Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8237RESOLUTION NO. 8237 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. FOUR TO CONTRACT DATED MAY 13, 1996, BETWEEN THE CITY OF PUEBLO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND ISBILL ASSOCIATES, INC., RELATING TO FEDERAL GRANT AIP PROJECT NO. 3 08 0046 18, PAVING, MARKING AND LIGHTING FOR TAXIWAY "K" EXTENSION AND BYPASS TAXIWAY "M" AT THE PUEBLO MEMORIAL AIRPORT AND AUTHORIZING THE USE OF LAND SALE REVENUE FUNDS FOR THE NON - FEDERAL PORTION OF THIS PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO EXECUTE SAME WHEREAS, the City of Pueblo, A Municipal Corporation, and Isbill Associates, Inc. entered into a Contract on May 13, 1996, and WHEREAS, both parties wish to amend the Contract to include fees for engineering services relating to improvements at the Pueblo Memorial Airport, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PUEBLO, COLORADO THAT: SECTION 1 A certain Amendment No. Four to the Contract, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part thereof by reference, after having been approved as to form by the City Attorney, by and between the City of Pueblo, a Municipal Corporation, and Isbill Associates, Inc., relating to the inclusion of fees for engineering services for Federal Grant AIP Project No. 3 08 0046 18, Paving, Marking, and Lighting for Taxiway "K" Extension and Bypass Taxiway "M" at the Pueblo Memorial Airport, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions as set forth in said Contract. SECTION 2 The total Contract amount is $70,484. The portion of this Contract which is covered under the Federal Grant AIP Project is $52,969.83. The City of Pueblo's matching funds for the project will be $5,296.98, which will be taken from the 34 fund. The non - federal portion of this Contract is $17,514.17, which will be taken from the Land Sale Revenue funds. SECTION 3 The President of the City Council is hereby authorized to execute said Amendment No. Four to the Contract on behalf of Pueblo, A Municipal Corporation, and the City Clerk shall affix the Seal of the City thereto and attest the same. INTRODUCED gepteher 22,. 1997 BY John Verna Councilperson ATTEST: y Clerk APPROVED: Presid t of CX y Council ISBILL ASSOC. INC. ID :303- 364 -0257 SEP 15'97 15:34 No.033 P.02 SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED FROJI COST Based on Low Bid Project Cost Total FAA Share Sponsor Share Administration $5,000.00 $4,500.00 $5(X).00 Engineering Design Engineering Surveying (Design) Soils Investigation (Design) Surveying (Construction) 50' Wide 1,127.27 1,014.55 112.72 Surveying (Construction) 25' Wide 372.73 * 372,73 1,500.00 1,014,55 485.45 Material Testing (Construction) 50' Wide 601.21 541.09 60.12 Material Testing (Construction) 25' Wide 198.79 "' 198.79 800.00 541.09 258.91 Riddiq and Construction Administration 50' Wide 8,532.71 7,679.44 853.27 Ridding and Construction Administration 25' Wide 2,821.29 * 2,821.29 11,354.00 7,679.44 3,674.56 Field Engineering 50' Wide 42,708.64 38,437.77 4,270.87 Field Engineering 25' Wide 14,121.36 * 14,121.36 56,830.00 38,437.77 18,392.23 Total - r11gincering $70,484.00 $47,672,85 $22,811.15 Construction Total Cost - Schedule 11 $1,081,435,00 Less Pavement Cost for 25' Width Plus Additional Subbase 268,429.00 * 268,429.00 Cost for 50' width 81.3,006.00 731,705.40 81,300.60 Total Cost - Schedule III $214,779.50 Less Pavement Cost for 25' Width Plus Additional Subbase 53,660.00 * _ .. 53,660,00 Cost for 50' Width $161,119,50 145,007.55 16,111.95 ' TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $1,296,214.50 $876,712.95 $419,501.55 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $1,371,698.50 $928,885.80 $442,812.70 Sponsor - Total Land Sales Total $339,603.17 $442,812.70 * nasign Engineering. Surveys, and Soils Investigation included in AT No. 3.08- 0046 -13 NOTE: Engineering has been pro -rated based on construction costs at 67.64% I!ngineering Fees have not been negotiated at this time. Federal eligible and 32.36`95 Sponsor. ISBILL ASSOC. INC U S. Department of l nsportaiion Federat Aviation Administration January 12, 1995 Northwest Mountain Region Mr. James P. Elwood Director of Aviation City of Pueblo, Department of Aviation Pueblo Memorial Airport Pueblo, Colorado 81001 Dear Sir: JAN 24'95 16:02 No.015 P.02 i� Pueblo Airport Traffic Control Tower 31385 Bryan Circle Pueblo, Colorado 81001 (719) 948 -3374 I want to take a moment to express the tower's support for establishing a width of 75 feet for taxiway Kilo when it is extended to meet, the approach end of runway 26R. In addition, we hope that the new extension will be stressed to accommodate the weight of the heavy aircraft that use the Pueblo airport. From an operational standpoint, the ground controllers at Pueblo verify that it is typically the pilots of the large and heavy weight -class aircraft who request to back -taxi on runway 26R from the current taxiway Kilo intersection. These aircraft have a heavier footprint, wider landing gear, and a larger turn radius than smaller aircraft that will accept a departure on runway 26R from Kilo. The proposed extension of taxiway Kilo will best serve the pueblo airport and ATC if it is 75 feet wide and stressed for all sizes of aircraft. The operational advantages to be gained are twofold. First, traffic delays for aircraft taxiing to and departing runway 26 Right will be reduced when the back -taxi on the runway is eliminated. Second, the airport's accommodation of large aircraft will be enhanced when runway 26 Right is in use. Georg Hof Air Traffic nager Pueblo Airport Traffic Control Tower ID :303- 364 -0257 'D o City of Pueblo JAMES P. ELWOOD, A.A.E. Director of Aviation January 24, 1995 Mr. Alan E. Wiechmann Manager Airports District Office Federal Aviation Administration 5440 Roslyn Street, Suite 300 Denver, Colorado 80216 RE: Pueblo Memorial Airport, Pueblo, Colorado AIP Project No. 3 -08- 0046 -14 Grade, Drain, Pave and Light Taxiway "K" Extension Rehabilitate and Overlay Existing Portion of Taxiway "K" Dear Mr. Wiechmann: 31201 Bryan Circle Pueblo, Colorado 81001 (719) 948 -3355 (719) 948 -3361 The purpose of this letter is to express our concern over the width of the proposed extension of Taxiway "K ". The existing portion of Taxiway "K" is 75 feet wide, as are all taxiways at the Airport. We believe it is a key safety issue that all taxiways remain consistent. A unique fleet mix operates at our airport. Aircraft operations in 1994 totaled over 80,500. Over 22,600 of those were military aircraft including the C -130 and C -141. During the week ending January 22, 1995, there were 79 jet operations ranging from Citation to B -727 aircraft. Historically, these jet operations and the majority of general aviation operations are transient. Although aircraft depart Runway 26R from the intersection of the existing "K" connector, there are many instances when aircraft will need to back -taxi to use the full length of the runway. Airline and Corporate policies often dictate that their pilots utilize the full length of the departure runway. In addition, when one combines the high elevation of our field and the hot summer months, it is necessary for jet aircraft to back -taxi due to lower performance levels. We believe that the decreasing width of the extension is a safety issue. The width should remain consistent with all existing taxiways due to the large number of jet, military, and transient operations. Many of these aircraft are unfamiliar with the field and require consistency. If pilots do not utilize the extension because of this issue, the runway capacity will be reduced and the intent of the construction defeated. The estimated cost of construction for 75 feet of width is $179,100 more than the 50 feet width. If the taxiway is widened in the future, the cost in 1995 dollars is estimated at $372,200, a 207 percent increase. There will also be additional engineering fees of approximately $75,000.00 to design and oversee the construction in the future. This engineering cost is unchanged if done at this time. The estimated cost to construct the extension at a width of 75 feet and overlay the existing portion of Taxiway "K" is $1,979,800 with the FAA portion being $1,781,820. FAA programmed monies for this project is $1,850,000. The project can be completed with the current FAA budget based on the estimated costs. Attached is a copy of the letter we received from the Air Traffic Manager for the Pueblo Memorial Airport addressing their concerns with the proposed width of the taxiway. Once again, the main issue is safety. If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, James P. Elwood, A.A.E. Director of Aviation JPE:cd Enclosure cc: Isbill Associates, Inc. George Hof, Air Traffic Manager, Pueblo Memorial Airport r Z �� S �ares dF r��P�e FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION July 7, 1995 Mr. James P. Elwood, Director of Aviation Pueblo Memorial Airport 31201 Bryan Circle Pueblo, Colorado 81001 Dear Mr. Elwood: Pueblo Memorial Airport, Pueblo, Colorado AIP Project No. 3 -08- 0046 -13 Taxiway "K" Extension JENVER AIRPORTS DISTRICT OFFICE 5440 ROSLYN STREET, SUITE 300 DENVER, COLORADO 80216 -6026 (303) 286-5525 We have reviewed your request to increase the design width of the extension of Taxiway "K" from 50' to 75'. It is our determination that the aircraft currently utilizing Pueblo Memorial Airport, as well as those forecast to use the airport within the five year planning period, can operate safely and efficiently on a 50' wide taxiway and that a 75' width is not justified. A 75' wide taxiway requires a critical aircraft (greater than 500 annual operations) identified in airplane design group IV (wingspans from 118' to 170') to be justified under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). Existing and forecast activity at the airport does not meet this requirement. We understand that Pueblo Memorial receives significant military activity utilizing C -130 and C -141 aircraft. While these aircraft do fall within design group IV, the aviation trust fund, and therefore AIP, cannot be used to fund improvements based on military use. If you have any questions or comments on this matter, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Christopher J. affer Project Manager cc: Isbill Associates, Inc. ilk 1 01995 V 0-00 uS. Deparrrnenr of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration July 14, 1995 Northwest Mountain Region Jim Elwood Director of Aviation Pueblo Memorial Airport Pueblo, Colorado 81001 Dear Jim: Pueblo Airport Traffic Control Tower 31385 Bryan Circle Pueblo, Colorado 81001 (719) 948 -3374 Per our discussion earlier this week, I reviewed the air traffic statistics regarding the use of the Pueblo airport by commercial aircraft at least the size of the Boeing 737. During the last twelve months, Pueblo Tower accounted for 185 air carrier itinerant operations and for approximately 400 local operations by aircraft of this size. The itinerant operations category accounts for aircraft arriving to a full stop and the local operations category depicts aircraft conducting instrument training or traffic pattern flight training at the airport. Please note that many of the local operations by this size aircraft include full stop, taxi back, and departure operations. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance in this matter. George Hof Air Traffic nager Pueblo Airport Traffic Control Tower Ot TRA 2e, its ci P Q�v FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION March 13, 1996 Mr. Edward Chamberlain, Acting Director of Aviation Pueblo Memorial Airport 31201 Bryan Circle Pueblo, Colorado 81001 Dear Mr. Chamberlain: Puebla Meinoriai Airport, Pueblo, Colorado Land Sale Proceeds /Extension of Taxi\vav "K" DENVER AIRPORTS DISTRICT OFFICE 5310 ROSLYN STREET, SUITE 300 DENVER, COLORADO 80216 -6026 (303) 286 -5525 This letter is in response to your inquiry concerning the use of land sale revenues to finance improvements to Taxiway `'K" which are beyond the scope of future Airport Improvement Program (AIP) participation. We have reviewed the request with respect to applicable agency guidelines and have determined that widening and strengthening the taxiway is an acceptable use of land sale revenues. In conjunction with the airport's calendar year 1995 audit, please examine the surplus land sales program, including city funds which are set aside to represent sales proceeds for investment into the airport. So that we might have the current status of sales proceeds and reinvestment activities, we request that you submit your balance sheet information for comparison to our records. Included should be past sales, amounts reinvested into the airport and plans for investment of outstanding sales proceeds. If you have any questions or comments on this matter, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Christopher J. Schaffer Project Manager IAI No. PUB 1665 (Project II) AIP Project No. 3 -08- 0046 -18 City Project No. 97 -051 AMENDMENT NO. FOUR TO CONTRACT DATED MAY 13, 1996 BETWEEN ISBILL ASSOCIATES Raytheon Infrastructure Inc. AND CITY OF PUEBLO, COLORADO The Sponsor and the Engineer agree to amend their Contract dated May 13, 1996 for improvements to Pueblo Memorial Airport, Pueblo, Colorado to include the fees for engineering services. The improvement items covered by this amendment are described as follows: Construct Taxiway Extension "Paving, Marking and Lighting for Taxiway "K" Extension and Bypass Taxiway ff PART A - BASIC SERVICES BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION Item No. 1 (Project II) .............. ............................... $11,354.00 PART B - SPECIAL SERVICES (SOILS AND PAVEMENT INVESTIGATIONS/ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS /FIELD ENGINEERING) The maximum estimated SPECIAL SERVICES engineering is as follows: SOILS AND PAVEMENT INVESTIGATIONS (FOR DESIGN) Item No. 1 (Project II) ....................... Not Applicable to this Amendment 2. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS (FOR DESIGN) Item No. 1 (Project II) ....................... Not Applicable to this Amendment 3. FIELD ENGINEERING The Engineer shall be reimbursed on a Cost Plus Fixed Fee Basis. The Engineer's costs shall be determined on the basis of time (i.e., the number of hours worked), multiplied by the Engineer's standard hourly rates for each applicable employee classification, plus direct non - hourly expenses including labor, overhead, and general administrative costs. Overhead costs are based on the most recent audit on the Engineer's records. See attached page for hourly rates and billing procedure. Page 1 of 2 The estimated maximum for FIELD ENGINEERING is: For Item No. 1 (Project II) ....................... Maximum of $59,130.00 For this Amendment, the Sponsor shall pay the Engineer's costs to a maximum of $52,875.00 plus a fixed fee of $6,255.00. The Engineer's costs, exclusive of the fixed fee, shall not be exceeded without the Sponsor's written prior approval. The above estimated maximum is based on a construction project taking 40 working days. Method of payment shall be as follows: For services rendered under PART B - SPECIAL SERVICES, the Sponsor agrees to make monthly payments based upon the work performed by the Engineer less 10 percent. The final 10 percent of the fee shall be due and payable when the project final inspection and the construction report have been completed, and when reproducible "Record Drawings" have been submitted to the Sponsor and when the revised Airport Layout Plan has been approved by the FAA. The "Record Drawings" and Construction Report shall be submitted within a period of 90 days from end of construction period. This Amendment shall be considered concurrent with completion of audit. All other terms and conditions of the original contract shall remain in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have affixed their signatures this 22nd day of September 1997. SPONSOR: ENGINEER: CITY OF PUEBLO ISBILL ASSOCIATES PUEBLO, COLORADO By yk , By , f� President, ity Co ncil Sr. Vice President Page 2 of 2 DESIGN ENGINEERING RATES HOURLY RATES* AND BILLING PROCEDURES Principal................................... ............................... $ 95.60 Staff Engineer /Planner ....................... ............................... 82.10 Engineer /Planner /Construction Coordinator ..... ............................... 61.70 Assoc. Engineer /Planner /Constr. Coordinator .... ............................... 44.00 Draftsman /CADD Operator ................... ............................... 36.00 Clerical /Data Processor ....................... ............................... 39.10 Auto -CADD Work Station ..................... ............................... 25.00 Auto -TROL Work Station ..................... ............................... 35.00 * Includes labor overhead, general and administrative costs and profit. Company car and Personal car usage will be billed at the rate of $27.70 per day and $0.31 per mile. Auto rental and out -of -town expenses will be billed at actual costs. Out -of -town meals will not exceed $30.00 per day; or $7.00 for breakfast, $9.00 for lunch and $14.00 for dinner. Soils and pavement investigations, topographic surveys, and other engineering support will be billed at actual costs. (01.04.96) FIELD ENGINEERING RATES HOURLY RATES* AND BILLING PROCEDURES Principal................................... ............................... $ 83.10 Staff Engineer /Planner ....................... ............................... 71.40 Engineer /Planner /Construction Coordinator ..... ............................... 53.60 Assoc. Engineer /Planner /Constr. Coordinator .... ............................... 38.30 Draftsman /CAD D Operator ................... ............................... 31.30 Clerical /Data Processor ....................... ............................... 34.00 Auto -CAD D Work Station ..................... ............................... 25.00 Auto -T R OL Work Station ..................... ............................... 35.00 * Includes labor overhead, general and administrative costs. Company car and Personal car usage will be billed at the rate of $27.70 per day and $0.31 per mile. Auto rental and out -of -town expenses will be billed at actual costs. Out -of -town meals will not exceed $30.00 per day; or $7.00 for breakfast, $9.00 for lunch and $14.00 for dinner. Soils and pavement investigations, topographic surveys, and other engineering support will be billed at actual costs. (01.04.96)