HomeMy WebLinkAbout09577RESOLUTION NO. 9577
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION GRANT OFFER
PROJECT NO. 3- 08- 0046 -21 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$110,314 FOR COMPENSATION FOR A PORTION OF
DIRECT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH NEW, ADDITIONAL,
OR REVISED SECURITY REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED ON
PUEBLO MEMORIAL AIRPORT BY THE ADMINISTRATOR
ON OR AFTER SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 AND
AUTHORIZING THE PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TO EXECUTE SAME
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PUEBLO, that:
SECTION 1.
The City of Pueblo, a Municipal Corporation, does hereby accept the Federal
Aviation Grant Offer Project No. 3- 08- 0046 -21 in the amount of $110,314 for
compensation for a portion of the direct costs associated with new, additional, or revised
security requirements imposed on Pueblo Memorial Airport by the Administrator on or
after September 11, 2001.
SECTION 2.
The City of Pueblo does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representatives,
warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in its Application for Federal
Assistance which is incorporated by reference in said Grant Offer.
SECTION 3.
The President of the City Council is hereby authorized to execute said Grant
Offer on behalf of the City of Pueblo and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to attest said execution and impress thereon the Official Seal of the City of
Pueblo.
SECTION 4.
A true copy of the Grant Offer is attached hereto, incorporated herein, and by
reference made a part hereof.
INTRODUCED: April 22. 2002
BY: Patrick Aval os
C CILPERSON
APPROVED:
PRESIDENT OF CITY COUNCIL
ATTESTED BY:
C CLERK
nMA Aw....,...wl %I- A9Ao AAA,
APPLICATION FOR
2- DATESUBurno
V V1J
AMointldenfifier
FEDERAL ASSIS
1. TYPE OF
3. DATE RECEIVED BY STATE
State Appli slim Idenfifier
SUBMISSION:
Applkallon Preapplication
❑ Construction ❑ Constriction
4. DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY
Federal Identifier
® Non-Construction ❑ Non - Construction
5. APPL)CANT INFORMATION
Legal Name:
Organizational Unit
City of Pueblo, Colorado
City Council
Address (give city, county, state, and zip code)
Name and telephone number of the person to be contracted on matters involving
1 City Hall Place
this application (g(ve area code)
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
Mr. John B. O'Neal, C.M.
Director of Aviation
(719) 948 -3355
EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN):
7. TYPE OF APPLICANT: (enter appropriate letter in box) C
3 11 _ 113 a 3 0
13 El
A. State H. Interdependent School District
B. County I. State Controlled Institution of Higher Learning
C. Municipal J. Private University
D. Township K. Indian Tribe
E. Interstate L. Individual
8. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
® New [3 Continuation ❑Revision
F. Intermunicipal M. Profit Organization
G. Special District
N. Other (Specify)
If Revision, enter appropriate letters) in box(as): 1:11:1
A Increase Award B Decrease Award C Increase Duration
D Decrease Duration Other (specify)
9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY
Federal Aviation Administration
10. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC
11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT:
ASSISTANCE NUMBER a
Application Form for Additional AIP Funding ($175 minion)
•
TITLE: Airport Improvement
for New Airport Security Requirements per USDOT/FAA
Program AIP
Program Guidance Letter 024 for Section 119 of the
Aviation and Transportation Security Act (S1147). Request
12 AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT (titles, counties, states, etc.):
City of Pueblo, Colorado
for reimbursement of costs incurred due to new, additional
or revised security requirements imposed after September
11, 2001.
13. PROPOSED PROJECT
14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF
Start Date
Ending Dale
A. Applicant
b. Project
Sept. 2001
Sept. 2002
3rd
3rd
15. ESTIMATED FUNDING
18. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS
a. YES, THIS PREAPPLICATION/APPLICATION WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO THE
a. Federal
i 110,314
STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON
DATE:
b. NO PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E. O. 12372
❑ OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW
b. Applicant
$
a State
$
d. Local
$
e. Other
$
f. Program income
$
17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT?
❑ Yes If yes, attach an explanation ® No
g. TOTAL
$ 110,314
18. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY
AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE.ASSISTANCE IS
AWARDED
a. Typed Name of Authorized Representative
b. Title
a Telephone number
John B O'Neal, M. I
Dire
of Aviation
719 948 -3355
d. Spnature d R tative /1
*.
e. Date Signed
Y s F-owns Not Usable 1 - s artl 0rM 424 (REV "a
Prey OMB Circular A-1 02
Authorized for Local Reproduction
LEE R. EVETT
City Manager
JOHN B. O'NEAL, C.M.
Director of Aviation
D E
p c—�
CITY OF PUEBLO
DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION
Application Request
Additional AIP Funding ($175 million)
for New Airport Security Requirements
Narrative
Pueblo Memorial Airport
31201 Bryan Circle
Pueblo, CO 81001
(719) 948 -3355
Fax (719) 948 -4878
After the September 11, 2001 incident, several new airport security requirements were issued by the
FAA. One of these requirements was the presence of law enforcement officers at the screening point
during flights. The Pueblo Airport currently has three flights Monday through Friday, one flight on
Saturday and two flights on Sunday. A Pueblo Police Officer has been present at each flight since
the September 11 `" incident and will continue to be at each flight until the requirement from the FAA
is changed.
At the time of the September 11 cl incident the Pueblo Airport was categorized as a level 3 airport and
had to place a barrier 300 feet from the terminal building. Since the Pueblo Airport's parking area
is next to the terminal building, the road to the terminal had to be barricaded. This caused the airport
to provide a security person at the road entrance in order to escort people to the building. The airport
requested that the category level be changed from level 3 to level 4 and that request was approved
by the FAA in December of 2001. This changed the barrier to 75 feet around the control tower and
the airport no longer needs to provide the extra security at the road entrance for escort purposes.
Cost Summary
The costs incurred by the Airport which is owned and operated by the City of Pueblo for the new
security requirements were $34,318 for law enforcement personnel, $8,970 for security provided at
the road entrance for escort purposes, $1,376 for vehicle use and fuel, and $63* for rental of
barricades. The total actual costs incurred is $45,298.
The only cost which the Airport will incur this year is the law enforcement personnel cost. This is
projected to be $65,016.
The total costs for actual and estimated is $110,314.
ti+ pueblomemorialalrpor•t. org
Application Form for Additional A] UP Funding ($175 million) For New
Airport Security Requirements
Per USDOT/FAA Program Guidance Letter 024 for Section 119 of the
Aviation and Transportation Security Act (S1147)
(ACI -NA Standardized Form — Approved by the FAA, as providing information
identified in PGL 02 -04)
Critical Submission Date: January 18, 2002
Section I. Eligible New, Additional or Revised Security Requirements & Direct
Costs
(Definition — Costs that airports can specifically identify as being unique to new, additional, or revised security
requirements imposed by the FAA or the TSA on or after September 11, 2001. Operational costs and small
capital costs that have been or will be expensed are eligible. Amortized capital costs are not eligible for this
special funding. Actual costs incurred after September 11 and estimated costs to be incurred in the firture but no
later than September 30, 2002 are eligible for funding consideration. * Note: If airports have increased fees,
including rates and charges, to users of airports, the applications should also reflect that action. FAA would expect
that an airport should not receive a grant for costs that have been recovered unless the airport provides a plan for
rebating these reimbursements back to airport users providing the reimbursement from FAA.)
New, Additional, or Revised
Actual
Estimated
Total Cost(s)
Has the
Does the
Security Requirement(s)
Direct
Direct
airport
airport have
cost(s)
cost(s) to be
recovered
the ability to
incurred
incurred
these costs
recover these
9/11/01—
1/18/02—
through their
costs through
1/18/02
9/30/02
rate base?
the rate base?
Increased Law Enforcement
$34,318
$65,016
$99,334
❑ yes X no
❑ yes X no
Officer personnel/overtime
Increased other
$8,970
$0
$8,970
❑ yes X no
❑ yes X no
p ersonnel/overtime
Equipment, supplies, radios,
$1,376
$0
$1,376
❑ yes X no
❑ yes Xno
badge stock, vehicles, etc.
Temporary construction, facility
$634
$0
$634
❑ yes X no
❑ yes X no
modifications barriers etc.
Outside services, contractor
$
$
$
❑ yes ❑ no
❑ yes ❑ no
supp ort, etc.
Other:
$ .
$
$
❑ yes ❑ no
❑ yes ❑ no
Total
$45,298
$65,016
$110,314
Please Note: To assure complete compliance, please refer to the attachment that enumerates the
eligible project categories for this Security Grant Application and also submit under CFR 191.
, a �►
Section II. Traffic Data
Year
September
October
November
December
2000
8176
1 6059
7305
6933
6293
2001
Fuel Fees
9476
9697
7123
2001 Budgeted Total
Passengers
2001 Revised Total
Passengers
2002 Budgeted Total
Passengers
2002 Revised Passenger
Estimate
9296
6944
7175
5902
Section III. Additional Supporting Information - Financial Impacts (This information is
necessary in order to identify and assess airports with the greatest financial challenges and their ability to
absorb costs in the rate base.)
Airport Revenues &
Expense Categories
Annual Totals
(for most recent
fiscal ear
September 2001
October thru
December 2000
October thru
December 2001
Aeronautical Revenues
Landis Fees
$11,210
$597
$2,771
$2,976
Fuel Fees
$103,561
$7,543
$23,540
$30,252
Terminal Rents
$58,679
$12,590
$16,414
$18,776
Other
$50
$3
$14,888
$16
Sub -Total
$223,830
$24,551
$57,613
$68,840
Non - Aeronautical Revenues
Concessions
$3,022
$225
$675
$997
Parkin
$0
$0
$0
$0
Rental Cars
$49,673
$5,811
$15,209
$11,274
Other
$100,264
$8,261
$31,181
$25,545
Sub -Total
1 $152,959
1 $14,297
1 $47,065
1 $37
A. Total Operating
Revenue
$376,789
$38,848
$104,678
$106,656
Total Operating
Expenses
$1,103,725
$113,233
$341,236
$272,472
Interest Expense
$0
$0
$0
$0
B. Total enses
$1 103 725
$113,233
$341,236
$272,472
C. *De reciation
$982 780 est.
$81 est.
$245,694
245,694 est.
Net (A -B-C)
S(1,709,719
$(156,283)
482,252
411,510
Section IV. 2001 Monthly Security Operating Costs
Month (2001)
Security Operating Cost
June
$15,708
Jul
$16,888
August
$16,394
September
$23,099
October
$26,587
November
$23,289
December
$25,888
Section V. Ineligible Costs Resulting from New, Additional or Revised Security
Requirements (Major security capital projects not covered by Section 119 ($175 million) or Section
121 (authorized $1.5 billion).
Requirement/Project
Cost
Has this been
budgeted for?
If no, what source(s) of
funds /rate base do you
anticipate using?
Terminal Reconfi - 'on/Retrofittin
AIP
$225,000
100%
CTX accommodation
$
❑ yes ❑ no
$7,029
Security Screening Checkpoints
$
❑ yes ❑ no
Retained Earnings
Parking Facility Reconfiguration
$
❑ yes 0 no
%
Security Perimeter Reconfiguration
$
❑ yes 0 no
%
Access Control Capital Costs
$500,000
❑ yes X no
AIP fimds
Additional Law Enforcement Capital Costs
$
❑ yes 0 no
Baggage Systems Reconfiguration
$
❑ yes ❑ no
Other: Electronic Gates
$170,000
❑ yes X no
AIP fimds
Other: Barricades
$13,000
❑ yes X no
AIP funds
Other: Vehicle (truck) with lights and radios
$30,000
❑ yes X no
AIP fimds
Total
$713 000
Section VI. Financial Capacity /Capability to Absorb Increased Security Costs
The intention of this section is twofold -- to determine if airports have already committed potential future
funds in bond covenants and to determine the current ability of airports to make additional funds available
for new security requirements.
Funding Source
Projected Amount for FY
2002
Percentage of
Source Previously
Committed
Percentage of
Source Still
Available
Total
AIP
$225,000
100%
0%
= 100%
PFC
$7,029
100%
0%
— 100%
Retained Earnings
$(12,872,647)
100%
0%
%
As of 12/31/01, what was the amount of your unrestricted cash reserves? $0
Section VII. Status of Airport Capital Improvement Plans
It is important to understand what changes are being made to airport capital plans as a result of September 11
Project
Location
AIP Eligible
Capital Costs
% of AIP
Projects
Being
Delayed
Average
Length of
Delay
Non AIP Eligible
Capital Costs
% of Non
AIP Projects
Being
Delayed
Average
Length of
Delay
Airside
$
%
$
%
Terminal
$
%
$
%
Landside
$
1
%
$
Total
$
%
$
%
�°f TRA% DENVER AIRPORTS DISTRICT OFFICE
26805 EAST 68TH AVENUE, SUITE 224
DENVER, COLORADO 80249 -6361
4 Q (303) 342 -1254
y ' I AoEs of �
FEDERAL AVIATION
ADMINISTRATION
PLEASE READ BEFORE EXECUTING GRANT
March 26, 2002
Mr. Michael Occhiato, President
Pueblo City Council
1 City Hall Place
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
Dear Mr. Occhiato:
Enclosed are four copies of a grant offer for Airport Improvement Program Project No. 3 -08- 0046 -21 at
the Pueblo Memorial Airport in which $110,314 of Federal funds have been obligated to accomplish the
development described on page 1 of the grant offer. Please complete Part H (Acceptance) by having the
authorized officials execute the last page of the grant offer. Certification by the attorneys should be
completed following the acceptance and dated on or after the acceptance date.
Your normal procedures for accepting documents such as this in accordance with local and state law
should be followed, but evidence of such procedure is not required by the Federal Aviation
Administration.
After execution and certification of the grant agreement, please return three copies to this office. The
other copy is for your records.
Sincerel ,
Jo Bauer, Acting Manager
Denver Airports District Office
Enclosures
f
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
GRANT AGREEMENT
Part I — Offer
Date of Offer: 2 6 2002
Airport: Pueblo Memorial
Project No: 3 -08- 0046 -21
Contract No: DOT- FA02NM -1016
TO: City of Pueblo, Colorado
(herein called the "Sponsor ")
FROM: The United States of America (acting through the Federal Aviation
Administration, herein called the "FAA ")
WHEREAS, the Sponsor has submitted to the FAA a Project Application dated January 18,
2002, for a grant of Federal funds for a project at or associated with the Pueblo Memorial Airport,
which Project Application, as approved by the FAA, is hereby incorporated herein and made a
part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the FAA has approved a project for the Airport (herein called the "Project ")
consisting of the following:
"Compensation to the sponsor for a portion of the direct costs associated with new,
additional, or revised security requirements imposed on the airport operator by the
Administrator on or after September 11, 2001."
as more particularly described in the Project Application, and protected as sensitive security
information under 49 CFR Part 1520.
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to and for the purpose of carrying out the applicable provisions
of Public Law 107 -117, providing funds for "grants -in -aid for airports" for reimbursement to
airports of direct costs associated with additional or revised security requirements, herein called
"the Act ", and in consideration of (a) the Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer as hereinafter
provided, and (b) the benefits to accrue to the United States and the public from the
accomplishment of the Project and compliance with the terms and conditions as herein provided,
THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE
UNITED STATES, HEREBY OFFERS AND AGREES to pay, as the United States share of
the allowable costs incurred in accomplishing the Project, 100 per centum thereof.
This Offer is made on and subject to the following terms and conditions:
Con_
1. The maximum obligation of the United States payable under this Offer shall be
$110,314.
2. The allowable costs of the project shall not include any costs determined by the
FAA to be ineligible for consideration as to allowability under the Act.
3. Payment of the United States' share of the allowable project costs will be made
pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of such regulations and
procedures as the FAA shall prescribe. Final determination of the United States'
share will be based upon the final audit of the total amount of allowable project
costs and settlement will be made for any upward or downward adjustments to
the Federal share of costs.
4. - The Sponsor shall carry out and complete the Project without undue delays and
in accordance with the terms hereof, and such regulations and procedures as the
FAA shall prescribe, and agrees to comply with the terms and conditions which
are made part of this grant offer.
5. The FAA reserves the right to amend or withdraw this offer at any time prior to
its acceptance by the Sponsor.
6. This offer shall expire and the United States shall not be obligated to pay any part
of the costs of the project unless this offer has been accepted by the Sponsor on
or before May 1, 2002, or such subsequent date as may be prescribed in writing
by the FAA.
7. The Sponsor shall take all steps, including litigation if necessary, to recover
Federal funds spent fraudulently, wastefully, or in violation of Federal antitrust
statutes, or misused in any other manner in any project upon which Federal funds
have been expended. For the purposes of this grant agreement, the term "Federal
funds" means funds however used or dispersed by the Sponsor that were
originally paid pursuant to this or any other Federal grant agreement. It shall
obtain the approval of the FAA as to any determination of the amount of the
Federal share of such funds. It shall return the recovered Federal share, including
funds recovered by settlement, order, or judgment, to the FAA. It shall furnish to
the FAA, upon request, all documents and records pertaining to the determination
of the amount of the Federal share or to any settlement, litigation, negotiation, or
other efforts taken to recover such funds. All settlements or other final positions
of the Sponsor, in court or otherwise, involving the recovery of such Federal
share shall be approved in advance by the FAA.
The United States shall not be responsible or liable for damage to property or
injury to persons that may arise from, or be incident to, compliance with this
grant agreement.
9. It is hereby understood and agreed that:
a. The Sponsor will comply with all applicable Federal laws, regulations,
executive orders, policies, guidelines, and requirements as they relate to the
application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this project including
but not limited to the following:
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 - 29 U.S.C. 794.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Title VI - 42 U.S.C. 2000d through d-4.
Age Discrimination Act of 1975 - 42 U.S.C. 6101, et seq.
Single Audit Act of 1984 - 31 U.S.C. 7501, et seq.2
Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988 - 41 U.S.C. 702 through 706.
Executive Order 11246 - Equal Employment Opportunityl
Executive Order 12898 - Environmental Justice
49 CFR Part 18 - Uniform administrative requirements for grants and
cooperative agreements to state and local governments.
49 CFR Part 20 - New restrictions on lobbying.
49 CFR Part 21 - Nondiscrimination in federally- assisted programs of the
Department of Transportation - effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964.
49 CFR Part 27 - Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap in programs
and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance.1
49 CFR Part 29 — Government wide debarment and suspension
(nonprocurement)
and government wide requirements for drug -free workplace(grants).
OMB Circular A -87 - Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts
with State
And Local Governments.
OMB Circular A -133 - Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non - Profit
Organizations
b. The Sponsor assures that It has legal authority to apply for the grant, and to
finance and carry out the proposed project; that a resolution, motion or
similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the
applicant's governing body authorizing the filing of the application, including
all understandings, terms and conditions contained therein, and directing and
authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant
to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional
information as may be required.
c. The Sponsor agrees it will not take or permit any action which would operate
to deprive it of any of the rights and powers necessary to perform any or all
of the terms and conditions in the grant agreement without the written
approval of the FAA, and will act promptly to acquire, extinguish or modify
any outstanding rights or claims of right of others which would interfere with
such performance by the Sponsor. This shall be done in a manner acceptable
to the FAA.
d. The Sponsor agrees it shall keep all project accounts and records which fully
disclose the amount and disposition by the recipient of the proceeds of the
grant, the total cost of the project in connection with which the grant is given
or used, and such other financial records pertinent to the project. The
accounts and records shall be kept in accordance with an accounting system
that will facilitate an effective audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act
of 1984.
e. The Sponsor agrees it shall make available to the FAA and the Comptroller
General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives,
for the purpose of audit and examination, any books, documents, papers, and
records of the recipient that are pertinent to the grant. The FAA may require
that an appropriate audit be conducted by a recipient. In any case in which
an independent audit is made of the accounts of a sponsor relating to the
disposition of the proceeds of a grant or relating to the project in connection
with which the grant was given or used, it shall file a certified copy of such
audit with the Comptroller General of the United States not later than six (6)
months following the close of the fiscal year for which the audit was made.
f. The Sponsor agrees it will comply with such rules as are promulgated to
assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national
origin, sex, age, or handicap be excluded from participating in any activity
conducted with or benefiting from funds received from this grant. This
assurance obligates the sponsor for the period during which Federal financial
assistance is extended to the program.
g. The Sponsor agrees that none of the costs reimbursed from this agreement
can be included in any rates charged to users of the airport and in the event
that such costs have been included in rates charged by the airport to users,
such rates shall be adjusted to reflect this reimbursement. If rates have been
collected, such funds will be refunded to the users of the airport in the same
amount as collected.
The Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer and ratification and adoption of the Project Application
incorporated herein shall be evidenced by execution of this instrument by the Sponsor, as
hereinafter provided, and this Offer and Acceptance shall comprise a Grant Agreement, as
provided by the Act, constituting the contractual obligations and rights of the United States and
the Sponsor with respect to the accomplishment of the Project and compliance with the terms and
conditions as provided herein. Such Grant Agreement shall become effective upon the Sponsor's
acceptance of this Offer.
UNITEqST TES O F AMERICA
FED RYIATION ADMINISTRATION
Actillanager, Denver Airports District Office
Part II - Acceptance
The Sponsor does hereby ratify and adopt all terms and conditions, statements, representations, warranties,
covenants, and agreements contained in the Project Application and incorporated materials referred to in
the foregoing Offer and does hereby accept this Offer and by such acceptance agrees to comply with all of
the terms and conditions in this Offer and in the Project Application.
Executed this 22nd day of Apri 1 , 2002.
CITY PUEBLO, COLORADO
(SEAL) B
Sponsors Designated Official Representative
Title Pre of Cit,y Council
Attest:
Title: City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SPONSOR'S ATTORNEY
I, % {tOhtAS 1f , �1 yq g acting as Attorney for the Sponsor do hereby certify:
That in my opinion the Sponsor is empowered to enter into the foregoing Grant Agreement under the laws
of the State of Colorado. Further, I have examined the foregoing Grant Agreement and the actions taken by
said Sponsor and Sponsor's official representative has been duly authorized and that the execution thereof
is in all respects due and proper and in accordance with the laws of the said State and the Act. In addition,
for grants involving projects to be carried out on property not owned by the Sponsor, there are no legal
impediments that will prevent full performance by the Sponsor. Further, it is my opinion that the said
Grant Agreement constitutes a legal and binding obligation of the Sponsor in accordance with the terms
thereof.
Dated at kd 4 _ �o n a o this R6 1 - 4 day of & k t L 2002.
B y /iS.��A
Signature of Spon r' Attorney