Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6317RESOLUTION NO. 6317 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR PRO- FESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF PUEBLO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. QPrTTnnT 1 _ The Agreement For Engineering Services between the City and Wright Water Engineers, Inc. dated January 9, 1989 relating to the proposed golf course, the original which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein, having been approved as to form by the City Attorney, is hereby approved. SECTION 2 The President of the City Council is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreement for and on behalf of the City and the City Clerk is directed to affix the seal of the City thereto and attest same. ATTEST: INTRODUCED: January 9, 1989 By MIKE SALARDINO Councilman APPROVED: C ty Clerk Pres dent of the City Council AGREEMENT FOR ENGINE SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made this 9th day of January 1989, by and between the City of Pueblo Colorado, a Colorado municipal corporation ( hereafter "the City ") , and Wright Water Engineers, Inc. ( hereafter "the Engineers ") . R E C I T A L S A. The City desires to obtain engineering services in connection with certain projects which the Department of Public Works will conduct during 1989 (hereafter collectively referred to as the "Project ") . B. The Engineers provide professional engineering services to the public and are fully qualified to perform the engineering services needed by the City in connection with the Project. C O V E N A N T S NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and obligations set forth below, the City and the Engineers agree as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. GENERAL The Engineers shall serve as the City's professional representatives in connection with the Project and shall consult and advise the City as it reasonably requires during the term of this Agreement. They shall act as agent for, and at the direction of, the City employee who has been assigned by the City to the Project as Project Manager. As a general matter, they shall communicate with the City about the Project only through the Project Manager. B. SPECIFIC DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES In connection with the Project, the Engineers shall undertake the duties and responsibilities described in Appendix A, ( proposal dated December 1, 1988) which consists of 7 pages are attached and incorporated herein by reference. C. EXTRA SERVICES Upon the express, written request of the City, the Engineers shall perform services beyond the scope of the duties and responsibilities described in Appendix A. The engineers shall charge the City for such extra services, if any, in accordance with the provisions of Subsection IV.C. Page 1 of 6 Pages It D. DOCUMENTS All work notes, reports, computer programs (nonproprietary), computer input and output, analyses, tests, maps, surveys, or any other materials developed specifically for the Project are and shall remain the sole and exclusive property of the City. The Engineers shall not provide copies of any material prepared hereunder to any other party without the prior written consent of the City. Engineer may retain copies of material for his files. II. COOPERATION BY CITY The City will thoroughly and promptly consider all reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals and other documents prepared by the Engineers, and it shall inform the Engineers of all decisions it has made which would affect the Engineer's work under the Agreement as soon as reasonably feasible. The City will inform the Engineers of any pending change or revision to the Project as soon as reasonably feasible. The City will provide the Engineers with current, updated plans for the Project as soon as reasonably feasible after they are produced. III. SCHEDULE The Engineers' services are anticipated to be provided over the course of 6 to 8 weeks, occurring between January 11, 1989 and March 11, 1989 However, it is understood by the parties that the actual schedule may differ from what is anticipated. The Engineers shall provide their services at such times as are necessary in order to promote the smooth progress of the Project, while at the same time, as much as possible, avoiding overtime work by the Engineers. IV. AMOUNT OF PAYMENTS TO ENGINEERS A. AGGREGATE LIMIT Unless services in addition to those specified in Subsection IB are subsequently agreed upon in writing, the amount paid by the City to the Engineers pursuant to this Agreement will not exceed the sum of $ 12,400 B. INSPECTION OR RECORDS Upon reasonable, advance request, the City may inspect and copy any or all records of the Engineers which would bear on any amounts charged to the City pursuant to this Agreement. Page 2 of 6 Pages n. C. SPECIFIC CHARGES The Engineers shall charge the City for their services hereunder on an hourly rate not to exceed basis. The compensation for the services performed hereunder shall be charged as specified in Appendix B, which consists of 1 pages, and are attached and incorporated herein by reference. V. BILLS AND TIME OF PAYMENTS TO ENGINEERS A. The Engineers shall bill their charges to the City once a month. The monthly, itemized invoices from the engineers shall include the following: 1. A list of the Engineers' employees who worked on the Project during the billing period, the amount of time each worked, and the associated payroll costs for these individuals. 2. An itemized list of reimbursable expenses and, where appropriate, copies of invoices for outside services or materials. B. The City will pay each such bill in full within 45 days of its receipt. If the City fails to pay the Engineers in full within 45 days after receipt of a bill, the amount shall include a charge at the rate of 1 -1/2 percent per month from the forty -fifth day. IV. TERMINATION A. This agreement may be terminated by either party for a material breach of the Agreement by the other party not caused by any action or omission of the terminating party by giving the other party written notice at least three (3) days in advance of the termination date. The termination notice shall specify in reasonable detail each such material breach. If this Agreement is so terminated by the Engineers, they will be paid for all services rendered up to the date of termination. If this Agreement is terminated under this subparagraph A, the Engineers shall promptly deliver to the City all drawings, computer programs, computer input and output, analyses, plans, photographic images, test, maps, surveys, and written materials of any kind generated in the performance of its services under this Agreement up to and including the date of termination. Termination pursuant to this Subsection shall not prevent either party from exercising any other legal remedies which may be available to it. Page 3 of 6 Pages B. In addition to the foregoing, this Agreement may be terminated by the City for its convenience and without cause of any nature by giving the Engineers written notice at least seven (7) days in advance of the termination date. In the event of such termination, the Engineers will be paid for all services rendered to the date of termination and upon such payment, all obligations of the City to the Engineers under this Agreement will cease. Furthermore, in the event of such termination, the Engineers shall promptly deliver to the City all drawings, computer programs, computer input and output, plans, photographic images, analyses, tests, maps, surveys, and written material of any kind generated in the performance of its services under this Agreement up to and including the date of termination. VII. SUSPENSION Without terminating this Agreement or breaching its obligations hereunder, the City may, at its pleasure, suspend the services of the Engineers hereunder. Such suspension may be accomplished by giving the Engineers written notice one (1) day in advance of the suspension date. Upon receipt of such notice, the Engineers shall cease their work in as efficient a manner as possible so as to keep their total charges to the City for services under this Agreement to the minimum. VII. LAWS TO BE OBSERVED The Engineers shall be cognizant of all federal and state laws and local ordinances which in any manner affect those engaged or employed in the work or which in any manner affect the conduct of the work, and of all such orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having any jurisdiction or authority over the same, and shall at all times observe and comply with all such existing laws, ordinances, regulations and decrees, and shall protect and indemnify the City against any claim or liability arising from or based on the violations of any such law, ordinance, regulation, order or decree, whether by itself or its subcontractors, agents, or employees. The Engineers agree to pay costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the City as a result thereof. In addition, the inclusion of this paragraph shall not limit any common law remedies of indemnification that the City may have. IX. PERMITS AND LICENSES The Engineers shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges, fees and taxes and give all notices necessary and Incidental to the due and lawful prosecution of its services. X. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES The Engineers shall hold and save harmless the City from any and Page 4 of 6 Pages 't- all claims for infringement, by reason of the use of any patented design, device, material, process, any trademark or copyright and shall indemnify the City for any costs, expenses and damages which it might be obligated to pay by reason of infringement, at any time during the prosecution or after completion of the work. XI. IDEMNIFICATION The Engineers shall be responsible for all damages to persons or property caused by them, their agents or employees, which may result from their negligent acts, errors and omissions hereunder, and will idemnify and hold harmless the City from any claim brought against the City by reason thereof, and pay all costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the City as a result of such actions. In Addition, the inclusion of this paragraph shall not limit any common law remedies of indemnification that the City may have. XII. INSURANCE A. MINIMUM AMOUNTS The Engineers shall carry the following minimum amounts of insurance: 1. Worker's Compensation in statutory limits. 2. Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability Policy for amounts not less than: Bodily Injury $150,000 each person, including death $400,000 each occurrence Property Damage $150,000 each occurrence 3. Engineers' Professional Liability Policy for the amount of $100,000 per claim, (in no case this amount being less than $100,000 per claim) . B. COVERAGE Said insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement and shall protect the Engineers, their employees, subcontractors, agents and representatives, and the City from claims for damages for personal injury and wrongful death and for damages to property arising in any manner from negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of the Engineers, their employees, agents or representatives, in the performance of the services covered herein. Page 5 of 6 Pages C. VALUABLE PAPERS Furthermore, the Engineers shall carry valuable papers insurance in an amount sufficient to assure the restoration of any plans, drawings, field notes or other similar data related to the services covered by this Agreement in the event of their loss or destruction until such a time as the final submission by the Engineers has been made and accepted by the City. D. CERTIFICATES Certificates showing that the Engineers are carrying the above described insurance shall be furnished to the City within fifteen (15) calendar days after the date on which the Agreement is made. XIII. GENERAL This document constitutes the entire agreement between the City and the Engineers. Neither party shall assign, sublet, or transfer its interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. No amendments or modifications shall be made to this Agreement unless it is in writing and signed by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Agreement effective as of the day and year first above written. City of 7 j w,( - ?, o Colorado WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. B ` y2 �ent The City Council ATTEST: City Clerk Director of Finance and Record Ex- Officio City Clerk s En:31ineerin.g Con;,ul,an,3 24-3 1h ~st 201 Ave., SU;'c 55-A Denver, C iGicuv �;2, (1.13) 881- 117.000 Paae 6 of 6 Paaes Wright Water Engineers, Inc. DENVER OFFICE 2490 West 26th Ave., Suite 100 A Denver, Colorado 80211 (303) 480 -1700 TULSA OFFICE 201 West 5th St., Suite 130 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103 (918) 584 -7136 GLENWOOD SPRINGS OFFICE 818 Colorado Avenue P. O. Box 219 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 (303) 945 -7755 Denver Direct Line: 893 -1608 December 1, 1988 Mr. Ryszard Zajac Assistant Manager City of Pueblo P.O. Box 1427 Pueblo, CO 81002 Re: Proposal for Preliminary Engineering Evaluation of Golf Course Feasibility on 260 -acre Tract North of the University of Southern Colorado Dear Mr. Zajac: At your request, we have prepared the following suggested scope of work and engineeng proposal for the preliminary golf course feasibility study that we discussed with you and Messrs. Lewis Quigley and Tom Cvar on November 23. We recommend a phased approach to this assignment. Phase 1, which is des- cribed within this letter, represents a preliminary engineering feasibility evaluation. If the results of Phase 1 indicate that a golf course is fea- sible in the sub''ect setting, then a more detailed engineering evaluation (Phase 2) should be conducted. The scope of our Phase I study will focus on: (1) the concerns that you expressed to us on November 23 and (2) gen- eral golf course feasibility questions. The concerns that you expressed to us include the following: 1. Can surface drainage be accommodated? 2. How will the local groundwater regime be affected by the course? 3. What will the physical behavior of soils and the underlying geo- logy be in response to irrigation water application'? 4. Will adjacent properties be adversely affected by changes in the groundwater and surface water regime? Will there be adverse public reaction to the proposal? 5. Finally, from a general standpoint, is the site suitable for a golf course given the basic topography, on -site soils, site geo- F 0 and surface water /groundwater hydrologic characteristics'? Mr. Ryszard Zajac December 1, 1988 Page 2 To preliminarily address these concerns, our recommended Phase 1 work pro- gram would include five steps: 1. Data gathering and interviews. 2. Identification of design concerns. 3. Evaluation of the site itself with particular emphasis on con- straints. 4. Define site utilization alternatives. S. Prepare preliminary engineering feasibility report. Immediately after completing Phase 1, and assuming that a golf course appears to be feasible, prior to proceeding to a Phase 2 feasibility study, a site audit for hazardous constituents should be undertaken. The city should not acquire property that has liability associated with it. Discussion regarding each of the five work steps follows. STEP l: DATA GATHERING AND INTERVIEWS The following data will be collected: o All civil engineering feasibility studies pertaining to the site itself. • Topographic mapping. • Surface water hydrology information. • Hydrogeologic information. • Geologic mapping and reports. • Soils /geotechnical engineering mapping /reports. • Utilities. o Literature review. Data will be collected for the 260 -acre site and the adjacent main arroyo. Interviews will be conducted with staff from the U.S. Geological Survey, Soil Conservation Service, and Colorado State Geologists office. We regu- larly consult with the Colorado State Geologist, Mr. John Rold on assign- ments of this nature and would plan to have him function in a similar capa- city on this assignment. Mr. Ryszard Zajac December 1, 1988 Page 3 Wright Water Engineers will prepare for and attend two progress meetings during Phase 1 to keep the city informed of the status and to obtain speci- fic direction for the project. The importance of understanding existing groundwater problems at downgrad- ient sites cannot be overestimated. To protect the city of Pueblo from liability in the event that a golf course is constructed in this setting, the city must be aware of how baseline conditions change. If problems are currently being experienced, and if remedial actions are planned or have been implemented, we should be fully informed of relevant details. STEP 2: IDENTIFICATION OF DESIGN CONCERNS This phase of the study will focus on refining the concerns that you raised with us (as delineated at the outset of this letter). Field evaluation of the site and formulation of alternatives will undoubtedly prompt new design concerns, which will also be described. Identifying potential problems is especially important because the various alternatives for site development will be judged in the context of the identified potential problems. Selec- tion of the preferred alternative, if one exists, could well be based as much on how it interacts with design concerns as on traditional evaluation criteria such as capital and operation /maintenance costs, land require- ments, environmental impact, etc. STEP 3: FIELD EVALUATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRAINTS Our proposed Phase l budget precludes more than minimal soil sampling and augermg : however, substantial information about the soils and geologic characteristics of the site can be garnered by a thorough field inspection. This field inspection at a strategy level will consist of 6 to 10 pits and result in a report which estimates general site characteristics and identi- fies design constraints. Selecting the most appropriate location on the 260 -acre tract for the golf course could well be the most effective miti- gation measure available. Consequently, a thorough understanding of site variability will be essen- tial to enable this determination. Through very limited testing of surface and subsurface soils for geotechnical and chemical properties, coupled with observations of subsurface features in the many arroyos on the property, road and highway cuts and other features, we hope to develop an understand- ing of such items as: o What amendments will have to be added to soil to make it suitable for growing the required array of grasses. • Likely alkali problems once irrigation is practiced. • Geologic profile from the surface soils to depths of at least 20 feet. Mr. Ryszard Zajac December 1, 1988 Page 4 o Detailed visual observation of the various materials constituting the profile (moisture content, fracturing, response to wetting, etc.). o Likely behavior of recharge water from irrigation. o Frequency of lenses. o Beddin& planes (strike and clip), especially as they relate to the likely direction of flow to downgradient properties. STEP 4: PREPARE SITE UTILIZATION ALTERNATIVES To develop potential golf course alternatives, we will solicit limited input from a golf course architect. The role of the golf course architect will be to provide a "fatal flaw" analysis to assure that we do not study an alternative that is clearly infeasible from the standpoint of general golf course design. The golf course architect will visit the site with us, concisely delineate fatal flaw feasibility issues and participate in "brainstorming" of alternatives. Regardless of which alternatives are studied, the underlying mitigation strategy will consist of three aspects: Minimize the amount of irrigation water recharge to subsurface materials. 2. If excess irrigation water is applied and there is recharge to subsurface materials, intercept the subsurface water before it leaves the confines of the 260 -acre tract. Once the water has been intercepted, convey it in open channels or buried conduits to downslope outfalls. 3. There is the possibility that for even the preferred alternative, mitigation strategies 1 and 2 will not be totally effective. In the absence of total effectiveness, some shallow groundwater could migrate downgradient and theoretically affect structures. Pro- vided that existing (baseline) conditions are fully understood and if it can be demonstrated that only under unusual circumstances will groundwater leave the golf course and migrate downgradient, then it may be feasible to argue that the golf course cannot mate- rially affect downgradient properties. This argument represents mitigation strategy 3 and it should be viewed only as a last resort. In fact, the city of Pueblo could well decide that if mitigation strategies 1 and 2 cannot be fully assured, then the subject tract will not be suitable for a golf course. This is an important policy question that requires resolution after steps I through 3 of our work plan have been completed. Mr. Ryszard Zajac December 1, 1988 Page 5 Strategies that we will rely upon to minimize the potential for adverse impacts to downgradient properties include: • Careful site selection. Through optimizing the location of e course on the 0 -acre tract, it may be possible to avoid problems to downgradient properties altogether. • Carefully control the amount of irrigation water applied. Through sophisticated monitoring ot the va ose (unsaturated) zone using suction lysimeters, potentiometers, gypsum blocks and similar devices, the behavior of the "wetted front" can be monitored. So long as the wetted front does not advance below a prescribed depth (probably 2 to 3 feet), there will not be groundwater recharge to underlying strata that could adversely affect downstream properties. By contrast, ex- cessive irrigation water application will create deep ground- water recharge which could cause downgradient problems, pro- vided that the groundwater is not intercepted. o Provide groundwater interception facilities. This strategy involves the construction of devices to stop excessive irrigation water from leaving the 260 -acre tract. Potential interception mechanisms include deepened surface drainage channels, trenches that are backfilled with granular material and drained by gravity, selective use of conven- tional underdrains beneath areas of particularly high water application, especially greens, selective installation of permeable layers of material beneath topsoil with accompany- ing drainage systems, and others. Two major factors may influence the feasibility of the these strategies: 1. The effectiveness of underdrains may be impaired due to the tightness of the soil and concurrent high construction costs. 2. To prevent buildup of alkali in the topsoil, periodic flush- ing with relatively large doses of water may be required. This conflicts with the essential need to limit the amount of irrigation water applied. STEP 5: REPORT PREPARATION The Phase 1 engineering evaluation would culminate with a written report that would describe our methodology, findings, and recommendations. Three outcomes could emanate from the Phase 1 analysis: 1. The site is clearly feasible. 2. The site is clearly not feasible. Mr. Ryszard Zajac December 1, 1988 Page 6 3. Further evaluation is required (proceed with Phase 2 feasibility study). If a Phase 2 study is recommended, we will describe the elements and asso- ciated costs of the study in our Phase 1 report. ESTIMATED FEES Our estimated fees for this assignment can be summarized as follows: Task Number Estimated Cost 1. Data collection and interviews $3,000 2. Identify potential problems 2,000 3. Site evaluation and constraints 1,800 4. Conceptualize and contrast 3,000 alternatives 5. Prepare feasibility report 2,200 6. Peer review 500 TOTAL $12,400 The costs provided above do not include the following: • Additional meetings (beyond two) with city of Pueblo staff to dis- cuss the project, including travel expenses (mileage and meals). • Miscellaneous costs such as long distance calls, printing, post- age, etc. • Geotechnical or chemical laboratory tests. • Travel costs (mileage and meals). Mr. Ryszard Zajac December 1, 1988 Page 7 We will be pleased to discuss our proposed fees desire. We are prepared to start this work project to take 6 to 8 weeks to complete from cerely appreciate the opportunity to be of working on this project. Very truly yours, and scope of work if you so immediately and estimate the m notice to proceed. We sin - service and look forward to WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. B William P. Ruzzo,JV.. Senior P ject Manager B J onat an E. Jones,1 Vice President JEJ /WPR:ard (1.40) 881 - 117.000 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES Personnel Senior Principal Engineer - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PrincipalEngineer - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Senior Project Engineer - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Senior Water or Wastewater Engineer I - - - - - - - - - - Senior Geohydrologist - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SeniorWaterEngineerIl - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Geohydrologist - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Water or Wastewater Engineer I - - - - - - - - - - - - - CivilEngineerI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Civil Engineer II - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Water or Wastewater Engineer II - - - - - - - - - - - - - Senior Engineering Designer /Consultant - - - - - - - - - Water Resources Analyst - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EngineeringDesigner - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Groundwater Geologist - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Geologist - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Senior Engineering Draftsman I - - - - - - - - - - - - - __Resident Engineer - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Senior Engineering Draftsman II - - - - - - - - - - - - - Senior Resident Inspector - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hydrologic Technician - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Engineering Draftsman - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Computer Technician - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Resident Inspector - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EngineeringTechnician - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Technician - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SpecialTechnician - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Senior Water Engineer /Consultant - - - - - - - - - - - - Automobile at 25 cents per mile. Four -wheel drive vehicle at 35 cents per mile. Rate Per Hour [$1 85 75 70 65 65 60 55 54 54 46 46 46 46 43 43 40 40 40 35 35 37 32 32 27 30 27 20 85 Five percent (5 %) will be added to out -of- pocket expenses to cover adminis- tration for special consultants, independent laboratory tests, direct printing costs, telephone, miscellaneous supplies, lodging and subsistence, in -house computer, word processor, auto, and travel. Terms of Payment It is agreed that this account will be billed on a monthly basis. Unless otherwise approved by our company, payment is due thirty (30) days after billing date at the main office of the company at 2490 West 26th Avenue, Suite 55 -A, Denver, Colorado 80211. If payment is not received, client agrees to pay interest at the rate of 1.5% per month on the outstanding balance. This does not constitute a credit arrangement; and in no case shall the minimum payment be less than 33% of the amount billed. If account is placed with an attorney for collection, client agrees to pay court costs and reasonable attorney's fee. d Z Q W Z 0 W Q W Q I C! n U V r ' International Surplus Lines k Insurance Company CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE THIS IS TO CERTIFY as to the existence as of this date of the below described insurance with International Surplus Lines Insurance Company. Should any change occur in this insurance, the undersigned will endeavor to give written notice to the holder of this certificate, but failure to give such notice shall impose no obligation or liability upon the company or the undersigned. Named Insured Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Address 2490 West 26th Avenue, Suite 100 —A Denver, Colorado 80211 Policy or Policies of Insurance described as follows: Policy Number: PAE -3888 ❑Architects' Professional Liability Policy E7Engineers' Professional Liability Policy Term: From December 31, 1988 to December 31, 1989 12:01 A.M., standard time, at the address of the Named Insured as stated herein. Limits of Liability: $ 2,000,000 each claim, and in the aggregate to all claims discovered during the policy period. This certificate is issued at the request of: Name City of Pueblo, Colorado Attn: Ryszard Zajac, Asst. Mgr. Address P.O. Bog 1427 Pueblo, Colorado 81002 This Certificate of Insurance neither affirmatively or negatively amends, extends or alters the coverage afforded by any of the above mentioned policies. REMARKS: Project: Preliminary Engineering Evaluation of Gulf Course Feasibility North of University Of Southern Colorado Certified this 6th day of ____. February __19 89 INTERNATIONAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY FM 200.0.46 (3 -88) n C E R T I F I C A T E G F I N S U R A N C E ISSUE DATE (MM /DD /YYYY): 1/25i1989 ------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'PRCDL!CER : THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY 'ND CONFERS NO ; ;PILG.R.IM ASSOC., INC. ; RIGHTS L!PGN THE CERTIfICA ?E HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE ^GCS NOT AMEND, ; ;44 Cook St. ; EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELnW. ; ;DENVER, COLORADO 80205 -------'----- -- -------------------------------- - - - - -; : CCDE SUB -CODE '-------------------------------------------!- ; C 0 M P A N I E S A F F 0 R D I N 5 r G C R A G E �JSi 4' I ;,tD C ^!� ' P='NY LETTER A: NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL ; , �.. ;ar 7nt WafPf Fniir : C.. NY LETTER B. :24gO Nest 25th Ave. ; COMPANY LETTER C: :3,nna rnaPaNy IETTPR D ;Denver co 30211 ; COMPANY LETTER E: COVERAGES THIS IS Tn rFRTTFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY ; PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT ; TO 'WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS ; SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. : - - - - -; --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;C0 TYPE OF INSURANCE ; POLICY NUMBER ; POLICY ;POLICY EXPIR -; ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS ; rE DATE; ATION DATE ; rFECT. : 'Am `DD /YYYY : MM /DD /YYYY ; ---;---------------------------------- A ;GENERAL LIABILITY ;--------------------------- !------------ ; ------------- ;---------------------------------- ; BCP379219 ; 4/01/1933 ; 410111989 :GENERAL .IGGREOA'E ; $ 1 ;[X]CGMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ; ; ;PRO DUCTS - COUP AGGREGATE ; $ 1,000 ; [ lclaims made [X] occurrence : ; :PERS. $ ADVERTISING : INJURY ; $ 1.000 : ;[ ]OWNERS $ CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE; :EACH OCCURRENCE ; $ 1.000 ; ;FIRE DAMAGE (ANY ONE ; : FIRE) ; $ 50 ; ;MEDICAL EXPENSE (ANY ONE PERSON) ; $ 5 : ---;---------------------------------- ;--------------------------- ;------------ ;------------- ;---- --- --------------- ;----------- : A ;AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ; BCP379219 ; 41'01/1983 ; 4/0111989 ;COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT ; $ 500 ; :[X] ANY AUTO ; ; :BODILY INJURY ; ;[ ] ALL OWNED AUTOS : ; : : (PER PERSON) : :[ ] SCHEDULED AUTOS : : : :BODILY INJURY HIRED AUTOS : : : : (Pb ACCIDENT) : $ : :[ ] NON - nWNED AUTOS ;[ ] GARAGE LIABILITY : : : :PROPERTY DAMAGE ---------- --------------------------- - - - - : A ;EXCESS LIABILITY -' ------------- - - - - -- :------------ :-- ----------- :----------------------- : BCP379214 4/0111953: 4/01/1989 : EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE ; :[ ] OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM ; : : $ 1,000 $ 1,000 : - - - - - -------------------------- - - - - - WORKERS' COMPENSATION ! : : :STATUTORY T : AND r 1 ; $ (EACH AC -iDENT) , EMP!OYERS' LIABILITY : : : : $ (DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT): $ (DISEASE -EACH EMPLOY.); '------------ ' -----------'----------------------------- - - - - -; - --'----------------------------- - - - - GT;IER r , -'--------------------------- t r , :DESCRIPTIONS OF OPERATIONS /LOCAT IONS /', "EHiCLES / "nESTRICTIO:dS /SPECIAL ITEMS Project: Preliminary Engineering E valuation of Golf Course Feasibility North of University of Southern Colorado ;= CERTIFICATE HOLDER = --------------------- -----= CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE : City of Pueblo, Colorado : EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL ; : Att:Ryszard Zajac : DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, : P. 0. Box 1427 : BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATIO:i OR LIABIL- : Pueblo, CO 81002 : ITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. : '---------------------------- - - - - -- -------- --------------------------------- AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE r ----- --- +=---- ---- ---- - - - -- -- -� *`---=----------- - - - - -, -------- ACORD 25 -S (3133) - - - - -! -------------------- r . ArORD is a reaist_ _ er•. -, Corporation