HomeMy WebLinkAbout6963RESOLUTION NO. 6963
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1992 SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER
PLAN UPDATE AS THE THREE —MILE AREA PLAN FOR THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF
THE CITY OF PUEBLO, PURSUANT TO THE MUNICIPAL ANNEXATION ACT OF 1965
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission is authorized to prepare
and submit to the City Council for its approval a master plan for the physical
development of the City, pursuant to Section 12 -5 of the Charter of Pueblo; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission, in compliance with the
Municipal Annexation Act of 1965 (Section 31- 12- 105[l][e], CRS [1988 Cum. Supp.]),
has approved a three —mile area plan for the Southeast Quadrant of the City ( The
1992 Southeast Quadrant Annexation Master Plan Update
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PUEBLO that:
SECTION 1:
The 1992 Southeast Quadrant Annexation Master Plan Update heretofore approved by
the City Planning and Zoning Commission and submitted to the City Council, the
original of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, is hereby approved.
SECTION 2
The 1992 Southeast Quadrant Annexation Master Plan Update shall function and
hereby is adopted as the City of Pueblo's official "three —mile area plan," as
required by Section 31- 12- 105[l][e], CRS [1988 Cum. Supp.] for the Southeast
Quadrant of the City and shall be updated at least annually.
SECTION 3:
All three —mile area plans and all parts thereof heretofore adopted by the City
Council for the Southeast Quadrant of the City are hereby repealed and rescinded,
except insofar as any physical development has been approved pursuant thereto by
the City or any of its agencies, commissions, or boards.
SECTION 4:
This Resolution shall become effective upon final passage.
INTRODUCED July 13 1992
BY : HOWARD WHITLOCK
Councilperson
APPROVED:
/Y e4s2�L -,
President of the Council
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(SEAL)
1992 UPDATE -- SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A. PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
B. OBJECTIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
C. ASSUMPTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
D. LOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
II. ANNEXATION REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
A. COLORADO ANNEXATION REQUIREf'MENTS. . . . . . . . . . 5
1. Development Eligibility (CRS Title 31-12-104) . . . . 5
2. Annexation Master Plan (CRS Title 31- 12- 105[l][e]) . . . . . 5
3. Annexation Impact Report (CRS Title 31 -12- 108.5) . . . . . . 7
B. CITY ANNEXATION REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 7
1. Development Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 8
2 . Drainage Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 8
3. Sanitary Sewer Report . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 8
4. Transportation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 10
5. Zoning and Subdivision . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 12
6. Public Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 13
7. Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 13
8 . Amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 13
III. REFERENCE MATERIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 15
PREFACE EN 15
RO
A. THE ENVINMT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1. IMGRID Analysis . . . . . . . . . . 15
2. Section 208 Water Quality Program, Pueblo,Colorado . . . . 16
3. General and Engineering Geology of the Northern Part. . . .
of Pueblo, Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
B. LAND USE AND INFRASTRUCTURE . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. 17
1.
Pueblo Regional Comprehensive Development
Plan. . . . . .
. 17
2.
City of Pueblo Urban Parks and Recreation
Recovery. . . .
.
Action Program. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. 17
3.
Airport Subdivision Sketch Plan . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. 17
4.
Air Facilities Plan . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. 18
5.
Pueblo (Memorial Airport Plaster Plan . . .
. . . . . . . .
. 18
6.
Airport Noise Compatibility Program . .
. . . . . ..—
. 18
7.
Pueblo Board of Water Works Distribution Plan
. . . .
. 20
8.
Sanitary Sewerage and Wastewater Treatment
Facilities . .
. 20
9.
Pueblo Airport Industrial Park Wastewater
Treatment . . .
.
Plant Preliminary Engineering Study . .
. . . . . . . .
. 21
- i -
1992 UPDATE -- SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT - D)
SECTION TITLE
PAGE
C. TRANSPORTATION. . . . . . . . . . . 21
1. Analysis District Evaluation To The Year 2010 . . . . . . . 21
2. The Year 2010 Transportation Plan Report. . . . . . . . . . 22
3. Pueblo Airpark Access Alternatives Study. . . . . . . . . . 22
IV. THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT THREE —MILE ANNEXATION PLAN . . . . . . . . . 25
PREFACE . . . . . . . . . MA . R . . RAN . POR . . ATI . . N . COR . . IDO . . S .
A. EXISTING AND PROPOSED JO TSTORR. 26
1. East /West Corridors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2. North /South Corridors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3. Proposed Roadway'Construction Standards . . . . . . . . . . 28
B. THE PROPOSED URBAN EXTENSION AREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
1. Upper Region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
2. Middle Region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
3. Lower Region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
C. PUEBLO MEMORIAL AIRPORT AND INDUSTRIAL PARK . . . . . . . . . . 34
1. Airport . . 34
2. The Airport Industrial * Park 35
3. Fire Protection -- Airport & Airport Industrial Park. . . . . 35
4. Emergency Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
5. Airport Police Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
6. Pueblo Memorial Airport Noise Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
D. DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
1. Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
2. Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
3. Industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4. Mineral Resource Extraction Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
E. PUBLIC FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
1. Police . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
2. Fire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
3. Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
F. PARKS, OPEN SPACE, AND TRAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
1. Parks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2. Open Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
3. Trails . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
- ii -
1992 UPDATE -- SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION [1ASTER PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D)
SECTION TITLE
V.
VI.
VII.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A. ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1. Bedrock Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Surficial Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Landforms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Climate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Flora and Fauna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Water Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PAGE
49
49
49
49
52
56
56
56
59
60
61
B. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 62
1. Floodplain Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 62
2. Drywash Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 63
3. Wildfire Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 63
4. Geologic Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 63
5. Mineral Resource Areas . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 67
INFRASTRUCTURE PLANS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A. TRANSPORTATION NETWORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. WATER SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. WASTEWATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D. ELECTRIC POWER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
E. GAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F. TELEPHONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
G. CABLE TELEVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PUBLIC FACILITIES -- EXISTING AND PROPOSED PLANS. . . . . . . . . . .
.•
69
69
73
77
80
82
83
83
PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
A. SCHOOLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
1. School District No. 60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
2. School District No. 70. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
3. Detachment and Annexation of School Districts . . . . . . . 89
B. RECREATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
1. Parks and Recreation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
2. Recreational Trails System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
— iii —
1992 UPDATE -- SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D)
SECTION TITLE
PAGE
C. FIRE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
1. City Fire Department. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
2. Pueblo Rural Fire Protection District . . . . . . . . . . . 95
3. CF &I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
4. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
D. POLICE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
1. City Police Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
2. County Sheriff Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
VIII. CURRENT ZONING AND LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 97
PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 97
A. CITY ZONING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 97
B. COUNTY ZONING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 97
C. LAND USES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 100
1 . General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 100
2 . Farmland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 100
3 . Farmland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 100
APPENDIX 1: STANDARD AVIGATION EASEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . .
—iv —
1992 UPDATE -- SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
MAP NO. LISTING OF MAPS /TITLE PAGE
I.
PLANNING AREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 3
II.
PROPOSED URBAN EXTENSIONAREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 4
III.
ENTERPRISE ZONE BOUNDARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 6
IV.
AIRPARK SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN . . . . .
. 19
V.
MAJOR TRANSPORTATION ROUTES FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP . . . .
. 23
VI,
AIRPARK ACCESS ALTERNATIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 24
VII.
PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 27
VIII.
PROPOSED URBAN EXTENSION AREA REGIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 31
IX.
PROPOSED LAND USES. .. . .
.. . .... . .
32
X.
1977 PUEBLO MEMORIAL AIRPORT CNR NOI CONTOURS
38
XI.
1987 PUEBLO MEMORIAL AIRPORT LDN NOISE CONTOURS . . . . . . . . .
. 39
XII.
PROPOSED RECREATIONAL TRAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 47
XIII.
BEDROCK GEOLOGY , . . . . . . , , .
50
XIV.
SURFICIAL GEOLOGY . . . . . . , . . . .
53
XV.
SOILS ASSOCIATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 55
XVI.
LANDFORMS
57
XVII.
DRAINAGE BASINS AND 100 -4W FLOODPLAINS. . . . . . . .
. 58
XVIII.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPOSITE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 66
XIX.
MINERAL EXTRACTION SITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 68
XX.
TRAFFIC ZONES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 72
XXI,
WATER PRESSURE ZONES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 74
XXII.
WATER SERVICE PERMIT AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 75
XXIII,
WASTE14ATER SERVICE AREAS. . . . . . . . . . . .
. 79
XXIV.
ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS AND TRANSP•1ISSION LINES . . . . . . . . . . .
. 81
XXV.
SCHOOLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .
. 86
XXVI.
PARK FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 92
XXVII.
FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 94
XXVIII,
CITY ZONING , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, 98
XXIX.
COUNTY ZONING , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, 99
XXX.
IMPORTANT FARMLANDS . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 101
N0,
LISTING OF TABLES /TITLE
PAGE
I.
DESIGN NOISE LEVEL /LAND USE RELATIONSHIPS . .
. 30
II.
COMPARISON OF CNR /LDN NOISE LEVELS RELATING TO LAND USE IMPACT. .
. 40
III.
LAND USES NORMALLY COMPATIBILE WITH VARIOUS NOISE LEVELS. . . . .
. 41
IV.
GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS -- BEDROCK. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 51
V.
GEOLOGIC PROPERTIES -- SURFICIAL DEPOSITS . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 54
VI.
ANALYSIS DISTRICT EVALUATION TO THE YEAR 2010 . . . . . . . . . .
. 71
VII,
SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 60 ENROLLMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 87
VIII.
SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 70 ENROLLMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. _,88
IX.
PARK STANDARDS. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 89
X.
URBAN RECREATION FACILITIES -- SOUTHEAST QUADRANT . . . . . , . . .
. 91
- v -
1992 UPDATE -- SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
I. INTRODUCTION
A. PURPOSE
PUEBLO, COLORADO
The Southeast Quadrant Annexation Master Plan is in response to the Municipal
Annexation Act of 1965 (Section 31- 12- 105[l][e], CRS [1988 Cum. Supp.]) as amended
by Senate Bill 45 (1987). Compliance of this act requires that prior to
completion of any annexation, a municipality shall have in place a plan that
generally describes proposed public facilities, utilities, and land uses within a
three —mile limit from current City boundaries. Section 12 -5 of the Charter of
Pueblo authorizes the preparation of a master plan for the physical development of
the City. The Department of Planning and Development is charged with the
responsibility of conducting such long —range planning activities for the City of
Pueblo. It is the goal of long —range master planning to provide a framework which
will guide development in a consistent manner. Individual annexation and
development decisions should be made according to criteria that best suits the
overall goals of the City.
In 1988, the City of Pueblo annexed the U. S. Highway 50 corridor, east from the
City limits to 30 -1/2 Lane. This action resulted in the extension of municipal
service boundaries to include the corridor. This annexation, coupled with recent
development proposals, indicates a possible growth trend in the Southeast
Quadrant.
The Southeast Quadrant Annexation Master Plan addresses this potential growth
trend. The purpose of the plan is.,to establish specific guidelines and recommend
policy which would ensure that annexation and development are consistent and
compatible with existing land uses, with City land use and transportation
policies, and with State annexation statutes.
B. OBJECTIVE
This annexation master plan will serve as the official "three —mile area plan" for
the Southeast Quadrant. It does not supersede the 1980 Pueblo Regional
Comprehensive Development Plan except insofar as the Three —Mile Plan shall be
used to identify proposed land uses in that area defined as the "proposed urban
extension area" within the Southeast Quadrant. It is designed to be a framework
for development, with sufficient flexibility to be changed as conditions warrant.
The goals of the Southeast Quadrant Plan are: -,
GOAL 1 : Establish appropriate land use and annexation policies which will guide
development within the Southeast Quadrant. These policies will provi:e a
standard approach for future annexations and will supplement the City's
zoning and subdivision regulations.
GOAL 2 : Comply with State annexation laws, Pueblo Board of Water Works policies,
and U. S. Government Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airport
regulations and aircraft noise recommendations.
GOAL 3 : Identify proposed public facilities, utilities, and land uses within the
Southeast Quadrant.
GOAL 4 : Provide an inventory of the planning area in relation to the natural
environment, the infrastructure, and the public facilities that are
available.
C. ASSUMPTIONS
1. Development at the Pueblo Memorial Airport Industrial Park (AIP), directly
north of the study area, will continue at or near its historic rate.
2. There will be an increasing need for service industry to support AIP growth
and activity (i.e., restaurants, service stations, lodging, shopping centers).
3. There will be a continuing need for recreational areas (i.e., parks, rest
stops, and natural and bike trails).
4. There is a need to protect the AIP from incompatible development.
D. LOCATION
The Southeast Quadrant contains approximately 37 sq. miles and encompasses an area
which extends three miles from the existing City limit line adjoining the
Southeast portion of Pueblo, Colorado.
The Southeast Quadrant Annexation Master Plan study area is that area bound on the
north by U. S. Highway 50 —B, on the east by 36th Lane (Colorado State Highway 231)
and the St. Charles River, on the west by U. S. Interstate 25, and on the south by
the Comanche power generating plant (See Map I).
This study area has been divided into an Urban (proposed urban extension area) and
a Rural category. The Urban /Rural Demarcation Line identifies the boundary beyond
which urbanization is not anticipated to occur within a 12 —month period following
the adoption of this plan. The term "proposed urban extension area" indicates
that area which is considered to be the most probable for annexation based on the
ability to extend municipal service into the area (See Map II).
The area between U.S. Highway 50 —B and the Arkansas River is considered to be the
most probable for annexation due to its proximity to the airport and AIP and due
to the ability to extend municipal service into the area. The remainder of the
study area including the St. Charles. Mesa communities and the CF &I Steel
Corporation is presently served by alternate potable water suppliers and
wastewater treatment services and has little pressure to annex into the City.
— 2 —
14
4-D t
sr
P\P0 � O � � � � �
J
U_
V.,
>;
L
1A
L
im
AE >
f I I I
7, m
0
t
... .... MIA,
<
4+4
IV fl-3,
X4; j Fj
N
I
-.4
Pq
z
0
Iii
z
Pq
E-
x
Pq
z
rn
0
P q
4':'.. may— � ..� .i� .1 -- °+r• ���` f f ', �, S{ i. •�� . ,•..../'�d�
.... ........ ;J
•f ,., ' ._ ;. '" ... r ���4�,;�: ,•1 Ira •�t. Ilfr' • Y ._�� ", I
J.
.j
on
4 4 1 0
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Development MAP:
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN II
- 4 --
II. ANNEXATION REQUIREMENTS
PREFACE
This plan is designed to conform to the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965 (Part I
of Article 12 of Title 31, CRS) amended by Senate Bill 45 (1987). This Act
requires a municipality to develop an annexation master plan describing proposed
public facilities, utilities, and land uses within a three —mile limit from current
City boundaries.
A. COLORADO ANNEXATION REQUIREMENTS
Senate Bill 45 was passed in t_he 1987 Session of the Colorado General Assembly.
The following requirements apply to all municipal annexations requested after
May 28, 1987.
1. Development Eligibility (CRS Title 31 -12 -104)
The perimeter of the area proposed for annexation must have no less than one —sixth
contiguity with the annexing municipality. Contiguity may be established by the
annexation of one or more parcels in a series completed simultaneously and
considered together for purposes of public hearing requirements. Contiguity shall
not be affected by the existence of a platted street or alley, a public or private
right —of —way, a public or private transportation right —of —way or area, and public
lands whether owned by the State, the United States, or an agency thereof (except
County —owned open space), or a lake, reservoir, stream, or other natural or
artificial waterway between the annexing municipality and the land proposed to be
annexed.
Municipality boundaries shall not be extended more than three miles in any
direction from any point of such municipal boundary in any one year. Such
three —mile limit may be exceeded if such limit would have the effect of dividing a
parcel of property held in identical ownership, provided that at least 50 percent
of the property is within the three —mile limit. Such three —mile limit may also be
exceeded for the annexation of an enterprise zone. The area within the Southeast
Quadrant which is within an enterprise zone is depicted in Map III.
2. Annexation Master Plan (CRS Title 31 -12- 105(11 —[e
Prior to completion of any annexation within the three —mile area, the municipality
shall have in place a plan for that area which describes the proposed location,
character, and extent of streets, subways, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, park—
ways, playgrounds, squares, parks, aviation fields, other public ways, grounds,
open spaces, public utilities, and terminals for water, light, sanitation, and
transportation. Power to be provided by the municipality and the proposed land
uses for the area shall also be addressed. Such plan shall be updated at least
once annually.
— 5 —
{
o r
W 0 > b
a
I I F
AX
P 7
I '�, 1 L_:r+�'� t' -,, �.` ___ ._i: �. _ ��. •• ; tom_— f 1,�.. . �.
in 0
` I :� { � .I ' ". -:- y ea - - - n........_... c�. �� j . r • • .. . ' ,. ��:.�i•..._.. `-�
rJ i e o : G: :7: r / •.�_~• yk•
A .
�1 - � • �"�' •� mot' a a_, {rrn..•r - � ~ - .. •ry.,
...... � �;, •fir �
r
off
Ai 4441,i
i i; �•
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Development
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
A
z
N
r-a
P.,
P4
W
MAP:
I1I
— 6 —
3. Annexation Impact Report (CRS Title 31- 12- 108.5)
The municipality shall prepare an impact report concerning any proposed annexation
at least twenty —five days before the date of the hearing. Such report shall not
be required for annexations of ten acres or fewer in total area or when the
municipality and the Board of County Commissioners governing the area proposed to
be annexed agree that the report may be waived. Such report shall include as a
minimum a map or maps of the municipality and adjacent territory to show the
following information:
a. the present and proposed boundaries of the municipality in the vicinity of the
proposed annexation;
b. the present streets, major trunk water mains, sewer interceptors and outfalls,
other utility lines and ditches, and the proposed extension of such streets
and utility lines in the vicinity of the proposed annexation;
c. the existing and proposed land use pattern in the areas to be annexed;
d. a copy of any draft or final pre — annexation agreement, if available;
e. a statement setting forth the plans of the municipality for extending to or
otherwise providing for, within the area to be annexed, municipal services
performed by or on behalf of the municipality at the time of annexation;
f. a statement setting forth the method under which the municipality plans to
finance the extension of the municipal services into the area to be annexed;
g. a statement identifying existing districts within the area to be annexed; and
h. a statement on the effect of annexation upon local public school district
systems including the estimated number of students generated and the capital
construction required to educate such students.
B. CITY ANNEXATION REQUIREMENTS
This section describes general guidelines to be followed by those persons
(hereinafter referred to as the Petitioner) wishing to petition the City of Pueblo
for annexation. The minimum requirements the Petitioner must meet are:
o The proposed annexation is a logical extension of the City's boundary and
municipal services; and
o The Petitioner shall submit a Property Master Plan (PMP) to City Council
for adoption. The PMP must comply with the policies of the Pueblo
Regional Comprehensive Plan and the Southeast Quadrant Annexation Master
Plan presently existing and as same may hereafter be amended.
The Petitioner shall provide a PMP to City representatives for review. Adequate
time for discussion, debate, and revision should be allowed. The PMP shall
consist of the following:
— 7 —
1. Development Plan
The Development Plan shall be prepared by the Petitioner in consultation with the
City's Subdivision Review Committee and Department of Planning and Development.
This plan must be in accordance with the requirements of Title 12- 4 -6(A) of the
1971 Code of Ordinances of the City of Pueblo and as same may be subsequently
amended. A phasing plan outlining the anticipated order of development projects
for the Property shall be included in the Development Plan.
2. Drainage Plan
The Drainage Plan submitted by the Petitioner shall be in accordance with the
Pueblo Storm Drainage Criteria Manual then in effect. This Plan must be certified
by a licensed Professional Engineer competent in the field of surface water
drainage engineering and registered in the State of Colorado.
The Drainage Plan shall address on —site and off —site surface water drainage, as
well as the effects of the proposed development upon downstream properties and
existing drainage facilities. Any associated impact identified in the Drainage
Plan will be mitigated through surface water drainage improvements financed by the
Petitioner. Stormwater detention facilities, designed and constructed in
accordance with the Manual may be used to mitigate the increased runoff due to
development. The Drainage Plan shall include a phasing plan outlining the order
of necessary drainage improvements.
3. Sanitary Sewer Report
The Petitioner shall prepare a Sanitary Sewer Report in accordance with criteria
specified by the Director of Public Works. This report shall be supported by
studies and reports prepared by a licensed Professional Engineer.
The report shall address the
will be designated by the
system and the impact on
addressed. Any impact by
Petitioner through sanitary
Sanitary Sewer Report shall p
needs of the entire sewer drainage basin. This basin
Director of Public Works. The existing wastewater
that system by the proposed development shall also be
the proposed development shall be mitigated by the
sewer improvements financed by the Petitioner. The
rovide a phasing plan for anticipated improvements.
In some cases, the Petitioner will be required to install oversized sanitary
sewers in the PMP area. These oversized sanitary sewers would serve future
development outside the PMP area but within the sewer drainage basin. A Sewer
Participation Cost Recovery Agreement may be entered into between the Petitioner
and the City. The Petitioner may then be reimbursed for the oversize cost by a
newly benefitted Property owner when any part of the benefitted Property within an
approved subdivision is connected, directly or indirectly, to such oversized
sewers located within the PMP area.
— 8 —
If the Petitioner constructs sewer improvements downstream from the master plan
area which will serve future development outside the master plan area, the Sewer
Participation Cost Recovery Agreement shall include provisions for reimbursement.
The Petitioner may be reimbursed for a pro —rata share of the costs of construction
of such downstream improvements, plus interest, by the benefitted Property owner
when any part of the benefitted Property is connected, directly or indirectly, to
such sewers.
The Sewer Participation Cost Recovery Agreement shall be in conformity with the
City's then existing ordinances and shall be approved by City Council.
a. Sanitary Sewer Report Criteria
The following criteria will provide guidelines for the planning and design of
sanitary sewers. These guidelines shall include planning criteria and minimum or
maximum controls of sewer design and construction. However, in unusual
circumstances or where special conditions dictate, certain deviations from the
standard criteria may be directed or approved by the Director of Public Works.
All improvements to the sanitary sewer system shall be planned and designed to
provide adequate service as specified by the following:
(1) Acreages for separate land uses, i.e., single — family, multifamily,
commercial, and industrial, shall be established based upon the Development
Plan.
(2) Sanitary sewer impact shall be computed for the entire sewer drainage basin
including the proposed development or annexation. Mains shall be designed to
accommodate the area as per criteria contained herein.
(3) The report shall include an analysis of the existing sanitary sewerage system
addressing the impact of additional flows, including but not limited to:
(a) location of all points on the City's existing sewer system where the new
system will connect;
(b) identification of hydraulic deficiencies in the system caused by the
development (these deficiencies will have been identified by the City
during an initial meeting with the developer);
(c) a discussion of any pumping stations, force mains, packaged treatment
plants, and other special equipment as needed;
(d) proposed corrections, improvements, or upgrading to relieve the existing
impacted system; and
(e) financing and scheduling of corrections, improvements, or upgrading to
-• relieve the existing system, including any private sewer agreements that
may be proposed.
— 9 —
(4) The report shall discuss and analyze areas upstream of the annexation site,
within the gravity drainage basin, that would impact a trunk line within the
site.
(5) The report shall identify on a United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Map - -Scale 1 to 24,000 - -the gravity drainage basin or basins incorporating
the proposed annexation site and the service boundary for the City's
wastewater treatment plant.
b. Design Criteria for Sanitary Sewers
(1) Design of sanitary sewers shall be in accordance with minimum design
standards and specifications for subdivisions of the City of Pueblo,
Colorado.
(2) Sewer lines shall be designed to flow at less than their capacity. Lines 15"
or less shall have a design capacity of 50 percent of the pipe depth. Lines
18" or larger shall have a design capacity of 75 percent of the pipe depth.
(3)
Flow Factors - -Peak
— Single — Family Residential -- 0.0042 cfs per acre
— Multiple— Family Residential -- 0.0009 cfs per unit
— Commercial -- 0.0040 cfs per acre
— Industrial -- 0.0051 cfs per acre
— High —Water Consuming Industries -- Special Study Required
— Institutional Use -- Special Study Required
— Areas Outside the Development Plan -- 0.0044 cfs per acre
— Average Infiltration /Inflow -- 0.0003 cfs per acre
(4) Areas with a high potential for groundwater infiltration shall be
identified. These areas shall be designed to allow an infiltration /inflow
(I /I) in accordance with Article 13, "Specifications for Sanitary Sewers."
Due to rapid conditional changes, the Department of Public Works shall not be
committed to any reported sewer capacities until the property has been legally
subdivided. The information in the Sanitary Sewer Report may need to be updated
and amended during subdivision procedures.
4. Transportation Plan
A Transportation Plan shall be submitted by the Petitioner in accordance with the
following criteria and outline specified by the City Traffic Engineer. The plan
shall be supported by studies and reports prepared by Professional Engineers
competent in the field of transportation and registered in the State of Colorado.
The plan shall be in conformance at a minimum with the goals and functional
classifications of the Year 2010 Plan as presently exists and as same may
hereafter be amended. The plan shall also be in conformance with the requirements
set forth in this Annexation Master Plan. The impact by the proposed development
— 10 —
(on —site and off —site, if deemed necessary by the City Traffic Engineer) to the
existing and proposed roadway system identified in this study will be mitigated
through traffic improvements financed by the Petitioner (such as but not limited
to additional roadway corridors, traffic signals, signal interconnect conduit and
wire, deceleration /acceleration lanes, and median islands). The Transportation
Plan shall provide a phasing plan of traffic improvements. The Transportation
Plan shall comply with existing and proposed roadways in adjacent subdivisions.
a. Transportation Plan Requirements
(1) Study Area Boundaries
(a) _Description of Study Area Boundaries - -The study area boundaries
shall include the area and intersections.
(b) Existing and Proposed Land Uses -- Proposed land uses shall be based
upon the Development Plan.
(c) Existing and Proposed Study Area Boundary Uses -- Proposed uses for
land areas which are outside the Development Plan, but within the
study area boundaries, shall be based upon existing zoning.
(d) Existi and Proposed Roadways and Intersections
(2) Study Area Trip Generation
(3) Study Area Trip Distribution
(4) Study Area Trip Assignment
(5) Study Area Existing Conditions and Proposed Traffic Volumes - -A study of
morning and evening peak hour site traffic shall be conducted. This
study shall address turning movements and site traffic, plus through
traffic including turning movements for current conditions. Twenty —year
traffic projections and build —out traffic conditions must be discussed.
(6) Critical Movement Analysis - -This analysis will include Volume /Capacity
and Level of Service Analysis at Critical Intersections for peak hours
for existing conditions and at build —out.
(7) Traffic Signal Progression - -The study shall determine traffic signal
locations using criteria from the Uniform Traffic Control Devices Manual
and corresponding two —way traffic signal progression pattern. Traffic
progression is of paramount importance. A spacing of one —half mile for
all intersections should be maintained to ensure optimum two —way signal
progression. An approved traffic engineering analysis will be made to
properly locate all intersections and connecting access approaches that
may require signalization.
— 11 —
(8) Traffic
occurring
from the
accident
roadway
developer
off —site
(9)
Accidents - -The Plan shall review the number and type of accidents
at study area intersections. This information is available
Pueblo Police Department. Estimates of increased or decreased
potential shall be evaluated. The consultant will recommend
improvements based on accepted safe design practices. The
shall only be responsible for additional impact upon existing
roadways and intersections.
Recommendations
(a) The Transportation Plan shall identify the project construction
phases indicating the time and order at which specific street
improvements and traffic controls shall be required.
(b) Proposed principal and minor arterials shall be constructed to
standards as stated in the City's Code of Ordinances, Title XII,
Public Improvements and Planning. Construction may be phased at the
discretion of the City of Pueblo.
(10) Critical Lane Capacity Analysis
(a) The plan shall include a Peak Hour Volume /Capacity (V /C) Analysis at
critical intersections based on traffic generated by development at
build —out. An intersection improvement plan shall be prepared based
on the results of the V/C Analysis.
(11) Study Area Criteria.
(a) Trip generation criteria from the Institute of Transportation
Engineers' Trip Generation Guide (latest edition) shall be utilized
for this Transportation Plan.
(b) Critical Lane Capacity Analysis is to be determined using the most
current edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (Special Report 209),
as amended.
(c) Level of Service "C," as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual
shall be the goal for street design.
5. Zoning and Subdivision
The property shall be zoned and subdivided in conformity with the approved master
plan pursuant to the requirements of Titles 12 and 17 of the 1971 Code of
Ordinances of the City of Pueblo, and as same may be subsequently amended, and the
Land Use Policies of the 1980 Pueblo Regional Comprehensive Development Plan and
any subsequent amendments to such plan.
— 12 —
6. Public Facilities
The Petitioner shall dedicate land and rights —of —way for public uses and
facilities required by the City. These shall include, but are not limited to,
sanitary and storm sewers, utilities, drainage ways, roadways, trail systems, and
parks. The Petitioner at his expense shall construct and install all on —site and
off —site improvements required by the City including, but not limited to, streets,
curbs and gutters, sidewalks, trail systems, bridges, traffic control devices,
sanitary sewers, storm sewers, drainage channel improvements and facilities, but
excluding public buildings such as fire stations.
7. Utilities
The Petitioner shall comply with all applicable requirements of the City of Pueblo
(sanitary and storm sewers), Public Service Company (gas), WestPlains Energy
Corporation (electric), Telecommunications, Inc. (TCI Cablevision), and Pueblo
Board of plater Works (water) for the installation of mains, lines, stations, or
other utility facilities.
8. Amendments
The City of Pueblo Department of Planning and Development is currently revising
annexation guidelines. Petitioners should inquire about updated annexation
requirements prior to beginning preparation of the Property Master Plan.
— 13 —
III. REFERENCE MATERIAL
PREFACE
A number of plans were referenced in the preparation of the Southeast Quadrant
Annexation Master Plan. The three fields of study and documents referenced are:
A. THE ENVIRONMENT
1. IMGRID Analysis
2. Section 208 Water Quality Program, Pueblo, Colorado
3. General and Engineering Geology of the Northern Part of Pueblo, Colorado
B. LAND USE AND INFRASTRUCTURE
1. The 1980 Pueblo Regional Comprehensive Development Plan
2. City of Pueblo Urban Parks and Recreation Recovery Action Program
3. Airport Subdivision Sketch Plan
4. Air Facilities Plan
5. Pueblo Memorial Airport Master Plan
6. Airport Noise Compatibility Program
7. Pueblo Board of Water Works Distribution Plan
8. Sanitary Sewerage and Wastewater Treatment Facilities
9. Pueblo Airport Industrial Park Wastewater Treatment Plant Preliminary
Engineering Study
C. TRANSPORTATION
1. Analysis District Evaluation,_to the Year 2010 (by Traffic Zone)
2. Year 2010 Transportation Plan
3. Pueblo Airpark Access Alternatives Study
A. THE ENVIRONMENT
1. IMGRID Analysis
The IMGRID (Improved Grid) Analysis was prepared in 1977 and determined, by
computer analysis and mapping, the geographic location of natural hazards and
resources in Pueblo County, Colorado. The analysis was designed to address the
concerns described in Footnote 37 of Senate Bill 468 (1975) as Pertinent Matters
and includes:
a. Floodplain Hazards;
b. Wildfire Hazards;
— 15 —
c. Geologic Hazards
(1) Unstable Slopes
(2) Mud Flows /Debris Fans
(3) Expansive Soils and Rocks
(4) Ground Subsidence
(5) Seismic Effects
(6) Radioactivity
(7) Rockfalls
(8) Landslides
(9) Avalanches
d. Mineral Resource Areas
2. Section 208 Water Quality Program, Pueblo, Colorado
Water Quality Management Planning is required under Section 208 of the Federal
Clean Water Act, Public Law 92 -800. The purpose of this act is to preserve and
enhance the nation's water systems. The Pueblo 208 Dater Quality Program was
first implemented in 1977 with subsequent updates in 1981, 1984, and 1987 by the
Pueblo Area Council of Governments (PACOG). The Pueblo Water Quality Management
Plan is now comprised of six (6) volumes:
Volume I: 208 Stream Segment Analysis, June, 1977;
Volume II: 208 Point Source, Non —Point Source, Institution /Management
Subplans, June, 1977;
Volume III: 208 Final Plan and Implementation Schedule, July, 1977;
Volume
IV:
208
Plan
Update,
1981
Volume
V:
208
Plan
Update,
1984; and
Volume VI: 208 Plan Update, 1987.
These plans analyzed the main water sources, both ground and surface, for Pueblo
County. Wastewater facilities were examined; point and non —point pollution
sources were assessed; methodology and results of water tests were documented; and
stream segments were analyzed. The following surface watercourses were included:
a. the Arkansas River -- Segments A, B, and C;
b. the Fountain Creek;
c, the St. Charles River -- Segments A, B, and C;
d. Greenhorn Creek -- Segments A and B;
e. Six —Mile Creek; and
f. the Huerfano River.
The 1987 208 Plan Update reviews point source pollution, sludge production, and
wastewater disposal by the City and outlying sanitary districts.
— 16 —
3. General and Enaineerina Geoloav of the Northern Part of Pueblo. Colorado
This Geological Survey Bulletin 1262 was prepared by Glenn R. Scott in 1969. This
document has located bedrock formations and surficial deposits in Pueblo County.
The bulletin has also identified general characteristics and engineering concerns
for each geologic member.
B. LAND USE AND INFRASTRUCTURE
1. Pueblo Regional Comprehensive Development Plan
The Pueblo Regional Comprehensive Development Plan was prepared by the Pueblo
Regional Planning Commission and adopted by the City of Pueblo and Pueblo County
in 1980. The purpose of this document is to prepare for necessary and desirable
growth through the development ._of a master plan for physical development. The
plan includes eight major parts, or elements, which address concerns associated
with physical development in the region. The eight elements are Land Use,
Housing, Public Facilities, Environmental Quality, Land Conservation, Parks and
Recreation, Transportation, and Downtown Pueblo.
The overall concept that guides the plan's recommendations is the desire that the
Pueblo region grow in a way that will not detract from the quality of life of its
residents. The plan's goals, policies, and land use recommendations consistently
attempt to reflect the community's desire to be prepared to accept growth which is
deemed to be necessary and desirable for all residents.
2. City of Pueblo Urban Parks and Recreation Recovery Action Proaram
The City of Pueblo Urban Parks and Recreation Recovery Action Program (UPARR) was
prepared by the Pueblo Regional Planning Commission and adopted by City Council in
1981. The UPARR assessed the physical inventory, the rehabilitative capability,
and the concerns of the City of Pueblo Parks and Recreation Department.
This federally funded program was designed to help physically and economically
distressed urban areas improve recreational opportunities. The conclusion of this
report states that Pueblo's physical parks system is evidence of a firm foundation
for providing the open spaces and services needed and requested by its
population. Recent emphasis to provide parks on the neighborhood level has had
positive results, but future planning should consider more strongly the need for
quality design, construction, rehabilitation, renovation, operations, maintenance,
and the need for the development of additional City —wide facilities.
The UPARR report is presently being updated to fulfill Federal eligibility
requirements for possible funding of future projects.
3. Airport Subdivision Sketch Plan
Although the AIP is outside of the Southeast Quadrant study area, it is
immediately adjacent to the study area; therefore, it is necessary to examine any
impact of potential growth which could offset the Southeast Quadrant.
— 17 —
The City of Pueblo in 1986 prepared a sketch plan for the subdivision of the
airport property. The purpose was to enhance development opportunities at the
airport and AIP. The sketch plan (See Map IV) is part of the process required by
the Pueblo County's subdivision process. It identifies roadway and utility
corridors and the general arrangement of the lots.
4. Air Facilities Plan
The Air Facilities Plan was prepared
Department of Planning and Development.
of land available for industrial devel
is reserved for continued development
addresses land availability, ground
availability.
in October, 1986, by the City of Pueblo
The plan's goal is to maximize the amount
Dpment while ensuring that sufficient land
of the airport. The Air Facilities Plan
access, air —side access, and utility
5. Pueblo Memorial Airport Master Plan
This Airport Master Plan was prepared in 1975 to provide an objective analysis of
the facilities and capabilities of the airport. It presents a detailed, yet
flexible, plan for the future needs of the airport. Based upon the available
data, this plan was designed to furnish reasonable recommendations for the
aviation needs of 1975 and thereafter for the Pueblo area.
Recommendations and alternatives for meeting aviation demands were presented.
These provided for short —range (5— year), intermediate range (10— year), and long
range (20 —year) development.
It should be understood that this document, although detailed, is for use as a
general guideline for the continued development of the airport and AIP areas. The
development recommendations set forth in this analysis provide guidance for
long —range airport needs of the Pueblo area. The Airport Master Plan is currently
being updated.
6. Airport Noise Compatibility Program
Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 implements portions of Title I of the
Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979. It establishes a single system
for the measurement of airport (and background) noise, a single system for
determining the exposure of individuals to airport noise, and a standardized
airport noise compatibility planning program. The planning program includes:
(1) a provision for the development and submission to the FAA of noise exposure
maps and noise compatibility programs by airport operations;
(2) standard noise units, methods, and analytical techniques for use in airport
noise assessments;
(3) identification of land uses which are normally considered compatible (or
non — compatible) with various levels of noise around airports; and
(4) procedures and criteria for FAA approval or disapproval of noise
compatibility programs by the administrator.
— 18 —
aoaroaoo AYMOVOa
-
II v
- N
I _ 1
LU
fn Cq -I
z a //w� w cc z I I: U
u•I Q
3. W W � Q Q O W c - - -��
(D ¢ a a I - - - - -- _
a W
a CC x > Q O I: N
Z as a. J LL
O I
F-
a
Z =
:W C
' •Z :riF N
:a
M I I : N Y�
Li. W X �• .
:U
0
y U:
o. �— -
v:�
C
7
Q O ( ......... ....
J 9t CJ /
Q O
I .......... ...........................:... ........................... N
�� Z • i
LLI
z T — I
O�
CO I N I ;
C
LU
¢
,r. 1
O
. M
W
W
CL
" ` N001H000 AVMGYoki
a�
L
O
c
3
`
M
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Development
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
P4
w
O
H
a
MAP:
IV
- 19 -
The program includes consideration of alternative noise control that might be
employed, as well as appropriate land use planning strategies. The goal of the
overall program is for the airport proprietor, in consultation with State /local
planners, local aviation groups, and interested citizens, to develop a balanced
and cost— effective program to minimize and /or mitigate the airport's noise impact
on local communities. This study is currently being prepared.
7. Pueblo Board of Dater Works 14ater Distribution Plan
In 1979, Black and Veatch consulting engineers prepared a water distribution
system study for the Pueblo Board of bJater 'Norks. The report provides a master
plan for improvement and construction by the Board in its continuing program of
water distribution. The purpose was to determine the adequacy of the Pueblo water
distribution system in satisfying present and future water needs through the Year
1985. The report provides a general guideline for projections made through the
Year 2000 and contains area development studies to determine present and estimated
future population distribution G�ithin the service area. Estimates of water
demands and predicted distribution demands on the system were also analyzed.
In addition, in 1976 the Board of Hater !Works published an informational booklet,
entitled Pueblo's !later System which describes the sources of water supply and
follows the water through the treatment system and to the tap.
8. Sanitary Sewerage and !Wastewater Treatment Facilities
The Sanitary Sewerage and Wastewater Treatment Facilities Engineering Report was
prepared in 1971 by Sellards and Grigg, Inc. The report presents a study of the
City's sanitary sewage and wastewater treatment facilities. Proposals for
additions and corrections to the existing system are set forth in order to plan
for an efficient treatment system for the present and future needs of the City.
The scope of the work within this report includes the following:
a. development of a long —range master plan for the sewerage and establishment of
a service area boundary; and
b. analysis of the existing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and recommended
improvements to correct present deficiencies and to provide capacity for
future needs.
Since the development of the report, the City has made many of the improvements to
the sanitary sewer collections system and has constructed a new wastewater
treatment facility. The new WWTP will accommodate the sanitary sewer needs in
Pueblo to the Year 2004. The City of Pueblo's Department of Public Uorks is
responsible for updating the SO report.
— 20 —
9. Pueblo Airport Industrial Park Wastewater Treatment Plant Preliminary
Engineering Study
CH21 Hill Consultants prepared the Pueblo Airport Industrial Park Wastewater
Treatment Plant and Preliminary Engineering Study for the City of Pueblo in March,
1988. A supplement to the study was prepared in February, 1989. The original
study stated that the existing airport wastewater treatment facility would not be
capable of processing wastewater flow and loading in the event of significant
industrial growth within the AIP. Several industrial development scenarios were
used to calculate five flow and loading projections.
In a subsequent study, CH2M Hill included another possible alternative. This
alternative would require that additional wastewater be pumped back to the main
City plant and that current flows be treated at the airport WWTP. It was
determined in the supplemental study that continued treatment of current flows at
the airport's WWTP is not a feasible alternative. CH2M Hill replaced this
alternative with a pumping systerii- -four (4) pump stations placed strategically
along the route of the pipeline. They have identified this alternative to be the
most economical. In addition, it allows for flexibility and better access into
the system.
The construction of the pipeline and pumping stations began in January, 1992, and
are scheduled to be completed in the summer of 1992. Once the pipeline and
pumping stations are operational, the airport's WWTP will be abandoned.
C. TRANSPORTATION
Analysis District Evaluation To The Year 2010 (bv Traffic Zone
The Pueblo Analysis District Evaluation To The Year 2010 (by Traffic Zone) was
prepared in December of 1984 by the Pueblo Regional Planning Commission. This
report is part of the "Urban (3 -C) Transportation Planning Process" administered
through the Urban Transportation Planning Division (UTPD) of the Pueblo Area
Council of Governments (PACOG). The report is in support of the transportation
network analysis conducted by agencies involved in preparation of the "Year 2010
Transportation Plan."
Projections of population, dwelling units, and employment are provided for the
Years 1990, 2000, and 2010. One hundred and thirty -nine (139) traffic zones in
the urban "3 -C" analysis area and 34 traffic zones in the non -urban area of Pueblo
County have been examined.
The urban (3 -C) traffic zones were grouped into 11 analysis districts for the
purpose of this report. Each zone was then examined as to its degree of develop-
able land, stability of environment, activity type (residential, commercial, or
industrial), predominant age of structures, and historical change in population.
Population predictions were then assigned a share of expected change.
The traffic zones were analyzed as to their future growth and transportation
needs. Information pertinent to the Southeast Quadrant has been included in the
"Transportation Network" section of this report.
- 21 -
2. The Year 2010 Transportation Plan Report
The Pueblo Urban Area Year 2010 Transportation Plan report, January, 1990, was
prepared by the PACOG s UTPD and the Colorado Department of Highways' Division of
Transportation Planning, in cooperation with the U. S. Department of
Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
The report is an end — product of a process that began with an analysis of the
existing transportation system -- Analysis District Evaluation to the Year 2010 (by
traffic zone) -- progressed through development of a long —range plan, then evolved
into a continuing monitoring phase.
The plan's objectives are:
a. To adopt a revised transportation plan for the Pueblo urbanized area with a
long —range planning horizon for the Year 2010.
b. To identify transportation system needs compatible with revised projections of
development in the Pueblo urbanized area through the Year 2010.
c. To perform a systems level evaluation of the social, economic, and
environmental impact of alternative land use and transportation plans.
Map V identifies the functional classification of major transportation routes as
identified in the Year 2010 Transportation Plan.
3. Pueb Airpark Access Alternatives Stud
Recent developments at the AIP have resulted in traffic congestion and delays
within the AIP internal traffic system during the peak hours. In response to the
development and activity at the AIP, the FY 1987 Unified Planning Work Program
listed Task C. 6. as the "Airport Corridor Study." The Urban Transportation
Planning Division contracted with the City of Pueblo's Department of Planning and
Development to complete this study. The objective of this study was to identify
and assess the environmental, economic, social, and traffic impact of the
alternative corridors. The six alternative corridors studied are identified on
Map VI. This study concluded that no single alternative completely addressed the
AIP's transportation needs at "build— out." However, a combination of these
alternatives can provide a solution. There are many possible combinations of
alternatives that together can form a course of action.
The Pueblo Area Council of Governments approved and supported the construction of
improvements to the Paul Harvey Boulevard interchange followed by the extension of
William White Boulevard to State Highway 47.
If at the time when a second access is needed and the right —of —way or funding for
the William White Boulevard extension is not available, the 36th Lane Alternative,
-or 27th Lane Alternative, can address a short —term need depending upon the area of
development. The course ultimately chosen will be determined by the availability
of funds, timing, and need
— 22 —
tea. 1
I I
1
1
,..... i..? .... i.IN •.�..
r 11 N r R�1 • .�. • • •
... et 1:'" tom:
:: •
�.... .... a 'emu:
�••' • N011IN iM
L` ....
uacric•
� g
I i
H
P4
O
1
:I
...�..
cSNmTVrN@i
.TM
34,44q,"
KEY:
, ,!�Y
north
Go
z
0
U
r v r^ `
V`
Z
U
a
a
oC )O
H
H
u•a r... 1. i
iRT iD.
W
yj
Hz
aH
CDVNTT I,rtN .D.
Fj
- , p
.... ..
.: ....
.........
p
c"
L O
1
\`
MiCMDIfON 11 D.
�
1 r � ,
z
.�� FREEWAY
EXPRESSWAY
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
MINOR ARTERIAL
COLLECTOR
- - -- CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Develop MAP:
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN V
- 23 -
1111211111
.L
a-
O
C
36TH LANE
BAXTER RD.
B ACULITE M ESA RD
1
1
1
1
1p
1
d' z
u
BON FDRTE �-
m
z
O
O
JERRY MURPHY
HUDSON
INTERSTATE 25
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & D evelopment
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
0
}
s
W
H
H
Qi
z
W
E-4
U
H
MAP:
VI
- 24 -
.16
1 m
0>
z
> J
J CD
a
m w
J
w f'
J A
L
r
Ci
> > =3
�.AAU
m 3 �
w �Q
40 -
0 0 3
�� °
�
Q } J O GS
=_
ao
r
oir
'rt C7 0
V
-
Z 2 r Co
o ad 0 w
�wwui
ozz cc:)w
c o
F" T. Z x =3
TROY
z (�
r
t 0
W
0 Co C4 Co
o
X66
NOnWOOD
HUDSON
INTERSTATE 25
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & D evelopment
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
0
}
s
W
H
H
Qi
z
W
E-4
U
H
MAP:
VI
- 24 -
IV. THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT THREE —MILE ANNEXATION PLAN
PREFACE
The population of the City of Pueblo is predicted to reach 110,000 persons by the
Year 2000, resulting in an increase of 10,000 persons. It is anticipated that
this growth will be largely fueled by increased employment at the AIP. Recent
trends indicate that a substantial portion of the accompanying residential growth
will occur within the Southeast Quadrant. Proper planning of the development in
this quadrant will ensure compatibility with existing land uses and will also
ensure provision of a smooth transportation system.
This plan is the result of an extensive inventory and analysis of the quadrant's
environmental and man —made conditions. These conditions, along with potential
development restrictions, were simultaneously analyzed in order to identify areas
which would require more restrictive land use and development requirements. The
Southeast Quadrant Three —Mile Annexation Plan will facilitate development by
establishing logical patterns of land use based upon the needs of the community in
accordance with the adopted standards and policies of the City of Pueblo.
It is the intent of this plan to encourage the most appropriate use of the land to
minimize future problems that result from incompatible development. It is further
intended that by identifying the area's present resources, natural and man —made,
the suitable preservation or utilization of these resources will allow for a
carefully developed community.
This plan is designed to meet the requirements of the Municipal Annexation Act of
1965 (Section 31- 12- 105[l][e], CRS [1988 Cum. Supp.]) as amended by Senate Bill 45
(1987). The 1987 amending bill requires that the plan describe the location,
character, and extent of streets, bridges, waterways, waterfronts, parkways,
playgrounds, parks, aviation fields, and other public grounds, public utilities,
and terminals for water, light, sanitation, transportation, and power to be
provided by the municipality. In addition, the bill requires the identification
of proposed land uses for the area.
The City's "Three —Mile Annexation Plan" is a compendium of all the plans and
reports previously referenced in this document. It shall serve as the official
"three —mile annexation plan" for the Southeast Quadrant but will not supersede the
Pueblo Regional Comprehensive Development Plan except insofar as the Three —Mile
Annexation Plan shall be used to identify proposed land uses in that area, defined
as the "proposed urban extension area" within the Southeast Quadrant. The
Three —Mile Annexation Plan shall be used to provide guidance in the review of
development proposals and in the negotiation of annexation agreements.
The boundaries of this study area are U. S. Highway 50 —B to the north, the
St. Charles River on the east, the Comanche power generating plant to the south,
and Interstate 25 to the west. The eastern boundary of the Southeast Quadrant has
been extended further than the required three miles in order to align with the
easterly boundary of the Northeast Quadrant Annexation Master Plan. The study
area has been partitioned into two areas:
— 25 —
(1) the proposed urban extension area representing that portion of the Southeast
Quadrant in which municipal services could logically be extended (See Map II,
Page 4); and
(2) the remainder of the study area which will not be master planned.
The primary components of this plan include the identification of existing and
proposed major transportation corridors, the anticipated land use around these
corridors, and specific development guidelines. Secondary components include the
anticipated location of major public facilities and district and urban parks
within the proposed urban extension area.
A. EXISTING AND PROPOSED MAJOR TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS
Roadway proposals for the Southeast Quadrant are intended to provide a
transportation system that will efficiently serve a growing community. These
corridors should be established so that adequate right —of —way and construction
agreements can be made at the time of subdivision review. The desired alignment
of these corridors is based on a minimum of one —mile spacing between the major
transportation corridors' standards. The exact locations of these corridors have
not yet been determined, and Map VII is intended only to offer a simulated graphic
depiction of the proposed transportation pattern of the Southeast Quadrant. In
addition, Map VII also delineates those roadways identified in The Year 2010
Transportation Plan report (existing corridors) from those roadways that are
long —range planning (proposed) corridors.
Transportation corridors and facilities which are proposed for the Southeast
Quadrant include:
1. East /West Corridors
The major east /west transportation corridor is U. S. Highway 50 —B in the Southeast
Quadrant's proposed urban extension area. Due to the Highway's location and
volume capacity, and due to the natural barrier of the Arkansas River on the
south, no additional major east /west corridors will be necessary within the
proposed urban extension area. Increased development within this area will make
construction of a highway frontage road viable. In addition to serving future
development, this frontage road would provide an increased element of safety by
controlling access onto U. S. Highway 50 —B.
2. North /South Corridors
Baxter Road is the only principal north /south arterial in the proposed urban
extension area. The following roadways are classified as minor north /south
arterials: Joplin Avenue (Colorado Highway 227), Baxter Road (Colorado Highway
233), and 36th Lane (Colorado Highway 231).
— 26 —
- 27 -
It is anticipated that along with growth in this Southeast area, the demand for
additional north /south transportation routes will increase. Proposed major north/
south transportation corridors include the southern extension of 27th Lane and the
southern extension of Paul Harvey Boulevard, as identified in the Year 2010
Transportation Plan report. The construction of a bridge over the Arkansas River
will be necessary in order to extend 27th Lane. Major grade separated
intersections will be necessary at the points where U. S. Highway 50 —B crosses
27th and 36th Lanes. The exact alignment for new road construction has not yet
been determined. In some cases, it may be necessary to relocate roadways in order
to accommodate anticipated volume in a manner that is both safe and compatible
with existing land uses. The Southeast Corridor Transportation Plan, adopted by
PACOG in January, 1991, provides a detailed discussion of potential right —of —way
alignment for the Paul Harvey Boulevard extension south to Baxter Road.
3. Proposed Roadway Construction Standards
All roadways within this quadrant shall be constructed to the City's standards
then in effect. The City of Pueblo's goal for street design shall be no less than
Level —of— Service "C," as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual
It is envisioned that a new standard should be developed for transportation
corridors such as 27th Lane. The optimum standard right —of —way (ROW) for
principal arterial corridors should be 150 ft. This would include a 125 ft.
roadway ROW and a 25 ft. trail ROW. The roadway would be a minimum of four lanes
with five to six lanes being required at the intersection of major transportation
corridors, depending upon projected traffic volume. Public and private access
onto these roadways shall be strictly controlled as per the Colorado State Highway
Access Code The two opposing lanes of traffic would be separated by a median
with a minimum width of 20 ft. These medians should be designed and landscaped in
a manner that will minimize maintenance costs and in accordance with City
standards. Noise abatement measures, in the form of increased building setback
and /or construction of noise buffers, should be required to ensure compatibility
of residential development and `traffic noise. These roadways should be
constructed to include a pedestrian sidewalk on one side and a trail within the
25 ft. trail ROW on the other. All trail ROW dedication should be credited to the
parkland dedication where appropriate. The trails shall be constructed as per the
Master Trails Plan then in effect.
The City currently requires developers to pay the entire cost of roadway and
sidewalk construction. Due to the fact that the envisioned standard of these
corridors exceeds the City's current standard, the City may choose to study the
adoption of an impact fee, or alternate system, to help fund the construction of
these corridors.
B. THE PROPOSED URBAN EXTENSION AREA
All residential, commercial, and industrial development within the Southeast
Quadrant (more specifically, the proposed urban extension area, Map II) shall
conform to the City's Code of Ordinances then in effect and the goals and policies
of the Pueblo Regional Comprehensive Development Plan
— 23 —
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has established Design Noise Level (DNL)
guidelines to protect various land uses and noise sensitive activities (See
Table I). These levels, expressed in decibels on the "A" weighted scale (dBA),
represent the upper limit of acceptable traffic noise and are used to evaluate the
degree of impact which traffic noise has on human activities. These guidelines
are imposed on those roadways which utilize Federal funding. If traffic noise
computer modeling indicates that noise abatement measures are necessary,
construction of noise barrier walls and /or non — construction techniques are
considered. Non — construction techniques include prohibition or time restrictions
on certain vehicle types (trucks), exclusive land designation, modifications to
the speed limit, and increased setbacks for construction. All future development
shall comply with these guidelines when appropriate. Additional restrictions on
both development and noise abatement regarding airport noise contours are
discussed in the next section.
Zoning and land use policies impacted by airport noise shall be compatible with
airport operations. It is recommended that prior to the completion of the FAA
Part 150 Airport Noise Study and the Airport Master Plan Update, development
within airport noise zones be in accord with the standards found in Table I.
Petitioners seeking to annex property located within the Southeast Quadrant will
be required to grant a standard avigation easement to the City. All rezoning
requests within the proposed urban service area will be requested to grant a
standard avigation easement. A copy of said easement is attached as Appendix 1.
In an effort to better identify anticipated land uses, the proposed urban
extension area has been divided into three distinct regions (See Map VIII).
Proposed land uses are identified on Map IX.
Upper Region (See Map IX)
The upper region is bound on the north by U. S. Highway 50 —B and on the south by
the vacated Booth Orchard Ditch.- Although it lies east of the ditch, the
Meadowbrook Mobile Home Park has been included in this region for planning
purposes. Please note that in those areas where the ditch and the Special Flood
Hazard Area (100 —year floodplain) of the Arkansas River, Fountain Creek, and
specific tributaries intersect, the vacated Booth Orchard Ditch is used as the
dividing line.
The upper region is not ideal for extensive residential development. The closure
of Baxter Elementary School due to insufficient enrollment indicates a declining
residential intensity in the area. It is anticipated, however, that predicted
residential development within the Southeast Quadrant will require the reopening
of the school in the future.
The lack of new housing stock in the upper region may be attributed to its close
proximity to U. S. Highway 50, the Airport Industrial Park, the Pueblo Memorial
Airport, and proximity to airport noise zones. Currently, only a small area of
the upper region is impacted by airport noise; however, these noise zones may
change or expand as a result of airport growth. The planned instrumentation of
the north /south runway with resulting increased use will dramatically impact the
noise contours immediately south of the airport. A portion of the Baxter
community, currently a low to medium density residential (conventional and
— 29 —
manufactured) neighborhood (R -1, R -2, R -8), may be within the noise zone influence
area of the north /south runway. Residential development is not desirable within
this influence area. Compatible development is described in Table I.
TABLE I: DESIGN NOISE LEVEL /LAND USE RELATIONSHIPS
DESIGN
LAND USE NOISE
CATEGORY LEVEL
IN Leq
DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE CATEGORY
W
57 dBA Tracts of lands in which serenity and quiet are of extra —
(Exterior) ordinary significance and serve an important public need,
and where the preservation of those qualities is essential
if the area is to continue to serve its intended purpose.
Such areas could include amphitheaters, particular parks
or portions of parks, or open spaces which are dedicated
or recognized by appropriate local officials for activ—
ities requiring special qualities of serenity and quiet.
67 dBA
B (Exterior)
72 dBA
C (Exterior)
D -- dBA
52 dBA
E** * (Interior)
Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting rooms, schools,
churches, libraries, hospitals, picnic areas, playgrounds,
active sports areas, and parks.
Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in
Categories "A" and "B" above.
For requirements on undeveloped lands, see paragraphs lla
and llc of FHPM 7 -7 -3.*
Residences, motels, public meeting rooms, schools,
churches, libraries, hospitals, and auditoriums.
Federal —Aid Highway Program Manual (FHPM), Federal Highway Administration,
Vol. 7, Chapter 7, Section 3.
See paragraphs 8c, d, and e of FHPM 7 -7 -3 for method of application.
— 30 —
.b d
:? .• • ' M
O �:ti3>. • '"tit ;: �
z
`• � II 1 � W
:' ;;li � �•. , �'�' III
G
I �. I• I W
I - - -- -
E-
27111 Lnne (extended) '� I >•, .,
1� W
z
7\ x
Z Z p v�
p p _ o
%��:. a
W x
W � a
d
a
J W
W p —�
o- C) p i
W
City of Pueblo Department o-f Planning & Development MAP:
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN VIII
- 31 -
L J
O t
-1 IM
�I
-1 IM
T
__
a
r
ae
0
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Development
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
w
A
a
A
P-4
P4
a
MAP:
IX
- 32 -
U
Cfj
c o
N
c
.a
C
CO
cn
p
:E
3
cc
c
w
.�
c
to
O
CL
N
+' p y
�-
00
VJ
'�
c.
c2 EZ
m o
C
.
(Y =
C
?
-p
• E C o m
0
a
c
RS
_ O
(�
C
p M N
-C):2
«. c0
`
co
O
.n
.c p
U X
0)
L
g)
� I V
` p W.!
U V
co �
W
a.
G-
a)
J
_I
a o� E ¢
> 0
®
®
®�O
U
•
"i
T
__
a
r
ae
0
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Development
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
w
A
a
A
P-4
P4
a
MAP:
IX
- 32 -
Mobile home parks and subdivisions (R -7, R -8) shall be permitted where they
currently exist. Expansion of the parks and subdivisions should be closely
monitored and allowed only if compatible to airport operations and when opaque
screening and appropriate roadway noise buffers are provided. Additional mobile
home parks and subdivisions should be allowed in those areas that are suitable for
medium density, urban - residential use.
It is anticipated that the market will dictate concentrations of commercial/
industrial land uses at the intersections of major transportation corridors.
Clustering of subregional and highway commercial uses (B -2, B -3) should be
promoted at the intersections of U. S. Highway 50 -B with 27th Lane,
Paul Harvey Boulevard, Baxter Road, and 36th Lane. Commercial and office
development (B -3, 0 -1) which is mixed with light industrial uses (I -2) should be
permitted along the U. S. Highway 50 -B corridor. Simultaneous development of a
highway frontage road should be required.
The upper region is in a state of transition. It is expected that it will develop
as a mixed -use area, including light industrial, commercial, office uses, and
multifamily residential. It is also expected that many of these developments will
support activities at the airport and AIP. Heavy industrial uses are not
anticipated and should not be encouraged. Due to the existing mixed uses in the
upper region, development should be reviewed on a case -by -case basis. The density
of land development will be partially determined by the availability of water and
sanitary services in the area.
2. Middle P,eaion (See Mae IX
The middle region is bound on the north by the vacated Booth Orchard Ditch and on
the south by the northern boundary of the 100 -year floodplain. It also includes
the area east of the Nleadowbrook Mobile Horne Park (34th Lane) that is south of
U. S. Highway 50 -B and north of the 100 -year floodplain.
With the exception of one industrial area, the middle region consists of dryland
farming and scattered single- family residences. This type of rural - residential
development (one to five acres) should be encouraged in this region. The vacated
Booth Orchard Ditch should be viewed as a transition line between the upper and
middle regions, and medium to high density residential development should only be
considered within the middle region as sanitary sewer services become available.
Additional industrial and commercial development should be discouraged since
commercial nodes within the upper region will sufficiently serve the low- density
needs of the middle region.
As build -out of the upper region occurs and land use patterns and growth trends
emerge, modification of the middle region's proposed land use will be necessary.
3. Lower Region (See Map IX)
The lower region is bound on the north by the northern boundary of the 100 -year
floodplain and on the south by the Arkansas River. It is entirely within a
100 -year floodplain; and unless it can be demonstrated through issuance of a flood
hazard area development permit that said development will not be affected by a
flood of 100 -year magnitude, most types of development within this region should
be discouraged.
- 33 -
Although most types of development in this region should be discouraged, large
deposits of sand and gravel within these floodplains ensure that high levels of
extraction activity will continue in the lower region for many years. The
majority of the lower region has already been permitted for the extraction of
natural resources. These proposed extraction sites contain thousands of acres;
and due to bonding limitations and expense, reclamation plans have been filed only
on those acres currently being mined. Recent water augmentation law may impact
extraction plans which would result in exposed groundwater, thus impacting future
reclamation plans of those areas that contain a high groundwater table. It is
anticipated and should be encouraged that due to floodplain development
restrictions the majority of this region will be reclaimed for "open space/
wildlife" use. Reclamation of this property as "open space /wildlife" use will
enhance and further the trail system along the Arkansas River.
C. PUEBLO MEMORIAL AIRPORT AND INDUSTRIAL PARK
Airport
The airport and adjacent industrial park are located six miles east of Downtown
Pueblo and occupies 3,800 acres of land. The airport was established in 1943 as
an Army Air Corps Base. In 1953, the facility was transferred to the City for use
as a municipal airport. Occupying 2,900 acres with three runways, a terminal, and
complete air —side facilities, the airport serves as a major air facility to
Southern Colorado.
The Master Plan for Pueblo Memorial Airport by Isbill Associates, Inc., refers to
the primary trade area" as the geographic area from where the greatest majority
of airline passengers are normally generated." The "primary trade area" for the
airport includes Pueblo, Colorado City, and Pueblo West. "Secondary trade areas"
extend to La Junta, Rocky Ford, Walsenburg, and small mountain resorts. The
volume and type of air traffic (passenger or cargo) is related to the population,
seasonal employment, and economic climate of these trade areas.
Based on increasing population, rising employment opportunities, and increasing
business and industry in the Pueblo area, an increasing demand for all airport
services is probable. Pueblo's Aviation Director states that capacity at the
airport is for four commercial airlines. Beyond four airlines, the terminal
building and other facilities would be in need of major expansion.
The operations budget for the airport is allocated by the City of Pueblo.
Additional funding for capital improvements is available through the Federal
Aviation Administration's Entitlement Program. The airport has planned
approximately $2.5 million in proposed improvement projects. Federal funding is
allocated through a priority system. Projects such as those concerning air —side
facilities are of priority and receive funding over projects for renovation of
public areas. It is unlikely that Pueblo will receive the entire $2.5 million
since not all proposed projects are top priority.
— 34 —
2. The Airport Industrial Park
The remaining 900 acres that are not committed to airport operations have been
made available for light industrial uses. This zone (I -1 or I -2) allows for
wholesaling activities, printing, warehousing, and some types of manufacturing.
Initially, all the land in the AIP was owned by the City.
Between 1953 and the early 1980's, a small number of industrial users moved into
the AIP, including Dana Corporation, Metal Processing, Pueblo Diesel, OK Tooling,
the Government Printing Office, and Martec.
In the early 1980's, the Pueblo Economic Development Corporation (PEDCo), a joint
public /private economic development effort, was founded. PEDCo began actively
iiarketing the community and promoting the industrial development of the AIP. The
first major corporation to respond to the effort was the Sperry Corporation
(previously Unisys and now Paramax Systems Corporation, a division of Unisys)
which announced their intention_ to locate in Pueblo in 1984. They were followed
by the Target Distribution Center, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics, Kurt
Manufacturing, PCL Packaging, Atlas Pacific, Pryor Giggey, Trane Company, Glenn
Trucking Company, Kaiser Aerospace Electronics, and B. F. Goodrich. There are
496 acres of developable land still available at the AIP. Employment has grown
from an available average AIP census prior to the Sperry announcei 660 to a
census of approximately 3,119 as of Play, 1992.
3. Fire Protection -- Airport and Airport Industrial Park (AIP
A City fire station is located at the airport. It is equipped with a three —way
pumper truck, two crash trucks with foam and powder fire retardant, and three
two— person shifts. The station's protection service area includes the airport
terminal, air —side facilities, and the AIP. Presently, the annual operation's
expenditure for the airport station is $248,000 (1988).
In the case of an emergency, the airport fire fighters and at least one other
station from the City are simultaneously dispatched. The airport crew usually
arrives within minutes and after assessing the scene can request additional
support if needed. If an emergency occurs in the AIP, the same sequence is
followed. However, when sufficient support crews arrive the airport team must
return to its station so as to ready itself for any air —side emergency.
The City's Fire Department and the County's Volunteer Rural Fire Department have
a standing mutual aid agreement which provides that either department will respond
to aid the other on request. The one exception is in the event of an air —side
emergency, in which case the rural fire fighters are immediately dispatched.
Rural Station Plumber 2, located on Baxter Road, is two miles from the airport and
has a response time of two to three minutes. It is staffed by a four — person crew
and equipped with a pumper truck and foam fire retardants.
— 35 —
4. Emergency Services
The greatest shortfall in emergency services at the airport is that of medical
attention, according to the Aviation Director. Firemen and police officers are
often licensed as Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs), but any advanced aid or
transportation to a medical facility must first be dispatched to the airport from
the City. If a rather lengthy delay is incurred, it could be detrimental in the
case of an emergency.
5. Airport Police Protection
The airport and the AIP are primarily a City development project on City land.
Currently, all law enforcement and regulation is provided by the Pueblo City
Police Department with the assistance of airport and private agency security
personnel.
The City Police have incorporated the airport into the City's Southeast area
police beat. However, because of the busy nature of this patrol, the airport is
not frequently accommodated. Night shifts are not scheduled to patrol the airport
or the AIP.
Federal law requires that a uniformed police officer be present at the airport
terminal when departing passengers are screened. No officer is permanently
assigned to this duty. lJhen a commercial airline is scheduled for departure, a
City Police officer must fill the duties at the airport.
City Law Enforcement Code 3 -1 -4 states that all Pueblo City traffic ordinances
will apply to the airport, and that the airport director is empowered to enforce
these ordinances. Currently, airport personnel enforce parking regulations and
City Police enforce all other traffic ordinances. City Offense Ordinances on
Personal Conduct shall apply at the airport and are enforced by City Police.
There are no formal, written agreements with the County which indicate whose
jurisdiction the airport falls under - -the City's or County's. Also, there are no
written guarantees with individual industries that the City Police will provide
the protection.
Airport security personnel patrol the airport and will assist any law enforcement
officer or private agency security personnel. The airport security personnel are
issued a Police commission which allows them to detain suspects and issue traffic
and parking citations. They do not carry firearms. Target and Paramax are the
only industries which employ security personnel. These security officers carry
firearms but do not leave the premises of their respective employers.
If law enforcement services continue as are currently practiced, and if the
airport builds out, a new City patrol beat may be needed. Annexation will neces—
sitate this beat and the revenue to pay for it. Currently, City Police protection
to the airport, terminal, and AIP is provided from other City patrol beats and is
not paid for from airport revenue or industry service fees.
— 36 —
6. Pueblo i1emorial Airport Noise Zones
Pueblo IMemorial Airport, located four miles east of the City of Pueblo, is
classified in the National Airport System Plan as a non —hub, medium— density
secondary air carrier airport. Its annual aircraft operations range between
100,000- 250,000 and 50,000- 100,000 annual passenger enplanements (departures). In
1991, there were 45,004 enplaned passengers. Air carrier service is provided by
Continental Express and United Express Airlines. The airport facilities are
available for both civilian and military uses. Flight training occurs 24 hours
daily by the Army, United Airlines, Aspen Airlines, Continental Express Airlines,
Trans Colorado Airlines, Evergreen International (for United Postal Service), and
Emery Air Freight.
The airport has two runways; the main runway is 10,496 x 150 ft, east /west and
the secondary runway is 7,000 x 150 ft. north /south. Over 90 percent of all
general aviation and military operations occur on the east —west runway.
Isbill Associates, Inc., prepared an Airport Plaster Plan for the airport in 1975.
Noise zones, or those areas significantly impacted by aircraft noise, were
measured by Composite Noise Ratings (CNR's). The following three zones were
identified: (1) Zone 5 - -115+ CNR's- -the highest next to the runway; (2) Zone
2-- 100 -115 CNR's in the takeoff and landing areas; and (3) Zone 1--90 -100 CNR's
outside those areas (See P-1AP X). Residential land uses were "Normally Acceptable"
by these FAA standards in Zone 1; "Normally Unacceptable" in Zone 2, and "Clearly
Unacceptable" in Zone 3.
These FAA standards are guidelines and "are not intended to substitute Federally
determined land uses for those determined to be appropriate by local authorities
in response to locally determined needs and values in achieving noise compatible
land uses."
These zones are indicative of older aircraft with noisier engines using different
takeoff and landing patterns than today's quieter planes. Pursuant to the Airport
and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, the FAA has streamlined the process for
determining noise exposure levels and land use capabilities around airports. All
Federal noise levels are now measured in Average Day —Night Sound Levels (LDN).
Through the use of quieter aircraft and different takeoff and landing patterns,
the noise zones have changed since 1975 (See MAP XI). Through the use of a
sophisticated computer modeling program developed by the FAA, aircraft types and
takeoff and landing patterns are computed for a iiore accurate depiction of today's
noise levels.
These new zones which were prepared in 1987 by the State Department of Local
Affairs for the City of Pueblo depict noise areas differently than in 1975,
especially in Zone 2. This study, while not approved by the FAA, is indicative of
a change in zone areas. A new Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) 150 noise study
will be forthcoming in 1992. This new study will be the most accurate study yet
prepared. It will use manual calculations, actual field measurements, and
computer modeling.
The CNR and LDN noise levels are compared in Table II. Land use compatibility
tables recommended by the FAA are listed in Table III. Zone 3 is recorimended
only for open space, agriculture, or industrial development. In Zones 1 and 2,
residential development and other land uses are recommended only with noise
abatement construction.
_37—
The airport's noise impact in the Southeast Quadrant is limited to a srnall portion
,vest of the Baxter coi�imunity. This area is contained within Noise Zone 1 which is
corupatible with host kinds of development (See Table I, pg. 30).
TABLE II
C01HPARISON OF CNR /LDPJ NOISE LEVELS RELATING TO LAND USE IMPACT
LDN" CNR
(AVERAGE DAY —NIGHT LAND USE IMPACT (COMPOSITE NOISE
ZONE SOUND LEVELS) (RESIDENTIAL) RATING) ZONE
- -- 0 -55 Clearly Acceptable - -- - --
ZONE 1
- -- 55 - Normally Acceptable 90 -100 (90 -100)
ZONE 1
(65 -70)
ZONE 2 ZONE 2
(70 - 75) 65 - Normally Unacceptable 100 -115 (100 -115)
ZONE 3 ZONE 3
(75 +) 75+ Clearly Unacceptable 115+ (115 +)
*65 LDN = 100 Decibels
75 LDN = 110 Decibels
— 40 —
TABLE III
LAND USES NORMALLY COMPATIBLE WITH VARIOUS NOISE LEVELS
Land Use*
Yearly Day -Night Average Sound Level (Ldn) In Decibels
Below
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
ZONE 3
ZONE 3
ZONE 3
65
65-70
70 -75
75 -80
80 -85
Over 85
Residential:
Residential, other than mobile homes and transient
Y
N -1
N -1
N
N
N
lodgings
Mobile home parks
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Transient lodgings
Y
N -1
N -1
N -1
N
N
Public Use:
Schools, hospitals and nursing homes
Y
25
30
N
N
N
Churches, auditoriums, and concert halls
Y
25
30
N
N
N
Governmental services
Y
Y
25
30
N
N
Transportation
Y
Y
Y -2
Y -3
Y -4
Y -4
Parking
Y
Y
Y -2
Y -3
Y -4
N
Commercial Use:
Offices, business and professional
Y
Y
25
30
N
N
Wholesale and retail -- building materials, hardware
Y
Y
Y -2
Y -3
Y -4
N
and farm equipment
Retail trade -- general
Y
Y
25
30
N
N
Utilities
Y
Y
Y -2
Y -3
Y -4
N
Communication
Y
Y
25
30
N
N
Manufacturing and production:
Manufacturing -- general
Y
Y
Y -2
Y -3
Y -4
N
Photographic and optical
Y
Y
25
30
N
N
Agricultural (except livestock) and forestry
Y
Y -6
Y -7
Y -8
Y -6
Y -8
Livestock farming and breeding
Y
Y -6
Y -7
N
N
N
Mining and fishing, resource production and
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
extraction
Recreational:
Outdoor sports arenas and spectator sports
Y
Y -5
Y -5
N
N
N
Outdoor music shells, amphitheaters
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Nature exhibits and zoos
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Amusements, parks, resorts and camps
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Golf courses, riding stables and water recreation
Y
Y
25
30
N
N
*The designations contained in this table do not constitute a Federal determination that any use of land covered by
the program is acceptable or unacceptable under Federal, State, or local law. The responsibility for determining
the acceptable and permissible land uses remains with the local authorities. FAA determinations under FAR Part
150 are not intended to substitute federally- determined land uses for those determined to be appropriate by local
authorities in response to locally- determined needs and values in achieving noise compatible land uses.
Y (Yes) -- Land use and related structures compatible without restrictions.
N (No) -- Land Use and related structures are not compatible and should be prohibited.
NLR -- Noise Level Reduction (outdoor to indoor) to be achieved through incorporation of noise attenuation Into the
design and construction of the structure.
20, 25, or 30 -- Land use and related structure generally compatible, measures to achieve NLR or 25, 30, or 35 must
be incorporated into design and Construction of structure.
1- Where the community determines that residential uses must be allowed, measures to achieve outdoor to indoor
Noise Level Reduction (NLR) of at least 25 dB and 30 dB should be incorporated Into building codes and be con-
sidered in individual approvals. Normal construction can be expected to provide a NLR of 20 dB, thus, the
reduction requirements are often stated as 5, 10, or 15 dB over standard construction and normally assume
mechanical ventilation and closed windows year round. However, the use of NLR criteria will not eliminate out-
door noise problems.
2- Measures to achieve NLR of 25 must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of these build -
Ings where the public is received, office areas, noise- sensitive areas or where the normal noise level is low.
3- Measures to achieve NLR of 30 must be Incorporated into the design and construction of portions of these build -
Ings where the public is received, office areas, noise - sensitive areas or where the normal noise level is low.
4- Measures to achieve NLR of 35 must be Incorporated Into the design and construction of portions of these build -
Ings where the public Is received, office areas, noise - sensitive areas or where the normal noise level is low.
5- Land use compatible provided special sound reinforcement systems are installed.
6- Residential buildings require an NLR of 25.
7- Residential buildings require an NLR of 30.
a- Residential buildings not permitted.
Sources: FAR Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, DOT -FAA, January 1981, Appendix A - Table 2, page ii.
- 41 -
D. DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
All development within the Southeast Quadrant shall be undertaken in accordance
with the then— existing City Code of Ordinance and the Policies of the Pueblo
Regional Comprehensive Development Plan
The following guidelines should be considered at the time of development for
properties within this quadrant.
1. Residential
a. Transitional high — density residential (R -4, R -5, R -6) or office (0 -1)
development should occur between single — farnily residential (R -1, R -2) and
commercial (B -1, B -2, B -3) land uses.
b. No single—family residential units (R -1, R -2, R -3, R -4) shall be permitted
private access onto major transportation corridors.
c. The Colorado State Highway Access Code shall be followed in permitting a
common access onto major transportation corridors for multiple residential
units (R -5, R -6, R -7).
d. All residential units adjacent to principal arterials and expressways shall be
required to provide properly engineered noise buffers (e.g., berms, fencing,
landscaping, or increased setback) between the residence and the roadway. The
buffers t>>ust feet a design standard, to be established by the City of Pueblo.
e. Every attempt should be made to pursue compatible zoning and land use policies
in those areas impacted by airport operations. It is highly recommended that
residential development within the airport's Noise Zones 1, 2, and 3 be in
accord with the standards found in Table III, page 41.
f. Petitioners for annexations within Noise Zones 1, 2, and 3 will be required to
grant to the City a standard avigation easement (See Appendix 1).
g. Every, effort should be made to link residential development with the City's
Blaster Trails System.
2. Commercial
a. Clustering of neighborhood and highway commercial uses depicted as commercial
nodes on Nap VIII should be permitted if compatible with existing land uses.
b. The Colorado State Highway Access Code shall be followed in permitting a
cor;imercial access onto major transportation corridors.
c. Commercial development within airport Noise Zones 1, 2, and 3 should be in
accord with the standards found in Table III, page 41.
d. Petitioners within all noise zones within the Southeast Quadrant will be
required to grant to the City a standard avigation easement (See Appendix 1).
— 42 —
3. Industrial
a. Industrial development should not be permitted adjacent to residential areas.
If such an industrial area develops, it must be contingent upon the
construction of an adequate buffer between the two uses.
b. The Colorado State Highway Access Code shall be followed in permitting an
industrial access onto major transportation corridors.
C. It is recommended that light industrial development be allowed to occur in the
"light industrial" and "mixed use" areas which contain an appropriate
industrial zone designation (depicted on Map IX, page 32). These are
primarily scattered areas south of U. S. Highway 50 and areas south of the
City limits boundary.
d. All industrial development within airport Noise Zones 1, 2, and 3 should be in
accord with the standards found in Table III, page 41.
e. Petitioners within all noise zones within the Southeast Quadrant will be
required to grant to the City a standard avigation easement (Appendix 1).
4. !Mineral Resource Extraction Areas
a. All mineral resource extraction areas which are adjacent to residential units
shall be required to provide properly engineered noise buffers between the
extraction area and the residences. The buffers must meet a design standard,
to be established by the City of Pueblo.
E. PUBLIC FACILITIES
1. Police
There are currently no plans to locate a Police substation within the area covered
by the Three —Mile Annexation Plan. However, extensive annexation and development
in this quadrant, coupled with growth at the AIP, will require that an additional
patrol route be instituted. This patrol route would adequately serve the
Southeast Quadrant's proposed urban extension service area at build —out.
2. Fire
Fire Department standards require that new fire stations be central to their
service area. No point should be further than one and one —half miles from the
station. Additional fire stations or expansion of staff and equipment will be
required at the Airport Fire Station No. 10 to provide protection to the proposed
urban- extension area at build —out. The exact locations of new fire stations have
not been investigated, as these locations will be dependent upon where development
takes place, new road construction, number and density of new buildings, and other
factors which may affect response time.
— 43 —
3. Schools
The proposed urban extension area is within both School Districts Nos. 60 and 70.
School District No. 60 does not have any immediate plans for new school sites
which would affect the Southeast Quadrant. School District No. 70 has discussed
the possibility of reopening the Baxter Elementary School if increased enrollment
warrants it.
F. PARKS. OPEN SPACE, AND TRAILS
1. Parks
Although intense residential development is not proposed, the existing Baxter
park — playground is not sufficient to meet the current or future needs of the
proposed urban extension service area. The existing park — playground, adjacent to
Baxter Elementary School, is owned by District No.70 and is maintained by County
Parks Department. Establishment of new parks and facilities in the proposed urban
extension service area will serve to correct existing deficiencies in the area.
Increased future recreational demand should be anticipated from the middle region,
which is proposed for rural residential development. If Baxter Elementary School
remains closed, adoption of the school as a multi —use recreation center should be
investigated.
The remainder of the Southeast Quadrant is severely deficient in adequate park
facilities.
Parks shall be dedicated by the developer of residential areas as per the City
Subdivision Ordinance, Section 12- 4 -7(e), or as may subsequently be amended. The
City of Pueblo will not accept a dedication of a park site unless said property
meets the criteria for the provision of free water, as set forth by the City of
Pueblo Board of t4ater Works'Rules and Regulations, October 18, 1983.
a. Neighborhood Park
A neighborhood park shall be developed on a minimum of five acres of land that is
accessible to all subdivision residents. A neighborhood park shall provide
sufficient areas for recreational activities including but not limited to
playgrounds, multipurpose courts, and open and shaded grassed areas.
When possible, dedicated parkland shall be located adjacent to school district
facilities for shared usage. Dedication of drainage ways, steep slopes, or other
"nondevelopable land" for parks is not to be permitted. The City may accept
drainage ways as a part of the master trails system if they are identified on the
master trails map and are improved in accordance with the Storm Drainage Criteria
Manual
-/14-
b. District Park
A district should be planned for the proposed intersection of 27th Lane extended
and the Arkansas River (See ;gap IX). This park should be a minimum of 25 acres
and provide specialized facilities such as docking areas for boats and rafts and
regulation —size playing fields. Large grass and tree areas and specially
landscaped open areas should be developed. Recreational programs should be
provided for all ages. This location would provide access to the recreational
trails system and Arkansas River natural areas and would be ideal for river
interpretation programs. The park would be accessible and available to a large
population once 27th Lane is extended south across the river and north to the
airport area.
In addition, there are plans to centrally locate a district park (specific site
not yet determined) to serve the residents of the St. Charles 1 1 •1esa.
C. Regional Park
Every atteitipt should be made to acquire land at the confluence of the Fountain
Creek and Arkansas River for development of a regional park. This part; should
serve the entire urban community and should consist of a iJinin of 200 acres. A
conceptual plan developed by the City Department of Planning and Development
coribines the Arkansas River areas -- Runyon Field and adjacent vacant land - -into a
regional park in excess of 300 acres (See Nap IX). This site shall be open for
multiple, recreational uses including but not limited to ballfields, tennis
courts, a swimming pool, soccer fields, picnic areas, and playfields. Limited
water sports and recreational trail access would be provided. Included in the
conceptual plan is an open air ar Such a theater would be near
Pueblo's Downtown, thereby complementing any future convention /hotel facility.
2. Open Space
The Arkansas River floodplain
the Colorado Division of Wild
designated 100 —year floodplain
to reclaim and enhance those
disturbed and /or developed.
bicycle and pedestrian trails
areas.
is considered to be a critical riparian habitat by
life. Every attempt should be made to maintain the
in its natural state. Every effort should be made
areas of the floodplain which were previously
These open spaces may be traversed by developed
and scenic, historic, or archaeological viewing
In the case where development on a floodplain is to be considered, a flood hazard
development permit shall be obtained. The flood hazard development permit rnust
demonstrate that the encroachment shall not result in any increase in flood levels
during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. Any development within the
floodplain shall be in accord with the City Code of Ordinances, then in effect.
— 45 —
3. Trails
To ensure continuity of the bicycle and pedestrian trails system, all developers
should be responsible for dedication of the right —of —way and extension of these
trail corridors through their developments. Alternately, the developers may be
required to pay a fee towards construction of the master trails system. These
trails shall be identified by the City of Pueblo's Bicycle System and Trails Plan,
then in effect. The trails and bicycle lane system should be located along major
roadways, natural scenic areas, river floodplains, arroyos, parks and school
locations, watercourses, and at the airport and central commercial centers (See
Map XI I ).
All trails shall be constructed pursuant to standards set forth by the Bicycle
System and Trails Plan, then in effect.
-n6-
- 47 -
V. ENVIRON1 ANALYSIS
PREFACE
The purpose of this review is to provide an understanding of current environmental
conditions, identify potential hazards, and determine the potential for mineral
resource extractions in the Southeast Quadrant. The results of this review will
then be used as a planning tool to ensure that environmental constraints are
recognized and mitigated prior to development and that environmentally sensitive
lands are conserved. Section A, Environmental Inventory, identifies geological,
topographical, and biological characteristics of the study area. Climate, air
quality, and water quality will also be addressed. Section B, Environmental
Constraints, identifies potential hazard areas and mineral resource reserves.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
1. Bedrock Geology
Bedrock is the undisturbed, unbroken rock at earth's surface upon which
transported surficial deposits lie. The bedrock in the Southeast Quadrant is
primarily of sediment and marine origin (70 to 100 million years old). From an
econoirlic point of view, sedimentary rocks are extremely important because many of
our natural resources are forrn by sedimentary processes. Some of the r,ost
faniiliar natural resources found in the Southeast Quadrant include sand, gravel,
and clay.
Since sedimentary rocks are produced by interactions of the hydrologic system and
the earth's crust, they record the history of physical and biological events on
the earth. From this record, we are able to interpret ancient mountain building
and specific erosion patterns that irnay impact development.
The bedrock in the Southeast Quadrant consists of Pierre shales (Kpl) and Niobrara
formations (Kn) (See Map XIII). Members of the Pierre shales include Apache Creek
Sandstone (Kpa), Sharon Springs (Kps), and Transition (Kpt). Members of the
Niobrara (Kn) formations include Upper Chalk (Ksuc) and Upper Chalky Shale
(Ksuc). Their corresponding geologic properties can be found in Table IV.
Beds of Bentonite can be found in these shale formations. Bentonite has a high
clay content which expands when the water level is increased. This expansion can
cause damage to structures. Engineering techniques should be researched and
utilized in areas deteriiined to have expansive soils.
Most bedrock in the region contains sulfate compounds, 14hen dissolved, these
compound$ react with concrete and cause deterioration. Deterioration can be
avoided in ii new construction by use of sulfate— resistant cement.
— 49 —
fi ll
1 411,
,„..�..x,.w�„
�w
; �.t..t".t.t' �.rt' -s- Wit'► .�
IBM
�� INDOOR
ftlqmlll��
�qvImmrwm_
MONL�.,N.
dc,u
TABLE IV: GEOLOGIC FN IATIMS — BEDROCK
-51 -
USE 16
BASE
(MATERIAL
TYPICAL
DIRECTLY
Sr 1-
THICK-
ENGINEERING
FOU IDATIg')
SHRINK/
EXCAVATION
UNDER
FOr11ATIC(I
[
BOL
NESS
PROBLEP
STABILITY
ShIELL
ABILITY
ROAD
CGIIIE "dTS
To 7 Ft.
easy;
Poor
Sv,elIing
[.1ore dif-
pernL-
Apache
clays;
ficult
Not
ability.
Pierre
Creek
Sulfate
beIov/
suit-
Erodes
Shale
-- - - -
Sandstone
- - - - - -
Kpa
- - -
200'
- - - -
reaction.
- - - - - - -
Fair -Poor
- - - - - -
High
- - - -
blasting.
- - - - - -
able.
- - - - -
easily.
- - - - -
Large
Pierre
Sharon
Above
concre-
P,`ot
High
Shale
Springs
Kps
113'
P'linor
Average
Sae
tions
- - - -
good
- - - - -
clay.
- - - - -
-- - - -
- - - - - -
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - - -
Pla jor
- - - - - -
- - - -
- -
swelling
To 5 Ft.
clays;
easy.
Poor
Sulfate
('Fiore
penJ_�-
reaction
dif -
iJot
ability.
Pierre
Transi-
iTpeme --
ficult
suit-
Erodes
Shale
tion
K.pt
223'
able.
Fair -Poor
High
below.
- -
able
- - - - -
easily.
- - - - -
-- - - -
- - - - - -
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - -
- - - -
To 5 Ft.
vn th
Sane;
backhoe.
di f-
Dif-
ficult
ficult
Upper
excava-
excava-
Too
Pio
Niobrara
Chalk
Ksuc
3'
tion.
Excellent
Pone
tion.
- - - -
coarse
- - - - -
erosion.
- - - - -
-- - - -
- - - - - -
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - - -
Severe
- - - - - -
- - - -
- -
swelling
clays;
Dif-
Poor
Sulfate
ficult
penre-
Upper
reaction
backhoe
Not
ability.
Chalky
iii » eniie -
excava-
suit-
Erodes
Niobrara
Shale
Ksus
265'
able.
Fair -Poor
High
tion.
ble
easily.
-51 -
2. Surficial Geoloqy
Much of the bedrock in the Southeast Quadrant is covered by Surficial deposits
(See Map XIV). This material is composed of clay, silt, sand and gravel, and
other substances which have been deposited by running water. These surficial
deposits overlie the sedimentary bedrock except where faulting, folding, or
erosion have exposed bedrock sections. Surficial deposits in the Southeast
Quadrant include Broadway Alluvium, Colluvium, Eolian Sand, Louviers Alluvium,
Post -Piney Creek Alluvium, Rocky Flats Alluvium, and Slocum Alluvium. The
geologic properties of these deposits are located in Table V. The USGS has
detailed maps locating surficial deposits in the Southeast Quadrant. It is
recommended that these maps be used as reference during all stages of planning and
development.
a. Soils
A soil association refers to the landscape that has a distinctive pattern of soil
composition in defined proportions. Map XV illustrates soil associations in the
Southeast Quadrant. These soils have been classified into three groups: River
Bottom and Terrace soils, Plains soils, and Foothills soils.
The following information provided in this blaster Plan refers to general soil
compositions. More specific information is available and should be referenced for
detailed Planning and Development decisions.
As shown on [lap XV, the soils in the Southeast Quadrant and their characteristics
are:
(1) River Bottom and Terrace Soils
#7: Las Association - -Warm, deep, poorly and somewhat poorly drained,
nearly level soils on floodplains.
(2) Plains Soils
##8: Manvel, Hinnequa, and Penrose Association - -Warm, deep, shallow, and
well - drained gently sloping soils on uplands plains.
(3) Foothills Soils
#39: Cascajo and Sunsil Association - -Warm, deep, and shallow, excessively
drained to well- drained, and gently sloping to moderately steep soils
on uplands breaks.
#, { 47: Gaynor, Samsil, and Limon Association - -deep, shallow, and well
drained, gently sloping to moderately steep soils on uplands breaks.
- 52 -
•
•
•••
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Deve
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER FLAN
0
r W
V
W
MAP:
XIv
- 53 - -
� � �
�:., •
• • •
lam_ /�-
•
J J
�
W .
�¢ V
/�
~
Z
2
0 0
Z N
J Z
O V
•
• r• �1 > '
u
W
,
6
• 1
•
•
•••
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Deve
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER FLAN
0
r W
V
W
MAP:
XIv
- 53 - -
� � �
�:., •
• • •
lam_ /�-
•
W .
0
•
ocr
.. , / . . f /
• • Q
•�
� L�1•
11
•
•
•••
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Deve
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER FLAN
0
r W
V
W
MAP:
XIv
- 53 - -
TABLE V: GEOLOGIC PROPERTIES— SURFICIAL DEPOSITS
USE AS BASE
TYPICAL MATERIAL
SURFICIAL SYM- THICK- ENGINEERING FOUNDATION SHRINK/ EXCAVATION DIRECTLY
DEPOSIT BOL NESS PROBLEMS STABILITY SWELL ABILITY UNDER ROAD COMMENTS
Broadway
Little
Alluviun
Qb
12' -25'
None
Fair -Good
to none
Easy
Suitable
Good permeability.
-- - - - -
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - -
To 10 Ft.
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
easy;
More
Fine;
Broadway
10' -25'
Fair- Cigood
Little
difficult
Not
Dump fill coarse.
Alluvium
Qba
10' -25'
None
Fair -{good
-
to none
below.
suitable
Concrete aggregate.
-- - - - -
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - -
Not anti-
- - - - - -
- - - - -
High
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
cipated
expan-
High sulfate;
because so
sive
Not
erodes easily; thin;
Colluviun
Qc
10'
thin layer
Fair -Poor
clay
Easy
suitable
poor permeability.
-- - - - -
Eolian
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - -
Little
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
Not
- - - - - - - - - - -
Sand
(es
20'
Pone
Good -Poor
to none
Easy
suitable
Good permeability.
-- - - - -
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - -
Fine;
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
Poor -Good;
Fine grained;
Coarse;
Excellent
Louviers
Good to
permeability.
Alluvium
Q1
20'
None
Excellent.
Pone
Easy
Suitable
Erodes easily.
-- - - - -
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Fine;
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
(Overlain by silt.)
Poor - Good;..
Fine to coarse
Coarse;
grained; Excellent
Louviers
Good to
permeability.
Alluviun
Qlla
20'
None
Excellent.
None
Easy
Suitable
Erodes easily.
-- - - - -
Piney Crk.
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - -
Flood
- - - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
Not
- - - - - - - - - - -
Shallow
Alluvium
Qpp
10'
hazard
Poor -Good
- - -
Easy
suitable
groundwater table.
-- - - - -
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
Terrace deposits
Piney Crk.
Flood
Not
intermediate
Alluvium
Qpp
30'
hazard
Poor-Good
- - -
Easy
Suitable
between Qp & Qpp.
-- - - - -
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Fair -Good
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
light
structures;
Rocky
Caissons
--
Flats
Swelling
for heavy
hbd-
Not
Poor permeability.
Alluviun
Qrfa
10'
soils
structures.
erate
Easy
suitable
Poor infiltration.
-- - - - -
Slocun
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Poor to
- - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
Alluviun
Qsa
25'
Variable
Excellent
Little
Easy
Suitable
Variable.
I I ,
e —
° Q1 ti
c Z
O w I 0 11
Cl )
CD
o
C' J E � V •� V' • I � _II
11 —
4' / r
C13
a
� J
° z z
o l-- - --- - - - - --
Q C N E
O
O Oa H
m ~ ••�I� V
W W Q 0
D
X /
d o 0) / tJ)
tr
m
N /
O m W d
W ~
0-
I o '„ • N
M
_ V)
O
tL • co
CC)
N N
1 - -- —
Y ., co
co
CD
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Development
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
MAP:
XV
- - 55 -
3. Landforms
Landforms refer to the topographical characteristics in a specific area. They
result from the interaction of three factors -- structure, process, and stage.
Structure refers to existing surface or geologic structures found in the area.
Processes are the natural and chemical erosional elements which modify the
structure. Stage indicates the length of time in which the erosion takes place.
Elevation in the study area ranges from 4,550 ft. above sea level at the Arkansas
River to 5,100 ft. at the Bluffs near CF &I. The physical characteristics of the
Southeast Quadrant are illustrated on Map XVI. They include a mesa, the
floodplain of the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek, and a terrace area.
4. Drainage
The area slopes from the bluffs near CF &I and adjoining mesas southward to the
Arkansas River. Slopes on the and mesas range from seven to twenty —five
percent (7 -25 %) and from zero to seven percent (0 -7 %) over the lowland prairie.
There are seven sub — drainage basins which flow into the Arkansas River (See Map
XVII). The environmental constraints of these drainage basins including arroyos
are described in Section B.
a. Floodplains
Five watercourses, three rivers, and two arroyos are classified as 100 —year
floodplains in this study area. A 100 —year floodplain is considered an area with
a one percent chance of flooding in any single year, or once every 100 years. The
Arkansas River, St. Charles River, Salt Creek, and two arroyos have significant
drainage basins and are classified as 100 —year floodplains (See Map XVII).
Environmental constraints that result from these floodplain hazards are described
in the accompanying Section B.
b. Wetlands
Wetlands are referred to as those areas that are inundated by surface or
groundwater with a frequency sufficient to support a prevalence of vegetative or
aquatic life. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas
such as sloughs, potholes, wet meadows, sewer overflows, mud flats, and natural
ponds. There are no wetlands within the study area.
5. Climate
The Pueblo region is located in the transition zone between the temperate and hot,
arid climatic regions. The climate is characterized by abundant sunshine, low
relative humidity, light to moderate winds, large daily temperature variations,
and light precipitation. Average annual precipitation is approximately
11.6 inches.
Temperatures in the summer reach 90 degrees or more, approximately one out of
every two days. Afternoon thunderstorms account for much of the summer precipita-
tion, and the probability of measurable precipitation is one day out of four.
— 56 —
M
x
a
X)
a
z
-3
z
t1j
a
° z
a
t
t
z
041 MI
7 •: ."� . "�{ i �..1 V n.l i l �{ I .I .�• � . l`' II II
T ` `� T 'fir •,`.;\. 1 . .� S .. w
T 11
ill 1 I.I�� Iola I:. �. , ... -_r� - • -
` I .;
Ail 1 \41
rD
� 111 - NC)1.AN
p IS
Nfil -N
1
f�. I
C �
Ite_
j � jj • ''�ilsx�
Tr. ) Jet br.l _J
' f_ a ke
goo
•�• 1 JJ N A.i
g
o rd - - - 1- --
Vu, ( north
N },l ?;� _
KEY
100 -Year Floodplain
0 Drainage Basin
DRAINAGE BASINS & 100 YEAR FLOODPLAINS
6. Flora and Fauna
Plant and animal associations are groups of species co— existing in a complementary
manner. Groups of associations are called communities. A biotic zone consists of
an association of communities. These zones are defined by soil, moisture,
climate, and the biotic history of the area. These conditions determine the
nature and distribution of plant and animal habitat.
The Southeast Quadrant study area is contained within the "Plains" biotic zone.
This zone characteristically lies between 3,500 and 5,500 ft. in elevation and
experiences minimal precipitation. The area is considered semiarid. Most of the
vegetation can tolerate long periods of drought. The dominant vegetation is
prairie grass.
The plant associations in the Southeast Quadrant include:
a. Grasslands of the Plains
(1) Blue grama is the dominant grass with Western wheatgrass and Galleta
occurring in varying amounts depending upon climatic and soil conditions.
(2) Grasses include Alkali sacaton, Inland salt grass, Galleta, Blue grama, and
Western wheatgrass. Flowing saltbrush, P,abbitbrush, and Greasewood are the
predominate shrubs and are normally found on skvale and floodplain portions of
this site.
(3) Blue gra„1a is the dominant grass occurring with Sideoats grama, Little
bluestem, Needle and Thread, Indian rice grass, and Prickly —pear cactus on
gravelly soils with Sand bluestem, Prairie sandreed, Needle and Thread,
Indian rice grass, Sand dropseed, and Prairie three awn on sandy soils.
b. Woodlands of the River Bottoms
(1) Varying amounts of Cottonwoods, WiIIows, Rabbitbrush, Farbs, Sidges, and
Cattails occur with Rye, Alkali sacaton, Inland salt grass, Muhly, and Sand
dropseed. Wildlife populations which interact with landforms, soils,
moisture, climate, plant associations, and other animals create wildlife
habitat. The more habitat available, the greater the diversity of species
which can be supported. The habitat groups in the Southeast Quadrant are
grassland and agricultural habitat.
Habitat is valued in terms of food sources, vegetative cover, water
availability, shelter, and breeding grounds. Different animal species relate
to different habitat.
Disturbance to or extinction of any one habitat, plant, or anirial species can
have an impact on another species. Preservation and protection of habitat
and species is imperative in maintaining the integrity of a native plant and
of animal populations.
— 59 —
c .
4 of the Foothills and Plains
(1) Vegetation includes Pinon pine, One seed and Rocky mountain junipers,
[Mountain mahogany, Skunkbrush, Sumac, Garnbel oak, Indian rice grass, Dig and
Little blue stein, Blue grama, Sideoats grama, and Western ,vheatgrass.
Nildlife populations which interact with landforrns, soils, moisture, climate,
plant associations, and other anii,ials create wildlife habitat. The more habitats
available, the greater the diversity of species which can be supported. The
habitat groupings in the Southeast Quadrant are Riparian, Urban, tdoodland, Plains
Breaks, and Grasslands. Habitats are valued in terms of food sources, vegetative
cover, water availability, shelter, and breeding grounds. Different animal
species relate to different habitats. According to the Colorado Division of
Wildlife, the Arkansas River floodplain is considered to be critical Riparian
habitat. A critical habitat is that which offers rare or limited environmental
conditions and includes those areas which support rare and endangered plant or
animal species. Anii,ial inhabitants of the area include coyotes, antelope, small
tnm
a,ials, small birds, quail, larger raptors, crows, and a variety of waterfowl.
The Arkansas River is included in the � ground of endangered species such
as the Ai,ierican Bald Eagle, the Golden Eagle, and the flight Peron. It is
inoperative that the river environment is preserved and that endangered species are
protected from further urban enchroachment. Zoning for parks and recreational
open space is encouraged in the floodplain to help facilitate this preservation.
7, Elater Qualit
The Southeast Quadrant consists of seven drainage subbasins (See lap XV II). The
subbasins are tributary to the Arkansas River Basin. Hater quality standards and
classifications have been adopted by and for the waters of the State to ensure the
quality and acceptability of Colorado's waters for beneficial use.
The mainster,i segioent of the Arkansas River within the study area is referred to as
the Lower Arkansas River, Segment 1, by the Section 200 later Quality Plan. It is
located from a point above the confluence with Fountain Creek to the
Colorado /Kansas border and is classified as a Class 2 Recreation and ivlarrn Wlater
Aquatic Life, Water Supply, and Agriculture stream segment. Using or traveling
the Arkansas River within City limits is not allowed.
The 1977 Section 208 Stream Segiiient Analysis describes this segment of the
Arkansas River as a Warm Water slow flowing river highly affected by a large
number of point and nonpoint sources that affect the merging of wastewater
effluent and tributary wastes. The parameters and results in which this stream
segment was analyzed include:
PARAMETER RESULT
Dissolved
Oxygen
Within
Safe
Lin;its -
Un— ionized
Ammonia
l�lithin
Safe
Liiiiits
Fecal Coliform 4•!ithin Safe Liiiits
Suspended Soils Exceeds Recommended Lir,its for Cold hater Aquatic Life
These conditions support the use of this segment as a Primary Contact Recreation- -
Aquatic Life -- Surface Mater Supply area.
The 1987 Section 208 Plan Update considers this segment to have "medium- priority"
impact. This is to say that "water quality" data indicate these stream segments
on the Fountain Creek and Arkansas River may be adversely impacted by nonpoint
pollution sources, but no human health hazard currently exists. Water quality
standards for aquatic life and agriculture are being exceeded.
The Lower Fountain Creek :ras monitored in 1985 for Storm Event water quality.
Sulfate, Chloride, and Nitrate (n) water quality constituents were found to be
higher in concentration, in most cases, in ambient water than storm water.
Historically, groundwater quality has not been a problem in this area and was not
analyzed in the 1977 or 1987 208 Plans.
8. Air Quality
Air quality in the Southeast Quadrant poses no problem to human health and
welfare. The entire Pueblo region complies with all National Ambient Air Quality
Standards pursuant to the 1963 Clean Air Act, as amended. Recent clean air
programs and the CF &I Steel Corporation production cutbacks have resulted in vast
improvements in Pueblo's air quality.
Air quality is determined by measuring specific particles suspended in the
atmosphere. Beginning in 1985, the Pueblo City- County Health Department has
monitored Total Suspended Particulates (TSPs). The results over time have
indicated a steady increase in air quality. In October, 1987, a new
system -- Particulate flatter 10 F1icrons or less (PI-1-10)--was installed. Eventually,
all monitoring will be done by P11 -10 as this system allows for a more detailed
analysis.
The 1988 PM -10 results indicate that the Pueblo region has a 14 -20 percent chance
of noncompliance with Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards. This is considered a
low priority concern and only requires that the region continue to monitor air
quality on a regular basis. Those areas with a 20 percent or greater chance of
noncompliance must have a State Implementation Plan in place. The implementation
plan outlines procedures directed at decreasing the chance of noncompliance.
Currently, there are no P1 -10 monitoring stations located in this study area. The
closest stations are at the Pueblo Memorial Airport and AIP and one atop the
City- County Health Department Office in Downtown Pueblo.
It should be noted that new development may cause a short -term increase in
suspended particulates as a result of cut and fill, grading, and other
construction activities. Such activities may require the issuance of an emissions
permit from either the State or local Health Department.
Carbon monoxide, of concern to several Colorado cities, has not reached severe
levels in Pueblo. The City is thereby not required to monitor this particular
pollutant.
- 61 -
5 EPIIVIRONjNE'�1TAL CON'STRAIINTS
Areas in which environmental hazards exist ,may not be the opti ;ru+,i areas for land
use development projects. Those areas dhere steep or unstable slopes,
floodplains, erodible soils, and large arroyos exist can place constraints on
development.
Prior to any new developrment, an envirornnental analysis should indicate areas of
environmental sensitivity. i ,measures should then be utilized in
planning and construction.
The severity and location of various environmental hazards and of ;Mineral resource
areas within Pueblo County were computer — mapped via a program called IfIGRID
Analysis (Improved Grid). This program was developed by the Depart,Ient of
Architecture of Harvard University's School of Design. This analysis of
Envirornmental Hazards is identified on Nap XVIII.
The potential hazards analyzed for Pueblo County and included in this report are:
(1) Floodplain Hazards- -high for Southeast Quadrant; (2) Drywash Channels - -high
north of the Arkansas River and low south of the Arkansas River; (3) l
Hazards - -low; (4) Geologic Hazards: (a) Unstable Slopes - -low to rmoderate;
(b) Mud flow /Debris Fans -- extensive; (c) Ground Subsidence -- moderate to high;
(d) Expansive Soils and Pocks - - moderate to high; (e) Seismic Effects - -low to
moderate; (f) Erosion - -lour to moderate; (g) Radioactivity--none identified in the
Southeast Quadrant; and (5) Mineral Resource Areas- -high potential for sand and
gravel excavation in the Southeast Quadrant.
The following text describes potential hazards in the Southeast Quadrant:
Floodolain Hazards
A floodplain is an area along the course of a river or stream that is naturally
subject to flooding. A floodplain is described by Colorado statutes
(24- 55.1 - 103[71) as an area adjacent to a stream ahich is subject to flooding as a
result of the occurrence of an intermediate regional flood and which the area is
thus so adverse to past, current, or foreseeable construction or land use as to
constitute a significant hazard to public health and safety or to property.
The Federal Insurance Administration has delineated areas of special flood hazards
applicable to the City of Pueblo. These are shown on the Environmental Composite
Map XVIII.
Fine silt, r;ud, and sand are deposited on these floodplains when water volume is
high. During each high water stage, these deposits (called alluvium beds) become
thicker and wider. Simultaneously, erosion creates steep, unstable river banks.
It is the goal of Zoning and Development procedures to protect floodplains in
order to freely discharge a base flood without increasing the water surface
elevation more than one foot. Development in the floodplain is restricted unless
technical evaluation demonstrates that encroachments shall not result in flood
levels (City Ordinance Title XVII Section 9). Construction on fringe areas should
require special floodproofing ,measures found in Title XVII of the Zoning
Ordinances for the City of Pueblo.
_r2_
2. Drywash Channels
A drywash channel refers to a small watershed with a very high percentage of
runoff after a torrential rainfall. These channels are not classified as 100 —year
floodplains, yet they riiay be hazardous if not properly regarded in the planning
process. Water channels change overtime as a result of both natural and man —made
conditions. Land disturbances, such as construction, could act as flow
obstructions, possibly increasing flow depths and velocity, and changing the
channel's course. Drywash channels are located on Map XUIII.
Prior to developriient, a master drainage plan must be prepared which would address
natural flows, additional hydrologic flow generated by new developments, and
mitigating measures necessary to ensure adequate drainage. Improveilents might
include holding ponds, diversion channels, drainage pipes, gutters, and channel
boxes. Hydrologically, the results are similar but the cost and aiiiount of land
required for such iiieasures varies.
3. 1ildfire Hazards
A wildfire is any fire that is burning out of control including brush fires,
forest fires, grass fires, and structure fires. A number of factors must work
together to create an area of wildfire hazard potential. Climate, fuel loads,
topography, and wind patterns all play a determining role in identifying fire
sensitive areas. The Southeast Quadrant is classified as a Type "A" low wildfire
hazard zone. Zones such as these contain sparse fuel sources (grasses, shrubs,
trees, etc.). f!o measures which are over and above standard fire prevention
development policies need to be implemented.
4. Geologic Hazards
Geologic hazards are geologic phenomenon which are so adverse to past, current, or
foreseeable construction or land use as to constitute a significant hazard to
public health and safety or to property. The tern includes, but is not limited
to, unstable slopes - -iiud flows /debris fans; expansive soils and rocks; ground
subsidence; seismic effects; erosion; radioactivity (no hazards defined by
IMGRID); rockfalls (no hazards in the area); landslides (no hazards in the area);
and avalanches (no hazards in the area).
a. Unstable Slopes
An unstable slope is an area where gravity can cause loose dirt, gravel, or any
surface materials to move downhill. Natural and man —made slopes occur from
weathering, erosion, filling or cutting away existing slopes, or altering natural
drainages. River floodplains create a natural unstable slope on channel banks.
The slopes in the Southeast Quadrant are not considered "severely" unstable or
hazardous by the IiGRID analysis. Specific construction and design techniques can
be utilized, thereby - iitigating hazards which such slopes pose.
— 63 —
b. Mud Flows /DebrisFans
A mud flow (also called earth flow or debris flow) is a rapid movement of a mass
of earthen mud. A mud flow occurs chiefly in dry canyons or arroyos in semiarid
regions and results from cloudbursts or snowmelt. A debris fan is a deposit of
gravel, mud, silt, small rocks, and other substances which are shaped like a
triangle and are formed where a watercourse enters a larger valley. A debris fan
is closely related to a mud flow and is sometimes associated with each other.
Building on or in the path of a mud flow or on a debris fan is extremely
hazardous. A mud flow can be unpredictable and seemingly minor factors can
trigger the flow. Moderate mud flow and debris fan hazards are found chiefly in
the proximity of a floodplain. Since the Arkansas River floodplain encompasses a
sizeable portion of the study area, mud flow /debris fan hazards are considered
extensive (See Map XVIII.
c. Ground Subsidence
Ground subsidence refers to the downward displacement of surface material. Ground
subsidence can occur naturally or by man —made processes, such as:
(1) the removal of groundwater;
(2) the addition of water to weak soils;
(3) the dissolving of certain rock formations by exposure to groundwater
flows; and
(4) the removal of materials by underground mining activities.
The Southeast Quadrant proposed urban extension area has a subsidence hazard as
illustrated on Map XVIII. Techniques for mitigating problems caused by subsidence
on structures do exist and should be reviewed prior to structural design.
d. Expansive Soils and Rocks
Expansive soils and rocks contain clay which due to their molecular structure
expand to a significant degree upon wetting and shrink upon drying. Map XVIII
illustrates those areas found to have moderate to high expansive properties. It
should be noted that the majority of these hazardous areas are in the proposed
urban extension area.
Certain types of structures can be severely impaired by such soil movements.
Professional soil engineers or geologists should be involved in project design.
— 64 —
e. Seismic Effects
Seismic effects refer to the degree upon which earthquakes or an underground
nuclear detonation impact the environment. An earthquake or tremor in an area can
increase the possibility of a geologic hazard occurrence. Landslides, rockfalls,
unstable slopes, and flood potential would be greatly affected. Areas bordering
the Arkansas and St. Charles Rivers, according to the IMGRID analysis, are
considered low to moderate seismic hazardous areas. The remainder of the study
area is classified as a low hazardous area.
f. Erosion
Erosion is the end — result of a culmination of factors such as vegetative and
man —made cover types, gradient, the chemistry makeup of soil, weathering,
overgrazing, and other man — caused disturbances.
The erosion problem in the study area is low to moderate with one given acre
losing five to 100 tons of soil per year. The most detrimental soil losses occur
on the sloping areas of the Arkansas and St. Charles Rivers floodplains and
terraces.
Remedial devices such as check dams, sedimentation ponds, terracing, and rapid
planting of bare soil may be required to minimize sedimentation in these areas.
Erosion sensitive areas are illustrated on Map XVIII. Developers should utilize
the expertise of a soils professional in the design and engineering of any
structure.
g. Radioactivity
Radioactivity means a condition related to various types of radiation emitted by
natural radioactive minerals that occur in natural deposits of rock, soil, and
water. The IMGRID Analysis identified no radioactive hazards in the Southeast
Quadrant. Since the completion of the Analysis in 1977, public awareness of
potential radioactivity in the Pueblo region has increased, resulting in
additional testing for radioactive materials by property owners.
The City of Pueblo does not require testing for radioactivity during development
since the City is considered to be low risk. The burden of such testing, if
desired, lies with the property owner.
— 65 —
aril
�r ` 6
so
RO I 1
Idl• 1
IM
■ \
� IL
5. fiineral Resource Areas
Colorado House Bill 1529 (1973) established the policies which most of the local
mineral resource plans follow in the State of Colorado. The law declares that the
State's corIuiiercially extractable mineral deposits are essential to the State's
economy, and as such these deposits should be extracted according to a rational
plan. House Bill 1529 was followed by House Bill 1041 (1974) which served to
reiterate the importance of the State's mineral deposits by describing extractable
deposits as "areas of State and local interest."
1 deposits within Pueblo County have been identified by the Colorado
Geological and U. S. Geological Surveys. Deposits of sand and gravel are abundant
near the St. Charles and Arkansas Rivers.
Prior to extraction of any resources, a thorough analysis uuist be made of the
iiipacted area. The following must be addressed in this analysis:
a. the importance of diverting developments to areas which will not
interfere with extraction of minerals;
b. the need to permit extraction or exploration of minerals, unless extraction or
exploration would cause significant danger to public health and safety;
C. the cor:1parison bet:veen the econoiiic value of the minerals present against the
econoiric value of the proposed developient; and
d. the procedures proposed for assuring that exploration and extraction of a
mineral shall be carried out in a r,anner vhich ,Jill cause the least practical
environmental disturbance.
Permits for extraction of sand and gravel are issued by the Pueblo County Planning
Coi
Active and inactive extraction pits,_and processing operations within the Southeast
Quadrant are located on Hap XIX, and the corresponding status and types are listed
below:
Special U se Permit Status Type
Ho.
54
Active
Extraction
No.
75
Inactive -- 4/26/73
Extraction /Processing
i!o.
77
Inactive -- 12/10/35
No.
133
Active
i1o.
239
Inactive -- 10/26/76
!o.
472
Inactive -- 9/14/82
i A lo.
546
Active
fi /11
I!o.
596
Active
— 67 —
m
■ /j
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Development MAP:
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN XIX
VI. INFRASTRUCTURE PLANS -- EXISTING AND PROPOSED ROADIIAY AND UTILITY SYSTEM
PREFACE
The existing infrastructure of an area and its ability to expand is crucial in
attracting and supporting new growth. Annexation and the subsequent development
of new areas, whether residential, commercial, or industrial, will impact the
existing infrastructure and likewise will result in the extension of municipal
services.
This section will describe the existing transportation routes, water and waste—
water systems, electrical and gas services, telephone services, and cable
television systems. An analysis will address the ability of these services to
expand and support new development.
A. TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
The iiiajor transportation routes serving the Southeast Quadrant are:
1. U. S. Highway 50 —B, an expressway and national east /west route which serves as
the primary entrance to the Pueblo Memorial Airport.
2. U. S. Highway 50 —C (Santa Fe Drive), a principal arterial and east /west access
to the St. Charles P"esa community.
3. South Road, an east /west minor arterial which serves the southern portion of
the St. Charles Mesa.
4. Joplin Avenue (State Highway 227), a north /south minor arterial.
5. Baxter Road (State Highway 233), a north /south principal arterial which serves
the Baxter coiiimunity and provides a link between U. S. Highway 50 —B and U. S.
Highway 50 —C.
6. Lane 36 (State Highway 231), a north /south minor arterial.
The segment of the Arkansas River, contained within the study area, is bridged by
Santa Fe Avenue, Joplin Avenue (State Highway 227), Baxter Road (State Highway
233), and 36th Lane (State Highway 231). The St. Charles River is bridged at
U. S. Highway 50 —C, South Road, and 27th Lane.
Transportation planning in the City of Pueblo is accomplished with the aid of two
transportation studies - - The Analysis District Evaluation to the Year 2010 and The
Year 2010 Transportation Plan (adopted in 1989). The Year 2010 Transportation
Plan utilizes computer modeling (TRANPLAN) and actual vehicle counts to determine
the degree of efficiency of the current transportation network. Deficiencies are
analyzed and the effect of alternate roadways is examined (proposed transportation
corridors in the 2010 Transportation Plan are illustrated on Map VII, pg. 27).
— 69 —
The Analysis District Evaluation To The Year 2010 Plan provides statistics on
population, dwelling units, and employment projections for Pueblo County's 139
traffic zones. The Southeast Quadrant examines 17 zones. Table VI lists the
Evaluation's projections, and flap XX illustrates corresponding traffic zones.
The Southeast Quadrant is comprised of ten zones, with the majority of the
proposed urban extension area contained within two zones (87 and 133). The
Evaluation predicts slow growth for all ten zones through the Year 2010.
The Three— I'lile Annexation Plan, Section IV of this report, proposes two roadway
extensions. The first proposal is the extension of 27th Lane south from U. S.
Highway 50 —B, bridging the Arkansas River and joining South 27th Lane. The second
proposal is the southern extension of Paul Harvey Boulevard (See Map VIII,
pg. 31). These corridors are currently being proposed, regardless of immediate
need, so that the City's transportation system remains cohesive.
The Transportation Network depicted in the Year 2010 Transportation Plan report
appears adequate to support these potential growth areas. Updated projections in
the Network Analysis report will - be formulated when results are obtained from the
Bureau of the Census 1990 census count.
— 70 —
TABLE VI: ANALYSIS DISTRICT EVALUATION TO THE YEAR 2010 -- SOUTHEAST QUADRANT
TRAFFIC ZONE
1980
1990
2000
2010
No. 87
Population
199
172
179
178
Dwelling Units
67
61
66
67
Employment
62
70
73
75
No. 124
Population
455
555
516
503
Dwelling Units
117
182
182
182
Employment
5,558
3,558
3,718
3,891
No. 125
Population
1,243
1,163
1,293
1,335
Dwelling Units
452
446
517
538
Employment
141
163
170
178
No. 126
Population
1,387
2,439
2,712
2,796
Dwelling Units
514
799
926
963
Employment
287
332
347
363
No. 128
Population
621
754
838
848
Dwelling Units
159
247
286
297
Employment
0
48
50
52
No. 129
Population
1,606
2,399
2,664
2,699
Dwelling Units
506
786
910
946
Employment
11
60
63
66
No. 130
Population
674
739
820
831
Dwelling Units
156
242
280
291
Employment
96
111
116
121
No. 131
Population
2,212
3,193
3,549
3,599
Dwelling Units
673
1,046
1,212
1,261
Employment
135
156
163
171
No. 132
Population
888
1,276
1,417
1,438
Dwelling Units
269
418
484
504
Employment
53
61
64
67
No. 133
Population
1,461
1,507
1,472
1,469
Dwelling Units
534
544
554
564
Employment
7
400
550
700
- 71 -
- 72 -
B. WATER SERVICE
Pueblo County's water supply flows from mountain snowmelt. The mountain water
travels via streams, creeks, groundwater flows, and man —made water systems to the
major Eastern Colorado drainage basin of the Arkansas River.
Several suppliers provide water to the Southeast Quadrant study area. They
include the St. Charles Mesa Water District, O'Neal Water Supply, and the Pueblo
Board of Water Works.
The Pueblo Board of Water Works is the primary purveyor of water for the City of
Pueblo. The Board does not have a franchise agreement with the City; therefore,
upon annexation, private water suppliers may continue service to their customers.
Officials at the Board have stated that the water supply companies in the
St. Charles Mesa adequately serve their customers with quality water. The Board
does not consider it probable that Board water will be requested in this area.
The Board, however, does provide service to several parcels in the proposed urban
extension area and can adequately - serve a build —out population therein.
The Pueblo Board of Water Works owns parts of the Arkansas River flow referred to
as "direct flow water rights." By State law, this water must be used at the time
of diversion and may not be stored in its raw state. The Board also owns rights
to water originating on the Western Slope. This water may be stored. The Board
has water rights and storage capacity to support a population of 350,000 persons.
Water diverted from the Arkansas River enters the Whitlock Treatment Plant. This
plant became operational in 1977. The treatment process employed by the Board of
Water Works includes flocculation, sedimentation, and a filtration process.
Testing on a continual basis ensures Pueblo of high quality water through rigid
quality control methods. The plant has the capability of serving a population of
158,000. There is no opportunity for further expansion at the Whitlock Plant.
The Board of Water Works does own a plant site downstream from the Pueblo Dam. If
facility expansion was necessary, a "peaking plant" could be constructed on this
site. Such a facility would supplement the existing plant during peak summer
months and would likely be shut down during winter months.
Treated water from the Whitlock Treatment Plant is transferred to the distribution
system. This system is divided into pressure zones in order to maintain water
pressures within practical limits. The Southeast proposed urban extension area
lies within the 1000 Zone (See Map XXI). This represents ground elevation (City
of Pueblo datam) of 4,650 to 4,750 ft. above sea level. The 1000 Zone receives
its water from the Watts Reservoir and pumping station north of 32nd Street and
the J. 0. Jones tanks and pumping system on Widener Drive. Currently,
distribution in the proposed urban extension area consists of two water mains, a
20 —inch and a 16 —inch line which lie in the U. S. Highway 50 —B corridor. These
lines are cross tied for reliability and serve the Pueblo Memorial Airport, the
AIP, and several properties south of U. S. Highway 50 —B.
The Board of Water Works has-,developed rules and regulations for water service
outside corporate limits. Two service areas are identified by Board policies:
Service Area "A" and Service Area "B" identified on Map XXII.
— 73 —
- 74
Q
north
EXTRATERRITORIAL WATER SERVICE PERMIT AREA
PUEBLO BOARD OF WATER WORKS
I 1
SFRVI(:F PERMIT CFiFG ••e
SERVICE PERMIT AREA "B"
/�' (Remainder of the County)
I
0 6 12 18 24 30
SCALE IN MILES
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Development
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
to
w
N
a
w
U
w
w
H
y
.•
XXII
- 75 -
Extraterritorial water applicants, whether in Permit Area A or Area B, must agree
to annex to the City when legally eligible. They must agree that such service is
to be contingent upon maintaining sufficient service to the City's residents.
Once an agreement is negotiated, the applicant has 120 days in which to act while
being guaranteed the negotiated fees. After this time, fees will be allowed to
fluctuate. The plant water investment fee is charged to customers seeking service
through new, additional, or increased size of meter, or number of units. The fees
are updated regularly and may be obtained from the Board of plater Works.
The unit cost structure program allows all water applicants including contractors
and developers to install water mains at equitable costs under Board engineering
and inspection standards. The Board will credit accounts and projects completed
within one year. Hore information regarding the unit cost program may be obtained
from the Board of (later Works.
If an applicant requests that the Board install a main extension inside City
limits, the applicant will be-charged the unit cost per foot of main extension,
regardless of size. The cost of asphalt pavement or concrete replacement shall be
an additional charge.
It should be noted that the workload of the Board does not allow for any early
scheduling of water main installation. There is a one —year completion deadline
and no extension of time will be granted. Furthermore, the established costs per
linear foot do not refer to the applicant's actual cost to install the water
main. In certain areas, such actual costs may exceed the outlined costs. Any
additional costs are the responsibility of the applicant. All work is to be
thoroughly inspected by the Board of !Dater I'lorks.
A small section of the proposed urban extension area is supplied by O'Neal later
Supply Service (See I'lap XXII). This company serves approxiniately 400 people in a
one —mile radius. Raa water is obtained from a well and runs through a
chlorination treatment process. The water quality is in compliance with Colorado
Primary Drinking 14ater Standards.
Some residents continue to utilize private wells. The groundwater in the
St. Charles Mesa area has high nitrate levels and is not considered a guaranteed
safe water source without proper treatment.
In the semiarid Southeast, water is viewed as a limited resource. Individual
wells are coming under closer scrutiny by the State's regulatory authorities as to
their affect on surface water rights. Subsurface waters in the State are
considered to be tributary to surface water rights, unless through the provisions
of Senate Bill 213 (1973) non — tributary status can be established. If in the
application process a proposed new well is found to be tributary, water
augmentation may be required. In addition to water augmentation legislation, the
importance of community water systems is further substantiated by the considerable
cost of tapping a non — tributary aquifer to avoid water augmentation. In Pueblo
County, non — tributary aquifers are generally in excess of 800 ft. below surface.
Neither tributary nor non — tributary wells are assured to produce potable water.
Based on these conditions, it can be assumed that most of the future growth in the
Pueblo region will be dependent upon community water supply systems.
—7G—
C. !%!ASTE'.
The City of Pueblo Departruent of Public Norks is responsible for the sanitary
sewerage and wastewater treatment operations for the City of Pueblo.
In 1984, construction began on a new 19 r.iillion gallon
trickling filter /activated sludge k�. treatment
plant, located off of Joplin Avenue (State Highway 227),
facility. The new plant will be capable of serving a co
persons. It began full operation during the suru,er of 1989
per day (P�1GD) high —rate
plant. This treatment
will replace the former
miunity of up to 147,900
In 1988, CH2fi '-sill consulting engineers released the Pueblo Airport Industrial
Park Wastewater Treatment Plant Preliiinary Engineering Study. This report
examines five alternatives for processing the increased wastewater flow and
loading at the Pueblo i"Ieworial Airport. The engineering report recommended
pumping all wastewater back to the City's main plant.
CH2'11 Hill recently completed a supplemental study. The supplemental study
addressed additional alternatives. One alternate plan which would utilize the
existing AIP wastewater treatment plant for the current load and would pu11p any
additional flow back to the City plant was determined not to be a feasible
alternative. CH211 Hill replaced this alternative with a puiiiping system with three
pump stations placed strategically along the route of the pipeline. They have
identified this alternative to be the most economical. In addition, it allows for
better access into the system.
The City "ultiiiate" , service line as defined by the 1971 Sellards and
Grigg Report is depicted on 11ap XXIII. This boundary line indicates an area
adjacent to the City which niay be served by the existing treatment system and
gravity —flow basins. 1 service outside this area may be costly. At this
time, the engineering staff of the City's Public Porks Department has not yet
determined the construction needs of the Southeast Quadrant.
Prior to "arch, 1983, extraterritorial sewer service was provided to applicants
with the stipulation that the owner or developer agree, in writing, to consent to
annexing to the City of Pueblo when the land became eligible and that the owner
understand that such service could be terriinated by the City Manager in order to
maintain adequate service to the City of Pueblo.
In ""arch of 1988, Ordinance 1`.Jo. 5466 was adopted. This amendment to Section II of
Chapter IV, Title XVI of the 1971 Code of Ordinances relating to Extraterritorial
Sewer Services, reads:
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter to the contrary, no land
located outside the City of Pueblo or outside the Pueblo 14emorial Airport is
eligible to receive extraterritorial sewer service and no application for
such service may be filed with or accepted by the City. This subsection (d)
is repealed, effective July 1, 1989. Prior to sa..d repeal, the City Council
shall review this chapter.
— 77 —
l this ordinance ,vas adopted, i t was anti ci pated that if the new treatr�en t
plant was in full operation prior to July 1, 1989, this ariendment would be
repealed; however, for various reasons, the ordinance was extended to July 1,
1990, and subsequently extended to July 1, 1991. Ordinance No. 5690, which was
adopted in June, 1991, deletes any reference to an expiration date.
Three sanitation districts provide service to the study area's residences
(See Hap XXIII).
The Blende Sanitation District serves approximately 574 persons (1937). Effluent
from the area is transported to the City wastewater facility. The City,
therefore, iilust approve all extension of service and has the right to withdraw
service should the plant's capacity be needed to serve the City's residents.
The Salt Creek Water and Sanitation District has a user population of 650. The
District discharges into the Blende sanitation system.
Also discharging into the Blende system is the St. Charles Sanitation District.
This District's user population numbers 372.
Meadowbrook P Home Park provides its own wastewater treatment with an
activated sludge package plant. This plant produces liquid sludge which is puirped
once a month. Effluent is discharged for treatment at the City of Pueblo's
wastewater treatment plant (See °liap XXIII).
CF°I Steel Corporation produces wastewater and provides its own treatment through
clarification, settling, filtering biological oxidation, and aeration. Final
treatment occurs in two treatment lagoons. These lagoons discharge into the
Arkansas River (See ;-lap XXIII).
Septic tank pumpers and haulers which pump out and dispose of septic waste and
other sewage wastes must abide by City— County Health Department requirements.
They crust also meet the receiving wastewater treatment plant's applicable
conditions or disposal regulations.
Pursuant to the Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Act, the Pueblo City — County
Health Department is responsible for licensing septic tank pumpers and haulers.
The license governs tank capacity, safety, and disposal. They are issued annually
and complaints on safety and dumping can result in the revocation of a license.
The exact number of septic tanks in the area is not known, although it is believed
to be well over 1,000. The 1984 203 Water Quality Prograin Update states that in
many areas parcels are too small and soils inappropriate to support individual
septic tanks and leaching systems in compliance with the Colorado Department of
Health and the Pueblo City— County Health Department's regulations. The Update
also states that faulty septic systems are believed to be a cause of groundwater
contamination.
The impact by development on the City sewerage and wastewater treatment system
will depend on the amount and type of development. A treatment plant is designed
to adequately process wastewater during peak hours (morning and early evening
hours). Residential development has the most iinpact on the system, ":
high— density units being the most severe. Typically, commercial and industrial
uses are not in full operation at peak hours.
—73—
- 79 -
Prior to annexation to the City of Pueblo, a sanitary sewer report will be
completed outlining the proposed development and its probable impact on the
stormwater drainage and wastewater system. If it is discovered that new
construction will cause hydraulic deficiencies in the system, commonly referred to
as "bottlenecks," then the developer will be required to finance the solution for
such deficiencies. As development in and around the City continues, it will be
inevitable that the existing line and interceptor systems will be in need of
expansion. This is accomplished by laying line parallel to existing trunk lines
or by replacing sections of the old system with new and larger lines.
Developers shall pay a cost of construction for trunk line interceptor extensions
and for any lift stations needed. Through an agreement with the City, a portion
of the construction cost can be refunded to the developer when new customers tie
onto those particular trunk lines.
Stormwater disposal systems must also be financed by the developer. Stormwater
disposal is provided by a system of drains and lines which are separate from the
wastewater system. These lines drain the City area and release stormwater into
the Arkansas River.
D. ELECTRIC POKIER
The Southeast Quadrant is provided electrical power by I�JestPlains Energy
Corporation (formerly Centel Corporation). The company has a franchise agreement
with the City of Pueblo to be the sole provider of electricity within municipal
boundaries.
',^,'estPlains operates an electric —power generating station at 105 S. Victoria.
Initially, the plant burned coal to generate electric power. The plant currently
burns natural gas as its primary fuel and utilizes oil for peaking generation and
as a backup in the event of natural gas curtailments. The plant complies with all
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements. Generation facilities at the
plant consist of two units with a capacity of 8,000 kilowatts each; one unit with
19,000 kilowatt capacity; and five diesel generators, each with a capacity of
2,000 kilowatts. WestPlains has two power plants outside the City of Pueblo, one
at Canon City and another at Rocky Ford. Together, the three power plants have a
total capacity of 106,000 kilowatts.
WestPlains purchases approximately 65 percent of its power requirements from
Public Service Company of Colorado under a renewable 20 —year contract.
UestPlains is a member of the Colorado Power Pool which includes Public Service
Company, the City of Colorado Springs, and the City of Lamar. The power pool
provides backup power in the event WestPlains experiences a temporary shutdown of
any of its generating units. Most power outages are due to extreme weather
conditions and rarely affect the entire City at one time.
UestPlains distributes electric energy throughout the City of Pueblo through its
transmission and distribution network. The Southeast Quadrant of the City is
served by five distribution substations. These substations are served by 69,000
and 115,000 volt electric transmission lines (See Map XXIV). The transmission
lines are located on utility easements of 120' for parallel lines and 100' for
single lines. 1 officials state that all requests for electric service
in the study area can be fulfilled with reasonable promptness.
— 80 —
'V!estPlains' service policy is found in Section 18 of its rules and regulations
manual. The policy states that an applicant's electric requirements (either for
an individual or a developer) are designated by the company to be permanent,
indeterminate, or temporary. Distribution system extension costs are estimated on
the basis of the anticipated construction and installation costs, including
material, labor, rights —of —way, trenching, backfill, tree trimming, and any
incidental and overhead expenses. An applicant for permanent service is required
to pay all distribution extension costs in excess of a construction allowance
determined by WestPlains. The construction allowance is determined by the type of
service and the customer's estimated electrical power demand. The customer's
payment may be partially or totally refunded during a five —year period. After
five years, no refunds will be made. Indeterminate and temporary customers are
required to pay all distribution extension costs and do not receive refunds unless
reclassified as permanent by UestPlains.
E. GAS
The Public Service Company of Colorado provides gas service to Pueblo and the
surrounding area including the Southeast Quadrant. The company has an agreement
with the City to be the sole provider of gas within municipality boundaries. Gas
is supplied to the Public Service Co;ipany by Colorado Interstate Gas (CIG)
Company. CIG pipelines are located east and south of the City. They lie in a
100 ft. easement. The ,Hain taps on CIG lines are located in Belmont in the
Northeast and at Salt Creek near CF &I in the Southeast. The gas is then
distributed by the Coripany.
Extension of distribution lines for new service is by application. The company
will designate an applicant's service needs as either permanent, intermediate, or
temporary. The proposed service installation is analyzed in order to estimate
costs of labor, materials, and rights —of —way, and any incidental and overhead
expenses. This estimate is the construction payment.
An applicant for permanent service will receive a construction allowance.
Indeterminate and temporary customers do not receive construction allowances.
Distribution lines are installed by the company and paid for by the applicant
(less the construction allowance).
Construction payments are refundable in part or in their entirety within a five
year period, commencing with the extension completion date. Nhen a new customer
is added to the line, his or her share of the construction payment is refunded to
those who initially paid for the installation of the distribution line. These
refunds are on a yearly basis. No refunds are given to temporary or indeterminate
customers unless the new applicant is designated for permanent service.
The Public Service Company is regulated by the Colorado Public Utilities
Commission. Regulations are subject to periodic changes.
P, ?
F. TELEPHONE
U. S. West Communications provides local telephone service to the City of Pueblo
and to the Southeast Quadrant. The technical service is divided by 27th Lane,
with everything to the west being served by offices in Downtown Pueblo and
everything to the east served by Vineland offices. The U. S. West technical
service areas are not fixed and can accommodate fluctuations caused by new
development.
U. S. West Communications Corporation will provide prompt service to all requests
in its service area. For most installations, the entire cost is paid for by the
developer. Upon the completion of installation, and for five years thereafter,
the developer will be entitled to refunds of part, or the entirety, of the
installation payments. This occurs when new customers use the new distribution
lines and when initial construction payments are recalculated to include the new
customer. Service to the Southeast Quadrant would be relatively simple as
distribution lines already serve a large portion of the area.
U. S. West prefers to work closely with the developer so as to efficiently serve
new customers. Such cooperation facilitates the acquisition of 20 ft. easements
for the cables and poles; it also ensures the use of the most appropriate
communications system.
G. CABLE TELEVISION
The Southeast Quadrant is in the service area of Telecommunications, Inc. (TCI),
Cablevision of Colorado. TCI Cablevision offers cable television hookup and an
array of programming packages. TCI Cablevision serves the City of Pueblo, the
St. Charles Mesa area, Baxter, and Meadowbrook Mobile Trailer Park.
The company requires that
considering the extension
technicians estimate the t
needed to extend service.
committee for approval.
approximately one year.
there be 28 to 35 residences per square mile prior to
of services. If service is to be offered, company
Dtal cost of materials, labor, and installation methods
An application is made to the company's budget
The application and installation process takes
TCI Cablevision has a contract to use U. S. West telephone poles by application.
It is not opposed to installing cable underground and will work with the developer
in order to install cable in the least obtrusive manner. Costs of installing
cable are approximately $5,000 for an aerial mile and $10,000 for a subsurface
mile. All construction and installation costs of distribution cables are paid for
by the company. Residents who desire the cable services pay for the initial
hookup and then pay a monthly service charge.
— 33 —
VII. PUBLIC FACILITIES-- EXISTIPG AND PROPOSED PLAWS
PRFFARF
Recreation, education, and public protection are community services which maintain
an area's well being, growth, and attractiveness. In turn, growth will impact the
demand for public services and facilities. Public facilities must be capable of
expanding in order to meet this increased demand and still provide consistent
quality and quantity of service.
This section will examine schools, parks, and fire, police facilities, and
services within the Southeast Quadrant. The impact caused by development and
expansion capabilities will also be discussed.
A. SCHOOLS
Pueblo County has two public school districts, No. 60 and No. 70. School District
1!o. 60 is primarily contained within the Pueblo City limits, while School District
do. 70 encompasses the remainder of the County. District boundaries are not
precisely the same as City Wits in that some "City" children go to "County"
schools and vice versa (See Map XXV).
Land use trends and recent development proposals indicate that the Southeast
Quadrant's proposed urban extension area will develop primarily as a .nixed
commercial and industrial area. This area is not anticipated to generate an
excessive demand on schools.
. School District Po. 60.
School District do. 60 is divided into four high school service areas which relate
closely to the City's North, East, Southeast, and Southwest Planning Quadrants.
District No. 60 maintains a total of four (4) high schools, seven (7) middle
schools, and twenty —nine (29) elementary schools. The District prefers that its
elementary schools be "neighborhood" schools in that they are planned to be
located centrally to and within walking distance of the population they serve.
School District No. 60 acquires new school sites by working directly with the
eveloper. The School District prefers this method in lieu of land dedication
through the subdivision process because it allows them to select quality land.
Bradford, Fountain, Fairview, Bessemer, and Spann Elementary Schools and Risley
fiddle School are located within the Southeast area of the District. Bradford and
Parkview Elementary Schools are nearing capacity, A new Risley Middle School is
presently under construction.
East High School serves the study area. This high school would be impacted by
additional growth in the Southeast portion of the School District.
-55-
:.
Table VII illustrates 1991 -1992 enrollments and school capacities for those
schools previously mentioned.
TABLE VII: SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 60 ENROLLMENT
NO. OF STUDENTS
SCHOOL 1991 -1992 CAPACITY*
Elementary
Bessemer
386
450
Bradford
288
420
Fountain
306
500
Parkview
406
500
Spann
269
450
Middle
Risley 477 650
High School
East 1,257 2,000
SOURCE: School District 60 Administrative Office, 1992.
1980 Pueblo Regional Comprehensive Development Plan (figures are currently in
process of being revised).
Capacity of new school.
2. School District No. 70
School District No. 70 maintains one high school, two middle schools, and three
elementary schools which serve students in the study area. Enrollment figures for
1991 -1992 are illustrated on Table VIII. County High, Pleasant View, and Vineland
Middle Schools, and South Mesa, North Mesa, and Vineland Elementary Schools can
adequately serve an increasing enrollment. In addition, Baxter Elementary School,
located north of the Arkansas River on 28th Lane, is currently closed due to
insufficient enrollment. This school would be reopened if growth warranted such
action (See Map XXV).
— 87 —
School District No. 70 is not experiencing intense pressure associated with rapid
development and increasing enrollment. This may change with continuing growth and
annexation by the metropolitan area. Presently, population is lightly
concentrated along U. S. Highway 50 and sparsely distributed throughout the rest
of the County.
The schools in District No. 70 are considered "suburban" schools by the Colorado
Department of Education. Approximately 94 percent of the students are bussed to
schools. The District identifies philosophically with neighborhood schools and
would construct additional facilities in an area to meet the demands of growth and
development.
School District No. 70, through an agreement with Pueblo County, requires that ten
percent of net land in residential developments be dedicated for school sites or
that fees be paid to the District in lieu of land dedication. School officials
estimate that ten to fifteen acres are needed for an elementary school, twenty to
twenty —five for a middle school, and thirty —five to forty acres for a high school.
TABLE VIII: SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 70 ENROLLMENT
SCHOOL
NO. OF STUDENTS
1991 -1992
CAPACITY
Elementary
Middle
Pleasant View 405 700
Vineland 307 350
High School
Pueblo County 986 1,525 -1,525
SOURCE: School District 70, Administrative Services Center, 1992.
Currently being used as a Day Care Center.
Eff-986M
Baxter
- -- 250
North Mesa
336 400
South Mesa
_ 403 700
Vineland
289 400
Middle
Pleasant View 405 700
Vineland 307 350
High School
Pueblo County 986 1,525 -1,525
SOURCE: School District 70, Administrative Services Center, 1992.
Currently being used as a Day Care Center.
Eff-986M
3. Detachment and Annexation of School Districts
Detachment and annexation of territory from one district to another is a complex
process. The School District Organization Act of 1965, Section 22 -30 -138, states
that if detachment and annexation is deemed to be worthwhile, then both boards of
education must adopt a resolution to change the boundaries of their respective
districts. This resolution then goes to a joint committee or to the County school
superintendent to be approved. Once this is done, a special election is held in
the territory proposed to be detached. If five or fewer registered voters reside
within the territory proposed to be detached and annexed, a notarized statement
of consent of all voters within the territory shall make it unnecessary to hold an
election. In the absence of said statements an election must be held. If there
are no registered voters within the territory, no election is to be held; and the
joint committee or County superintendent shall approve the proposed detachment and
annexation of the territory. Such detachment and annexation of territory brings
to issue not only student welfare but district assets, liabilities, revenues, and
influence. It should not be assumed that Districts 60 and 70 would change their
boundaries when land is annexed to the City.
B. RECREATION
1. Parks and Recreation
The City of Pueblo has approximately 948 acres of parkland and 1,707 acres of open
space floodplain within its boundaries. Combined, these account for more than ten
percent of total City land. Recreational facilities include a large urban park
(City Park) which serves the entire Pueblo community, a district park (Mineral
Palace) serving a portion of the City, and smaller parks serving neighborhood
populations.
Park and recreational land standards are expressed in terms of a given number of
acres per unit of population. Those quantitative standards observed by the City
Department of Planning and Development are as shown in Table IX below:
TABLE IX: PARK STANDARDS
DESCRIPTION
SERVICE AREA
DESIRABLE SIZE
POPULATION
Urban Park
30 Minutes
200 Acre Min.
2.5
Ac /1,000
District Park
1 -2 Miles
25 Acre Min.
5.0
Ac /1,000
School Park /Playgrounds
112 Mile
2 -25 Acre Min.
4.0
Ac /1,000
Neighborhood Park
1 -112 Miles
5 Acre Min.
2.5
Ac /1,000
TABLE IX: PARK STANDARDS (CONTINUED)
DESCRIPTION
Special Use Facilities:
Urban Plaza /Streetscape:
Parkways /Median:
Recreational
Trails System:
SERVICE AREA DESIRABLE SIZE POPULATION
Areas which are designated for one single purpose.
Open space in urban core offering sidewalks,
seating, and landscaping.
A landscaped thoroughfare providing visual relief
and natural beauty. Parkways are of considerable
value in the implementation of a recreational trail
system.
A non — motorized trail of varying width (minimum of
eight feet) and length. It is designed to weave
through existing natural /scenic and urban areas,
thus connecting and offering better utilization by
recreational and non — recreational users.
As a home rule city, the City of Pueblo has the authority to own and maintain
property for public purposes. Parkland areas may be acquired through City
purchase, property gifts, through settlement of delinquent taxes, abandonment,
easements, and through land dedication.
Title XII, Chapter 4, Section 7(e) of the City Code of Ordinances, states that
eight percent of land subdivided. for residential purposes (exclusive of street
widths) is to be dedicated as parkland. This land can be several small parks or
one large park depending on the needs of the community. If City Council
determines that said land is not appropriate for parkland dedication, the Council
shall require a cash payment in lieu of land dedication. This payment shall be
equal to eight percent of the fair market value of the land in such subdivisions.
This payment shall be deposited into a special fund to meet future recreational
needs in the City.
The City Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for the development,
operation, and maintenance of recreational and park facilities. The City
Department of Planning and Development provides professional planning and
landscape design services when needed. Financing of new parks and recreational
development is provided through the City's general fund. The dollars generated by
the Colorado Lottery are deposited into the general fund and are earmarked for
"allowable" parks and recreation projects. Funding is supplemented with State and
Federal grants.
— 90 —
Recreational facilities in the City portion of the study area are listed in
Table X below:
TABLE X: URBAN RECREATION FACILITIES -- SOUTHEAST QUADRANT
Approximate
FACILITY Acrea4e*
Neighborhood Parks
Mitchell
Plaza Verde
Bradford
El Centro de Quinto Sol
6.58
6.50
8.30
2.20
School -Parks
Bradford School - Playground
Fountain School Playground
Parkview School - Playground
Risley School - Playground
Spann School- Playground
1.80
3.03
1.43
1.72
4.17
TOTAL ACREAGE: 100.34
`Acreage provided by Pueblo Parks and Recreation Department's Urban Parks and
Recreation Recovery Action Program (1980).
The County area of the study quadrant is limited to a community center serving the
Salt Creek area, a school - playground at the Fulton Heights Elementary School, and
the school -park at Baxter Elementary School (See Map XXVI).
2. Recreational Trails Svstem
The Pueblo River Trails System consists of non - motorized trails available for
bicyclists, pedestrians, horses, and other non - motorized recreationalists. Trails
in the City are generally 8 ft. wide and are constructed of asphalt or concrete.
Trails flank the Arkansas River to the Reservoir and the Fountain Creek. Other
paths are located along sections of Wildhorse Creek, State Highway 78,
Northern Avenue, Pueblo Boulevard, State Highway 47, U. S. Highway 50 Bypass, and
near the University of Southern Colorado.
It is desirable to plan for multipurpose trails in order that proper right -of -way
be reserved and that a logical network can be constructed. Trails in the study
area should take advantage of the Arkansas River, rural areas, proposed parks, and
principal roadways. They should link existing recreational facilities with
natural settings and other public facilities.
- 91 -
5 ;
L
1 ,�'1 / I� 1 ETP9
U.
7 0
0
o
- C ca
L- CL
0 1
_u 0
-C 0
z co
4-
C)
0
Q)
a .
7F)
0 0 Q.
0
0 *
a)
E-
F
A
u
ZZ
Y.
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Development
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
MAP:
xxvi
- 92 -
The Pueblo Bicycle Syste,, and Trails Plan was completed in 1990 by the City of
Pueblo Department of Planning and Development. This plan exa,ines the existing
trails system and proposes logical extensions of the system. The plan also
examines trail design construction factors and safety. The goal of the plan is to
set fortis policies aimed at the construction of a trails system which will serve
Pueblo in an efficient, safe, and pleasurable manner.
The Pueblo County Planning Department has outlined a conceptual plan for a river
trails recreational system. This plan would include a multipurpose trail south of
the river, linking small parks, the airport, and the St. Charles Mesa communi—
ties. The County Department will research the possibility of acquiring land which
was previously used for mineral extraction activities. These areas, once
reclaimed, could be developed as recreational, picnic, and trail access areas.
C. FIRE
1. City Fire Department
The Pueblo City Fire Department provides standard fire protection to the City of
Pueblo. The Department employs 134 fire fighters and three administrative
assistants and operates nine fire stations. Operating and improvement costs are
budgeted by the City.
The City is divided into eight fire protection zones and one zone at the airport.
Each is served by a fully equipped fire station. The Southeast portion of the
City is served by four fire stations (See ;lap XXVII).
Stati No. 4 , located at 1201 E. Evans, is equipped with a three —way pumper truck
and
The
crew
This
an 85 ft, aerial fire truck. This station employs three, five — person shifts.
station also houses the Hazardous Materials (HAVRAT) Response Team. This
is specially trained and equipped to contain hazardous material accidents.
teary will respond to emergencies County —wide.
Station Pao. 6 , located at 1335 E. 4th Street, is equipped with a three —way pumper
truck and staffed by three, four — person shifts.
Station No. 9 , located on Prairie Avenue and 2500 Aster, is equipped with a
three —way pumper truck and staffed by three, three— person shifts.
Station No. 10 , located at the airport terminal area, is staffed by three, two
person shifts and is equipped with a three —way pumper truck and two crash trucks.
In the event that a new station is heeded, the Fire Department will apply for
special funding from City Council. A new fire station, utilities, a new pumper
truck, equipment, and fire fighter salaries (3 shifts and backup personnel) would
initially amount to $861,000 (1988 dollars). Annual operation costs would be
approximately $400,000 0988 dollars).
By department standards, a station should be central to its service area with no
point further than one and one —half miles away. It is ideal to have a maximum
response time between four and one —half and five minutes to any point in the
service area. Roadways, accessibility, and the number and density of housing
units are all factors contributing to new fire station locations.
_93—
- 94 -
2. Pueblo Rural Fire Protection District
The County portion of the study area is contained within the Pueblo Rural Fire
Protection District.
The Pueblo Rural Fire District is made up of two fire stations (See flap XXVII) and
serves a large area. The District has a mutual aid agreement with the City Fire
Department stating that either department will assist the other, upon request, in
the event of an emergency.
3. CF I
The Colorado Fuel and Iron Corporation (CF &I) has its own fire protection
service. The City Fire Department has a inutual aid agreement with CF &I.
4. Summary
If build -out of the Southeast Quadrant's proposed urban extension area is
realized, additional fire protection facilities, staffing, and equipment will be
needed. Airport Station No. 10 could be expanded to serve a portion of the area
by increasing the number of fire fighters per shift so that the station remains
staffed during emergencies. New facilities would be needed as development density
and the area requires.
Long -range plans for the Pueblo City Fire Department are dependent upon where
development takes place, new road construction, number of buildings, density of
buildings, and other factors which may affect response time. Slow City growth has
benefited the Department, enabling precise planning decisions to be made.
D. POLICE
1. Citv Police Department
The Pueblo City Police Department is located at 130 Central Plain Street. All
operations are headquartered at this location; there are no substations. The
Department employs 171 authorized sworn officers and maintains an array of patrol
vehicles. The City is divided into ten beats, or routes, which are patrolled 24
hours a day in three shifts. The annual cost for one beat is approximately
$207,500, including three, one- person shifts of officers, backup personnel, and
automobile expenses and repairs (1989 Dollars).
All areas within Pueblo County (incorporated and unincorporated) are within the
jurisdiction of the County Sheriff. However, when land is annexed to the City,
the Police Department assumes primary protection of that area. There are no
specific standards for instituting a new patrol route: If the Department has a
concern for an area as to the amount of protection needed, a study will be
organized by the Department. This inquiry will examine the level, type, and
density of development, the employment sources, and the employee and consumer
- 95 -
generating sources. Business and commercial development requires higher levels of
protection than does strictly residential development. The sources of
employment, employees, and consumers will indicate to the Department if activity
is new to the Pueblo area or merely a shift from another area. The decision to
create a new beat will be based on the Police Department study.
The Southeast portion of the City is protected by four patrol routes. These
routes have been expanded to incorporate the 1988 U. S. Highway 50 —B annexation.
With the addition of this annexed property, the capability of further expansion of
police service is at a minimum. Pueblo's Police Chief has stated that City
Council must review the capability of the Department's current staff to support
and serve any additional annexations to the City.
2. County Sheriff Department
The County Sheriff deputies patrol all areas outside the City, with the exception
of the airport and AIP. They patrol Baxter and the St. Charles Mesa
communities and provide service to areas in the Southeast proposed urban extension
area. The County Sheriff deputies do not regularly patrol the open rangeland.
Upon annexation, police protection transfers from the County Sheriff Department to
the Pueblo City Police Department.
— 96 —
VIII. CURRENT ZONING AND LAND USE
PREFACE
Land uses within this study area reflect historical as well as current development
trends. These trends indicate that the Southeast Quadrant will not likely develop
into an extensive residential area. This section will document current zoning and
land uses in both the City and the County. Zoning and land uses recommended by
this plan reflect a desire for compatible yet flexible planning policies.
A. CITY ZONING
Zoning trends in the southeastern part of the City reflect a transition from
residential uses in the north to industrial areas in the south. The area in the
northwest corner of the quadrant is primarily residential, with pockets of
neighborhood commercial zones. Toward the Missouri— Pacific Railroad and the
confluence of the Fountain Creek and Arkansas River, parcels tend to be industrial
and public. Continuing south is a small residential area surrounded by industrial
lands, followed by the residential areas near Lake Plinnequa (See ( XXVIII).
B. COUNTY ZONING
Areas in the Southeast Quadrant present a wide variety of Pueblo County land use
zones. Industrial zones include the CF &I Steel Corporation and the Comanche power
generating plant. The southern portion of the St. Charles Mesa is agriculturally
zoned. The Blende community and areas adjacent to U. S. Highway 50 —C include
primarily low to medium density housing, rural residential areas, and some
agricultural uses.
These residential areas are mixed with commercial zones along U. S. Highway 50 —C.
Approaching the river from the south, zoning returns to agricultural areas (A -2)
and open space floodplains (S -1).
f'1ap XXIX details current zoning in the proposed urban extension area. Here the
land begins in the west with industrial and public lands, a few residential
parcels, and then is zoned agricultural near the river. Adjacent to U. S. Highway
50 —B are several industrially zoned properties and a multiple— residential and
commercial zone which includes a nonconforming mobile home park. The residential
community of Baxter provides low —to— medium— density residential zoning with some
commercial zoning. A second multiple residential and commercial zone containing a
nonconforming mobile home park is located between 33rd and 34th Lanes.
Agricultural land continues to the eastern boundary of the area.
— 97 —
I -25
nil
1-3
U.S. HIGHWAY 50
4 ,
A
H
north
4:
T k ,��•� �f M: � l� .
Bz4-
�T
T
j - R-3
1 7-
j q i r !*.-' "I ,
F
KEY
Single-family residential
0
(R-1, R-2)
Multi- f amily Residential/
Office(R-3, R-4, R- R"6)
Mobile Home Par>< Ik-7)
Commercial/Off ice
(B-1 B-2 B-3 0
Industrial (1-1, 1-2 1-3)
Public Use (8-1)
Floodplain (8-3)
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Development
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN
0
z
1�1
z
0
MAP:
XXVIII
- 98 -
m o o
i
.� z
z
ix
U .
ey
GiN
Til i7
Ty
f il � z
y U
City of Pueblo Department of Planning & Development MAP:
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ANNEXATION MASTER PLAN XXIX
-
99 -
C. LAND USES
1. General
Land uses in the Southeast Quadrant study area vary widely. In the study area,
land uses are primarily residential and rural residential. These are supported by
commercial uses along U. S. Highway 50 —C (Santa Fe Drive). Small scale farming is
also prevalent. Two large industries, CF &I Steel Corporation and Public Service
Company's Comanche Power Plant, are located in this quadrant.
Land uses between U. S. Highway 50 —B and the Arkansas River include Pueblo's
East Side low— density residential uses, some warehousing activities, and other
commercial uses. There is a wastewater treatment plant, mineral extraction
operations, and vacant land in the area. Continuing east, small scale industries
flank U. S. Highway 50 —B. Agricultural or vacant lands are situated between these
and the Arkansas River. There is mobile home park, the residential community of
Baxter, and several convenience markets. Continuing east is located a second
mobile home park and agricultural uses in the study area's boundary.
2. Farmlands
The economy of Pueblo County is partially based on the farming and ranching
industry. The land in the study area supports such crops as alfalfa, corn, dry
beans, sorghum, and peppers.
The U. S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, was charged with
the responsibility of identifying and locating prime and unique farmlands. This
important farmland program also encouraged the identification of farmlands of
Statewide and local importance. Prime agricultural lands, as identified on
Map XXX, are defined as having adequate and dependable water supply from
irrigation, a favorable temperature and growing season, acceptable acidity or
alkalinity, and acceptable salt and sodium content. Soils should be permeable to
air and water, not excessively erodible, nor excessively saturated with water.
It is recommended by this plan that those prime agricultural lands located in the
Southeast Quadrant proposed urban extension area remain as agricultural and rural
residential areas.
— 100 —
APPENDIX A
STANDARD AVIGATION EASUIENT
WHEREAS,
Grantor, is the owner in fee simple
Pueblo County, Colorado, described on
Grantor's property.
, hereinafter called the
of that certain tract of land situated in
Exhibit "A" hereto, hereinafter called
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and
other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the Grantor, for itself, its heirs, personal representatives
and assigns, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, and convey unto the City of Pueblo,
hereinafter called the Grantee, its successors and assigns, for the use and benefit
of the public, an easement and right -of -way appurtenant to the City of Pueblo's
Mlemorial Airport, for the unobstructed passage of all aircraft ( "aircraft" being
defined for the purposes of this instrument as any device now known or hereafter
invented, used, or designed for navigation of or flight in the air) by whomsoever
owned and operated, in the airspace above the surface of Grantor's Property to an
infinite height above said Grantor's Property, together with the right to cause in
said airspace such noise, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel particles, and all other
effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft landing at, or taking off
from, or operating at or on said Airport. Grantor further covenants and agrees for
itself, its successors, and assigns that no man -made or non - man -made obstructions
on Grantor's Property shall penetrate the 40:1 approach surface of said Airport;
that Grantor's Property shall not be used in a manner as to result in or cause
electromagnetic, light, or any other physical emissions which interfere with
aircraft, avigation, communications or navigational aids, or radio communication
between said Airport and aircraft, or flyers' ability to distinguish between said
Airport's lights and others, or glare in the eyes of flyers using said Airport, or
impaired visibility, or otherwise to endanger the landing, taking off, or
maneuvering of aircraft. Where applicable the singular includes the plural.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said easement and right -of -way and all rights
appertaining thereto unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, until said
Airport shall be abandoned and shall cease to be used for public airport purposes;
it being understood and agreed that these covenants and agreements shall run with
the land and may be enforced by specific performance.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal
this day of , 1991, A.D.
By:
State of Colorado
City of Pueblo
of
Notary Public
Poly Commission expires:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
, 1991, by
day
[S EALI