Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12151RESOLUTION NO. 12151 A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION #3592 BANNING MOTORIZED TRAFFIC IN THE INTERIOR LOOP OF CITY PARK DURING SUMMER MONTHS WHEREAS, in 1975 City Council passed Resolution #3592 banning motorized traffic in the interior loop of City Park during summer months; and WHEREAS, the circumstances that led to citizen concern and eventual approval of Resolution #3592 are not applicable today; and WHEREAS, the implementation of Park Rangers will allow for an active presence in city parks and immediate response to traffic and crime related concerns; and WHEREAS, the Parks staff has the ability to close the park if the need arises with consultation with Transportation and Police Departments; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PUEBLO, that: SECTION 1. Resolution #3592 is hereby rescinded and motorized traffic is permitted on all City Park roadways without seasonal time restrictions or unless otherwise approved by City Council through the revocable permit process, SECTION 2. Signage east of City Park on Goodnight Ave restricting access shall be removed in a timely manner. INTRODUCED: May 9, 2011 BY: Steve Nawrocki COUNCILPERSON Background Paper for Proposed RESOLUTION AGENDA ITEM # Q-1 DATE: May 9, 2011 DEPARTMENT: PARKS AND RECREATION, CREIGHTON WRIGHT, DIRECTOR TITLE A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION #3592 BANNING MOTORIZED TRAFFIC IN THE INTERIOR LOOP OF CITY PARK DURING SUMMER MONTHS ISSUE Should City Council rescind Resolution #3592 from 1975 banning motorized traffic in the interior loop of City Park during the summer months? RECOMMENDATION Approval of this Resolution. BACKGROUND In 1975, City Council passed Resolution #3592 after impassioned public comment from neighbors who live around City Park complaining about traffic and crime. As part of researching this issue, Parks consulted with the Transportation Division and discovered that the park was closed for two reasons: 1. People driving along Goodnight had a tendency to stop in the line of traffic and socialize with other cars/pedestrians congregated along the street causing major backups; and 2. The perception and isolated reality of violence and negativity of some park users. Based on research, and consulting with Chief Billings last year, there was little actual violence that occurred, other than people getting frustrated when others stopped traffic and created backups. Ultimately, closing of the park was a political solution that helped solve the perceived and limited real problems that occurred, but created other unintended consequences and greatly restricted and prevented those who wanted to use the park for legitimate reasons. This is a situation where the conduct of a few, ended up hurting the majority. The solution that was initially proposed, which is what we did last year, is to leave the park open, work closely with PD to ensure regular ongoing patrols and keeping traffic moving. Another even better option to combat traffic and crime related concerns in the City Parks, and in City Park especially, is implementation of park security staff, Park Rangers. The Rangers will be in the parks in the next few weeks and will monitor activity to ensure appropriate behavior. If situations escalate, the Police Department will assist. The Park Rangers will closely monitor the activity in City Park, and if the needs arises with consultation from Police and Traffic, the Park can be closed. At this point, this is not necessary, as people are behaving and acting appropriately. While signs entering City Park from the east state that the park is closed on weekends and holidays, the park was not closed last year to test the reasoning again. While the park did get very busy and nearly reached capacity last year, the issues and concerns that caused for the political uprising in the late 70's doesn’t seem to be an issue. Public parks are for the enjoyment and use of the public. And, unless there is an imminent threat to public health, safety and welfare, parks should be open for the enjoyment of our citizens. Closing parks, as has been the practice in the past, restricts access, forces congestion in other areas of the park, decreases use and attendance at the zoo and kiddie rides, and increases the negative behaviors of people (i.e. driving over curb, over grass or wrong way on a one-way). FINANCIAL IMPACT There is no perceivable financial impact to leaving City Park open during the summer. EXHIBIT 1 – Resolution #3592