HomeMy WebLinkAbout6144RESOLUTION NO. 6144
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
PUEBLO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND THE COLORADO STATE
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DIVISION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
CONCERNING CENTRALIZED TRAFFIC DATA AND AUTHORIZING THE
PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL TO EXECUTE SAME.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PUEBLO, COLORADO,
THAT:
SECTION 1.
The contract between the City of Pueblo, a Municipal
Corporation, and the Colorado State Department of Higways, Division
of Highway Safety, relating to the acceptance of $14,400 in grant
monies is hereby approved. Grant monies will be used to centralize
traffic data entry and develop a data base of traffic violations and
accidents transferrable to micro - computers.
SECTION 2.
The City of Pueblo's share of the project, in the
amount of $16,977, is available in and is hereby transferred from
accounts 001 -0100- 109 - 0 - 010 - 0104, 001- 0100 - 109 -0 020 - 0004,
001 - 0100 - 109 -0 020 - 0008, 001 - 0100 - 109 -0 020 - 0009, and
001 -0100- 109 -0 030 - 0011.
SECTION 3.
The President of the City Council is hereby authorized
to execute this contract for and on behalf of the City and the City
Clerk is authorized and directed to attest same and affix the seal of
the City thereto.
`_
ATTEST:
Introduced February 8 , 1988
Michael A. Occhiato
Councilman
APPROV
r sident of the Council
7
r �
Cit Clerk
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS- DIVISION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT APPLICATION
1. Proposed Activity:
Centralized Traffic Data Entry
2. Applicant Agency City of Pueblo, Data Processing Department.
Mailing Address 150 Central Main Street
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
3. Policy and Budget Authority:
Lewis Quigley, City Manager
4. Proposed Period: (mo) (day) (yr) (mot taay) tyrt
From 1 1 88 To 8 31 88
5. Signature (see additional certifications on next page):
(type name and title)
6. Date Submitted:
12 -15 -87
7. PRELIMINARY APPROVAL (Policy and Budget Authority):
Signature: !�
(type name and title)
Lewis Quigley, City Manager
For:
)Agency) City of Pueblo
Date:
December 15, 1987
NOTE. Refer to Section 11, Colorado Division of Highway Safety Contract Management Manual for
instructions in the preparation of this application.
rnnu c........
DHS Previous eamon■ ars aosms.. -au -, . - - - -. --- i
ADDITIONAL REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS
1.
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: . (use one of the two following statements)
NOTE: If an affirmative action plan is required, but has not been previously approved, it
should accompany this application at the time of submission.
I certify an affirmative action plan, meeting the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, (42 U.S.C. 200d -d4) has been approved by and is on file with, the
Colorado Department of Highways Equal Employment Opportunity Office.
Signature
J`�l J W✓ .0
(type name and title)
Lewis Quigley, City Manager
I certify an affirmative action plan, meeting the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, (42 U.S.C. 2000d -d4) is not required for this agency.
Signature
(type name and title)
2.
PROJECT CONTINUATION:
I certify it is intended to continue any highway safety- funded project activities to a point in
the future substantially beyond the project expiration date without any material reduction In
the level or thrust of the efforts. STRIKE OUT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING NON - APPLICABLE
STATEMENTS. QAc�adtaXipaoXOCacatDt�erx�4# isc3�xitxxm 'leatKklW�atOtagxMols�c�ft .
6II��bG�6J�ldX�i10RX�XUC�f 1�d g �(YD�da76D(�iK)C)0�(UCVVQ4?4 ft(?tF�m}� 7 � X ((7E<1F�k�(�( u X�C
�$ck����k>�d�t6l �xaoA�] a�Cat�iK�iaQ1XQl�rl%�C14��y�1]4 �1�tPtxd ��`1�14�da1 �lit4�6tI�1�4J�yX�f��
ftxxicsck( �AcaiQxr ore�a ►t?gcacge�a�c�C>�at�}ax�xDC� t4t<gV�v���1St4i��y�E i� l4m���Sd�d�4?4�P4r�t`c�a'ti4�S�
wok l� a �i oa � ix�tic�c#�r�aaig�c � ►`altf c � �i �ifl�f�r�tX� x �i dit�g � YsXy�
Signature
(type name and title)
Lewis Quigley, City Manager
OHS -10 cuum Form
page 2
I PART A - PROBLEM STATEMENT
(1) Describe the situation. Include data and any other information to establish the existing conditions.
(2) State why this situation is undesirable.
(3) What are the causes?
(4) Identify changes needed to resolve the identified problem(s).
When the computerized record - keeping system was developed in -house for
the Pueblo Police Department eight years ago, the decision was made to omit
traffic records from the system. That decision was based upon three
pertinent facts. First, on -line storage was limited and traffic records
would require a great deal of disk space. Second, all necessary
information was at that time being collected and made available on -line
through the STEP/MIS program and to include traffic information in the
Pueblo system would be a duplication of records. Finally, one full -time
employee was responsible for data entry into the STEP/MIS system, and it
was considered an unnecessary duplication of effort to repeat the process
for the Pueblo system.
In March of 1986, the STEP/MIS program was decentralized through a
system of microcomputers, and traffic information was no longer collected
or available through the on -line system. Although disk storage space was
no longer a problem, the need for on -line records and centralized data
entry still existed, and traffic records were assimilated into the Pueblo
records system. One of the two Zenith microcomputers provided by the
Division of Highway Safety was placed in the Police Department's Traffic
office and the other in the City Traffic Engineer's office, where STEP/MIS
information pertinent to each office could be collected and necessary
reports generated. Unfortunately, funds were not available for the newly
acquired data entry functions in the two City departments, and now while
traffic records are available through the on -line records system, STEP/MIS
information is gathered and reports generated only when manpower is
available for data entry in either of the two departments.
Both the Police Department and the Traffic Engineer agree that valuable
statistical information is to be had through the STEP/MIS programs
developed to run under REVELATION software on the Zenith computers,
however, neither department considers it cost efficient to duplicate the
data entry process on the mainframe and on the microcomputers. The City's
Data Processing Department has offered a centralized data entry solution
based on the collection of data through the mainframe and the transferral
of that data to the microcomputers.
A programmer who has interned for the Data Processing Department for
two years was hired on a temporary basis in June, 1987, to begin work on
the solution. Analysis of the system requirements has been completed and
program design has begun, however, funding for the programmer will run out
December 31, 1987. To complete the process will require the modification
of certain programs now running on the mainframe, the development of new
mainframe programs focusing on traffic records, and the development of
microcomputer programs to convert the raw data to REVELATION format. 1988
budgeted staffing for, the Data Processing Department is not adequate to
complete these tasks on a timely basis, and funding of the temporary
programmer is needed for the remaining eight months of the project.
CDOH Form a
PART B - PROPOSED ACTIVITIES
GOAL To centralize the data entry function for the City of Pueblo's traffic
incident records and provide for the transfer of necessary data from the
mainframe to the microcomputer -based STEP/MIS system.
TASKS: State what is to be accomplished and when.
1. Modify existing mainframe programs to separate traffic - related
incidents from criminal incidents by March 1, 1988.
2. Generate new mainframe programs to add, modify, and query
traffic- related incidents by May 1, 1988.
3. Install, test, and debug completed on -line system by June 1,
1988.
4. Generate, test, and debug data transfer programs by July 1, 1988.
5. Train users, document, and install completed system by September
1, 1988.
PART C - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
What equipment, if any, will be purchased to meet the needs of this project? NOTE: Items previously
purchased with highway safety funds are not eligible for replacement with highway safety funds.
NONE
DHS -10 l.Uu rorm
p:. 4
PART D- EVALUATION AND MONITO
(1) State how success or failure of the project will be determined. Administrative, Performance or Impact
measures can be used (See Project Evaluation in Contract Management Manual).
Success or failure of the project will be determined by the following
administrative criteria:
1. Is the traffic system completely compatible with the current ,
on -line system and the STEP/4IS microcomputer system?
2. Is the system user friendly both from the data entry /retrieval
standpoint and from the operational standpoint?
3. Is the system reliable and completely debugged?
4. Are resultant reports correct in both content and format, and do
they meet the needs of the users?
(2) State how the Contract Director will monitor project activity and progress during the contract period.
The Contract Director will monitor project activity through the use of
weekly status reports and time sheets required of project participants.
TI>ese reports include progress made during the reporting period, problems
encountered, and percent of completion. The forms are part of a standard
procedure within the Data Processing Department.
coon Form
DHS -10 page 5
PART E - BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
DHS Use
Only (1) Salaries
HSP
Task
Number
Name or Position
Base
Pay
($)
Benefits
(S)
Monthly
Weekly
Etc.
No.
of
Mos.
Total
(S)
DHS
Share
(S)
Agem
Shar
(S)
David Van Dyke
10.00
-0-
Hourly
8
14,400
14,400
-0-
_
Programmer
2212
500
Monthly
4
10,848
-0-
10,84E
Jr. Programmer
1900
500
Monthly
2
4,800
-0-
4,80(
SUBTOTALS — SALARIES
30,048
14,400
15,6
(2) Overtime
HSP
Task
Number
Name
Overtime
Rate
($)
No. of
Units
Total
Cost
($)
DHS
Share
($)
Agenc
Shari
(S)
SUBTOTALS - OVERTIME
(3) Contractual Services
HSP
Task
Number
Contractor
Dates of
Contract
Rate
($)
No. of
Units
(Indicate
H,D,M,FP)
Total
Cost
($)
DHS
Share
($)
Agen(
Share
($)
SUBTOTALS - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
DHS Share Agency Shar
TOTAL - PERSONAL SERVICES $ 30,048 $ 14,400 $ 15,648
48 % 52
DHS -10 CDOH Form
pago 6
PART E - 'BUDGET (continued)
OHS Use
Only OPERATING EXPENSES
HSP
Task
Number
Description
Number
of
Units
Cost per Unit
(sl
Total Cost
(sl
DHS
Share
(S)
Agenc
Share
(s)
Computer Paper
10 Cases
28.00
280.00
280.0(
Printer Ribbons
2 Each
26.00
52.00
52.0(
Backup Tapes - Mainframe
12 Each
16.00
192.00
192.0(
Diskettes
100 Each
1.50
150.00
150.0(
Removable Hard Disks (pc)
5
75.00
375.00
375.0(
Telephone Charges -
Long Distance
10
5.00
50.00
50.0(
Consultation Fees / Hour
2
65.00
130.00
130.0(
Basic Compiler
1
100.00
100.0(
DHS Share Agency Shz
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $ 1329.00 -0- 1329.00
-0- % 100
DHS -10
PART E —BUDGET (continued)
DHS Use
Only TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE
HSP
Task
Number
Description
In
State
(S)
Out of
State
(S)
Total
(S)
DHS
Share
(S)
Agem
Shar
(S)
DHS Share Agency SK
TOTAL TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE $ _p_ $ $
DHS use
Only CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
HSP
Task
Number
Descriptlon
N
or
R
No. of
Units
Cost per
Unit
($)
Total
($)
DHS
Share
($)
Agenc
Share
( S)
DHS Share Agency Sh.
TOTAL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT $ - o - $ $
o�
DHS -10 %.utin row
page a
PART E - BUDGET (continued)
BUDGETSUMMARY
(from pages 6 through 8)
DHSSHARE
AGENCYSHARE
Personal Services
$
14,400
$
15,648
Operating Expenses
$
-0-
$
1,329
Travel and Subsistence
$
-0-
$
-
Capital Equipment
$
-0-
$
-0-
SUBTOTALS
$
14,400
$
16,977
Percent of Total
46
54
PROPOSED PROJECT TOTAL
$
31,377
DHS-10 n q n q
PART F - PROPOSED PROJECT CONTINUATION AND
PLANNED ASSUMPTION OF COSTS
1. PROJECTED FUNDING FY 1989
A. Describe objective, activities, and proposed funding source:
The costs associated with this project will be absorbed within the
Data Processing Department's budget once the system is installed and
debugged. Activities will be limited to program maintenance and
system enhancement on an as requested basis.
B. PROJECTED BUDGET SUMMARY
Personal Services $
Operating Expenses $
Travel and Subsistence $
Capital Outlay $
TOTAL $
2. PROJECTED FUNDING FY
A. Describe objective, activities, and proposed funding source:
B. PROJECTED BUDGET SUMMARY
Personal Services $
Operating Expenses $
Travel and Subsistence $
Capital Outlay $
TOTAL $
CDO14 Form q
nNS -1Q -- t;+
PART'G ANFORMATION FOR PROJECT CONTACTS
1. CONTRACT DIRECTOR
3. PROJECT COORDINATOR
NAME
Judy Leach, Director of Data Processing
NAME
Judy Leach, Director of Data Processing
ADDRESS
150 Central Main Street
ADDRESS
150 Central Main Street
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
TELE N
303) 542 -2491
TELE NO.
(303) 542 -2491
2. ACCOUNTING RECORDS:
4. MAIL PROJECT PAYMENTS TO:
NAME
Billy G. Martin, Director of Finance
NAME
Billy.G. Martin, Director of Finance
ADDRESS
#1 City Hall Place
ADDRESS
#1 City Hall Place
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
TELE NO.
(303) 543 -1041
TELE NO.
(303)543 -1041
PART H - PROJECT APPROVAL
Director, Division of Highway Salety
Date
CDOH Form #1
DHS-10 page 11
Form 6 A(' -02A I 5195)
CONTRACT
UFPARI NII-N [OR AGLN('Y NUMB LR
oNTR.%cI RUUI°IN(; Nt!%16FR
THIS CONTRACT, made this day of 198 __._ . by and between the
Starr of Colorado for the use and benefit of tile Ikpartment of ' _ Highways, Division of
High waY Safet
hereinafter referred to as the State, and * Th City of Pueb 0 o�e US@ an
befit of the Da ta Processing Department
hereinafter referred to as the contractor,
WHEREAS, authority exists in the Law and Funds have been budgeted, appropriated and otherwise made
available and a sufficient unencumbered balance thereof remains available for payment in Fund Number 2001
G/L Account Number 55616 , Contract Encumbrance Number 98923 ; and
WHEREAS, required approval, clearance and coordination has been accomplished from and with appropriate
aoencies: and
WHEREAS, the State has received approval and funding for
implementation of its FY 1988 Highway Safety Plan (HSP) from the
U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration and Federal Highway Administration; and
WHEREAS, the HSP contains programs and activities designed to
reduce traffic crashes or improve the operational efficiency of
existing programs; and
WHEREAS, the State is responsiale for the overall administration
of the HSP within the State of Colorado; and
WHEREAS, certain programs and activities in the HSP can only be
accomplished by other State agencies and local agencies; and
WHEREAS, the State determines which agencies would be most
appropriate in completing the objectives and conducting the
activities and services required by the HSP; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor has the technical ability to properly
complete the objectives and activities described in Attachment A of
this Contract; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined no State agency can reasonably
provide the activities and services required of the Contractor; and
WHEREAS, this Contract is executed by the State under authority
of Sections 43 -5 -401 and 24 -42 -101, C.R.S., as amended, and is
executed by the Contractor under authority of Section 29 -1 -203,
C.R.S., as amended, and as authorized by the formal resolution
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows:
1. The Contractor shall carry out the program and conduct all
the activities and provide the services described in Attachment A.
attached hereto and incorporated herein.
2. The Contractor shall comply with all the administrative
procedures and contract requirements contained in the July 1, 1987
Colorado Highway Safety Contract Management Manual issued by the
State. Such procedures and requirements are conditions of this
contract. The above - referenced document is incorporated herein and
made part hereof by reference. By signature on this contract,
Contractor acknowledges receipt of this document and is aware of its
content.
3. The Contractor shall submit quarterly and final reports to
the State according to the reporting criteria set forth in page two
of Attachment A. attached hereto and incorporated herein.
39J530'F1014 Page I of 3 I,at;e,
*I ti,.�, •�t tf r�i .. 1 , ,,P. nn f••�Cf v' �n.f t,�:•'.)
4. The budget for this contract is set forth in page 3 of
Attachment A attached hereto and incorporated herein. Contractor
shall comply with this budget.
5. The maximum total amount of this Contract is $31,377, with
the State and Contractor participating as follows:
A. State share $14,400
B. Contractor's share $16,977
Total $31,377
The total amount of this Contract shall not be exceeded without
the benefit of a supplemental contract executed prior to the
performance of additional activities or the incurring of additional
costs.
6. The State shall reimburse the Contractor for the
accomplishment of this Contract with funds available under the
Highway Safety Act, Title 23, U.S.C. Section 402. Such
reimbursement shall be only as provided in the July 1, 1987 Colorado
Highway Safety Contract Management Manual.
7. The term of this contract shall begin on the effective date
and shall terminate on September 30, 1988. The effective date of
this contract shall be the date the required signature approval of
the State Controller is obtained, as evidenced by the date first
appearing above, as filled in by the State Controller. Contractor
agrees that any contract work performed prior to the effective date
shall not be compensated under the terms of this contract.
8. The contractor agrees any subcontract entered into under
this contract must be approved by the Director. Division of Highway
Safety. prior to execution.
9. The Special Provisions attached hereto are hereby made a
part hereof.
Page 2 of 3 pages
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties hereto have caused the foregoing
contract to be executed by their duly authorized officers the day
and year first above written.
ATTEST
Chief Clerk
Highway Department
STATE OF COLORADO
ROY ROMER, GOVERNOR
By
A. RAY CHAMBERLAIN
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
JOHN E. CONGER, DIRECTOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
ATTEST
By
Tit
State Controller
By
JAMES A. STROUP
By
DUANE WOODARD
Attorney General
BARRY B. RYAN
Assistant Attorney General
Natural Resources Section
Page 3 of 3 pages
City of Pueblo
Title _ S /SENT OF 7 0 C) MAzell-
APPROVALS
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
CONTRACT OBJECTIVE PLAN
State Program: Public Ways
Contracting Agency:
City of Pueblo. Data Pro cess. e t.
State Sub - Program:
Project Coordinator:
Highway Safety
Judy Leach
Problem Solution Plan:
Contract Period:
3/1/88 - 9/30/88
Project #
HSP #
Task #
Objective:
Develop system designs and related programs necessary to integrate the STEP /MIS program
into the City of Pueblo's Central Computerized Recordkeeping system by
September 30, 1988.
Task
Activity #
Activity Description
43- 01.2.1
Modify existing mainframe programs to seperate traffic - related incidents
by May 1, 1988.
43- 01.2.2
Generate new mainframe programs to add, modify, and query traffic related
incidents by May 1, 1988.
43- 01.2.3
Install, test, and debug completed on -line systems by June 1, 1988.
43- 01.2.4
Generate, test, and debug data transfer programs by July 1, 1988.
43- 01.2.5
Train users, document and install completed system by September 1, 1988.
43- 01.2.6
Provide final report and system demonstration to DHS personnel by
September 30, 1988.
DHS -23A Previous editions are obsolete and may not be used coo" Form irllue
6/87
Attachment A , page 1 of 3
ADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
N OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
TRACT EVALUATION DATA
E
Project #
HSP#
Task #
88 -04
43 -01.2
Task
Activity #
EVALUATION DESCRIPTION
Type of
Evaluation
Report
Timeframe
43- 01.2.1
Were mainframe programs modified as required?
Performance
Quarterly
Describe modifications.
43- 01.2.2
Describe programs generated to add, modify
Performance
Quarterly
and query traffic related incidents.
- -43- 01.2.3
Was on -line system installed in a timely
Performance
Quarterly
manner?
43- 01.2.4
Were data transfer programs generated?
Performance
Quarterly
Describe operation.
43- 01.2.5
Were users trained? How many? What
Performance
Quarterly
agencies? Was completed system installed?
43- 01.2.6
Submit final report including narrative
Performance
Final
description of:
• Compatibility of traffic, on -line
and STEP /MIS systems.
• User friendliness of systems.
• Reliability of system
• Reports generated
• System operation
D H S -23B
Previous eamons are oosomm ano may not oe uses Guun corm in lur
8/87
Attachment A , page 2 of
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
CONTRACT FINANCIAL BUDGET
Total
Project # 23 -88
HSP # 88 -04
Personal Services
$14,400
Source of
Distribution of
Task K
Total
Funds
DHS Funds
(Benefit of)
1,329
Cost
-
100%
DHS
State
Agency
Other
State
Local
Capital Equipment
-
43-01.2.1
$31,377
$14,400
-
$16,977
$14,400
$16,977
$14,400
Totals
$31,377
$14,400
$16,977
$14,400
BUDGET ALLOCATION
Category
DHS
Share
Agency
Share
Total
DHS
/o
Agency
io
Personal Services
$14,400
$15,648
$30,048
48%
52%
Operating Expense
-
1,329
1,329
-
100%
Travel Expense
-
-
-
-
-
Capital Equipment
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL BUDGET
$14,400
$16,977
$31,377
46%
54%
DHS -23C Previous editions are obsolete and may not be used CDOH Form 01108
6/87
Attachment A , page —3— of 3
Form s- AC-02B SPECIAL PROVISIONS
CONTROLLER'S APPROVAL
1. This contract shall not be deemed valid until it shall have been approved by the Controller of the State of
Colorado or such assistant as he may designate. This provision is applicable to any contract involving the pay-
ment of money by the State.
FUND AVAILABILITY
2. Financial obligations of the State payable after the current fiscal year arc contingent upon funds for that
purpose being appropriated, budgeted and otherwise made available.
BOND ' REQUIREAIENT
3. If this contract involves the payment of more than fifty thousand dollars for the construction, erection,
repair, maintenance, or improvement of any building, road, bridge, viaduct, tunnel, excavation or other public
works for this State, the contractor shall, before entering the performance of any such work included in this con-
tract, duly execute and deliver to and file with the official whose signature appears below for the State, a good
and sufficient bond or other acceptable surety to be approved by said official in a penal sum not less than one -
half of the total amount payable by the terms of this contract. Such bond shall be duly executed by a qualified
corporate surety, conditioned for the due and faithful performance of the contract, and in addition, shall provide
that if the contractor or his subcontractors fail to duly pay for any labor, materials, team hire, sustenance, pro-
visions, provendor or other supplies used or consumed by such contractor or his subcontractor in perfornlance of
the work contracted to be done, the surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in the
bond, together with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum. Unless such bond, when so required, is
executed, delivered and filed, no claim in favor of the contractor arising wider this contract shall be audited.
allowed or paid. A certified or cashier's check or a bank money order payable to the Treasurer of the Stale of
Colorado may be accepted in lieu of a bond. This provision is in compliance with 38 -26 -106 CRS, as
amended.
LN DEMNIFICATION
4. To the extent authorized by law, the contractor shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the State, its
employees and agents, against any and all claims, damages, liability and court awards including costs, expenses,
and attorney fees incurred as a result of any act or omission by the contractor, or its employees, agents, subcon-
tractors, or assignees pursuant to the terms of this contract.
DISCRIMINATION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
5. The contractor agrees to comply with the letter and spirit of the Colorado Antidiscrimination Act of 1957,
as amended, and other applicable law respecting discrimination and unfair employment practices (24 -34 -402.
CRS 1982 Replacement Vol.), and as required by Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action,
dated April 16, 1975. Pursuant thereto, the following provisions shall be contained in all State contracts or
sub - contracts.
During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows:
(1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of
race, creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, religion, ancestry, mental or physical handicap, or
age. The contractor will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed, and that employees
are treated during employment, without regard to the above mentioned characteristics. Such action shall
include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer, recruitment or
recruitment advertising; lay -offs or terminations; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and sclec-
tion for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available
to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the contracting officer setting forth
provisions of this non - discrimination clause.
(2) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the
contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to
race, creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, religion, ancestry, mental or physical
handicap, or age.
(3) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has collective
bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, notice to be provided by the contracting officer,
advising the labor union or workers' representative of the contractor's committment under the Executive
Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action, dated April 16, 1975, and of the rules, regulations, and
relevant Orders of the Governor.
(4) The contractor and labor unions will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order,
Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1975, and by the rules, regulations and Orders of
the Governor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the con-
tracting agency and the office of the Governor or his designee for purposes of investigation to ascertain
compliance with such rules, regulations and orders.
(5) A labor organization will not exclude any individual otherwise qualified from full membership rights in
such labor organization, or expel any such individual from membership in such labor organization or dis-
criminate against any of its members in the full enjoyment of work opportunity. because of race, creed,
color, sex, national origin, or ancestry.
(6) A labor organization, or the employees or members thcreol' will not aid, abet, incite, compel or coerce
the doing of any act defined in this contract to lie discriminatory or obstruct or prevent any person from
complying with the provisions of this contract or any order issued thereunder: or attempt, either directly or
indirectly, to commit any act defined in this contract to be discriminatory.
.55 -501 122
3 -0
,95- 3- 1 • 0 page .A.— of I'nues
Form 6- AC -02C
(7) In the event of the contractor's non- comp' ;ancc with i •,: non - discrimination clauses of this con-
tract or with any of such rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be cancelled, terminated or sus-
pended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further State contracts in
accordance with procedures, authorized in Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative
Action of April 16, 1975 and the rules, regulations, or orders promulgated in accordance therewith, and
such other sanctions as may be imposed and remedies as may be invoked as provided in Executive
Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 1.6, 1975, or by rules, regulations, or orders
promulgated in accordance therewith, or as otherwise provided by law.
(8) The contractor will include the provisions of paragraph (1) through (8) in every sub - contract and
subcontractor purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders issued pursuant to
Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1975, so that such provisions
will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to
any sub - contracting or purchase order as the contracting agency may direct, as a means of enforcing
such provisions, including sanctions for non- compliance; provided, however, that in the event the con-
tractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with the subcontractor or vendor as a result
of such direction by the contracting agency, the contractor may request the State of Colorado to enter
into such litigation to protect the interest of the State of Colorado.
COLORADO LABOR PREFERENCE
6 a. Provisions of 8 -17 -101 & 102, CRS for preference of Colorado labor are applicable to this contract if public
works within the State are undertaken hereunder and are financed in whole or in part by State funds.
b. When a construction contract for a public project is to be awarded to a bidder, a resident bidder shall be
allowed a preference against a non - resident bidder from a state or foreign country equal to the preference given or
required by the state or foreign country in which the non - resident bidder is a resident. If it is determined by the
officer responsible for awarding the bid that compliance with this subsection .06 may cause denial of federal funds
which would otherwise be available or would otherwise be inconsistent with requirements of federal law, this sub-
section shall be suspended, but only to the extend necessary to prevent denial of the moneys or to eliminate the
inconsistency with federal requirements (section 8 -19 -101 and 102, CRS).
GENERAL
7. The laws of the State of Colorado and rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto shall be applied in the
interpretation, execution and enforcement of this contract. Any provision of this contract whether or not incor-
porated herein by reference which provides for arbitration by any extra- judicial body or person or which is other-
wise in conflict with said laws, rules and regulations shall be considered null and void. Nothing contained in any
provision incorporated herein by reference which purports to negate this or any other special provision in whole or
in part shall be valid or enforceable or available in any action at law whether by way of complaint, defense or other-
wise. Any provision rendered null and void by the operation of this provision will not invalidate the remainder of
this contract to the extent that the contract is capable of execution.
8. At all times during the performance of this Contract, the Contractor shall strictly adhere to all applicable
federal and state laws, rules and regulations that have been or may hereafter be established.
9. The signatories hereto aver that they arc familiar with 18 -8 -301, et. seq., (Bribery and Corrupt Influences)
and 18 -8 -401, et. seq., (Abuse of Public Office), CRS 1978 Replacement Vol., and that no violation of such pro-
visions is present.
Paa• 'L rh,ch n the 1& d Z paKes
10. The signatories aver that to their knowledge, no state employee has a personal or beneficial interest what-
soever in the service or property described herein:
BACKGROUND PAPER
DATA PROCESSING DEPARTMENT
February 8, 1988
ISSUE
Should the City Council approve a contract with the State of Colorado
Highway Department, Division of Highway Safety concerning centralized
traffic data entry?
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve the contract.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
When the computerized record - keeping system was developed in -house for
the Pueblo Police Department eight years ago, the decision was made to
omit traffic records from the system. That decision was based upon three
pertinent facts. First, on -line storage was limited; second, all
necessary information was at that time being collected and made available
on -line through the Selective Traffic Enforcment Program (STEP) on the CBI
computer; and finally, one full -time employee was responsible for data
entry into the STEP system, and it was considered an unnecessary
duplication of effort to repeat the process for Pueblo's system.
In March of 1986, the state sponsored STEP program was decentralized
through a system of microcomputers, and traffic information was no longer
collected or available through the CBI computer. Since disk storage space
was no longer a problem and the need for on -line records and centralized
data entry still existed, the traffic records were assimilated into the
Pueblo records system. One of the two microcomputers provided by the
Division of Highway Safety was placed in the Police Department's Traffic
office and the other in the City Traffic Engineer's office, where traffic
data pertinent to each operation could be collected and necessary reports
generated. Both the Police Department and the Traffic Engineer agree that
valuable statistical information is to be had through the micro - computer
programs developed by the State of Colorado, however, neither department
considers it cost efficient to duplicate the data entry process. The Data
Processing Department has offered a centralized data entry solution based
on the collection of data through the mainframe and the transferral of
that data to the microcomputers.
A temporary programmer was hired in June, 1987, to begin work on the
solution. Analysis of the system requirements has been completed and
program design has begun, however, funding for the programmer ran out
December 31, 1987. To complete the process requires the modification of
certain programs now running on the mainframe, the development of new
mainframe programs, and the development of microcomputer programs to
convert the raw data to micro - computer format. 1988 budgeted staffing for
the Data Processing Department is not adequate to complete these tasks on
a timely basis; the $14,400 Highway Safety Grant will fund the temporary
programmer for the remaining eight months of the project. The City's
share of the project, $16,977, is included in the 1988 Data Processing
budget and will consist of programminq support from two other staff
members and necessary operating supplies.
CULOHADU Utt'AM I NIMN t wr
TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT APPLICATION
1.
Proposed Activity: Centralized Traffic Data Entry
2.
Applicant Agency: City of Pueblo, Data Processing Department.
Mailing Address 150 Central Main Street
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
3.
Policy and Budget Authority:
Lewis Quigley, City Manager
4.
Proposed Period: (onto) (day) (yr) tmol (day) 31
1 1 88 To 8 31 88
From
5.
Signature (see additional certifications on next page):
(type name and title)
6.
Date Submitted:
12 -15 -87
7.
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL (Policy and Budget Authority):
Signature: -
(type name and ptle)
Lewis Quigley, City Manager
For:
{Agency) City of Pueblo
Date:
December 15, 1987
NOTE: Refer to Section ll, Colorado Division of Highway Safety Contract Management Manual for
instructions in the preparation of this application.
n.....e CDOH Forr.
OHS -10 r—.va..a...v... w... ..._ _.._ .. -• -
rev ✓ v.�.�... ..�.... v...a..✓ vv,.... .v.-.. .... ....
1.
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: (use one of the two following statements)
NOTE: If an affirmative action plan is required, but has not been previously approved, it
should accompany this application at the time of submission.
I certify an affirmative action plan, meeting the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, (42 U.S.C. 200d -d4) has been approved by and is on file with, the
Colorado Department of Highways Equal Employment Opportunity Office.
Signature
vv
(type name and title)
Lewis Quigley, City Manager
I certify an affirmative action plan, meeting the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, (42 U.S.C. 2000d -d4) is not required for this agency.
Signature
(type name and title)
2.
PROJECT CONTINUATION:
I certify it is intended to continue any highway safety- funded project activities to a point in
the future substantially beyond the project expiration date without any material reduction in
the level or thrust of the efforts. STRIKE OUT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING NON - APPLICABLE
STATEMENTS. ¢ Acxaimipimaaxaaa4tterx> �i�cS�4xhwtlrrteaKOttd {�xDtagx6ols�c�xcitt .
Rvtaba6)e)dx1kjvlo xrxmf j d aN Ayaar&OK XXiXMUIXWftUtM 9 *VA)dxfc
4tsct��15����t� xa�Af;ad�fcoa�dK�ca�dx���l4�tvy �>`tx� c��?S�g�dl �Witf�6t�g�►'4J�yKi�
ftxxi�sck�AcaiQx roa�exa►a�gcacgesaa>;�C �lax� xDCa IoXV��� �Sg�ty�f �?4 mK ���d��V�i�'+?i4PS r�a�9t�e't
�k b�a�d��Dt�c�ci> ntrat> gx�► �Gcttc��Pd����r�tX4 '�x�idf>'kg�tsxy�
Signature
(type name and title)
Lewis Quigley, City Manager
DHS -10 r.;uum Corm
page 2
VAK 1 H- rnvoL-F- 'J i r I �' -- .
(1) Describe the situation. Include data and any other information to establish the existing conditions.
(2) State why this situation is undesirable.
(3) What are the causes?
(4) Identify changes needed to resolve the identified problem(s).
When the computerized record - keeping system was developed in -house for
the Pueblo Police Department eight years ago, the decision was made to omit
traffic records from the system. That decision was based upon three
pertinent facts. First, on -line storage was limited and traffic records
would require a great deal of disk space. Second, all necessary
information was at that time being collected and made available on -line
through the STEP/MIS program and to include traffic information in the
Pueblo system would be a duplication of records. Finally, one full -time
employee was responsible for data entry into the STEP/MIS system, and it
was considered an unnecessary duplication of effort to repeat the process
for the Pueblo system.
In March of 1986, the STEP/MIS program was decentralized through a
system of microcomputers, and traffic information was no longer collected
or available through the on -line system. Although disk storage space was
no longer a problem, the need for on -line records and centralized data
entry still existed, and traffic records were assimilated into the Pueblo
records system. One of the two Zenith microcomputers provided by the
Division of Highway Safety was placed in the Police Department's Traffic
office and the other in the City Traffic Engineer's office, where STEP/MIS .
information pertinent to each office could be collected and necessary
reports generated Unfortunately, funds were not available for the newly
acquired data entry functions in the two City departments, and now while
traffic records are available through the on -line records system, STEP/MIS
information is gathered and reports generated only when manpower is
available for data entry in either of the two departments. .
Both the Police Department and the Traffic Engineer agree that valuable
statistical information is to be had through the STEP/MIS program
developed to run under REVELATION software on the Zenith computers,
however, neither department considers it cost efficient to duplicate the
data entry process on the mainframe and on the microcomputers. The City's
Data Processing Department has offered a centralized data entry solution
based on the collection of data through the mainfraie- and the transferral
of that data to the microcomputers.
A prograrm)er who has interned for the Data Processing Department for
two years was hired on a temporary basis in June, 1987, to begin work on
the solution. Analysis of the system requirements has been completed and
program design has begun, however, funding for the programmer will run out
December 31, 1987. To complete the process will require the modification
of certain programs now running on the mainframe, the development of new
mainframe programs focusing on traffic records, and the development of
microcomputer programs to convert the raw data to REVELATION format. 1988
budgeted staffing for, the Data Processing Department is not adequate to
complete these tasks on a timely basis, and funding of the temporary
programmer is needed for the remaining eight months of the protect.
cuun rom
relic to
j GOAL: To centralize the data entry function for the City of Pueblo's traffic
incident records and provide for the transfer of necessary data from the
mainframe to the microcomputer -based STEP/MIS system.
TASKS: State what is to be accomplished and when.
1. Modify existing mainframe programs to separate traffic - related
incidents from criminal incidents by March 1, 1988..
2. Generate new mainframe programs to add, modify, and query
traffic - related incidents by May 1, 1988.
3. InLstall, test, and debug completed on -line system by June 1,
1988.
4. Generate, test, and debug data transfer programs by July 1, 1988.
5. Train users, document, and install completed system by September
1, 1988.
PART C - CAPITAL EQUIPMEN
What equipment, If any, will be purchased to meet the needs of this project? NOTE: Items previously
purchased with highway safety funds are not eligible for replacement with highway safety funds.
NONE
DHS -10 CDOH Form
p:. •, ) 4
r- (1) State how success or failure of the project will be determined. Administrative, Performance or Impact
measures can be used (See Project Evaluation in Contract Management Manual).
Success or failure of the project will be determined by the following
administrative criteria:
1. Is the traffic system completely compatible with the current 1
on -line system and the STEP/MIS microcomputer system?
2. Is the system user friendly both from the data entry /retrieval
standpoint and from the operational standpoint?
3. Is the system reliable and completely debugged?
4. Are resultant reports correct in both content and format, and do
they met the needs of the users?
(2) State how the Contract Director will monitor project activity and progress during the contract period.
The Contract Director will monitor project activity through the use of
weekly status reports and time sheets required of project participants.
These reports include progress made during the reporting period, problems
encountered, and percent of completion. The forms are part of a standard
procedure within the Data Processing Department.
CDOH Fc
DHS -10 patio 5
r M,A 1 L - uv v - - ,
PERSONAL SERVICES
DHS Use 1 ,.,
omy
HSP
Task
Number
11/ ..,o. °......
Name or_Position
Base
Paa,
Benefits
($)
Monthly
Weekly
Etc.
No.
of
Mos.
Total
(S)
DHS
Share
(S)
Ager
Sha
IS _
David Van Dyke
10.00
-0-
Hourly
8 114,400
14,400
-C
Programmer
2212
500
Monthly
4 1 10,848
-0-
10,84
Jr. Programmer
1900
500
Monthly
2
4,800
-0-
4,8C
SUBTOTALS — SALARIES
1
30,048 1
14,400
15,E
mmmmwmmmm
(2) Overtime
HSP
Task
Number
Name
Overtime
Rate
($)
No. of
Units
Total
Cost
($)
DHS
Share
($)
Ager
Sha
(S
SUBTOTALS - OVERTIME
(3) Contractual Services
HSP
Task
Number
Contractor
Dates of
Contract
Rate
($)
No. of
Units
(Indicate
H,D,M,FP)
Total
Cost
($)
DHS
Share
($)
Age
Sha
(S)
SUBTOTALS - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
DHS Share Agency Sh
. TOTAL - PERSONAL SERVICES $ 30 X 048 $ 14,400 15,648
48 Rio 52
pHs -lo pogo 6
PART E - BUDGET (continued)
DHS Use
Only OPERATING EXPENSES
HSP
Task
Number
Description
Number
of
Units
Cost per Unit
(S)
Total Cost
(S)
DHS
Share
(S)
Agenc
Share
(S)
Computer Paper
10 Cases
28.00
280.00
280.0
Printer Ribbons
2 Each
26.00
52.00
52.0
Backup Tapes - Mainframe
12 Each
16.00
192.00
192.0
Diskettes
100 Each
1.50
150.00
150.0
Removable Hard Disks (pc)
5
75.00
375.00
375.0
Telephone Charges -
Long Distance
10
5.00
50.00
50.0
Consultation Fees / Hour
2
65.00
130.00
130.
Basic Compiler
1
100.00
100.(
DHS Share Agency St
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $ 1329.00 -0- 1329.00
-0- % 100
nHS -10
DHS TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE
Only ly
HSP
Task
Number
Description
In
State
(S)
Out of
State
(S)
Total
(s)
OHS
Share
(S)
Age!
Sha
(S
DHS Share Agency S,
TOTAL TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE $ _p_ $ $
OHS CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
Only ly
HSP
Task
Number
Description
N
or
R
No. of
Units
Cost per
Unit
($)
Total
($)
DHS
Share
($)
Age
Sha:
(S
DHS Share Agency S
TOTAL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT $ -0- $ $
DHS -10
page 8
PART E - LSUUUt i tconunueu)
BUDGETSUMMARY
(from pages 6 through 8)
DHSSHARE
AGENCYSHARE
Personal Services
$
14,400
$
15,648
Operating Expenses
$
-0-
$
1,329
Travel and Subsistence
$
-0-
$
-0-
Capital Equipment
$
-0-
$
-0-
SUBTOTALS
$
14,400
$
16,977
Percent of Total
46
54
PROPOSED PROJECT TOTAL
$
31,377
CDOH For
DHS-10 nip. 9
PART F - PROPOSED PROJECT CONTINUAL IUN ANU
PLANNED ASSUMPTION OF COSTS
1. PROJECTED FUNDING FY 1989
A. Describe objective, activities, and proposed funding source:
The costs associated with this project will be absorbed within the
Data Processing Department's budget once the system is installed and
debugged. Activities will be limited to program maintenance and
system enhancement on an as requested basis.
B. PROJECTED BUDGET SUMMARY
Personal Services $
Operating Expenses $
Travel and Subsistence $
Capital Outlay $
TOTAL $
2. PROJECTED FUNDING FY
A. Describe objective, activities, and proposed funding source:
B. PROJECTED BUDGET SUMMARY
Personal Services $
Operating Expenses $
Travel and Subsistence $
Capital Outlay $
TOTAL $
CDOH For;
Il141;_ln n,'. I,.,
1. CONTRACT DIRECTOR 3. PROJECT COORDINATOR
NAME
NAME
Judy Leach, Director of Data Processing Judy Leach, Director of Data Processing
ADDRESS ADDRESS
150 Central Main Street_ 150 Central _Main Street
Pueblo, Colorado 81003 Pueblo, Colorado -81003
TELE N TELE NO.
542 -2491 (303) 542 -2491
2. ACCOUNTING RECORDS: 4. MAIL PROJECT PAYMENTS TO:
NAME
NAME
Billy G. Martin, Director of Finance Billy.G. Martin, Director of Finance
ADDRESS ADDRESS
#1 City Hall Place #1 City Hall Place
Pueblo, Colorado 81003 TELE NO. Pueblo, Colorado 81003
TELE NO. ( 303) 543 -1041
(303) 543 -1041
PART H - PROJECT APPROVAL
oua
Director. Division of Highway Salaly
CDOH Form
HS-10 Pa9a 11
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
PUEBLO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND THE COLORADO STATE
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DIVISION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
CONCERNING CENTRALIZED TRAFFIC DATA AND AUTHORIZING THE
PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL TO EXECUTE SAME.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PUEBLO, COLORADO,
THAT:
SECTION 1.
The contract between the City of Pueblo, a Municipal
Corporation, and the Colorado State Department of Higways, Division
of Highway Safety, relating to the acceptance of $14,400 in grant
monies is hereby approved. Grant monies will be used to centralize
traffic data entry and develop a data base of traffic violations and
accidents transferrable to micro- computers.
SECTION 2.
The City of Pueblo's share of the project, in the
amount of $16,977, is available in and is hereby transferred from
accounts 001 - 0100 - 109 -0- 010 -0104, 001- 0100 - 109 -0- 020 -0004,
001 -0100- 109 -0- 020 -0008, 001- 0100 - 109 -0 - 020 - 00099 and
001 -0100- 109 - 0 - 030 - 0011.
SECTION 3.
The President of the
to execute this contract for and on
Clerk is authorized and directed to
the City thereto.
City Council is hereby authorized
behalf of the City and the City
attest same and affix the seal of
Introduced
MM
Councilman
. 1988
APPROVED_
President of the Council
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Form 6 AC-02A IR 5IN5I
UPI', \H'I \1FN 1 OR AGF•N(•Y NL' \11lLR
('ON tKAI'f H4U fINt1 Nt' \16FR
CONTRACT
TIIIS CONTRACT, made this day of 198 _ . by and between the
State of Colorado for the use and benefit of tite D iiartment of 't Highways, Division of
hereinafter referred to as the State. and .2
hereinafter referred to as the contractor,
WHEREAS, authority exists in the Law and Fund% have been budgeted, appropriated and otherwise made
available and a sufficient unencumbered balance thereof remains available for payment in Fund Number 2001
GIL Account Number 55616 , Contract Encumbrance Number 98923 ; and
WHEREAS, required approval, clearance and coordination has been accomplished from and with appropriate
agencies; and
WHEREAS, the State has received approval and funding for
implementation of its FY 1988 Highway Safety Plan (HSP) from the
U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration and Federal Highway Administration; and
WHEREAS, the HSP contains programs and activities designed to
reduce traffic crashes or improve the operational efficiency of
existing programs; and
WHEREAS, the State is responsible for the overall administration
of the HSP within the State of Colorado; and
WHEREAS, certain programs and activities in the HSP can only be
accomplished by other State agencies and local agencies; and
WHEREAS, the State determines which agencies would be most
appropriate in completing the objectives and conducting the
activities and services required by the HSP; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor has the technical ability to properly
complete the objectives and activities described in Attachment A of
this Contract; and
WHEREAS, it-has been determined no State agency can reasonably
provide the activities and services required of the Contractor; and
WHEREAS, this Contract is executed by the State under authority
of Sections 43 -5 -401 and 24 -42 -101, C.R.S., as amended, and is
executed by the Contractor under authority of Section 29 -1 -203,
C.R.S., as amended, and as authorized by the formal resolution
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows:
1. The Contractor shall carry out the program and conduct all
the activities and provide the services described in Attachment A.
attached hereto and incorporated herein.
2. The Contractor shall comply with all the administrative
procedures and contract requirements contained in the July 1, 1987
Colorado Highway Safety Contract Management Manual issued by the
State. Such procedures and requirements are conditions of this
contract. The above - referenced document is incorporated herein and
made part hereof by reference. By signature on this contract,
Contractor acknowledges receipt of this document and is aware of its
content.
3. The Contractor shall submit quarterly and final reports to
the State according to the reporting criteria set forth in page two
of Attachment A. attached hereto and incorporated herein.
395-5:W1.1014 fuse I of 3 pace.
• 11••. •v,rrn t•..n. .. , r... r•r..� r.t 1 r.t p'. •.1
4. The budget for this contract is set forth in page 3 of
Attachment A attached hereto and incorporated herein. Contractor
shall comply with this budget.
5. The maximum total amount of this Contract is $31,377, with
the State and Contractor participating as follows:
A. State share $14,400
B. Contractor's share $16,977
Total $31,377
The total amount of this Contract shall not be exceeded without
the benefit of a supplemental contract executed prior to the
performance of additional activities or the incurring of additional
costs.
6. The State shall reimburse the Contractor for the
accomplishment of this Contract with funds available under the
Highway Safety Act, Title 23, U.S.C. Section 402. Such
reimbursement shall be only as provided in the July 1, 1987 Colorado
Highway Safety Contract Management Manual.
7. The term of this contract shall begin on the effective date
and shall terminate on September 30, 1988. The effective date of
this contract shall be the date the required signature approval of
the State Controller is obtained, as evidenced by the date first
appearing above, as filled in by the State Controller. Contractor
agrees that any contract work performed prior to the effective date
shall not be compensated under the terms of this contract.
8. The contractor agrees any subcontract entered into under
this contract must be approved by the Director, Division of Highway
Safety, prior to execution.
9. 'The Special Provisions attached hereto are hereby made a
part hereof.
Page 2 of 3 pages
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties hereto have caused the foregoing
contract to be executed by their duly authorized officers the day
and year first above written.
ATTEST
Chief Clerk
Highway Department
ATTEST
By
Title
State Controller
By
STATE OF COLORADO
ROY ROMER. GOVERNOR
By
A. RAY CHAMBERLAIN
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
JOHN E. CONGER. DIRECTOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
City of Pueblo
By
Title
APPROVALS
DUANE WOODARD
Attorney General
By
JAMES A. STROUP BARRY B. RYAN
Assistant Attorney General
Natural Resources Section
Page 3 of 3 pages
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
CONTRACT OBJECTIVE PLAN
State Program:
Public Ways
Contracting Agency:
City of Pueblo Data Process.
State Sub - Program:
Project Coordinator:
Highway Safety
Judy Leach
Problem Solution Plan:
Contract Period:
3/1/88 - 9/30/88
Project #
J HSP
#
Task #
Objective:
Develop system designs and related programs
necessary to integrate the STEP /MIS program
into the City
of Pueblo's Central Computerized
Recordkeeping system by
September 30,
1988.
Task
Activity #
Activity Description
43- 01.2.1
Modify existing mainframe
programs to seperate traffic - related incidents
by May 1, 1988.
43- 01.2.2
Generate new mainframe programs
to add, modify, and query traffic related
incidents by May 1, 1988.
43- 01.2.3
Install, test, and debug
completed on -line systems by June 1, 1988.
43- 01.2.4
Generate, test, and debug
data transfer programs by July 1, 1988.
43- 01.2.5
Train users, document and
install completed system by September 1, 1988.
43- 01.2.6
Provide final report and
system demonstration to DHS personnel by
September 30, 1988.
DHS -23A Previous editions are obsolete and may not be used CDOH Form #1106
6/67
Attachment A , page 1 of 3
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
CONTRACT EVALUATION DATA
Project #
HSP#
Task #
23-88
1 88 -04
43 -01.2
Task
Activity #
EVALUATION DESCRIPTION
Evaluation
Repo
Timef ame
43- 01.2.1
Were mainframe programs modified as require it?
Performance
Quarterly
Describe modifications.
43- 01.2.2
Describe programs generated to add, modify
Performance
Quarterly
and query traffic related incidents.
43- 01.2.3
Was on -line system installed in a timely
Performance
Quarterly
manner?
43- 01.2.4
Were data transfer programs generated?
Performance
Quarterly
Describe operation.
43- 01.2.5
Were users trained? How many? What
Performance
Quarterly
agencies? Was completed system installed?
43- 01.2.6
Submit final report including narrative
Performance
Final
description of:
• Compatibility of traffic, on -line
and STEP /MIS systems.
• User friendliness of systems.
• Reliability of system
• Reports generated
• System operation
OHS -238
Previous ea,hons are obsolete and may not be used CDOH Form 11107
6/87
Attachment A . page 2 of
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
CONTRACT FINANCIAL BUDGET
Total
Project a 23 -88
HSP a 88 -04
Personal Services
$14,400
Source of
Distribution of
Task If
Total
Funds
DHS Funds
(Benefit of)
1,329
Cost
—
100%
DHS
State
Agency
Other
State
Local
Capital Equipment
—
43-01.2.1
$31,377
$14,400
—
$16,977
$14,400
$16,977
$14,400
Totals
$31,377
$14,400
$16,977
$14,400
BUDGET ALLOCATION
Category
DHS
Share
Agency
Share
Total
DHS
%
Agency
%
Personal Services
$14,400
$15,648
$30,048
48%
52%
Operating Expense
—
1,329
1,329
—
100%
Travel Expense
—
—
—
—
—
Capital Equipment
—
—
—
—
—
TOTAL BUDGET
$14,400
$16,977
$31,377
46%
54%
UNS -131. Previous editions ore obsolete and may not be used CDOH Form tr11os
6187
Attachment A . page —2 of 3_
Form 6- AC -02U SPECIAL PROVISIONS
CONTROLLER'S APPROVAL
I. This contract shall not be deemed valid until it shall have been approved by the Controller of the State of
Colorado or such assistant as he may designate. This provision is applicable to any contract involving the pay-
ment of money by the State.
FUND AVAILABILITY
2. Financial obligations of the State payable after the current fiscal year arc contingent upon funds for that
purpose being appropriated, budgeted and otherwise made available.
BOND REQUIREMENT
3. If this contract involves the payment of more than fifty thousand dollars for the construction, erection,
repair, maintenance, or improvement of any building, road, bridge, viaduct, tunnel, excavation or other public
works for this State, the contractor shall, before entering the performance of any such work included in this con-
tract, duly execute and deliver to and file with the official whose signature appears below for the Slate, a good
and sufficient bond or other acceptable surety to be approved by said official in a penal sum not less than one -
half of the total amount payable by the terms of this contract. Such bond shall be duly executed by n qualified
corporate surety, conditioned for the due and faithful performance of the contract, and in addition, shall provide
that if the contractor or his subcontractors fail to duly pay for any labor, materials, learn hire, sustenance, pro-
f visions, provendor or other supplies used or consumed by such contractor or his subcontractor in performance of
the work contracted to be done, the surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the son specified in the
bond, together with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum. Unless such bond, when so required, is
executed, delivered and filed, no claim in favor of the contractor arising larder this contract shall be audited.
allowed or paid. A certified or cashier's check or a bank money order payable to the Treasurer of the Slate of
Colorado may be accepted in lieu of a bond. This provision is in compliance with 38 -26 -106 CRS, as
amended.
INDEMNIFICATION
4. To the extent authorized by law, the contractor shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the State, its
employees and agents, against any and all claims, damages, liability and court awards including costs, expenses,
and attorney fees incurred as a result of any act or omission by the contractor, or its employees, agents, subcon-
tractors, or assignees pursuant to the terms of this contract.
DISCRIMINATION AND AFFIRbIATIVE ACTION
5. The contractor agrees to comply with the letter and spirit of lltc Colorado Antidiscrimination Act of 1957,
as amended, and other applicable law respecting discrimination and unfair employment practices (24 -34 -402.
CRS 1982 Replacement Vol.), and as required by Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action,
dated April 16, 1975. Pursuant thereto, the following provisions shall be contained in all State contracts or
sub - contracts.
During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows:
(I) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of
race, creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, religion, ancestry, mental or physical handicap, or
age. The contractor will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed, and that employees
are treated during employment, without regard to the above mentioned characteristics. Such action shall
include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer, recruitment or
recruitment advertising; lay -offs or terminations; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and sclec-
tion for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available
j to employees and applicants for employmifit, notices to be provided by the contracting officer setting forth
provisions of this non - discrimination clause.
- (2) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the
contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to
race, creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, religion, ancestry, mental or physical
handicap, or age.
(3) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has collective
bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, notice to be provided by the contracting officer,
advising the labor union or workers' representative of the contractor's committmcnt under the Executive
Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action, dated April 16, 1975, and of the rules, regulations, and
relevant Orders of the Governor.
(4) The contractor and labor unions will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order,
Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1975, and by the rules, regulations and Orders of
the Governor, or pursuant thereto. and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the con -
tracting agency and the office of the Governor or his designee for purposes of investigation to ascertain
compliance with such rules, regulations and orders.
f (5) A labor organization will not exclude any individual otherwise qualified from full membership rights in
such labor organization, or expel any such individual from membership in such labor organizatimt or dis-
criminate against any of its members in the full enjoyment of work opportunity, because of race, creed,
, color, sex, national origin, or ancestry.
(6) A labor organization, or the employees or members thereof will not aid, abet, incite, compel or coerce
the doing of any act defined in this contract to he discriminatory or obstruct or prevent any person from
complying with the provisions of this contract or any order issued thereunder, or attempt, either directly or
indirectly, to commit any act defined in this contract to be discriminatory.
ii,
i 395 -53 -01 -1022
Revised 11 -35 Page —1— of _ Z_ pages
Form 6- AC -02C
'i
.i
i'
(7) In (tic event of dhc contractor's non -comp %rice with c a non- discrimination clauses of this con-
tract or with any of such rules. regulations, or orders, this contract may be cancelled, terminated or sus-
pended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further State contracts in
accordance with procedures, authorized in Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative
Action of April 16, 1975 and the rules, regulations, or orders promulgated in accordance therewith, and
such outer sanctions as may be imposed and remedies as may be invoked as provided in Executive
Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1975, or by rules, regulations, or orders
promulgated in accordance therewith, or as otherwise provided by law,
(8) The contractor will include the provisions of paragraph( 1) through (8) in every sub - contract and
subcontractor purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders issued pursuant to
Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1975, so that such provisions
will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to
any sub - contracting or purchase order as the contracting agency may direct, as a means of enforcing
such provisions, including sanctions for non - compliance; provided, however, that in the event the con-
tractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with the subcontractor or vendor as a result
of such direction by the contracting agency, the contractor may request the State of Colorado to enter
into such litigation to protect the interest of the State of Colorado.
COLORADO LABOR PREFERENCE '
6a. Provisions of 8 -17 -101 & 102, CRS for preference of Colorado labor are applicable to this contract ifpublic
works within the State are undertaken hereunder and are financed in whole or in part by State funds.
b. When a construction contract for a public project is to be awarded to a bidder, a resident bidder shall be
allowed a preference against a non - resident bidder from a state or foreign country equal to the preference given or
required by the state or foreign country in which the non - resident bidder is a resident. If it is determined by the
officer responsible for awarding the bid that compliance with this subsection .06 may cause denial of federal funds
which would otherwise be available or would otherwise be inconsistent with requirements of federal law, this sub-
section shall be suspended, but only to the extend necessary to prevent denial of the moneys or to eliminate the
inconsistency with federal requirements (section 8 -19 -101 and 102, CRS).
GENERAL
7. The laws of the State of Colorado and rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto shall be applied in the
interpretation, execution and enforcement of this contract. Any provision of this contract whether or not incor-
porated herein by reference which provides for arbitration by any extra - judicial body or person or which is other-
wise in conflict with said laws, rules and regulations shall be considered null and void. Nothing contained in any
provision incorporated herein by reference which purports to negate this or any other special provision in whole or
in part shall be valid or enforceable or available in any action at law whether by way of complaint, defense or other-
wise. Any provision rendered null and void by the operation of this provision will not invalidate the remainder of
this contract to the extent that the contract is capable of execution.
8. At all times during the performance of this Contract, the Contractor shall strictly adhere to all applicable
federal and state laws, rules and regulations that have been or may hereafter be established.
9. The signatories hereto aver that they are familiar with 18 -8 -301, et. seq., (Bribery and Corrupt Influences)
and 18 -8 -401, et. seq., (Abuse of Public Office), CRS 1978 Replacement Vol., and that no violation of such pro-
visions is present.
10. The signatories aver that to their knowledge, no state employee has a personal or beneficial interest what-
soever in the service or property described herein:
NESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract on the day first above
[(5Fu]1Lcga c) STATE: O F COLORADO
RICHARD D. LAMM, GO ZNOR
By
•5 EXECU1111C UIRECTOR.
Position (Title)
DEPAR' 'NT
5u 1 S,curny Nu 4, ,u Fcdpal 1.0. N—N, OF -
(If Corporation:)
Attest (Seal)
B
('npware Secnury. w F:Vm. alen,. r„.d'
X'' 0"k
APPROVALS
ATTORNEY RAL CONTROLLER
By— By
1
. Pap 2 •aKa n w rau N 2 Daaca
D vh1 B 9 - 9 5 -
SUPPLEMENTAL
CONTRACT
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT, made this 1.574 day
of OGlo6s.,— 1988, by and between the State of Colorado
for the use and benefit of the Department of Highways, Division of
Highway Safety hereinafter referred to as the State, and the City of
Pueblo for the use and benefit of the Data Processing Department
hereinafter referred to as the contractor.
WHEREAS, authority exists in the Law and Funds have been
budgeted, appropriated and otherwise made available and a sufficient
unencumbered balance thereof remains available for payment in Fund
Number 2001, G/L Account Number 55616, Contract Encumbrance Number
98923; and
WHEREAS, required approval, clearance and coordination has been
accomplished from and with appropriate agencies; and
WHEREAS, the State and Contractor entered into a contract dated
March 1, 1988 hereinafter referred to as the basic contract; and
WHEREAS, the State is desirous of continuing implementation of
its FY 1988 Highway Safety Plan (HSP); and
WHEREAS, the Contractor has available the technical ability to
properly complete the objectives stated; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor is not able to complete contract
performance by the scheduled September 30, 1988 termination date of
the original contract; and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that this lack of timely performance
did not materially breach the contract, and that performance can be
completed if the original contract is extended to December 31, 1988
at no additional cost; and
WHEREAS, the parties have the authority to extend the original
contract term; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the basic contract
in relation to time of completion.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed that:
A. The basic contract, unless specifically revised or amended
herein, shall be and remain in full force and effect with
respect to the contractual relationship between the parties
hereto.
B. The parties do hereby ratify and confirm all actions which
have taken place prior to the date this supplemental
contract has been executed and which are in accordance with
the terms hereof.
C. The effective date of this supplemental contract shall be
the date the required signature approval of the State
Controller is obtained as evidenced by the date first
appearing above, as filled in by the Controller.
D. Paragraph 7 of the basic contract shall be amended by
deleting the phrase "September 30, 1988" and substituting
therefore the phrase "December 31, 1988.
E. The Special Provisions (Revised 3/86) attached hereto are
hereby made a part of this supplemental contract and all
subsequent supplements unless modified by a supplemental
contract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the foregoing
contract to be executed by their duly authorized officers the day
and year first above written.
ATTEST STATE OF COLORADO
ROY RC I ER, GOVERNOR
B
Chief C * CHAMBEIRLAIN
Highway Department EXEdUtIVE DIRECTOR
DEPA TMENT OF IGHWAYS
Y
J O GE
RECTOR
IVISION OF HIGHW SAFETY
ATTEST
By City of Pueblo
Title &.i; & By
�.
APPROVALS
DUANE WOODARD
Attorney General
State Controller
By BY 6" i��
JAMES E. STROUP BARV B. RY N
Assistant Mttorney General
JAMTES A. STROUP
Natural Resources Section
Page 2 of 2 pages
Form 6- AC -02B SPECIAL PROVISIONS
CONTROLLER'S APPROVAL
1. This contract shall not be deemed valid until it shall have been approved by the Controller of the State of
Colorado or such assistant as he may designate. This provision is applicable to any contract involving the pay-
ment of money by the State.
FUND AVAILABILITY
2. Financial obligations of the State payable after the current fiscal year are contingent upon funds for that
purpose being appropriated, budgeted and otherwise made available.
BOND REQUIREMENT
3. If this contract involves the payment of more than fifty thousand dollars for the construction, erection,
repair, maintenance, or improvement of any building, road, bridge, viaduct, tunnel, excavation or other public
works for this State, the contractor shall, before entering the performance of any such work included in this con-
tract, duly execute and deliver to and file with the official whose signature appears below for the State, a good
and sufficient bond or other acceptable surety to be approved by said official in a penal sum not less than one-
half of the total amount payable by the terms of this contract. Such bond shall be duly executed by a qualified
corporate surety, conditioned for the due and faithful performance of the contract, and in addition, shall provide
that if the contractor or his subcontractors fail to duly pay for any labor, materials, team hire, sustenance, pro-
visions, provendor or other supplies used or consumed by such contractor or his subcontractor in performance of
the work contracted to be done, the surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in the
bond, together with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum. Unless such bond, when so required, is
executed, delivered and filed, no claim in favor of the contractor arising under this contract shall be audited,
allowed or paid. A certified or cashier's check or a bank money order payable to the Treasurer of the State of
Colorado may be accepted in lieu of a bond. This provision is in compliance with 38 -26 -106 CRS, as
amended.
INDEMNIFICATION
4. To the extent authorized by law, the contractor shall indemnify, save and hold harmless the State, its
employees and agents, against any and all claims, damages, liability and court awards including costs, expenses,
and attorney fees incurred as a result of any act or omission by the contractor, or its employees, agents, subcon-
tractors, or assignees pursuant to the terms of this contract.
DISCRIMINATION AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
5. The contractor agrees to comply with the letter and spirit of the Colorado Antidiscrimination Act of 195 7,
as amended, and other applicable law respecting discrimination and unfair employment practices (24 -34 -402.
CRS 1982 Replacement Vol.), and as required by Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action,
dated April 16, 1975. Pursuant thereto, the following provisions shall be contained in all State contracts or
sub - contracts.
During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows:
(1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of
race, creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, religion, ancestry, mental or physical handicap, or
age. The contractor will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed, and that employees
are treated during employment, without regard to the above mentioned characteristics. Such action shall
include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer, recruitment or
recruitment advertising; lay -offs or terminations; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selec-
tion for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available
to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the contracting officer setting forth
provisions of this non - discrimination clause.
(2) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the
contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to
race, creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, religion, ancestry, mental or physical
handicap, or age.
(3) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has collective
bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, notice to be provided by the contracting officer,
advising the labor union or workers' representative of the contractor's committment under the Executive
Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action, dated April 16, 1975, and of the rules, regulations, and
relevant Orders of the Governor.
(4) The contractor and labor unions will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order,
Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1975, and by the rules, regulations and Orders of
the Governor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the con-
tracting agency and the office of the Governor or his designee for purposes of investigation to ascertain
compliance with such rules, regulations and orders.
(5) A labor organization will not exclude any individual otherwise qualified from full membership rights in
such labor organization, or expel any such individual from membership in such labor organization or dis-
criminate against any of its members in the full enjoyment of work opportunity, because of race, creed,
color, sex, national origin, or ancestry.
(6) A labor organization, or the employees or members thereof will not aid, abet, incite, compel or coerce
the doing of any act defined in this contract to be discriminatory or obstruct or prevent any person from
complying with the provisions of this contract or any order issued thereunder; or attempt, either directly or
indirectly, to commit any act defined in this contract to be discriminatory.
395 -53 -01 -1022 page of pages
Revised 11 -85
Form 6- AC -02C
(7) In the event of the contractor's non - compliance with the non - discrimination clauses of this con-
tract or with any of such rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be cancelled, terminated or sus-
pended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further State contracts in
accordance with procedures, authorized in Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative
Action of April 16, 1975 and the rules, regulations, or orders promulgated in accordance therewith, and
such other sanctions as may be imposed and remedies as may be invoked as provided in Executive
Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1975, or by rules, regulations, or orders
promulgated in accordance therewith, or as otherwise provided by law.
(8) The contractor will include the provisions of paragraph (1) through (8) in every sub - contract and
subcontractor purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders issued pursuant to
Executive Order, Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action of April 16, 1975, so that such provisions
will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to
any sub - contracting or purchase order as the contracting agency may direct, as a means of enforcing
such provisions, including sanctions for non - compliance; provided, however, that in the event the con-
tractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with the subcontractor or vendor as a result
of such direction by the contracting agency, the contractor may request the State of Colorado to enter
into such litigation to protect the interest of the State of Colorado.
COLORADO LABOR PREFERENCE
6 a. Provisions of 8 -17 -101 & 102, CRS for preference of Colorado labor are applicable to this contract if public
works within the State are undertaken hereunder and are financed in whole or in part by State funds.
b. When a construction contract for a public project is to be awarded to a bidder, a resident bidder shall be
allowed a preference against a non - resident bidder from a state or foreign country equal to the preference given or
required by the state or foreign country in which the non - resident bidder is a resident. If it is determined by the
officer responsible for awarding the bid that compliance with this subsection .06 may cause denial of federal funds
which would otherwise be available or would otherwise be inconsistent with requirements of federal law, this sub-
section shall be suspended, but only to the extent necessary to prevent denial of the moneys or to eliminate the
inconsistency with federal requirements (section 8 -19 -101 and 102, CRS).
GENERAL
7. The laws of the State of Colorado and rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto shall be applied in the
interpretation, execution and enforcement of this contract. Any provision of this contract whether or not incor-
porated herein by reference which provides for arbitration by any extra judicial body or person or which is other-
wise in conflict with said laws, rules and regulations shall be considered null and void. Nothing contained in any
provision incorporated herein by reference which purports to negate this or any other special provision in whole or
in part shall be valid or enforceable or available in any action at law whether by way of complaint, defense or other-
wise. Any provision rendered null and void by the operation of this provision will not invalidate the remainder of
this contract to the extent that the contract is capable of execution.
8. At all times during the performance of this Contract, the Contractor shall strictly adhere to all applicable
federal and state laws, rules and regulations that have been or may hereafter be established.
9. The signatories hereto aver that they are familiar with 18 -8 -301, et. seq., (Bribery and Corrupt Influences)
and 18 -8 -401, et. seq., (Abuse of Public Office), CRS 1978 Replacement Vol., and that no violation of such pro-
visions is present.
10. The signatories aver that to their knowledge, no state employee has a personal or beneficial interest what-
soever in the service or property described herein:
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract on the day first abo
writ
Contract
(Full Legal STATE OF COLORADO
ROY ROMER, GOVER
By
*5 EXECUTIVE DIRECTO
Position (Title)
DEP ENT
Social Security Number or Federal I.D. Number O
(If Corporation:)
Attest (Seal)
By<<
Corporate Secretary. or Equivalent, To y /County Clerk
APPROVALS
ATTORNEY RAL CONTROLLER
By By
Page which is the last of pages
395 -53 -01 -1030 (Revised 3/86) *See instructions on reverse side. DC -10- 2494 -86