HomeMy WebLinkAbout06119ORDINANCE NO. 6119
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE XV OF
THE 1971 CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING GENERALLY
TO THE MODEL TRAFFIC CODE AND SPECIFICALLY TO
OWNER LIABILITY FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL CAMERA
VIOLATIONS, AND PROVIDING CIVIL PENALTIES FOR THE
VIOLATION THEREOF
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PUEBLO, that: (Brackets indicate matter
being deleted; underscoring indicates new matter being added)
SECTION 1
The City Council hereby finds and declares: that non - compliance with traffic signal devices
within the City has substantially increased in recent years; that such non - compliance results in
increasing numbers of vehicular collisions, death, injury and property damage; that City budgetary
constraints limit the ability of the City to provide police manpower for additional traffic
enforcement at signalized intersections; that additional deterrents are necessary to increase
compliance with traffic signals and reduce the volume of accidents at signalized intersections; that
demonstration programs have been established in other cities whereby civil penalties are imposed
upon the owners of vehicles for failure of an operator thereof to comply with traffic control
indications at intersections monitored by traffic signal camera monitoring devices; that initial reports
indicate such demonstration programs have produced a level of success in reducing non - compliance
with traffic signal devices; and that it is in the best interest of the City of Pueblo and its residents
to implement such a demonstration program within the City.
SECTION 2
Chapter 1 of Title XV of the 1971 Code of Ordinances of the City of Pueblo, as amended,
is hereby amended by the addition of a new section 15 -1 -15 thereto, to read as follows:
15 -1 -15: OWNER LIABILITY FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL CAMERA VIOLATIONS
Oaf As used in this section:
W "Traffic signal camera" shall mean a device operated under the
general supervision of a police officer, that is placed in a fixed location at a
signalized intersection within the City and which is wired and programmed to
automatically photograph or digitally record the intersection and vehicles entering
said intersection one or more seconds after a steady circular red signal or a steady red
arrow signal has been displayed to such vehicles, and to record and accurately depict
the vehicle's location within the intersection, the vehicle's license plate, the driver of
the vehicle the date and time of the event depicted, and the elapsed time from the
display of said signal.
Q "Owner" shall have the meaning provided in Section 25 -2 of the
Model Traffic Code.
W "Person" shall mean natural persons, corporations, partnerships,
limited partnerships and limited liability companies
W The Chief of Police and the Traffic Engineer are authorized and directed to
deploy traffic signal cameras at one or more intersections within the City for the purpose of
detecting non - compliance with traffic control devices at such intersections. The
intersections at which traffic signal cameras are deployed may be changed from time to time
among signalized intersections within the City which have high traffic volume, above
average accident experience and have experienced injury- producing accidents.
�c) The owner of a vehicle shi
in this section if such vehicle was used or i
or implied, in violation of section 15 -5(c
evidenced by information obtained from;
owner of a vehicle shall be liable for a r
operator of such vehicle has been convii
of the Model Traffic Code.
ill be liable for a civil penalty imposed as provided
)perated with the permission of the owner, express
of the Model Traffic Code, and such violation is
i traffic signal camera; provided however, that no
enalty imposed pursuant to this section where the
;ted of the underlying violation of section 15 - 5(c)
Proof that a particular vehicle, identified by its license plate tag or tags in a
photograph or digitally recorded image produced by a traffic signal camera, is registered to
-2-
a person, as shown in records of the Colorado Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle
Division, or of the Pueblo County Clerk and Recorder, or of the vehicle registration
authority for any other state in which a vehicle is found to be registered, shall constitute
prima -facie evidence that said person is the owner of said vehicle.
(4 Neither payment of the civil penalty assessed pursuant to a civil penalty
assessment notice issued under this section, imposition of liability under this section by
appearance and payment before the Traffic Violations Bureau nor imposition of liability
under this section determined upon hearing before a Judge or Magistrate of the Municipal
Court, shall be deemed a conviction as an operator or driver. A record relating to same shall
not be transmitted to the Colorado Department of Revenue as any matter bearing upon the
driving record of the persons upon whom such liability is imposed, nor shall it be used for
insurance purposes in the provision of motor vehicle insurance coverage or determination
of the premium therefor.
Wf The following procedures shall be followed with respect to imposition of civil
penalties under this section.
W A civil penalty assessment notice shall be sent by first class mail to
each person alleged to be liable as an owner for a violation recorded by a traffic
signal camera of section 15 -5(c) of the Model Traffic Code. The notice shall be
addressed to the registered owner of the vehicle, shall state the name and address of
the person alleged to be liable as an owner pursuant to this section, the registration
number of the vehicle involved in the violation, the location where the violation
occurred the date and time of such violation, identification of the traffic signal
camera which recorded the violation, and shall be signed by a police officer or
reserve police officer who has reviewed the photographic and other information
recorded by the traffic signal camera and examined appropriate vehicle registration
records and, based thereon, has reasonable grounds for believing that said owner is
liable for the civil penalty assessment as provided by this section The notice shall
Mate the amount of the penalty assessment and shall advise the alleged owner that
the alleged owner must respond to the notice by either appearance before the Traffic
Violations Bureau on or before a date stated in the notice to pay the assessment or
request an adjudicatory hearing to contest the liability alleged in the notice, or by
mailingpavment of the penally assessment amount to the Traffic Violations Bureau
on or before said date The notice shall advise the alleged owner of the provisions
of subsections (c) and (e) of this section The notice shall also contain a warning to
advise the person charged that failure to contest in the manner and time provided
shall be deemed an admission of civil liability and that a default judgment may be
entered thereon.
Q If the person to whom the civil penalty assessment notice has been
mailed fails to pay the civil penally assessment or respond to the notice by timely
-3-
seeking a hearing, the Clerk of the Municipal Court or Traffic Violations Bureau
shall send another notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to such person,
warning him that in the event such notice is disregarded for a period of twenty (20)
days from date of mailing, default judgment will be entered and the vehicle involved
in the violation will be subject to immobilization in accordance with section 22 -20(c)
of the Model Traffic Code, as amended by section 15- 1- 8(A)(22) of this Chanter.
(4 If a hearing is timely requested to contest liability under this section,
adjudication of the liability imposed upon owners by this section shall be by the
Municipal Judge, or one or the Assistant Municipal Judges, sitting as an
administrative hearing officer for the Traffic Violations Bureau. In hearings to
determine liability under this section, it shall be the City's burden to prove liability
by a preponderance of evidence. The proceedings shall be conducted informally
without strict adherence to the rules of evidence, provided that testimony and
exhibits received and considered shall have sufficient indicia of authenticity and
reliability so as to constitute competent evidence.
W If an owner receives a civil penal assessment notice pursuant to this
section for any time period during which the vehicle was reported to the police
department as having _been stolen, it shall be a valid defense to an allegation of
liabil4 for a violation of section 15 -5(c) of the Model Traffic Code pursuant to this
section that the vehicle had been reported to the police as stolen prior to the time the
violation occurred and had not been recovered by such time. For purposes of
asserting the defense provided by this subparagraph(4), it shall be sufficient that a
certified copy of the police report on the stolen vehicle be sent by first class mail to
the Traffic Violations Bureau or Municipal Court.
W An owner who is a lessor of a vehicle to which a civil penalty
assessment notice was issued pursuant to this section shall not be found liable
provided that he or she sends to the Traffic Violations Bureau or Municipal Court
a copy of the rental., lease or other such contract document covering such vehicle on
the date of the violation, with the name and address of the lessee clearly legible,
within thirty days after receiving the first civil penalty assessment notice of the date
and time of such violation, together with the other information contained in the civil
penalty assessment notice. Failure to send such information within such thirty day_
time period shall render the owner liable for the penalty_ prescribed by this section.
Where the lessor complies with the provisions of this subparagraph(5), the lessee
of such vehicle on the date of such violation shall be deemed to be the owner of such
vehicle for the purposes of this section, shall be subject to liability for the violation
of section 15 -5(c) of the Model Traffic Code pursuant to this section and shall be
sent a civil penalty assessment notice pursuant to subparagraph (f)(1) of this section.
(W In the event a person to whom a civil penalty assessment notice has
0
been sent pursuant to subparagraph(2) above fails to lay the assessment or
otherwise respond, the Clerk of the Municipal Court shall enter default judgment
which identifies the vehicle involved in the violation and transmit same to the Police
DDMartment. Thereafter, members of the Police Department or other employees of
the City acting in their official capacity may subject the vehicle to immobilization
in accordance with Section 22 -20(c) of the Model Traffic Code, as amended by
Section 15- 1- 8(A)(22) of this Chapter.
(g) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the liability of an operator
or driver of a vehicle for any violation of section 15 -5(c) of the Model Traffic Code.
The civil penalty assessed to owners under this section shall be an amount of
not less than $50.00 nor more than $150.00 for each violation. The presiding municipal
judge shall adopt and include with the schedule of designated fines adopted under section
15 -1 -6 of this Chapter, a designated schedule for civil penally assessments imposed under
this section; provided that, until the first such adoption of a designated schedule for civil
penalty assessments imposed under this section, the scheduled assessment shall be $50 for
each violation: and provided further that any failure of the presiding ,judge thereafter to
annually adopt such a schedule of designated civil penalty assessments shall not in anyway
invalidate the civil penalty established herein or in any such schedule previously adopted.
SECTION 3
In order that Council may assess the effectiveness of the demonstration program, the Chief
of Police is directed to submit a report on the results of the use of a traffic signal camera monitoring
system to the City Manager and City Council not later than 12 months after the system is fully
implemented. Such report shall include, but not be limited to:
(1) a description of the locations where traffic signal cameras were deployed;
(2) the number of violations recorded at each intersection and in the aggregate on a daily
and monthly basis;
(3) the number of civil penalty assessment notices issued by intersection and in the
aggregate on a daily and monthly basis;
(4) the number of civil penalty assessments paid by mail and at the Traffic Violations
-5-
Bureau;
(5) the number of civil penalty assessment notices which were contested and the
classification of various dispositions of same, and number of dispositions in each class;
(6) the number of civil penalty assessment notices issued for which no response was
made by the alleged owner,
(7) the number of vehicles impounded due to unpaid civil penalty assessments issued
under this section;
(8) comparison of the above data to the best available accident and traffic signal
compliance data for such intersections collected prior to deployment of the traffic signal camera
monitoring; and
(9) the Chief s observations on the use and effectiveness of the demonstration program
and any recommendations he may have on improvement to the program.
SECTION 4
This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon final passage and approval.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Rev. 8/26/96
INTRODUCED: September 9, 1996
By Samuel Corsentino
Councilperson
APPROVED:
Presi nt of the tity Council
-6- J:\ CITY\ POLICE \TRAFCODE\PHOTOENF\ORDINANC.WPD