HomeMy WebLinkAbout6317RESOLUTION NO. 6317
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR PRO-
FESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE
CITY OF PUEBLO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC.
QPrTTnnT 1 _
The Agreement For Engineering Services between the City and
Wright Water Engineers, Inc. dated January 9, 1989 relating to the
proposed golf course, the original which is on file in the office
of the City Clerk and incorporated herein, having been approved as
to form by the City Attorney, is hereby approved.
SECTION 2
The President of the City Council is hereby authorized and
directed to execute the Agreement for and on behalf of the City
and the City Clerk is directed to affix the seal of the City
thereto and attest same.
ATTEST:
INTRODUCED: January 9, 1989
By MIKE SALARDINO
Councilman
APPROVED:
C ty Clerk Pres dent of the City Council
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINE SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 9th day of January 1989, by and between the City
of Pueblo Colorado, a Colorado municipal corporation ( hereafter "the
City ") , and Wright Water Engineers, Inc. ( hereafter "the Engineers ") .
R E C I T A L S
A. The City desires to obtain engineering services in connection with
certain projects which the Department of Public Works will conduct
during 1989 (hereafter collectively referred to as the "Project ") .
B. The Engineers provide professional engineering services to the
public and are fully qualified to perform the engineering services
needed by the City in connection with the Project.
C O V E N A N T S
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and obligations set forth
below, the City and the Engineers agree as follows:
I. SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. GENERAL
The Engineers shall serve as the City's professional
representatives in connection with the Project and shall
consult and advise the City as it reasonably requires during
the term of this Agreement. They shall act as agent for, and
at the direction of, the City employee who has been assigned by
the City to the Project as Project Manager. As a general
matter, they shall communicate with the City about the Project
only through the Project Manager.
B. SPECIFIC DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
In connection with the Project, the Engineers shall undertake
the duties and responsibilities described in Appendix A,
( proposal dated December 1, 1988) which consists of 7 pages
are attached and incorporated herein by reference.
C. EXTRA SERVICES
Upon the express, written request of the City, the Engineers
shall perform services beyond the scope of the duties and
responsibilities described in Appendix A. The engineers shall
charge the City for such extra services, if any, in accordance
with the provisions of Subsection IV.C.
Page 1 of 6 Pages
It
D. DOCUMENTS
All work notes, reports, computer programs (nonproprietary),
computer input and output, analyses, tests, maps, surveys, or
any other materials developed specifically for the Project are
and shall remain the sole and exclusive property of the City.
The Engineers shall not provide copies of any material prepared
hereunder to any other party without the prior written consent
of the City. Engineer may retain copies of material for his
files.
II. COOPERATION BY CITY
The City will thoroughly and promptly consider all reports,
sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals and other documents
prepared by the Engineers, and it shall inform the Engineers of all
decisions it has made which would affect the Engineer's work under
the Agreement as soon as reasonably feasible. The City will inform
the Engineers of any pending change or revision to the Project as
soon as reasonably feasible. The City will provide the Engineers
with current, updated plans for the Project as soon as reasonably
feasible after they are produced.
III. SCHEDULE
The Engineers' services are anticipated to be provided over the
course of 6 to 8 weeks, occurring between January 11, 1989 and
March 11, 1989 However, it is understood by the parties that the
actual schedule may differ from what is anticipated. The Engineers
shall provide their services at such times as are necessary in
order to promote the smooth progress of the Project, while at the
same time, as much as possible, avoiding overtime work by the
Engineers.
IV. AMOUNT OF PAYMENTS TO ENGINEERS
A. AGGREGATE LIMIT
Unless services in addition to those specified in Subsection IB
are subsequently agreed upon in writing, the amount paid by the
City to the Engineers pursuant to this Agreement will not
exceed the sum of $ 12,400
B. INSPECTION OR RECORDS
Upon reasonable, advance request, the City may inspect and copy
any or all records of the Engineers which would bear on any
amounts charged to the City pursuant to this Agreement.
Page 2 of 6 Pages
n.
C. SPECIFIC CHARGES
The Engineers shall charge the City for their services
hereunder on an hourly rate not to exceed basis. The
compensation for the services performed hereunder shall be
charged as specified in Appendix B, which consists of 1
pages, and are attached and incorporated herein by reference.
V. BILLS AND TIME OF PAYMENTS TO ENGINEERS
A. The Engineers shall bill their charges to the City once a
month. The monthly, itemized invoices from the engineers shall
include the following:
1. A list of the Engineers' employees who worked on the
Project during the billing period, the amount of time each
worked, and the associated payroll costs for these
individuals.
2. An itemized list of reimbursable expenses and, where
appropriate, copies of invoices for outside services or
materials.
B. The City will pay each such bill in full within 45 days of its
receipt. If the City fails to pay the Engineers in full within
45 days after receipt of a bill, the amount shall include a
charge at the rate of 1 -1/2 percent per month from the
forty -fifth day.
IV. TERMINATION
A. This agreement may be terminated by either party for a material
breach of the Agreement by the other party not caused by any
action or omission of the terminating party by giving the other
party written notice at least three (3) days in advance of the
termination date. The termination notice shall specify in
reasonable detail each such material breach. If this Agreement
is so terminated by the Engineers, they will be paid for all
services rendered up to the date of termination. If this
Agreement is terminated under this subparagraph A, the
Engineers shall promptly deliver to the City all drawings,
computer programs, computer input and output, analyses, plans,
photographic images, test, maps, surveys, and written materials
of any kind generated in the performance of its services under
this Agreement up to and including the date of termination.
Termination pursuant to this Subsection shall not prevent
either party from exercising any other legal remedies which may
be available to it.
Page 3 of 6 Pages
B. In addition to the foregoing, this Agreement may be terminated
by the City for its convenience and without cause of any nature
by giving the Engineers written notice at least seven (7) days
in advance of the termination date. In the event of such
termination, the Engineers will be paid for all services
rendered to the date of termination and upon such payment, all
obligations of the City to the Engineers under this Agreement
will cease. Furthermore, in the event of such termination, the
Engineers shall promptly deliver to the City all drawings,
computer programs, computer input and output, plans,
photographic images, analyses, tests, maps, surveys, and
written material of any kind generated in the performance of
its services under this Agreement up to and including the date
of termination.
VII. SUSPENSION
Without terminating this Agreement or breaching its obligations
hereunder, the City may, at its pleasure, suspend the services of
the Engineers hereunder. Such suspension may be accomplished by
giving the Engineers written notice one (1) day in advance of the
suspension date. Upon receipt of such notice, the Engineers shall
cease their work in as efficient a manner as possible so as to keep
their total charges to the City for services under this Agreement
to the minimum.
VII. LAWS TO BE OBSERVED
The Engineers shall be cognizant of all federal and state laws and
local ordinances which in any manner affect those engaged or
employed in the work or which in any manner affect the conduct of
the work, and of all such orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals
having any jurisdiction or authority over the same, and shall at
all times observe and comply with all such existing laws,
ordinances, regulations and decrees, and shall protect and
indemnify the City against any claim or liability arising from or
based on the violations of any such law, ordinance, regulation,
order or decree, whether by itself or its subcontractors, agents,
or employees. The Engineers agree to pay costs and reasonable
attorneys' fees incurred by the City as a result thereof. In
addition, the inclusion of this paragraph shall not limit any
common law remedies of indemnification that the City may have.
IX. PERMITS AND LICENSES
The Engineers shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all
charges, fees and taxes and give all notices necessary and
Incidental to the due and lawful prosecution of its services.
X. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES
The Engineers shall hold and save harmless the City from any and
Page 4 of 6 Pages
't-
all claims for infringement, by reason of the use of any patented
design, device, material, process, any trademark or copyright and
shall indemnify the City for any costs, expenses and damages which
it might be obligated to pay by reason of infringement, at any time
during the prosecution or after completion of the work.
XI. IDEMNIFICATION
The Engineers shall be responsible for all damages to persons or
property caused by them, their agents or employees, which may
result from their negligent acts, errors and omissions hereunder,
and will idemnify and hold harmless the City from any claim brought
against the City by reason thereof, and pay all costs and
reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the City as a result of such
actions. In Addition, the inclusion of this paragraph shall not
limit any common law remedies of indemnification that the City may
have.
XII. INSURANCE
A. MINIMUM AMOUNTS
The Engineers shall carry the following minimum amounts of
insurance:
1. Worker's Compensation in statutory limits.
2. Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability Policy for
amounts not less than:
Bodily Injury
$150,000 each person, including death
$400,000 each occurrence
Property Damage
$150,000 each occurrence
3. Engineers' Professional Liability Policy for the amount of
$100,000 per claim, (in no case this amount being less than
$100,000 per claim) .
B. COVERAGE
Said insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect
during the term of this Agreement and shall protect the
Engineers, their employees, subcontractors, agents and
representatives, and the City from claims for damages for
personal injury and wrongful death and for damages to property
arising in any manner from negligent or wrongful acts or
omissions of the Engineers, their employees, agents or
representatives, in the performance of the services covered
herein.
Page 5 of 6 Pages
C. VALUABLE PAPERS
Furthermore, the Engineers shall carry valuable papers
insurance in an amount sufficient to assure the restoration of
any plans, drawings, field notes or other similar data related
to the services covered by this Agreement in the event of their
loss or destruction until such a time as the final submission
by the Engineers has been made and accepted by the City.
D. CERTIFICATES
Certificates showing that the Engineers are carrying the above
described insurance shall be furnished to the City within
fifteen (15) calendar days after the date on which the
Agreement is made.
XIII. GENERAL
This document constitutes the entire agreement between the City and
the Engineers. Neither party shall assign, sublet, or transfer its
interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the
other. No amendments or modifications shall be made to this
Agreement unless it is in writing and signed by both parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Agreement effective
as of the day and year first above written.
City of 7 j w,( - ?, o Colorado WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC.
B ` y2
�ent The City Council
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Director of Finance and Record
Ex- Officio City Clerk
s
En:31ineerin.g Con;,ul,an,3
24-3 1h ~st 201 Ave., SU;'c 55-A
Denver, C iGicuv �;2,
(1.13)
881- 117.000
Paae 6 of 6 Paaes
Wright Water Engineers, Inc.
DENVER OFFICE
2490 West 26th Ave., Suite 100 A
Denver, Colorado 80211
(303) 480 -1700
TULSA OFFICE
201 West 5th St., Suite 130
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103
(918) 584 -7136
GLENWOOD SPRINGS OFFICE
818 Colorado Avenue
P. O. Box 219
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
(303) 945 -7755
Denver Direct Line: 893 -1608
December 1, 1988
Mr. Ryszard Zajac
Assistant Manager
City of Pueblo
P.O. Box 1427
Pueblo, CO 81002
Re: Proposal for Preliminary Engineering Evaluation of Golf Course
Feasibility on 260 -acre Tract North of the University of Southern Colorado
Dear Mr. Zajac:
At your request, we have prepared the following suggested scope of work and
engineeng proposal for the preliminary golf course feasibility study that
we discussed with you and Messrs. Lewis Quigley and Tom Cvar on November
23.
We recommend a phased approach to this assignment. Phase 1, which is des-
cribed within this letter, represents a preliminary engineering feasibility
evaluation. If the results of Phase 1 indicate that a golf course is fea-
sible in the sub''ect setting, then a more detailed engineering evaluation
(Phase 2) should be conducted. The scope of our Phase I study will focus
on: (1) the concerns that you expressed to us on November 23 and (2) gen-
eral golf course feasibility questions.
The concerns that you expressed to us include the following:
1. Can surface drainage be accommodated?
2. How will the local groundwater regime be affected by the course?
3. What will the physical behavior of soils and the underlying geo-
logy be in response to irrigation water application'?
4. Will adjacent properties be adversely affected by changes in the
groundwater and surface water regime? Will there be adverse
public reaction to the proposal?
5. Finally, from a general standpoint, is the site suitable for a
golf course given the basic topography, on -site soils, site geo-
F 0
and surface water /groundwater hydrologic characteristics'?
Mr. Ryszard Zajac
December 1, 1988
Page 2
To preliminarily address these concerns, our recommended Phase 1 work pro-
gram would include five steps:
1. Data gathering and interviews.
2. Identification of design concerns.
3. Evaluation of the site itself with particular emphasis on con-
straints.
4. Define site utilization alternatives.
S. Prepare preliminary engineering feasibility report.
Immediately after completing Phase 1, and assuming that a golf course
appears to be feasible, prior to proceeding to a Phase 2 feasibility study,
a site audit for hazardous constituents should be undertaken. The city
should not acquire property that has liability associated with it.
Discussion regarding each of the five work steps follows.
STEP l: DATA GATHERING AND INTERVIEWS
The following data will be collected:
o All civil engineering feasibility studies pertaining to the site
itself.
• Topographic mapping.
• Surface water hydrology information.
• Hydrogeologic information.
• Geologic mapping and reports.
• Soils /geotechnical engineering mapping /reports.
• Utilities.
o Literature review.
Data will be collected for the 260 -acre site and the adjacent main arroyo.
Interviews will be conducted with staff from the U.S. Geological Survey,
Soil Conservation Service, and Colorado State Geologists office. We regu-
larly consult with the Colorado State Geologist, Mr. John Rold on assign-
ments of this nature and would plan to have him function in a similar capa-
city on this assignment.
Mr. Ryszard Zajac
December 1, 1988
Page 3
Wright Water Engineers will prepare for and attend two progress meetings
during Phase 1 to keep the city informed of the status and to obtain speci-
fic direction for the project.
The importance of understanding existing groundwater problems at downgrad-
ient sites cannot be overestimated. To protect the city of Pueblo from
liability in the event that a golf course is constructed in this setting,
the city must be aware of how baseline conditions change. If problems are
currently being experienced, and if remedial actions are planned or have
been implemented, we should be fully informed of relevant details.
STEP 2: IDENTIFICATION OF DESIGN CONCERNS
This phase of the study will focus on refining the concerns that you raised
with us (as delineated at the outset of this letter). Field evaluation of
the site and formulation of alternatives will undoubtedly prompt new design
concerns, which will also be described. Identifying potential problems is
especially important because the various alternatives for site development
will be judged in the context of the identified potential problems. Selec-
tion of the preferred alternative, if one exists, could well be based as
much on how it interacts with design concerns as on traditional evaluation
criteria such as capital and operation /maintenance costs, land require-
ments, environmental impact, etc.
STEP 3: FIELD EVALUATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTRAINTS
Our proposed Phase l budget precludes more than minimal soil sampling and
augermg : however, substantial information about the soils and geologic
characteristics of the site can be garnered by a thorough field inspection.
This field inspection at a strategy level will consist of 6 to 10 pits and
result in a report which estimates general site characteristics and identi-
fies design constraints. Selecting the most appropriate location on the
260 -acre tract for the golf course could well be the most effective miti-
gation measure available.
Consequently, a thorough understanding of site variability will be essen-
tial to enable this determination. Through very limited testing of surface
and subsurface soils for geotechnical and chemical properties, coupled with
observations of subsurface features in the many arroyos on the property,
road and highway cuts and other features, we hope to develop an understand-
ing of such items as:
o What amendments will have to be added to soil to make it suitable
for growing the required array of grasses.
• Likely alkali problems once irrigation is practiced.
• Geologic profile from the surface soils to depths of at least 20
feet.
Mr. Ryszard Zajac
December 1, 1988
Page 4
o Detailed visual observation of the various materials constituting
the profile (moisture content, fracturing, response to wetting,
etc.).
o Likely behavior of recharge water from irrigation.
o Frequency of lenses.
o Beddin& planes (strike and clip), especially as they relate to the
likely direction of flow to downgradient properties.
STEP 4: PREPARE SITE UTILIZATION ALTERNATIVES
To develop potential golf course alternatives, we will
solicit limited
input from a golf
course architect. The role
of the golf
course architect
will be to provide
a "fatal flaw" analysis to
assure that we
do not study
an alternative that
is clearly infeasible from
the standpoint
of general
golf course design.
The golf course architect
will visit the
site with us,
concisely delineate
fatal flaw feasibility
issues and
participate in
"brainstorming" of alternatives.
Regardless of which alternatives are studied, the underlying mitigation
strategy will consist of three aspects:
Minimize the amount of irrigation water recharge to subsurface
materials.
2. If excess irrigation water is applied and there is recharge to
subsurface materials, intercept the subsurface water before it
leaves the confines of the 260 -acre tract. Once the water has
been intercepted, convey it in open channels or buried conduits to
downslope outfalls.
3. There is the possibility that for even the preferred alternative,
mitigation strategies 1 and 2 will not be totally effective. In
the absence of total effectiveness, some shallow groundwater could
migrate downgradient and theoretically affect structures. Pro-
vided that existing (baseline) conditions are fully understood and
if it can be demonstrated that only under unusual circumstances
will groundwater leave the golf course and migrate downgradient,
then it may be feasible to argue that the golf course cannot mate-
rially affect downgradient properties. This argument represents
mitigation strategy 3 and it should be viewed only as a last
resort. In fact, the city of Pueblo could well decide that if
mitigation strategies 1 and 2 cannot be fully assured, then the
subject tract will not be suitable for a golf course. This is an
important policy question that requires resolution after steps I
through 3 of our work plan have been completed.
Mr. Ryszard Zajac
December 1, 1988
Page 5
Strategies that we will rely upon to minimize the potential for
adverse impacts to downgradient properties include:
• Careful site selection. Through optimizing the location of
e course on the 0 -acre tract, it may be possible to avoid
problems to downgradient properties altogether.
• Carefully control the amount of irrigation water applied.
Through sophisticated monitoring ot the va ose (unsaturated)
zone using suction lysimeters, potentiometers, gypsum blocks
and similar devices, the behavior of the "wetted front" can
be monitored. So long as the wetted front does not advance
below a prescribed depth (probably 2 to 3 feet), there will
not be groundwater recharge to underlying strata that could
adversely affect downstream properties. By contrast, ex-
cessive irrigation water application will create deep ground-
water recharge which could cause downgradient problems, pro-
vided that the groundwater is not intercepted.
o Provide groundwater interception facilities. This strategy
involves the construction of devices to stop
excessive irrigation water from leaving the 260 -acre tract.
Potential interception mechanisms include deepened surface
drainage channels, trenches that are backfilled with granular
material and drained by gravity, selective use of conven-
tional underdrains beneath areas of particularly high water
application, especially greens, selective installation of
permeable layers of material beneath topsoil with accompany-
ing drainage systems, and others.
Two major factors may influence the feasibility of the these
strategies:
1. The effectiveness of underdrains may be impaired due to the
tightness of the soil and concurrent high construction costs.
2. To prevent buildup of alkali in the topsoil, periodic flush-
ing with relatively large doses of water may be required.
This conflicts with the essential need to limit the amount of
irrigation water applied.
STEP 5: REPORT PREPARATION
The Phase 1 engineering evaluation would culminate with a written report
that would describe our methodology, findings, and recommendations. Three
outcomes could emanate from the Phase 1 analysis:
1. The site is clearly feasible.
2. The site is clearly not feasible.
Mr. Ryszard Zajac
December 1, 1988
Page 6
3. Further evaluation is required (proceed with Phase 2 feasibility
study).
If a Phase 2 study is recommended, we will describe the elements and asso-
ciated costs of the study in our Phase 1 report.
ESTIMATED FEES
Our estimated fees for this assignment can be summarized as follows:
Task Number Estimated Cost
1.
Data collection and interviews
$3,000
2.
Identify potential problems
2,000
3.
Site evaluation and constraints
1,800
4.
Conceptualize and contrast
3,000
alternatives
5.
Prepare feasibility report
2,200
6.
Peer review
500
TOTAL
$12,400
The costs provided above do not include the following:
• Additional meetings (beyond two) with city of Pueblo staff to dis-
cuss the project, including travel expenses (mileage and meals).
• Miscellaneous costs such as long distance calls, printing, post-
age, etc.
• Geotechnical or chemical laboratory tests.
• Travel costs (mileage and meals).
Mr. Ryszard Zajac
December 1, 1988
Page 7
We will be pleased to discuss our proposed fees
desire. We are prepared to start this work
project to take 6 to 8 weeks to complete from
cerely appreciate the opportunity to be of
working on this project.
Very truly yours,
and scope of work if you so
immediately and estimate the
m notice to proceed. We sin -
service and look forward to
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC.
B
William P. Ruzzo,JV..
Senior P ject Manager
B J
onat an E. Jones,1
Vice President
JEJ /WPR:ard
(1.40)
881 - 117.000
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC.
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
Personnel
Senior Principal Engineer - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PrincipalEngineer - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Senior Project Engineer - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Senior Water or Wastewater Engineer I - - - - - - - - - -
Senior Geohydrologist - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SeniorWaterEngineerIl - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Geohydrologist - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Water or Wastewater Engineer I - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CivilEngineerI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Civil Engineer II - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Water or Wastewater Engineer II - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Senior Engineering Designer /Consultant - - - - - - - - -
Water Resources Analyst - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EngineeringDesigner - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Groundwater Geologist - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Geologist - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Senior Engineering Draftsman I - - - - - - - - - - - - -
__Resident Engineer - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Senior Engineering Draftsman II - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Senior Resident Inspector - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hydrologic Technician - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Engineering Draftsman - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Computer Technician - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Resident Inspector - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EngineeringTechnician - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Technician - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SpecialTechnician - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Senior Water Engineer /Consultant - - - - - - - - - - - -
Automobile at 25 cents per mile.
Four -wheel drive vehicle at 35 cents per mile.
Rate Per Hour [$1
85
75
70
65
65
60
55
54
54
46
46
46
46
43
43
40
40
40
35
35
37
32
32
27
30
27
20
85
Five percent (5 %) will be added to out -of- pocket expenses to cover adminis-
tration for special consultants, independent laboratory tests, direct printing
costs, telephone, miscellaneous supplies, lodging and subsistence, in -house
computer, word processor, auto, and travel.
Terms of Payment It is agreed that this account will be billed on a monthly
basis. Unless otherwise approved by our company, payment is due thirty (30)
days after billing date at the main office of the company at 2490 West 26th
Avenue, Suite 55 -A, Denver, Colorado 80211. If payment is not received,
client agrees to pay interest at the rate of 1.5% per month on the outstanding
balance. This does not constitute a credit arrangement; and in no case shall
the minimum payment be less than 33% of the amount billed. If account is
placed with an attorney for collection, client agrees to pay court costs and
reasonable attorney's fee.
d
Z
Q
W
Z
0
W
Q
W
Q
I
C!
n
U
V
r ' International Surplus Lines
k Insurance Company
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY as to the existence as of this date of the below described insurance with International Surplus Lines
Insurance Company. Should any change occur in this insurance, the undersigned will endeavor to give written notice to the
holder of this certificate, but failure to give such notice shall impose no obligation or liability upon the company or the
undersigned.
Named Insured Wright Water Engineers, Inc.
Address 2490 West 26th Avenue, Suite 100 —A
Denver, Colorado 80211
Policy or Policies of Insurance described as follows:
Policy Number: PAE -3888
❑Architects' Professional Liability Policy
E7Engineers' Professional Liability Policy
Term: From December 31, 1988 to December 31, 1989
12:01 A.M., standard time, at the address of the Named Insured as stated herein.
Limits of Liability: $ 2,000,000 each claim, and in the aggregate to all claims
discovered during the policy period.
This certificate is issued at the request of:
Name City of Pueblo, Colorado
Attn: Ryszard Zajac, Asst. Mgr.
Address P.O. Bog 1427
Pueblo, Colorado 81002
This Certificate of Insurance neither affirmatively or negatively amends, extends or alters the coverage afforded by any of
the above mentioned policies.
REMARKS:
Project: Preliminary Engineering Evaluation of
Gulf Course Feasibility North of University
Of Southern Colorado
Certified this 6th day of ____. February __19 89
INTERNATIONAL SURPLUS LINES
INSURANCE COMPANY
FM 200.0.46 (3 -88)
n
C E R T I F I C A T E G F I N S U
R A N C E ISSUE DATE (MM /DD /YYYY): 1/25i1989
------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'PRCDL!CER
: THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY 'ND CONFERS NO ;
;PILG.R.IM ASSOC., INC.
; RIGHTS L!PGN THE CERTIfICA ?E HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE ^GCS NOT AMEND, ;
;44 Cook St.
; EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELnW. ;
;DENVER, COLORADO 80205
-------'----- -- -------------------------------- - - - - -;
: CCDE SUB -CODE
'-------------------------------------------!-
; C 0 M P A N I E S A F F 0 R D I N 5 r G C R A G E
�JSi 4'
I ;,tD
C ^!�
' P='NY LETTER A: NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL ;
, �..
;ar 7nt WafPf Fniir
: C.. NY LETTER B.
:24gO Nest 25th Ave.
; COMPANY LETTER C:
:3,nna
rnaPaNy IETTPR D
;Denver co 30211
; COMPANY LETTER E:
COVERAGES
THIS IS Tn rFRTTFY THAT POLICIES
OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY ;
PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT ;
TO 'WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE
ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS ;
SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS,
AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. :
- - - - -;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
;C0 TYPE OF INSURANCE
; POLICY NUMBER ; POLICY ;POLICY EXPIR -; ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS ;
rE DATE; ATION DATE ;
rFECT.
: 'Am `DD /YYYY : MM /DD /YYYY
;
---;----------------------------------
A ;GENERAL LIABILITY
;--------------------------- !------------ ; ------------- ;----------------------------------
; BCP379219 ; 4/01/1933 ; 410111989 :GENERAL .IGGREOA'E ; $ 1
;[X]CGMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
; ; ;PRO DUCTS - COUP
AGGREGATE ; $ 1,000 ;
[ lclaims made [X] occurrence
: ; :PERS. $ ADVERTISING
: INJURY ; $ 1.000 :
;[ ]OWNERS $ CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE;
:EACH OCCURRENCE ; $ 1.000 ;
;FIRE DAMAGE (ANY ONE ;
: FIRE) ; $ 50 ;
;MEDICAL EXPENSE (ANY
ONE PERSON) ; $ 5 :
---;----------------------------------
;--------------------------- ;------------ ;------------- ;---- --- --------------- ;----------- :
A ;AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
; BCP379219 ; 41'01/1983 ; 4/0111989 ;COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT ; $ 500 ;
:[X] ANY AUTO
; ; :BODILY INJURY ;
;[ ] ALL OWNED AUTOS
: ; : : (PER PERSON)
: :[ ] SCHEDULED AUTOS
: : : :BODILY INJURY
HIRED AUTOS
: : : : (Pb ACCIDENT) : $ :
:[ ] NON - nWNED AUTOS
;[ ] GARAGE LIABILITY
: : : :PROPERTY DAMAGE
----------
--------------------------- - - - -
: A ;EXCESS LIABILITY
-' ------------- - - - - -- :------------ :-- ----------- :-----------------------
: BCP379214 4/0111953: 4/01/1989 : EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE ;
:[ ] OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
; : : $ 1,000 $ 1,000 :
- - - - - -------------------------- - - - - -
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
! : : :STATUTORY
T
: AND
r 1
; $ (EACH AC -iDENT) ,
EMP!OYERS' LIABILITY
: : : : $ (DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT):
$ (DISEASE -EACH EMPLOY.);
'------------ ' -----------'----------------------------- - - - - -;
- --'----------------------------- - - - -
GT;IER
r
,
-'---------------------------
t
r
,
:DESCRIPTIONS OF OPERATIONS /LOCAT IONS /', "EHiCLES / "nESTRICTIO:dS /SPECIAL ITEMS
Project: Preliminary Engineering E valuation
of Golf Course Feasibility North of
University of Southern Colorado
;= CERTIFICATE HOLDER = ---------------------
-----= CANCELLATION
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE :
City of Pueblo, Colorado
: EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL ;
: Att:Ryszard Zajac
: DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, :
P. 0. Box 1427
: BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATIO:i OR LIABIL- :
Pueblo, CO 81002
: ITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. :
'---------------------------- - - - - -- -------- ---------------------------------
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
r
----- --- +=---- ---- ---- - - - -- -- -� *`---=----------- - - - - -,
--------
ACORD 25 -S (3133)
- - - - -! -------------------- r .
ArORD is a reaist_ _ er•. -, Corporation