 45,000 Expansion Joint . 120 If 40.00 A. f- 4,800 Caulking 12, 000 1. f. 1.50 Af. 18,000 Sealer 56,250 s, f. 0.35 /s. f. 19,688 Hollow Metal 1 L.S. 6,000 ea. 6,000 Hardware 7 L.S. 8,000 , ea. 8,000 Signage 1 L.S. 10,000 ea. 10,000 Painting 1 L.S. 12,000 ea. 12,000 Mechanical 56,250 s.f. 2.00 /s f. 112,500 Electrical 143,750 s. f. 1.00 /s. f. 143,750 - Hard Costs $1,912,800 Conditions 10.0 191,280; Design Fees 6.0% $133,819 Geotechnical Report 6,000 Survey 6,000 nspection 6,00 Subtotal - Project Cost $2,382,144 Onntinaencv 10.0% 238,214 Section III - E OMB Approved No. 0348 -0041 BUDGET INFORMATION -Construction Programs NOTE: Certain federal assistance programs require additional computations to arrive at the Federal share of project costs eligible for participation. If such is the case you will be notified. 0 3 M 0 a n N .o I Standard Form 424C 1 4.881 PIC SC IO ed by OMB Crrtu+al A•102 b. Costs Not Allowable c. Total Allowable Costs COST CLASSIFICATION a . Total Cost for Participation (Column a -b) 1. Administrative and legal expenses S O ! .00 1 S .00 S 0 .00 2. Land, structures, rights -of -way, appraisals, etc. S 0 .00 S .00 S 0 .00 3. Relocation expenses and payments S 0 .00 S .00 S 0 .00 4. Architectural and engineering fees S 139, 0o s .00 S 133,819 00 S. Other architectural and engineering fees S 12, 00 S .00 S 12,000 00 6. Project inspection fees S 6 OOO .00 ' > 'S .00 S 6 000 > 00 ot X. ;`' %:* -' 4. 8. Demolition and removal S .00 S .00 S .00 9. Construction S 2 ,230,325 0o S .00 S 2,230,325 00 10. Equipment S .00 S .00 S .00 r ............................................................................ ..... ................::::::::::::::::::::::::: ....................:::::.:.::::.:::::......:::::•:::::::::::• :::::::::::::::::::............ ::::::::::::................... .......... ............................... ::: :.• :.... ....:.......................... : . ... 12. SUBTOTAL (sum of lines 1 -11) S .00 S 00 S .00 13. Contingencies 238 S " 00 xk; S 238,214 .00 14. SUBTOTAL S i .00 +' S "�' 00 S 00 15. Project (program) income S + .00 S ' .00 S .00 16. TOTAL PROJECT COSTS (subtract #15 from 8 14) S 2,620,359' 00 S ' 00' S 2,620 00 FEDERAL FUNDING 17. Federal assistance requested, calculate as follows: Enter eligible costs from line 16c Multiply X 57-. (Consult Federal agency for Federal percentage share). Enter the resulting Federal share. S 1,500,000 .00 I Standard Form 424C 1 4.881 PIC SC IO ed by OMB Crrtu+al A•102 F1I �1�1 1191111 EXH4BIT D p 1 V -C - S City of Pueblo JAMES F. MUNCH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Director of Planning March 22, 1995 U.S.. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration ATTN: JOHN ZENDER : Denver Regional Office .`1244 Speer Boulevard, Room 670 Denver,.CO 80204 De ar ` John The City of Pueblo owns*all of the property within the project site other than the alley which is in the process of being vacated. The City has operated a public parking facility on this site since acquisition in the early 1970's. The City Attorney's title opinion will be delivered as soon a final title information: is available from Transamerica Title Company. Sincerely, Lewis A. Quigl , City Manager JFM /LAQ /sw 4 211 E. "D" Street, P.O. Box 1427 • Pueblo, Colorado 81002 -1427 • (719) 543 -6006 • Fax (719) 542 -6244 r p ED 0 Ex. tv - L - 7 0 0 r City of Pueblo r - OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER March 23, 1995 r U.S.' Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration ATTN: JOHN ZENDER r Denver Regional.Office 1244 Speer Boulevard, Room 670 Denver, CO 80204 . > Dear John: This letter.is to inform the Economic Development Administration`'of the City of Pueblo's intent to retain ownership and provide maintenance for the proposed Pueblo r Municipal Parking Structure. Sincerely, Lewis A. Quigley, City Manager r LAQ /sw i ; : I I Y "I' 19 I!ll 111 MAP, 20 '95 04 c 23PM WALKER. PARKING CONSL LTP14TS DWP.. / .93 SPACES GRAND A EXHIBIT V-A CITY Of PUEBLO PARJONG STRUCTURE. +W�iA F ers,oI�ltcznts/ ISOMEMC'VIEW LOOKING EAST MARCH 20,1995 D6M.00 r I r I r F I r I r I F 3RD 225!-G' m I lD W u - 7 lu - 0 n C) U) I - J C-4 0 rN T r e r ♦ r ♦ ► r r r . r ♦ r ♦ r • ( , r , r r I r N tD 225' —r tD 3 - n O � C J N CN - q D f�l1 A Q1 i 'r,f_.. 1: '�•�f •�. - • -!. _ .rte y:• (A A A • 3 H Q J U) z 2 o parking Consultants/ CITY PUEBLO PARING smucFURE a'+� Ina. _ of MARCH2Q 190 DMOD TOPTMPLAN ' 9CAM r-4 ' paSCS[�IVATiON y 3HVArAON EXHIBIT- IV -D -6 A/E Selection Process and A/E Proposal The process used for hiring an engineering consultant was based on the City of Pueblo's request 4 for proposals. The RFP was advertised in the local and regional newspaper. Two firms responded to the RFP; and both firms were interviewed by a selection committee. Walker Consultants was recommended based on their qualifications. A copy of the RFP is attached. EXHIBIT- IV -D -7 Architect/Engineer Report (a) Project Components: The proposed parking facility will erect a single supported level above four bays of an existing six (6) bay surface lot. The structure will be located on the eastern portion of the site, close to the CBD and new hotel/conference center. The two central bays will provide a ramp from floor -to -floor, creating a partial level on the south side of the project. A stair- elevator core, at the center of the south face, will serve all levels. As proposed, the stair will be open to the project's interior, to improve security. The exterior will have glazed openings to protect stairs from the elements while maintaining visibility. The elevator will also have a glass side to allow observation of the elevator cab. A second open stair will be provided at the northwest corner. A covered arcade is proposed on the south and southern half of the east side of the project. Limited areas will be designed for future retrofit as commercial space. Floor -to -floor heights at grate will be increased to accommodate retail clear heights. No provision for public'. rest rooms, or a manager's office are proposed. (b) Feasibility Anal The proposed project can be completed soon after occupancy of the conference center. The total construction period of seven months can occur after weather �- improves in April of 1996. Seasonality should not create significant construction delays.` Premiums for poor weather construction have not been included in the project budget. An April start date was selected as the basis for the schedule included as part of Item IV -D -5. (c) Proposed Method of Contract Award: The project will be awarded on to the lowest qualified bidder. Construction documents will be provided to a short list of pre - qualified bidders who were asked to submit bids on standardized bid forms. Work will not be performed by the applicant's own forces. (d) Prelimina!y Design Consideration: Preliminary design of the parking structure has been based upon contextual transportation and development patterns. Entries, exits, and interior circulation patterns have been coordinated with off -site traffic to eliminate crossing maneuvers. One -way flow patterns were selected to increase safety, optimize capacity and reduce the average area per automobile. The transportation center, south of the project, influenced location of the stair /elevator core and ramp orientation. The architecture of the proposed hotel/conference center will influence .. _ fenestration and materials selections for the garage. Scale of the surrounding buildings has also influenced the relative height of the project. (e) Facility Life: The estimated life of the project can be defined in several ways. The useful i economic life of the facility will relate to the rate of redevelopment in the Central Business r r - District. As land values escalate over the years, the highest and best use for the site will change from parking to commercial space. The duration of the cost effective life cycle, defined as the point at which maintenance costs are greater than replacement costs, will depend on the level and quality of regularly scheduled ` maintenance provided. A well - maintained facility can have an extended life of over 50 years, at which point the highest and best use of the site is likely to change. A poorly maintained structure, in corrosive environments can require restoration costing more than replacement costs in as little as 20 years. (f) Cost Estimate (See Attached The statement of probable construction costs is predicated on competitively bid prices in the second quarter 1996 dollars without bad weather premiums. Costs are based on recent representative`unit cost`s from similar proj ect Central Colorado, adjusted for local conditions. The scope and level of finish for the project are very preliminary and subject to change during the course of project development. A contingency fact of 10% has been included in the project budget. (g) Permit Status: The building will be required to comply with the version of the Uniform Building Code in effect when design of the project commences. The project will only require a ► building permit. No State or Federal permits will be required. r • r ^ r r r r v , EXHIBIT IV -E -5 Civil Rights Report The following three complaints have been filed against the City of Pueblo in the past two years. All three complaints were based on discrimination and filed with the EEOC and then reported to the City of Pueblo Personnel Department. At this time, the EEOC has not investigated any of the three complaints; therefore no status or further information has been passed on to the City Personnel Department. 1. name: Lori Bravo reason: working conditions filed: 1993 `status. no ` dispositton 2. name: Richard Bravo reason: working conditions filed: 1993 status: no disposition 3. name: Elias Manzanares reason: promotion filed: 1994 status: no disposition (information provided by the City of Pueblo Personnel Department) r I r _1 r I r I r • r I r t r , I ' OlA lv�. 0�,1v -'000 ♦ r ♦ r l r • r , F , o . Arfwbval Expires Novekber 30 1994 c F-+ t F-a FORM ED-612 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE t t. Name a E 2. This report is: (REV. 1/92) E ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Organization P EDA USE ONLY ADMINISTRATION Project No: I N w 1 M o� H H H C I lTJ I q 'O b r r• n N rt O x M x x H W H H H C 1 M I OJ 0 rr N rt . r , m r - 11 J. r r ^ r. I. Statement of Policy: �aSZ12A ' b v G NON - DISCRIMINATION AND AFFIMATIVE ACTION PLAN shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, ancestry or. national origin, age (over 40), physical or mental handicap, , or because he or she is 'a disabled ,veteran or ;Vietnam Era veteran,. in regard, to any osition for which Ehe : em to ee' or ..a licent - for em to l ent is p P y ' pP P Ym qualified. ZI. Responsibility':. A. appointed Company Equal. Employment Opportunity Officer. It shall be the responsibility of the`.EEO Officer.to assure .full implementation-of the EEO and Affirmative: Action .Programs within all .operating levels of the company. shall inc r . The EEO Officer shall conduct internal auditing of EEO operations which include the identification of hiring, promotion, and training and termination r problems and their remedies in both blue - collar and white collar 4 , sectors. The EEO Officer dill monitor selection procedures, assure compliance with regulations on sex and age discrimination, and coordinate with minority, female, veterans and handicapped organizations. B. The name, telephone number and address Where the EEO Officer can be reached at all times, shall be posted on the bulletin board at the offices and at each project site. C. The EEO Officer shall: 1. Investigate any complaint of alleged discrimination and institute all procedures necessary to correct any situation found to have merit. r 2. Develop policy statements, internal and external communication., procedures designed to foster understanding, acceptance and support among the company's executive management, supervisory personnel, and all employees for the Affirmative Action Plan 3. Develop responsible internal procedures to insure the ` non- discrimination and Affirmative Action Programs are being F fully implemented. 4. Serve as liaison between Government regulatory agencies, recruiting sources, labor organizations, and representatives. c r AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN CONTINUED - 5. Establish contacts with appropriate representative groups for the purpose of obtaining advice, technical assistance and the referral of potential employees to assist in carrying out the Affirmative r Action Plan. 6. Advertise and promote the commitment to non - discrimination and affirmative action with respect to employment and advancement of all persons. III. Dissemination.of Policy. A. All members of the ,. staff who are authorized to hire, supervise, promote and /or discharge employees, or who recommend actions, or who are substantially involved in such action, 'shall be made fully cognizant of, and will. implement this company's program to employ and advance all qualifiable minorities and females and qualified Vietnam Era veterans, disabled r veterans, and handicapped persons. B. To insure that the proceeding commitment will be met, the following actions will be taken as a minimum: 1. Periodic meetings of supervisory employees will be conducted at which time the Affirmative Action and non - discrimination Program shall be reviewed and explained. 2. All new personnel will be given an Indoctrination covering all the major aspects of this Affirmative Action Program, and our commitment in recruiting, employment, placement, upgrading, selection for training, and promotion of Vietnam Era veterans, disabled veterans, minorities, females and handicapped persons without discrimination. 3. In order to make the Affirmative Action Program known to all employees, prospective employees and potential sources of r employees (i.e. schools, employment agencies, labor unions, college placement officers, social service organizations, state ... employment services, vocational rehabilitation centers, etc.) will take the following actions: a. When advertising in newspapers or other publications for r- employees, such ads shall contain, the phrase "An Equal Opportunity Employer" circulation among minority groups, females, handicapped persons, and veterans organizations serving the areas from which our primary work forces will be drawn. b. Notices setting forth the . Affirmative Action Program will be placed in areas readily accessible to employees, applicants for employment and potential employees. 7 r' w r� t . AFFIR1 ACTION PLAN CONTINUED — c. Procedures to implement this Affirmative Action Program will be brought to the attention of all employees by means of meetings, inclusion within t' internal publications and newsletters. IV. Recruitment: A. will encourage its present employees to refer for placement, qualified individuals Who are of a.minority., female, handicapped, disabled veterans, or Vietnam Era veterans group. B. The company shall §eek qualifiable members of. minority groups and 'female organizations for "all.job categories and will make particular efforts to increase their representation at the higher levels of skill and responsibility, by the following methods: 1. All employment offices, and other recruiting • ' sources when used by ? . , will be advised of this Affirmative Action Program and will be encouraged to refer qualified applicants. V. Placement and Promotion: A. The shall seek to include all qualifiable minorities and females, qualified disabled veterans, Vietnam Era veterans and handicapped persons in . on—job or other training programs in .. which the company participates or supports. B. Placement, promotion and transfer of personnel at all levels shall be monitored to assure that full consideration has been given those qualifiable minority and female persons and qualified Vietnam Era veterans, disabled veterans, and handicapped persons, as required by this Affirmative Action Plan. C. Periodic review of job categories which reflect minimum utilit tion of those individuals covered by this Affirmative Action Plan. This review shall seek to determine the cause for such minimum utilization. " Remedial actions may include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Reevaluation of job requirements. 2. Redistribution of responsibilities R r AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN CONTINUED 3. Reassignment of personnel. " 4. Re- emphasis of the Affirmative Action Program commitment. 5. More vigorous recruitment of qualified minorities, females, r ' Vietnam Era veterans, disabled veterans and handicapped person. 4 . 6. Wider dissemination of our Affirmative Action Program commitments " among the public media. VI. Training: " A. The .. will assist in locating, • qualifying and increasing the skills of employees and applicants for 'employment. 4 B. The company will advise employees and applicants for employment of " available training programs and entrance requirements. C. Appropriate steps will be taken to ensure that qualifiable minorities and females and qualified -disabled veterans, Vietnam Era veterans, and handicapped persons are represented in all supervisory training programs. VII. Layoff, Termination and Downgrading: A. The will ensure that layoffs, termina- tions, downgrading, and recall from layoff are made without regard to race, color, religion, sex, ancestry or national origin, age (over 40), physical or mental handicap, or because he or she is a disabled veteran or Vietnam Era veteran. r r IX. Employee Benefits and Status: A. The will ensure there is no disparity in the compensation received by minority group, female, " handicapped, disabled veteran and Vietnam Era veteran employees and other employees for performing equivalent duties. and that opportunities for performing overtime work or otherwise earning increased compensation are afforded without discrimination to any employee. r r. . r AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN CONTINUED - B. None of the Company's facilities will be segregated and the same policy Will be observed With respect to any employee programs or activities which are sponsored or supported by the Company. President April 12, 1987 EEO Officer 10 r � ► • f• I � ► ♦ f � f • f � ► 't f 1 r � r . • . r e r . r 1 f 1 I t e s,± OhIB No. 0610 -0003; Approval Expires November 30, 1994 FORM ED-612 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (REV. 1/92) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION CURRENT AND PROJECTED EMPLOYEE DATA t. Name and address of organization 2. This report is: ®Initial. No Anniva Follow- up hems 1 1 --10. Complete only 10 ❑ Initial. Annual Follow -up is required. Complete all items. ❑ Annual Follow -up. EDA USE ONLY Organization Intra Financial Corporation P rolet:t No: "other Party aufflx:OP- No. and Street 14 South 5th Avenue, Suite 300. 3• Organization is: ❑ EDA Apprcantorretipientr 23 EDA - Other Parry% if - Other Party; enter name of EDA App6rant or Recipient. CITY OF P11FRin City St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301 State Zip Code 4. First Impact Date: S. Fully Operational Date: Complete0* hems 1-9. SEPTEMBER, '96 1 SEPTEMBER, '96 6. Current Permanent Employees 7. New Permanent Jobs t. Permanent 2. Permanent 10. Permanent Job Categories NOT APPLICABLE To be N/A Y Impact ear after First yeesone Fully Operational ly SEX A Taal Employ- sec e Black HN 0. n) mNative C HtQ� ^'c D Adana Pacific Islander E American Indian or Native ve F T Enpby on G Black (� of Origin) nk Origin) O H Hispank I Asian or Padl't law" J American n � or Alaskan Native K Targeted by Errployrrrnt Plan L Taal Enpbyess M Taal Minorities N Taal Errploysss 0 Taal Minorities P Taal Employees O Taal MinoMinorities Minorities Officials and Managers F 5 2 5 2 5 2 M 3 1 3 Professionals F 2 2 M Technicians F M 3 1 3 1 3 1 Sales Workers F 2 2 M Office and Clerical F 2 M Craftsperson (skilled) F 10 4 10 4 10 1 4 M 1 10 5 Operatives (semi- skilled) F 25 9 25 M 20 7 20 20 7 F Laborers (unskilled) M Service Work and others F 55 1 19 1 55 21 55 21 M 1 12 33 13 TOTAL F 1 34 1 0 101 6 M 69 1 25 0 69 27 69 27 GRAND TOTAL 17 1 11. Current temporary and pan -time employees Total Minorities Females 12. Projected temporary and part-time employees when fully operational Total Minorities Females 19. T t form prepay y: _ T Name ndPosrtton at T le hon No. 14. Name of labor Market Area PUEBLO, CO MSA Female a (not i Oren) Hispanic Asian a Pacific Islander In dian 1S. Authorized organization official Labor Force of Area Total 52 10 6x • % ti . 7 % d Unemployment of Area Overall Rate: x % 1 ti 12.6: 2 . 5 % T e Name and Title ure ate and sources o labor market data: . THE C E N S U O No lusher monies or other beneMs may be author wider this p am u 1 s this report Is cortpleted and filed as requited by esbtlrg law and regulations (42 U.S.C. 2000d•l. 42 U.S.C. 9173.42 U.S.C. 67og. E.0.11246. 1 S C.F.R, pan 9. ?9 C.F.A. pan a ?. 17 C F.n. pan J. LI Q O w Co Z I'D rr EMGwit yams. K J. _ M / k It ,3 M .... 4 . r (a) Primary Beneficiaries: EXHIBIT IV- F -8 Environmental Narrative Pueblo Hotel/Conference Center (b) Area Description: The site of the Downtown Parking Structure is the easterly two - thirds of the Block bounded on the east by Court Street, West 2nd Street on the south, Grand Avenue on the west, and West 3rd Street on the north. The project site itself adjoins Court Street and is a square approximately 250 feet on each side. The site on which the Parking Structure is to be built is an ` existing surface parking lot which has been in service since the early 1970s. The lot was originally constructed to provide retail parking for the adjoining Central Business District. Over time the commercial mix of the downtown has changed, and a majority of the lot is now used to provide long -term monthly .parking for service sector employees. The r existing lot is in the Downtown Urban Core and is surrounded on the west, north, and east by retail and service sector commercial uses. To the south is the Pueblo Plaza Ice Arena, which is a public facility owned and operated by the City of Pueblo. The site for the structured Parking Facility is relatively level and largely covered with asphalt, an impermeable cover, with some small landscaped areas. (i) Site photo as Exhibit IV- F- 8(b)(i) (ii) Aerial photograph of the site as Exhibit IV- F- 9(b)(ii) (c) Shorelines, Beaches and Dunes, Estuary, Wetlands Not applicable. The site is currently in use as a surface parking lot within a densely developed downtown section of the Urban Core. There are no wetlands on, near, or adjacent to the project location. (d) Wilderness, Wild and Scenic Rivers (i) Not Applicable. The project is located within the Downtown Urban Core. There ' are no wilderness, as designated or proposed under the Wilderness Act, located on or in the vicinity of the project site. (ii) Not Applicable. The project is located with the Downtown Urban Core. There are no wild or scenic rivers, as designated or proposed under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, located on or in the vicinity of the project site. (e) Air Quality (i) Air Quality Data - The Air Pollution Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment is responsible for and has performed previous monitoring in the City of Pueblo for criteria pollutants, which have included carbon monoxide (CO) and particulates (TSP and PM10). The data trends have shown that the levels recorded have shown Pueblo to be well below the Federal Standards for these pollutants. Given the low levels recorded during the present and ongoing particulate sampling, it is not expected that a substantial increase of particulate concentrations would be experienced as a result of the proposed project. Available air quality data for the project area is available upon request from Ms. Sheila Burns, Interim Program Manager, Air Pollution Control Division at (303) 692 -3223. (ii) It is not anticipated that the structured Parking Facility, itself will generate any air emissions other than those generated as a result of construction. There will be emissions from the automobiles using the structured facility following construction, and the structure will be designed ' according to applicable laws and standards to provide adequate ventilation. The City of Pueblo is currently designated as an air quality attainment area by the Environmental Protection Agency. It is not anticipated that the automobiles using this facility will affect the City's air quality attainment status. The availability of close, accessible, and available parking to the facility may actually reduce potential automobile emission because hotel guests and conference center attendees will be able to drive directly to a site with available parking. This will potentially reduce the automobile driving time required in looking for an available parking space. (iv) Topographical or meteorological conditions will not hinder the dispersal of air emissions. (f) Water Quality ` (i) There is no available data on the quality of underground water in or near the project area. The closest surface water to the project area is approximately three blocks to the southwest. This surface water is a diversion from the Arkansas River and is used by WestPlains Energy as cooling water in the process of generating electricity. WestPlains is in the initial stages of collecting water quality data on its cooling water. This preliminary data indicates that the quality of this water meets the following standards: dissolved oxygen 5.0 mg/l, plt 6.5 -9.0, and focal coliform 2000 /100 ml. (ii) Water is provided to the City of Pueblo by the Pueblo Board of Water Works. The Board presently has water resources of sufficient quantity to serve a population approximately three times Pueblo's current population. (iii) Two types of effluents or discharges are associated with the project facility and its primary beneficiary. The first associated solely with the primary beneficiary is domestic sewerage. The second which is associated with both the primary beneficiary and the project facility is surface storm water runoff. r r Domestic Composition uantities Prior to Treatment 29,600 gpd domestic Prior to Release 29,800 effluent meets NPDES permit See Attached Water Quality Standards to meet, according to the City's NPDES Permit Exhibit IV- F -8 -(f) iii. Storm WaterSurface Runoff Q uantities Composition Prior to Treatment Unknown Unknown Prior to Release Unknown Unknown (iv) Domestic sewage will be treated in Pueblo's Waste Water Treatment Plant. Preliminary treatment is achieved by screening large objects and debris through bar screens and removing grits by way of a grit chamber. Primary clarifiers initially treat the waste water. Secondary treatment is via is a high rate trickling filter coupled with aeration basins (activated sludge). Secondary clarifiers are also part of the secondary treatment. Chlorine injection is used to disinfect the water which is ultimately neutralized (dechlorinated) with sulfur dioxide. Biosolids (sludges) are anaerobically digested after excess water is removed in the gravity thickener and dissolved air flotation thickeners, (RAF's). Centrifuges are used to dewater digested liquid biosolids. Sludge drying beds are also used in place of the centrifuges. Existing & Projected Capacities City of Pueblo Wastewater Treatment Plant Capacity Flow (MGD) Peak Daily Organic (lbs/day) CBOD (2) Suspended Solids Design Year Existing Year at 800 Year at 90% 34 21.4 N/A N/A 19 11.2 N/A N/A 33,100 18,792 36,000 20,552 N/A N/A N/A N/A Notes: 1. The plant is capable of serving a community of up to 147,900 persons based upon design for a secondary treatment level of treatment. The existing flow and organic loading is based on 1992 data. 2. s On April 16, 1990, the City of Pueblo requested, from the State Health Department. that the effluent limit be established for carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (BOD ). Because of the treatment process, the BOD analysis were producing misleading results, although the plant was producing a high level of treatment. The CBOD effluent limit was approved by the State and became effective September 1, 1990. Storm water surface runoff will be treated using best management practices and will be in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. The City of Pueblo is not designated as a Phase I -City under storm water NPDES permitting requirements. Receiving Waters: Domestic: A. Receiving Water: Arkansas River B. WQCD Stream Segment Description - Lower Arkansas River No: 1 Mainstream of the Arkansas River from a point immediately above the confluence with Fountain Creek to a point immediately above the Colorado/Kansas border. C. Adopted Stream Segment Classification - Lower Arkansas River No. 1 Agriculture Aquatic Life -Class 2, Warm Water Water Supply Use Protected Recreation -Class 2 Storm water Surface Runoff. A. Receiving Water: Arkansas River B. WQCD Stream Segment Description - Middle Arkansas River No. 3 Mainstream of the Arkansas River from a point immediately above the confluence with Wild Horse Dry Creek to a point immediately above the Fountain Creek confluence. C. Adopted Stream Segment Classification - Middle Arkansas River No. 3 Agriculture Aquatic Life -Class 2, Warm Water Water Supply Use Protected Recreation -Class 2 (v.) The City of Pueblo's treatment plant is capable of serving a community of up to 147,000 persons. The community population is currently approximates 100,000. Effluents or discharges associated with the project facilities and its primary. beneficiaries. The City's sewer treatment facility will not overload. Pueblo Waste Water Treatment Plant's existing design capacity and unused capacity is described under Item (iv) above. (vi) Please See Item (iii) above. (g) Solid Waste Management (i) The types and quantities of solid waste to be produced by the project's facilities and its primary beneficiaries will be generally described as domestic. The exact quantity is unknown, but is not anticipated to be significant. (ii) Pueblo County is currently served by three licensed landfills, and a number of recycling centers for aluminum, glass, paper, and etc. The method of dispersal will include both recycling and landfills where appropriate. Between the three landfills and the various recycling centers, the region has adequate capacity to carry it in the next century. (iii) Recycling will be used where appropriate. (h) Transportation W Available transportation facilities service the project area and include a pedestrian facilities, private automobile facilities, and a public transit facility. The City of Pueblo Transit Transfer Facility is currently one block south of the project facility. The structured parking facility, and the primary beneficiary (the Hotel and Convention Center) will be linked via a shuttle and a pedestrian route. (ii) The proposed site for the structured parking facility is an existing public parking lot. Since we are not proposing any change in use, new transportation patterns will be brought on as a result of the project. Due to the two -block distance between the structured parking facility, and the primary beneficiary (the Hotel Convention Center), minor new transportation patterns may arise, such as heightened pedestrian activity along existing sidewalks and the new public shuttle routes between the two facilities along existing roadways. (iii) The project facility and the primary beneficiary are both within the community's commercial core. The area is currently crisscrossed by pedestrian movement and public transit. It is not anticipated that any existing land uses such as residential, hospital, schools, or recreational uses will be affected by these new patterns. (iv) The City currently has sufficient roadway capacity, the sidewalks are of sufficient width within the project area, and the Pueblo Transit Authority has sufficient busses to meet all anticipated demands. The existing capacities of these transportation facilities will not be exceeded. (i) Noise (i) The major source of noise associated with the project facilities and its primary beneficiaries will be noise associated with automobile traffic. This increase over the base noise currently experience is not anticipated to be significant. (ii) The land uses to be affected are downtown retail and commercial uses and potentially the Pueblo Ice Arena. The design and techniques used in the construction of the Ice Arena, (it has no windows and is heavily insulated), makes the potential impact on the ice arena negligible 0) Historic /Archeological Properties (i) Within the project area there are three known historic /archaeological resources that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places and considered to be of State .. significance. There are four other known National Register listed resources within the project's vicinity, and one known resource which is perhaps eligible for listing on the National Register. Exhibit IV -F -9 is a letter from the Colorado State Historical Society that concurs with the City's finding that the proposed project will not impact any of these sites. Project Area: Known Resources El Pueblo Henkle Duke Building Mechanic Building Tutt Building Vicinity Federal Building Colorado Building Vail Hotel Union Avenue Historic District Potentially'Elible: Stock Growers Banks/Fitch Building Montgomery Ward Building Studiski Block P. Mayher Company Building Attached as Exhibit IV- F- 8-0)(i), is a Map identifying the project area and these r resources. (ii) An historic /archaeological survey was conducted for the entire City of Pueblo in 1980. The survey is Volume No. 3, and on file with the Colorado Historical Society and is not available for attachment. Those resources identified on Exhibit IV- F- 86)(i), were identified in the 1980 historic /archaeological survey. (k) Wildlife Resources (i) Wildlife located in the project's area consists of those Fauna common to the area that are adapted to live in an Urban Habitat. There are no wildlife refuges located within the project area or its immediate vicinity. (ii) No endangered or threatened species or critical habitats have been identified in the project area or its immediate vicinity. (1) Energy (i) Energy supplies available to the project facilities and the primary beneficiary, includes electricity - WestPlains Energy, Natural Gas - Public Service Company of Colorado and petroleum products of various suppliers. (ii) The energy suppliers have adequate energy to supply the needs of the structured parking facility and the Hotel/Convention Center. The energy suppliers realize that their supplies are finite but the energy requirements of the project facility and the primary beneficiaries are so negligible compared to the capacities of the energy suppliers that it is difficult for the suppliers to definitively indicate what portion of the remaining capacities of these supplies will be utilized. ` (m) Construction During construction, the City will require that the contractor abide by all applicable Local, State and Federal Laws, and Regulations that deal with noise, soil erosion, siltation mitigation, dust, and etc. (n) Toxic Substance (i) There.are no known toxic hazardous, or radioactive substances which will be utilized or produced by the project facility and its primary beneficiary. (ii) Not Applicable - Please see item (i) above. ' (iii) The project site on which the structured parking facility is to be constructed has not been designated for toxic waste removal from the soil or underground area. ' A history of occupancy for the site on which the structured parking facility for the previous 50 -year period between 1945 -1995 was conducted for the site, per form ED -536, Applicant Certification Clause, and is attached as Exhibit IV- F -8 -(n) iii. - (o) Public Reaction (i) No objections have been made to the project. (ii) A public hearing on the Downtown Structured Parking Facility has not been held. ` (iii) The request for a parking facility initially came from Pueblo's Downtown Merchant's Association. A parking committee made up of merchants and citizens actively supports the projects. On July 11, 1994, the Pueblo City Council at their regular scheduled meeting passed a Resolution authorizing submittal of a preapplication to the Economic Development Administration for funding of the proposed Downtown Structured Parking Facility, and it was so noted on the following day in the Pueblo Chieftain newspaper. The project was also discussed during the proceedings of the meetings of February 6, 1995, of the Pueblo Area Council of Government during a presentation of the Transportation Improvement Plan and the contract with Walker Parking Consultants. r° The project was most recently discussed on March 20, 1995, at the Pueblo City Council Public Work Session in preparation of the submittal of this application and an advertisement appeared in the following day's Pueblo Chieftain newspaper. (p) Alternatives to the Proposed Project (i) Alternative Locations - A number of alternative locations were considered. Alternative location can be grouped into three categories: Alternative One: Place the structured parking facility on the Hotel/Convention Center site. This alternative was rejected for two reasons; first, the site is very restrictive and construction of a structured parking facility on the site could potentially preclude any expansion of the Convention Facility. Second, the Hotel/Convention Center facility may not require the additional off - street parking provided by this facility on a seven day a week basis. By placing the facility at the preferred location, additional parking when not required by the Hotel and Convention Center can be used by patrons of the ice arena; for example, on Sunday. Alternative Two: Acquisition'for various new sites from the private sector. One of the reasons for developing structured parking is to maintain the downtown inventory of existing buildings and keep as much land as possible in the private sector, thus creating additional redevelopment opportunities. The preferred site was already publicly owned and in use as a parking facility. Alternative Three: Construct the proposed structured parking facility on other public parking sites. A review of three public parking lots within the project area, West 3rd and Court Streets, West 4th Street and Santa Fe Avenue, and City Hall Place, and North Union Avenue revealed that none of these three site were of sufficient size or lacked the proper configuration on which to efficiently develop a structured parking facility. The preferred site is of sufficient size, and properly configured -for structured parking and is also in close proximity to the Hotel/Convention Center. (ii) Five alternative designs were studied and are identified as Alternate A, B, C, D, and E. These alternatives presented various configurations with various level of structured parking on the preferred site. Alternate E was chosen as the preferred alternative because it provided the best orientation, fully accommodated the off -site parking deficiencies identified in the shared use parking analysis, and was within the project budget. (iii) Alternate Projects with Similar Benefits: 1. No build: This alternative would result in a parking deficit and traffic F congestion in the downtown area. 2. Shuttle to existing outlying parking lots: This alternative would relieve some of the parking deficit if it was used. Most downtown users consider this alternative inconvenient. (q) Mitigation Measures No adverse environmental impacts are associated with the project. (r) Permits No permits of an environmental nature are needed for the project. 0 EXHI T C�� r s ,. �,�v , _ '+t "�"I�lr r� a ' }. 3.. ,,, trt N z nz �• 2 "!, ~ v �+' S �k" �1. I � + 1� � � •�fJ i k 3 � ?F�� U' �4. I. 7r-. 's+.+Y� .i �r¢t. ti��` -f w r, 1 .. �, 1 �S-'�'1 . p Al �1 � ( rL... I �' �1� - J v ,_j `� III I k 3r % • •R 4' ✓ ..� �� C. - �1.` �.J ii�� t 4..�� - a".�'s+ ':C�..Iz�, a�....i � � � L t_ a t�' .....,.s _ �I;S... �t � � +!+°7... � .+s}- .. �.�.::'�� .� � __�� - 1••"',. f� -`�J L.L -•F •5' �O { s.�uI - ' 1L } � , ©_ 1 {r In L .Ir�` a r 4 + „r_ �- W �• C.. I• • _ i� S C' , ��J:.I N♦.y • - ; I b 5 Cl .r� �' ^may- -�,,� - ' .. d n - -- -• : L�,v.l. !., .: - r �$ : • L — •...w +T.,..a ' }'�R X7.5-, • +.:, . ^�'a "•,'., •� +; ' 1 �< ' r ' �:` _,L, iii �� ,: •mss• .�, �• r� _ n' .� �!:+.r :�::��`i�Q '_l' � ;?; 1ti *r�; • .!(E !' I�: ii ti: ' • ~: '',•; ��,.�' . � -.�..� _ _ �.._�.-'.3e: _4iveal't'-= 1''' _ _ •, iea+-- :1�:�__ :i'r�F '•a„�„�,".,•�e�. :.. .. �.! ^. :' -•: __ r•_;,,y� �� -4 _ - `: =-[. r {•• 'vim• '+`' ♦ /'- •f ' 'v 'i�.` • �_ 'C l, • i I W4 _, -F ft_ .` -T- -._ -.. 1 � 3r�4!a: -L `•r ; ... . i• 'T; � ,a�j• � „ •��"�$, � � - ' JJJ1kk`•••j�� ""�•••"'�e mo t '- •�, _ '+1 �.� r�. 1 R.[.��y. '1 � �•.. �.., - _ , - '•'e. `��a. '. ..�� . L • • \ .4.a`:iTr -it :arse ,:..;. j .�Y�S�•' - �~ •- ig:".x\.. .'�� ''.'ti "+4 _, . ; J. � °' :� '� � `.'w �t-�►r..• :�.:r y.�. -.'q�. '. �. - �.� f. � y : e!' .r a'� - !c;� •>,Lyl�y r • - ,, ��.: /l:-i%s � , >�:. }'y.S + ; , . ;:T / a`� q ` � �'�/r, 4 ', f 4 � a .. r :�Z ♦� %' �. ��( av // ' - ^ ,'� %��° r ^q ��L a 1 '�� -0 r• ` � � ~:, �'� jr'%Y� ' ?� {� �„�� "� 1'�•i,�♦.+ � bi''..:�f .,, e .A.."� ~t �;_.'r��'�1 .i� �� ss��, }I��. �� ` ~l +y e t , .. \ : A'' %.., � s ,.� � :. '" y am ♦ §. «.•, • �� ,�' � II �, ..�S'.� y /. f �� - 1'7. e � � .. A Vi c - ` . ; .:e:•.��I I .,•<+Y, �� •ra <� ,•.. . " •' 4,�� Ft, ♦ 'e. \• - ,: / `y.' +�i� \s . , ,4,�, ' 'sue- - ..:f J :* v / \.•a� � �. �`.+... -.rr "' 4 �_�/ `, J�y�'� f ,! -a i �. ".. " ter. Aerial photo ojCen tral Pueblo Photo Log AM L q , kwk. cs4 "J I c nL is or AM L q , kwk. cs4 "J I c nL I P: 19 ITO 1111 I v f, a a �•.��' a �i I �� 1 r, Nr • TI if a Mo ZV �L I lit, - fp. Wl isX. .� C , � ki kw ---------- _2 1, d Iili_ 7'I - �c� -z u� - •f • # E ��'� i t � � 1 - , yar y - I. 1 F r ' 2•, / r S �'1 1 �l J 1 •.� �. ALM A P . wi it k t (r r WP � ; .�. � t. • Y. -�+ r _ s� � 4..7 `� t \ / r �\ 4c � �"i �„• �I aS ' 7'�l,7� r 1 \ >� s ` ". 11 l Ta cj M Al IV ��`� I� j a!,�e 1 t -\ , 7 �• /f��` , .�t ' ,{ ` �� i -c� �/�Jll"'V 1 Y- � r , ; , `, .7�. •� / � i Y .S. s ` l�� i ` : � � r•, ) t r Y) ��, t � �� •.r � /: � t! 1��'.' f �. � ,, `I YI:k�:. • `".� Vii' � �� µ. � �' l �l •' `f � °!, N x O A � �i�,.3• i e� e t i .. , a: V F. ' fj ��`! .t. - ,y��t tt �.�ls.�. � �L"vaP _,:��b�.ra :� - r � �� •' ,✓, �' 1� + ij NO fi ;•� !: � �,�.•' � . °Ctt R t � vy F N 0 �"�ei�•r �y�a �. f J�� •,St 0 ,� V ; -y am _ ' r 7q _ - 1W FF 171 °. � �/w ' • �1 � 1 '�r ye �. �+ J �'C __ +� � � " ~• t ill � •�� Rl�l` -} � I •4� � M . 1 i • • I r r r° r F XHIBIT F g_1b)ai) CITY OF PUEBLO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT i �.��',a•% ° � 5��_� .. n 1 � !-. f i� . � 4 s s i _.[.Yl�y �� I r �'�"!� �t'� c�.W.._ PROJECT SERVICE AREA k J -p �" .. �: :..fi. .� a�� i'; � A . , •. S Tv_ ° .' ,t ��7{" - � f t ��i� ?��I �3�s�� _ J .. .�'': �r� qi !+• `mil ` j3, t 1 a�`- C• -' _. _ r. n J ..� � yR .� [� z' �^• � ! l � , :. i : —. I. , e... • � • �• - � {.- Y'? ��'[�. �,- ��r�j�- � 4 , •� ��1- �: ��' -,Ili. /, .�. _'•''x .i[is;,. •' •1 ~ �' 'r: ,.k - �:. �+ ��,• -,'. -, .z ` �1.� "� 'C�'` x�� _ .fir � � ; �. 'tom . k ; �a•`�; , �_..`., -,.. :F f � '�;� • Y' ,; ' i PARKING STRUCTURES *' I k ' ��, '`'��.:�_., ` .kts � ' �� •.s � - . "fin '. r..e'L`L .`.�, 3. ._r_` ..t ... .ar l �'x'w..... �T:t��nE. mst.. ;:'X;i ii W ..�_. _. ...,.. ��•^!•rs. 1 .Te a !. �. • a ' N ^. `Vr Lr � '- RA + . .�x•.3 f WX •� ✓y�lJ• + ^s �. �`.. i• :�'• �,". °` "; rte,.`. zy �1„`.: �•� ��5 v „�� , = �• a .6. i:' a+ � �,"r�. \"'r� � v � n l r � .� ��. ;� J •cr` , �' ` 6:� : r� +I � HOTEL/CONFERENCE, 1R ! �"+. < , � lj.:., r �••.� Y,r�:. ♦ z� 1�` r' \s,,�`' � ti, -+r t � +, sd' i�y,:c_ � .yl'!�fw'\ t. tz Aerial photo of Central Pueblo AERIAL P H O T O G R A G H WATER QUALITY STANDARDS CITY OF PUEBLO WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Federal /State Characteristic Standard Physical and Biological D.O. Ph Fecal Coliforms Inorganic NH (ac) NH (ch) CL (ac) Cl-, (ch) Cyanide (free) S as undissociated H Boron Nitrite as N (NOD Nitrate as N (NO 3 ) Chloride (Cl) Sulfate (SO,) Metals Arsenic (As)(ac) Cadmium (Cd)(ac /ch) Cadmium (Cd)(ch) Chromium (tri)(CrIII)(ac) Chromium (hex)(CrM(ac /ch) Copper (Cu)(ac /ch) Iron (Fe, sol)(ch) Iron (Fe, sol)(ch) Lead (Pb)(ac /ch) Manganese (Mn, sol)(ch) Manganese (Mn, sol)(ch) Mercury (Hg)(ch) Nickel (Ni)(ac /ch) Selenium (Se)(ch) Silver (Ag)(ac) Silver (Ag)(ch) Zinc (Zn)(ac /ch) 5.0 mg /1 - -- -- -- 65 -9.0 2000/100m1 .TVs 0.1 mg/1 0.019 mg/l 0.011 mg/I 0.005 mg/1 0.002 mg/1 0.75 mg/1 OS mg/1 10 mg /1 250 mg /I 1800 mg /1 50 ug/1(Trec) TVs TVs 50 ug /1 (Trec) TVs TVs 300 ug /I (dis) 1400 ug /1 (Trec) TVs 50 ug /I (dis) 1000 ug /I (Trec) 0.01 ug /I (Trec) TVs 10 ug /1 (Trec) TVs TVs TVs EXHIBIT I -F -84 -iii EXHIBIT w -� -S Q ' CITY OF PUEBLO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT o0� to D p8 r ,,, r , rxw FEDERAL BLDG PROJECT SERVICE AREA COLORADO BLDG. HENKLE DUKE BLDG. - - - r r r P RKING STRUCTURE STOCK GROWERS E BANK /FITCH BLDG cl, k 4 - raross�r �tttttttttt tttt� r wwro .im wo 0 : r so xww r tttttttitttttt� F ILI r r U Q Pam �'' MECHANIC. BLDG. -EL PUEBLO. m � ra sXerr r ru rsan p J r - - � � -"x t U - O iei;Fu�iEvE r U.: VAIL HOTEL ¢ '. '"°` Q .� .. n • I ca' �� .•� .co o q Pp J�\De\G HOTEL /CONFERENCE CENTER �\`� LLt r ED -536 APPLICANT'S NAM s CITY OF -1 EXHIBIT OMB control number Zxyiration Dote: r1KW 6%71 li THZZx 1 Harden Hovz• dtat*mapt Thlif form belcrw 14 •D.timAtbd to take 20 hours to •wi.Zl vary •depandtng upon ih'p needs of the indlvidunl carQ. Any�pommectir on the tlMount bZ• tl1hf yqu 'rega to complete this form 1 Auld' be sent to the Dlr� Ae otor, Compliance vlev Dlvlalon, S�vlro�rri xa)iah, 6vonomia beve2opMobt xdRin ROOM N7019, Dopartmentt ott Commerce, Haohington, D..C. 20230•, dnd to the office of Znformatlon and Regulatory Affe1ra, Office .of •Nas flab' iAd Rsrdget, PApervork Reduction ProjQ9t (0110- D092), hington, :b�C: 2003 •• APPLICANT CERTIFICATION C�.AV6E Tha Applicant represents and certifies that it has used due diligence to determine that the description of the site described herein ie accurate with respect to the presence or absenee•'bf contamination from toxic or hazardous substances. The term wait*" includes the entire scope - of the project, including future phases of the project and all areas where construction will occur. 1. Is the site currently, or has it in the past fifty years, been used for any of the following operations or activities: a) generation of hazardous substances and /or waste. / /YRS /X /NO b) treatment, storage (temporary or permanent), or disposal of solid or hazardous substances and /or waste / /YS8 /X /NO * c) storage of petroleum products / /YES /X /NO * d) uavd /waste oil storage or reclamation units / /YES /X /NO * e) research or testing laboratory / /YES /X /No f) ordnance research, testing, production, or storage / /YES /X /NO g) chemical manufacturing or storage / /YZS / /NO h) military weapons or ammunition training or testing / /YES /X /NO r i) iron works /foundry / /Y88 /X /NO j) railroad yard / /YES /X /NO 4 .. k) industrial or manufacturing operation / /YES /X /No If any of the above operations aver occurred at the site, and appropriate cleanup or other action was performed in aeoordance with the local, state and federal laws, provide documentation of such cleanup. *A trucking company warehouse, farm machinery /auto sales and service, coal yard, and railroad spur track appeared at the site but we have no record of storage of petroleum products or used /waste oil storage on the site. r ED -536 PROirscT NUMERi 0610 -0092 2 - 2. vo wells draw water from an underlying aquifer to provide the local domestic water supply? / /YES / X/NO 38 Has a Federal, state or local regulatory authority ' ever conducted an environmental asseacment, environmental impact statement, or a preliminary aseeeoment /site inspection, or similar environmental survey or inspection report at the site? if yes, Rroyidg copies of reports or result. / /YES / X/NO 4. Have any environmental or OSHA citations or notice& of violation been issued to the facility? if yes, provide conies / /YES /X /NO 5. Have any unpermitted releases of hazardous substances occurred at the facility which resulted in notification to the EPA's National • R Sponse Center? If yes,. what kLas the nature of the releas '/ /YES /X/NO 6. Is asbestos containing material currently in the facility? If yes, describe / /YB9 IX /NO 7. is there any equipment (electrical transformers, etc.) containing polychlorinated biphenyls (Pc8) vn the site? If yes, describe J /YES / X/NO Y . S. a. Are there underground storage tanks on the site? / /YES / X/NO b. If so, how many are there? c. Have they been inspected for leaks within the past year? It so, what were the gesults / /YES / x/NO 9. Has the facility been tested for radon? If yea, provide results / /YE9 / X/NO 10. Have there been or are there now any environmental investigations by Federal, state or local government .. agencies on, or which could affect the I site in question? If yes, R,Yovido ayailablg information / /YES /X/NO The applicant acknowledges that this certification regarding hazardous substances and /or waste is a material representation of fact upon which the Government relies when executing this award. r The Government reserves the right to terminate the award, if at any time during the useful life of the project it becomes aware that hazardous substances and /or waste are present thereon, or that such hazardous substances and /or waste have been inappropriately handled thereon. Further, if it is determined at any time that the presence of hazardous substances and /or waste, or inappropriate handling thereof, has been misrepresented, the Government will utilize other available legal remedies against the applicant. r CITY MANAGER, CITY OF PUEBLO MARC 21, 1995 r utborised Ri4natur#J J Title is Date LEWIS A. QUIGLEY *Farm machinery and auto sales & service, and a trucking company warehouse uses appeared on the site, but we have no record of storage tanks on the site. EXHIBIT 0 NrF -9 D J � ° —FAYA _ =1 — —I X -M o m �Iw City of Pueblo JAMES F. MUNCH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Director of Planning. _ ` h* 14 1995 '0"S / aA Wp March 9, 1995 Kaaren Hardy -Hunt State Historic Preservation Office 1300 Broadway Denver, CO 80203 Dear Ms Hardy -Hunt: ' The City of Pueblo is making a final application for Federal Assistance on form ED -IOTA for Public Works funds from the Economic Development Administration. The funds are being requested for the construction of a parking structure to serve downtown Pueblo. The site for the proposed parking structure is currently a surface level parking lot and is in close proximity to .. several historic sites. Attached please find a copy of the site plan, which identifies the boundary of the Union Avenue Historic District and other nearby historic sites, and the project site. Also attached is a schematic elevation depicting the proposed parking structure. The City of Pueblo hereby finds that the proposed downtown parking structure will not affect the Union Avenue Historic District or any other National Register or eligible property as shown in the enclosed map. If you require additional information, please contact me at (719) 543 -6006. Your immediate processing of this finding will be greatly appreciated. • Sincerely, .. es F. Munch irector r I conc r: i Ja s E. Hartmann, State Historic Preservation Officer Date 211 E. "D ' Street, P.O. Box 1427 • Pueblo, Colorado 81002 -1427 • (719) 543 -6006 • Fax (719) 542 -6244 EXHIBIT r IV-G-3 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economic Development Administration EMPLOYER'S CERTIFICATE OF NONRELOCATION To be executed by employers within project boundaries of projects for donstruction grant assistance under Titles I, IV, IX and section 301 (f) of Title III of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended (PWEDA). NOTE - EDA's regulations at 13 CFR 309.3 prohibit EDA from making construction grants under Titles I, IV, IX and section 301(f) of Title III which will have the effect of assisting an employer in moving jobs from one commuting area to another commuting area. An expansion of an existing business to a new location may be assisted if such an expansion will not cause unemployment in other areas where the business conducts operations. Items 1 -2 are to be completed by Grant Applicants before this form is executed by employers. L Grant Applicant Name: City of Pueblo L City, State ; Pueblo, Colorado M 2. Short Project Description The construction .of a structured parking facility to serve the new Downtown Hotel /Conference Center and other downtown businesses.' Employers are to complete items 3 -4 and read . and� understand item . S. 3. This form is being executed by an employer who satisfies one or more of the following conditions: (Check at least one) [X) a. It is an employer located or locating, or a nonapplicant owner or operator of an industrial park or site within the Project Boundaries. [X] b. In the case of construction grants to fund area -wide utility systems it is an employer which uses or is projected to use greater than ten percent (10 %) of the total capacity of the utility system as improved by the EDA grant. [ ] c. It is an affiliate, subsidiary, or other entity under direct, indirect, or common control of the foregoing entities. ( ) d. It is an assignee, transferee, lessee, or successor in interest of the foregoing entities. 4. EMPLOYER CERTIFICATION AND ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH EDA'S NONRELOCATION REGULATIONS Intra Financial Corporation Name of Employer 14 South 5th Avenue, Suite 300 (612) 252 -6034 Street A ress one Num er St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301 ity, State, Zip (hereinafter called the "Employer ") certifies and assures that, as an Employer on a project involving EDA . _ financial assistance, it will comply with EDA's nonrelocation regulations at 13 CFR 309.3. r Form ID --101-A (Rev. 12/91) -31- Exhibit IV -G -3 EMPLOYER'S CERTIFICATE OF NONRELOCATION Page 2 • These regulations provide that EDA financial assistance will not be used directly or indirectly to assist Employers who transfer one or more jobs from one commuting area to another. A commuting area ` is that area defined by the distance people normally travel to work in the locality of the project receiving EDA financial assistance. This restriction applies to the transfer of jobs, not of personnel. The Employer certifies and assures that it is not its intention to transfer one or more jobs from one commuting area to another by either (1) closing an operation in one commuting area and opening a new operation in the Project Area, which is in a new commuting area, or (2) curtailing its operations in another location and increasing the number of jobs of the existing operations located in the Project Area, for a period forty -eight (48) months from the date of approval by EDA of financial grant assistance. The Employer certifies and assures that it has not located and that it will not locate in the Project Area prior to the date of EDA's approval of the proposed financial assistance, for the purpose of avoiding the restrictions of this nonrelocation rule. The Employer understands that EDA financial assistance is not prohibited for the expansion of an Employer through the creation of a new branch, affiliate, or subsidiary which will not result in a decrease in jobs in any area where the Employer conducts business operations, and that retail stores which open new outlets in EDA funded facilities are exempt from this requirement provided: (1) the retail store is not a direct recipient of EDA financial assistance; (2) the retail store is not engaged in a pattern of operations which would result in relocating a substantial portion of its operations from one multi -state region to another; and, (3) the new outlet opening will not result in • a significant reduction of employment in the retail store's entire operation. The undersigned is authorized to make the foregoing certification and assurances and to execute this Certificate on behalf of the Employer. Executed this � day of 19 -2ff A /1" ot� / J. , I /_ it e of :ec tang Of S. WARNING Note - Section 710(a) of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended, provides that: "Whoever makes any statement knowing it to be false, or whoever willfully overvalues any security, for the purpose of obtaining for himself or for any applicant any financial assistance under section 101, 201, 202, or 403 or any extension thereof by renewal, deferment or action, or otherwise, or the acceptance, release, or substitution of security therefor, or for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of the Secretary, or for the purpose of obtaining money, property, or anything of value, under this Act, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or by imprisonment for not more than five years, or both." EDA'S NONRELOCATION REQUIREMENTS AT 13 CFR 309.3(m) PROVIDE THAT: "WHEN EDA DETERMINES THAT THESE REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED, EDA WILL TERMINATE FOR CAUSE THE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE MADE AVAILABLE BY EDA. THE RECIPIENT WILL BE OBLIGATED TO REPAY TO EDA THE FULL AMOUNT OF THAT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE, PLUS INTEREST, FROM THE DATE DETERMINED BY EDA UPON WHICH THE VIOLATION OCCURRED, AT THE NEW YORK BANK PRIME RATE AS REPORTED IN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ON THE DATE OF TERMINATION." Form ED -IOTA (Rev. 12/91) -32- r i r Exhibit IV -G -2 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF NONRELOCATION To be executed by applicants for construction grant assistance under Titles I, IV, IX and section 301(f) of Title III of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended (FWEDA). Employer is defined to include grantee /applicant. NOTE - EDA's regulations at 13 CFR 309.3 prohibit EDA from making construction grants under Titles I, IV, IX and section 301(f) of Title III which will have the effect of assisting an employer in moving jobs from one commuting area to another commuting area. An expansion of an existing business to a new location may be assisted if such an expansion will not cause unemployment in other areas where the business conducts operations. Execution of the following Certificate is necessary for EDA to determine whether funding is available for the proposed project. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Applicants are to complete items 1 -3 and read and understand item 4. 1. Grant Applicant Name: CITY OF PUEBLO (hereinafter called the "Applicant ") City, State: PUEBLO, COLORADO 2. Short Project Description: MUNICIPAL PARKING STRUCTURE_ 3. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION AND ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH EDA'S NONRELOCATION REGULATIONS The Applicant certifies and assures that, as an Applicant for EDA assistance it will comply with EDA's nonrelocation regulations at 13 CFR 309.3. The Applicant certifies and assures that the facilities to be constructed are not undertaken for the purpose of serving an employer which has relocated its operation within the Project Boundaries, or for the purpose r of assisting or otherwise encouraging the relocation of such employers, prior to the date of EDA's approval of the proposed financial assistance, where such relocations are for.the purpose of avoiding the restrictions of the rule, and that relocations will not take place for forty -eight (48) months from the date of approval of this grant. The Applicant certifies and assures that it is not presently assisting Dr otherwise encouraging, nor does it intend to assist or encourage, employers which intend to transfer one or more jobs from one commuting area to another by either (1) closing an operation in one commuting area and opening a new operation within the Project Boundaries, which is in a new commuting area, or (2) curtailing its operation in another location and increasing the number of jobs of the employer's existing operations located within the Project ` Boundaries. The Applicant assures that it does not intend to encourage or use the project to assist employers in transferring jobs as described above. The Applicant understands that in accordance with 13 CFR 309.3(k)(1) it will obtain a Certificate of r , Nonrelocation from all employers locating within the Project Boundaries as follows: a. All employers located or locating or non - applicant owners or operators of industrial parks or sites within the Project Boundaries. In the case of grants to fund area -wide utility systems, Certificates of Nonrelocation will be required from businesses which use or are projected to use greater than ten percent (10 %) of the the total capacity of the utility system as improved by the EDA grant. b. Affiliates, subsidiaries, or other entities under direct, indirect, or common control of the foregoing. r I Form ED -101A (Rev. 12/91) -29- Exhibit IV -G -2 APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF NONRELOCATION Page 2 C. Assignees, transferees, lessees, and successors - in- interest of the foregoing entities. d. Successors - in- interest of the Applicant or Grantee, who will be required to execute the "Applicant's Certificate of Nonrelocation." The Employer Certificates must be maintained by the Applicant /Grantee and made available to EDA upon request. The undersigned is authorized to make the foregoing certification and assurances and to execute this Certificate on behalf of the Applicant. Executed this 21ST day of MARCH , 1995 by Type or Print Name Signature of Executing Offici 4. WARNINGS Garr Title of Executing Official) Note - Section 710(a) of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended, provides that: "Whoever makes any statement knowing it to be false, or whoever willfully overvalues any security, for the purpose of obtaining for himself or for any applicant any financial assistance under section 101, 201, 202, 403 or any extension thereof by renewal, deferment or action, or otherwise, or the acceptance, release, or substitution of security therefor, or for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of the Secretary, or for the purpose of obtaining money, property, or anything of value, under this Act, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or by imprisonment for not more than five years, or both." EDA'S NONRELOCATION REQUIREMENTS AT 13 CFR 309.3(m) PROVIDE THAT: "WHEN EDA DETERMINES THAT THESE REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED, EDA WILL TERMINATE FOR CAUSE THE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE MADE AVAILABLE BY EDA. THE RECIPIENT WILL BE OBLIGATED TO REPAY TO EDA THE FULL AMOUNT OF THAT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PLUS INTEREST, FROM THE DATE DETERMINED BY EDA UPON WHICH THE VIOLATION OCCURRED, AT THE NEW YORK BANK PRIME RATE AS REPORTED IN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ON THE DATE OF TERMINATION." 'Form ED -101A (Rev. 12/91) -30- FORM CD-511 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS; DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS AND LOBBYING Applicants should refer to the regulations cited below to determine the certification to which they are required to attest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing this form. Signature on this form provides for compliance with certification requirements under 15 CFR Part 26, "Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)" and "Govemmentwide Requirements for Drug -Free Workplace" and 15 CFR Part 28, "New Restrictions on Lobbying." 'Me certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of Commerce determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement. 4 W r r• 1. DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS As required by Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, and implemented at 15 CFR Part 26, for pro- spective participants in primary covered transactions, as defined at 15 CFR Part 26, Sections 26.105 and 26.110 - (1) The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three -year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or perform- ing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, mak- ing false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this ap- plication /proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State oT local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. 2. DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS Alternate I. Grantees Other Than Individuals As required by the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implemented at 15 CFR Part 26, Subpart F, for grantees, as defined at 15 CFR Part 26, Sections 26.605 and 26.610 - A. The grantee certifies that it will or will continue to provide a drug -free workplace by: (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; (b) Establishing an ongoing drug -free awareness program to inform employees about- (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (2) The grantee's policyof maintaining adrug -free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and em- ployee assistance programs; and (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be en- gaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will- (1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for aviolation of acriminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; (e) Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such con- viction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to the Director, Office of Federal Assistance, Office of Federal Assistance and Man- agement Support, HCHB Room 6054, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant; (f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted— (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirementsof the RehabilitationActof1973, as amended; or (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; USCOMM DC 91 -7115 r .r - (g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug - free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a),(b),(c),(d),(e) and (f). B. The grantee shall insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant: Place of Performance: (Street address, city, county, state, ZIP code): Alternate II. Grantees Who Are Individuals Check ❑ if there are workplaces on file that are not iden- tified here. As required by the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implemented at 15 CFR 26, Subpart F, for grantees, as defined at 15 CFR Part 26, Sections 26.605 and 26.610 - (A) The grantee certifies that, as a condition of the grant, he or she will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribu- tion, dispensing, possession, or use of acontrolled substance in conducting any activity with the grant; (B) If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity, he or she will report the conviction, in writing, within 10 calendar days of the conviction, to the Director, Office of Federal Assistance, Office of Federal Assistance and Management Support, HCHB Room 6054, U.S Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. When notice is made to such a central point, it shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant. 3. LOBBYING As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the U.S. Code, and implemented at 15 CFR Part 28, for persons entering into a grant, cooperative agreement or contract over $100,000, or loan or loan guarantee over $150,000, as defined at 15 CFR Part 28, Sections 28.105 and 28.110, the applicant certifies that to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modifica- tion of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agree- ments) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made orenteredinto. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. I . Statement for Loan Guarantees and Loan Insurance The undersigned states, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: If any funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or em- ployee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying" in accordance with its instructions. Submission of this statement is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required statement shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above applicable certification(s). NAME OF APPLICANT AWARD NUMBER AND /OR PROJECT NAME PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE LEIIIS A. QUIGLEY, CITY MANAGER, CITY OF PUEBLO SIGNATURE DATE 3/23/95