HomeMy WebLinkAbout7921RESOLUTION NO. 7921 _.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PUEBLO AND
DESIGN STUDIOS WEST, INC., FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THE HISTORIC
ARKANSAS RIVERWALK PROJECT, AND ESTABLISHING
A CONTINGENCY FUND FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES
THAT MAY BE REQUIRED
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PUEBLO, COLORADO, that:
SECTION 1.
The Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Engineering Services as-
sociated with the Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project, by and between the
City of Pueblo, a Municipal Corporation, and Design Studios West, Inc., a copy
of which is attached hereto, having been approved as to form by the City At-
torney, is hereby approved.
SECTION 2_
The President of the City Council is hereby authorized and directed to
execute said Amendment in substantially the same form as attached, for and on
behalf of the City of Pueblo, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to attest
same and affix the seal of the City thereto.
SECTION 3.
Funds for said Professional Services, in the amount of $308,500.00, shall
be paid from the proceeds of the HARP Bonds, Account No. 037 -1996- 100 - 000 -040-
0020.
SECTION 4.
In addition to the amount set forth in Section 3, a contingency fund is
hereby established in the amount of $30,000.00 for additional services that
may be required. This fund shall be taken from the proceeds of the HARP
Bonds, Account No. 037 -1996- 100 -000- 040 -0020.
ATTEST:
ity Clerk
INTRODUCED - j u l,__22_ ,1996
By___._ 7\1
Councilperson
APPROVED:
A -- �e -
Presid nt of the Council
- 2 -
AM ENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR P ENGINEERI SER
THIS AMENDMENT to Agreement for Professional Engineering Services is made
and entered into this 22nd day of July, 1996 by and between the City
of Pueblo, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Owner ") and
Design Studios West, Inc., a professional engineering firm (hereinafter re-
ferred to as "Engineer ").
WHEREAS, Owner and Engineer have heretofore entered into an Agreement
(hereinafter "the Agreement ") dated November 27, 1995 wherein Engineer agreed
to render certain professional engineering and related services for Owner in
connection with the Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project (hereinafter referred
to as the "Project ") ; and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that an Amendment to the Agreement is necessary
and desirable to increase the contract amount for additional services and de-
sign revisions as requested by the Owner;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and mutual terms and
conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. The Agreement is amended by expanding the scope of work to
include the additional services outlined in Appendix "A"
to this Amendment.
2. The Engineer shall complete the work items generally de-
scribed in Appendix "A" to this Amendment in accordance
with the terms of the Agreement.
3. With respect to Engineer's services provided under this
Amendment, Appendix "B ", "Fee Schedule" of the Agreement
shall apply to compensation payable for key personnel,
reimbursable expenses, and media costs, and shall be in-
creased in the amount of $308,500.00 for the work author-
ized by this Amendment.
4. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Agree-
ment shall remain in full force and effect. Any obliga-
tions remaining to be performed under the original Agree-
ment by either party, relating to the professional services
to be performed by Engineer generally or with respect to
other phases of the Project are not waived or excused in
any manner, but shall be fully performed in accordance with
the terms and conditions of the Agreement as it existed
prior to this Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and Engineer have executed this Amendment to
Agreement for Professional Engineering Services as of the date first above
written.
ENGINEER:
CITY OF PUEBLO
A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DESIGN STUDIOS WEST, INCA.
By
Pres / dent of the Council bJcr-
Title
ATTEST:
B y
City Clerk
BALANCE OF APPROPRIATION EXISTS FOR THIS CONTRACT A14D FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE:
A�-
AJJ Director o�n e
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
C C - ty 'Attorney
- 2 -
PROJECT
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
CONTRACT AMENDMENT
JULY 15, 1996
DSW
DESIGN STUDIOS WEST, INC.
FUnrung Lngmeermg La—ri&cape.Architecture
105WestB5: Pueblo, Colaado 811.03
H I S T O R I C
July 17, 1996
Mr. Tom Cvar
Public Works Director
City of Pueblo
211 East D Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
Dear Tom:
Enclosed is the proposed Contract Amendment /Work Release for the next several months of
projected work for HARP. The enclosed documentation is based on the conversation we had
on July 9, 1996 and July 15, 1996 to outline how Design Studios West, Inc. (DSW) should best
proceed with Preliminary Design (Design Development) while the Phase One construction
documents are approaching bidding and award.
As we discussed, the HARP program has changed significantly from our original proposal in
November 1995. Phase I of the HARP has made tremendous progress over the last six months.
Construction documents for this phase will be issued by the end of the month and construction
should begin by the end of September 1996. However, positive changes to the HARP program,
such as the Grand Avenue re- alignment, additional project parking, and revisions to the
private sector development pads, have caused a majority of the original design development
work for Phases II and III to no longer be valid. Before DSW can produce final Construction
Documents for Phases 11 and III of the project, two issues must be resolved. First, because of
the magnitude of changes which have occurred with the original project, design development
work must be performed to determine how the critical elements for the Phases 11 and III can be
accomplished. Secondly, construction budgets must be established for Phases I1 and I11.
It is our recommendation that we need to re- establish a project "baseline' for Phases II and 111.
To establish this baseline, design development services must be performed for Phases 11 and
111. The attached Preliminary Design Contract Amendment outlines the scope, schedule, and
estimated fees and expenses to accomplish these design development tasks.
The total estimated cost for the contract amendment is $308,500. For your convenience, we
have segmented the Contract Amendment into the following three (3) sections;
Mr. Tom Cvar
July 17,1996
Page 2
Section One: Previous Additional Professional Services
This is a summary of professional services which DSW performed during the
past several months which were not included in our original scope of services,
but were considered to be vital to the planning, design, and potential funding of
HARP.
Section Two: Preliminary Design, Scope of Services, Estimated Fee and Schedule
We have outlined the work tasks required to prepare Preliminary Design
documents for the balance of the HARP project area. As discussed, the exact
construction budget and extent of grants and donations will be determined in
the next several months. We anticipate completing only the first two tasks of
Preliminary Design until we have a specific estimate of construction value. The
estimated fee for this task is estimated at $179,000.
Section Three: Additional Services, Terms and Conditions
Recognizing that both the City of Pueblo and the HARP Commission may
require additional services from DSW and its team of special consultants we
have outlined those known services and estimated their cost and time to
complete. In addition, we have suggested that all additional work outside of the
Scope of Services for Preliminary Design (outlined in Section Two above) be
authorized by Work Release. The estimated fee for this task $129,500.
The work scope we are proposing to undertake is a design development effort for the balance
of the HARP and for Phase I construction contract procurement support. We have used the
term "preliminary design" throughout this proposal rather than "design development" in
order to be consistent with the City of Pueblo contract language. Additional contract
amendments will be required for Construction Administration services for Phase I
Construction and for the preparation of Construction Documents for Phases II and III.
Please review this packet of information at your earliest convenience. We remain hopeful that a
packet can be prepared, presented, and approved for Pueblo's City Council meeting on July 22,
1996.
Very truly yours,
DESIGN STUDIOS WEST, INC
Donald . Brandes, Jr., ASLA
President
SECTION ONE
PHASE ONE
ADDITIONAL S'ER VICES
SECTION ONE
PHASE ONE
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
During the course of DSW's work effort over the past several months, costs were
incurred for items not identified or budgeted for in our November 1995 cost
estimate. The total cost resulting from the additional work is estimated at $132,509
plus direct expenses. A summary of the items and costs incurred is listed below:
Great Outdoors Colorado Support:
DSW assisted with this work task by providing cost estimates, maps, graphics, and
attended coordination meetings and site visits with the GOCO board members. The
work was completed per the request of Jim Munch.
Total ................ ............................... $ 32,359
HARP Subcommittee Support:
DSW provided support to the HARP Foundation, HARP Arts, and Public
Communications, and Intergovernmental agreement committee's. The support
included maps and graphics support, attendance at meetings, and document
reproduction. The work was completed per the direction of the HARP Commission.
Total ................ ............................... $18,482
Economic Development Administration Support:
DSW assisted the City in identifying work elements within the HARP which could
be completed by a separate Davis -Bacon construction contract and prepared cost
estimates for various alternatives. The work was completed at the request of Jim
Munch.
Total .................. ............................... $ 3,485
Additional Environmental Investigations:
DSW was requested to expand the scope of the original Environmental Phase II Site
Assessment which was prepared to target suspected contamination at the corner of
Main and Elizabeth Streets. The scope was expanded to investigate two existing
parking lots south of Elizabeth Street and Lake Elizabeth. The work was added to
our environmental subconsultant.
Total ................ ............................... $18,708
HARP Preliminary Design - Section One Design Studios West, Inc.
Phase One Additional Services Page 1
Additional Site Planometric Survey:
DSW was requested to expand the scope of the HARP project on Main Street to "D"
Street and also to extend the curve on Elizabeth Street to West 2nd Street. DSW
subcontracted the site survey work to KLH Engineering consultants.
Total .................. ............................... $ 2,490
Trolley Investigations:
DSW was requested to investigate the structural modifications and costs associated
with incorporating a steel wheeled trolley across the Union Avenue bridge at two
locations. The work was completed by DSW's subconsultant, Lonco, Inc.
Total .................. ............................... $ 2,985
Leland Consulting Group:
DSW was requested by the HARP Commission to provide private - sector
development services. The services include Pro forma building budgets, Pro forma
operating budgets; Pro forma debt and equity requirements and pro forma cash
flow flow and return on investment analysis. The work was completed by DSW's
sub - consultants, Leland Consulting Groups and Semple Brown Roberts.
Total ................ ............................... $ 54,000
HARP Preliminary Design - Section One Design Studios West, Inc.
Phase One Additional Services Page 2
SECTION TWO
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
SCOPE, FEE AND SCHEDULE
SECTION Two
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. General
Design Studios West, Inc. (DSW) shall provide design services consisting of four primary elements for the
Preliminary Design Phase of the HARP. These four elements, or tasks as described herein, shall consist of
Task I. Final Program
Based on input provided by the HARP Commission, the City and the design charette
participants, DSW will begin the design effort by revising, updating and documenting the final
project elements and project programming for the entire 26 acre project area. This initial task
will be comprised of four primary elements. These are:
• Compile consensus revisions and document the final HARP program in diagrammatic
form.
• Compose an accompanying report document which outlines all the programming
assumptions that the preliminary and final design phases will be based on.
• Conduct and attend necessary coordination meetings and related presentations.
• Present the final project programming diagram and report to City Council and the
HARP Commission for final approval.
Task II. Preliminary Design
Develop final design solutions for the entire project excluding the scope included in the
construction documents for Phase One (currently being bid.) Task II shall include the
following:
• Final Layout
• Final Project Grading
• Final Site Furnishings Design
• Final Architectural Elements Design
• Final Project Lighting, and Sound System Layout and Design
• Final Specialty Finishes, Features and Fountain Design
• Final Landscape Planting Layout and Design
• Final Project Identity, Directional and Regulatory Signage and Graphics Program
• Final Environmental Interpretive System Design
• Final Historic Interpretive System Design
• Final Public Art Opportunities Program (Visual and Performance Arts)
• Final Environmental Arts Opportunities Program
• Final Waterway Function, Boathouse, Maintenance and Operations Program
• Final Project Marshaling, Operations and Maintenance Analysis and Program
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Two Design Studios West, Inc.
Proposed Scope of Services Page 1
Task III. Value Engineering
Create value engineering scenarios which address and anticipate three potential levels of
construction value:
• Scenario One- design to the level of known available construction funding at the time of
design.
• Scenario Two - design to a level of reasonably assumed, moderately enhanced funding
expected to be available by the time of bidding (Summer, 1997).
Scenario Three- design to an assumed eventual budget based on an amount of project
enhancement funding provided through a variety of likely sources over a period of several
construction phases.
Task IV. Definition of Phase Two Construction Documents
The limits of a Phase Two construction bid set will be determined based on the outcome of the
analysis provided in Task III above. We are anticipating a bid package to be complete by the
end of 1997 with Phase Two Construction beginning in early 1998.
Note: In addition to the four primary tasks of this phase of work, DSW proposes to continue
its involvement in several sub - tasks, such as:
• The HARP Commission and Sub - Committee assistance and involvement (as required and
approved by the HARP Commission through Work Release; see Section Three)
• Assistance with HARP funding applications, presentation materials and support (as
directed by the City and the HARP Commission through a signed Work Release);
• Coordination with those developing the downtown architectural design guidelines (as
directed by the City and the HARP Commission through a signed work release);
Section Three of this document further defines the extent of likely additional services and their associated
fees.
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Two Design Studios West, Inc.
Proposed Scope of Services Page 2
B. Preliminary Design Intent
The overall intent of this proposed phase of work is to produce design documents outlining specific design
layout and materials for the "finishes" portion of HARP and to arrive at a preferred development scenario
relative to realistic and reasonably assumed available project funding. DSW will then be prepared to begin
construction documents for the Phase Two construction bid set for the HARP.
C. Scope of Work
Task I. Final Project Elements Definition and Programming
DSW will begin this task by concluding all planning and programming efforts related to the overall
projects' form and function. There have been many studies, charretes and workshops intended to establish
and solidify the final built elements or `programming' components of the HARP. Through the hard work
of the City, HARP Commission, the consultant team and most importantly, the people of Pueblo, DSW is
now prepared to document and finalize the proposed project program elements. This will form the
framework for the application of design finishes, materials and layout.
Based on input provided by the HARP Commission, the City and the design charette participants, DSW
will begin the preliminary design effort by revising, updating and documenting the final project elements
and project programming for the entire 26 acre project area. This initial task will be comprised of four
primary elements. These are:
• Compile consensus revisions and document the final HARP program in diagrammatic
form.
• Compose an accompanying report document which outlines all the programming
assumptions that the preliminary and final design phases will be based on.
• Conduct and attend necessary- coordination meetings and related presentations
• Present the final project programming diagram and report to City Council and the HARP
Commission for final approval.
At the conclusion of this task, any further revisions or substantial deviations from the agreed upon final
program plan will affect project schedule and budget. Future modifications will only occur through a
signed work release and amended project schedule as approved by the HARP Commission and City
Council.
Task II. Final Design
Having established circulation, channel layout and project infrastructure improvements in the Phase One
construction bid documents (currently being compiled and bid), a strong, known framework has been
developed for the application of urban design and waterfront improvements through this preliminary design
effort.
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Two Design Studios West, Inc.
Proposed Scope of Services Page 3
In an effort to provide the highest degree of design focus, DSW has composed a consultant team which
brings together some of the finest professional expertise available in the nation while maintaining the
continuity of design. Below is a list of the special consultants which DSW believes will be necessary to
accomplish the full range of services required for Task II, Preliminary Design:
• Design Studios West, Inc.: Project Management, Urban Design, Landscape Architecture, Civil
Engineering, Signage and Identity Design.
• James E. Keeter, FASLA: Project wide design consultation, peer review and waterfront development
programming, maintenance and functional criteria development.
• HGF Architects, Inc.: Schematic programming and design for the projects' public architectural
components.
• Joanne Dodds: Historical Interpretive story boarding and schematic sequencing.
• Nan Rickey: Natural resources interpretive planning and schematic sequencing.
• Wetlands Consultant: Consultation, recommendations and peer review of riparian area design and
development.
• Structural Engineering Consultant: Design review of all structural elements and technical expertise
in cost effective, alternative structural methods and systems.
• Fountain/Pool Consultant: Design review and feasibility analysis and consulting on all water features
and water elements.
Using the Task I products with a variety of reference sources such as; the Soul document, the HARP /art
sub - committees' thematic areas, and the accumulated knowledge base of the previous years of planning and
design by previous and existing HARP Commission), DSW will provide the following services;
• Final Layout
All of the thirty -nine (39) or more project elements will be designed and laid -out both
horizontally and vertically. The placement, configuration, fitnction and dimension of each
project program element will be determined and documented through a variety of graphic tools
such as illustrative plans, cross sections perspectives, isometrics, computer modeling and/or a
combination of all or many of the above. This portion of the scope is intended to demonstrate
the design of the final project. Given the channel layout and roadway, bridges and utility
improvements provided in the Phase One construction package, a project development plan
will be designed representing the build out character and lay -out of the overall project.
• Final Project Grading
In conjunction with the final project layout design, the finished project grading will be
developed and designed. Elements such as ADA accessibility, stairways, pedestrian bridges,
ramps, plazas, walkways and landscape areas will be designed to accommodate aesthetic and
functional vertical solutions demonstrating project and thematic intent.
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Two Design Studios West, Inc.
Proposed Scope of Services Page 4
• Final Site Furnishings Design
In Coordination with the City's efforts to develop design guidelines for the central Pueblo area,
and in conjunction with the design of the public architectural elements, DSW will define a
project furnishings program that attempts to marry the architectural, urban design, thematic
and identity elements through the use of public project furnishing elements, such as; trash
receptacles, benches, bollards, railings, tree grates, etc. This system of urban furnishings will
correspond to the sequence and hierarchy of program elements and thematic progression
throughout the project.
• Final Architectural Elements Design
The public architectural elements envisioned for the HARP will be brought to a design
development level responding to the developing architectural and project design criteria and
assumptions. Architectural programming, materials, function, color, massing and finishes will
be designed and documented. The architectural vernacular defined throughout the design
process in response to the Soul document the HARP /Art group and the desires and efforts of
the HARP Commission will correspond to the urban and identity system program to ensure a
cohesive, integrated environmental design solution.
• Final Project Lighting and Sound System Layout and Design
As part of this materials and finishes phase of the HARP, DSW «ill design and coordinate a
program for lighting, electrical and public sound system improvements for the project. In
coordination with the final development program plan, these systems NNill lend continuity to the
way in which the HARP presents itself to the public. The ambiance and excitement of the
project at night and the public safety and welfare will be thoroughly considered in the
development of these systems.
• Final Specialty Finishes, Features and Fountain Design
Although many of these elements will likely need to be funded through other sources, a base
level of design Avill be given to specialty elements, such as; ceremonial fountains, plazas and
features thought to be outside the publicly funded portions of the HARP. As will be discussed
in TASK III below, a variety of development improvement scenarios NA be explored
responding to different levels of assumed funding for these as well as all significant finishes,
materials and furnishings.
• Final Landscape Planting Layout and Design
As a compositional element used to support spacial and thematic gestures, planting design will
be thoroughly investigated and developed to its base level of intensity given assumed available
construction funding. A primarily native palette of planting materials NNi11 be researched and
developed taking into consideration the unique micro - climate provided by the year -round
adjacent water source and unique climate of the Pueblo region. Strong consideration will be
given to those landscape materials representing native Colorado waterways and to those
planting materials seen to be of historic significance to the diverse historic populations of
Pueblo.
�T Design - --
HARP Przlimin Desi Section Two Design Studios West, Inc.
Proposed Scope of Services Page 5
• Final Project Identity, Directional and Regulatory Signage and Graphics Program
Working with the Communications Sub - Committee to the HARP commission, DSW will
define and develop a system of project identity elements which attempt to unify and
communicate the various theme elements sequentially through the project. A system of
communication elements corresponding to the hierarchy of events, activities and experiences
will be developed and incorporated into the spacial composition of the project design. A
similar system of both regulatory and directional signage will be developed concurrently to
provide a cohesive signing program moving through the project.
• Final Environmental Interpretive System Design
A system of environmental interpretive components and their associated graphic devices and
programmed nodes will be developed and incorporated into the final project layout and design.
Strong attention w'Ill be given to the story that is to be told through these project components
and how they are sequenced and presented. Durability, vandal resistance and maintenance
considerations will be of key concern in the design of these elements.
• Final Historic Interpretive System Design
A sequence of historic interpretive nodes and their associated graphic and spacial elements will
be designed and incorporated into a progression of spaces outlining significant elements of the
historic Pueblo region. Again, attention to maintenance, durability and vandal resistance will
play key roles in the design of these systems.
• Final Public Art Opportunities Program (Visual and Performance Arts)
A series or sequence of spaces and opportunities for public art (both visual art and
performance art) will be identified throughout the project area in anticipation of artist
participation within the public spaces of HARP. Included within this program will be
opportunities for enhancing project urban design elements for the communication of artistic
impression,
• Final Environmental Arts Opportunities Program
Environmental Arts or communication arts will be the responsibility of the design team.
Architectural, urban design and landscape architectural arts will be included in the preliminary
and final design phases of the HARP. A high level of attention will be given to coordination
with the team developing Pueblo's architectural design guidelines as well as with those on the
HARP commission who are beginning to help design thematic elements for HARP overall.
• Final Waterway Function, Boathouse, Maintenance and Operations Program
With the help of Jim Keeter, the design team will define the critical design relationships and
functional criteria for the waterway transportation activities.
• Final Project Marshaling, Operations and Maintenance Analysis and Program
Through coordination with the HARP commission sub - committees and with the help of Jim
Keeter, the design team will create a draft outline for the marshaling, maintenance and
function of the public rivervalk.
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Two Design Studios West, Inc.
Proposed Scope of Services Page 6
Task III. Value Engineering
Upon completion of Tasks I and II, the DSW design team will develop an analysis of the resultant design
efforts as it relates to a variety of value engineering scenarios. DSW will test the feasibility and design
impact of producing construction documents based on three levels of potential project funding:
• Scenario One- DSW will analyze the effects of modifying the design solutions developed in
Tasks I and II in light of known available construction funding at the then present time.
(Autumn 1996)
Scenario Two - DSW will analyze the effects of modifying the design solutions developed in
tasks I and II in light of reasonably assumed, moderately enhanced project funding expected to
be available at the time of Phase Two construction bidding. (Late 1997)
Scenario Three- DSW will analyze the effects of modifying the design solutions developed in
tasks I and II in light of assumed significant project enhancement funding provided through a
variety of likely sources over a period of several construction phases.
Given the unclear nature of available construction funding we believe this process will begin to lend clarity
and propose reasonable enhancement solutions in both the short and long term.
TASK IV. Definition of Phase Two Construction Documents
The limits of a phase two construction bid set will be determined based on the outcome of the analysis
provided in Task III above. We are anticipating a bid package to be complete by the end of 1997 with
Phase Two Construction beginning in early 1998.
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Two Design Studios West, Inc.
Proposed Scope of Services Page 7
SECTION TWO ATTACHMENTS
PROGRAM SCHEDULE
PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT SCHEDULE
SUMMARY RESOURCE COST TABLE
RESOURCE HOUR ESTIMATE
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Two Design Studios West, Inc.
Proposed Scope of Services Page 9
Work Scope
C O N S T R U C T I O N
X BIDDING ®PRELIMINARY DESIGN 7FINAL DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ADMIN.
Conceptual Design Construction Documents
Schematic Design
Design Development
a� � o0
}+ cy
z
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Preliminary Design Project Schedule
ID
Ta sk Name
Duration
% Complete
Cost
ully August
September October Nove
14 1 21 1281 4 11 1181251
1 1 8 1 15 1 22 1 29 6 13 20 27 3 10
1
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
84d
0%
$158,505.0Q
8/12
8/19
8120 9/16
9/17 ( 10/2
y
9/17 . „_ =.ar .. ;, 10/14
8/20
8/20 - 8/26
8/27 ', ",'' 9/2
9/3 i 919
9/10 , "re '" 9/16
9117 9123'
9/24 30
10/3 10118
10121
2
I
3
{ 4
5
TASK I
Revise Program Diagram
TASK II
Site Design
15d
15d
; 79d
t 55d
0%
�
$3,930.00
i 0 °6
0%
-- 0 %�
$3,930.00
$154,575.00
$72,225.00
6
Site Plan / Layout
15d
20d
! 0 °,b
$22,250.00
7
Site Grading and Drainage — PI
0 °6
$12,375.00
8
9
10
-
Planting Plans
Fountain Preliminary Design
rY g
Architectural Plans and Elevati
--
12d
20d
10d
0%
0%
0 %
-
$8,400.00
$18,650.00
$10,550.00
11
--
Signage and Graphics Program
- -
30d
�
°
0 /o
28 200.00
$ ,
12
Directional Signage
- 5d
0%
$4,800.00
13
Regulatory Signage -
- -- 5d
0%
$7,200.00
14
Event Spaces /Feature ID
5d
0%
$5,100.00
15
Kiosts _ -
5d
0%
$2,100.00
16
Marketing Element Board
5d
0%
$4,200.00
17
Alternative Marks
Sd
0%
$ 4,800.00
32d
i
12d
19
Drawings and Sketches
j 0%
$54,150.00
20
Project Cross Sections
0%
$15,200.00
21
Project Perspetive Sketches
Update Overall Illustrative
10d
10d
0%
0%
$29,150.00
22
$9
Project: Phase II
Date: 7/17/96/MRA
File: Phase II
Task i ,'j r ' { : +, Progress Milestone ♦ Summary
Page 1
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Preliminary Design Project Schedule
ID
Task Name
Duration
% Complete
Cost
ul
Au ust
September October Nove
14 21
28 4 11 1 18 25
1 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10
23
68d
'-
♦ 8/7
♦ 8/13
♦ 8/9
♦ 10 /8
♦ 1
24
HARP COMMISSION /MISC. MEETINGS
0%
$2,240.00
26
26
August 7, 1996 - Public Meeting
August 13, 1996 - Commission
Od --
Od
0%
0%
$480.00
$620.00
27
September 9, 1996 - Commission
Od
0%
$380.00
28
October 8, 1996 - Commission
Od _
0%
$380.00
28
November 11, 1996 - Commission
Od
0%
$380.00
Project: Phase II
Date: 7/17/96/MRA
File: Phase II
Task
El
Progress
Milestone Summary
Page 2
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Preliminary Design - Tasks I & If
Summary resource Cost Table
ID
Resource Name
Std. Rate
Cost Work
1
Princ
$95.00/h
14,915.00 157h
2
Project M r
$60.001h
$47,160.00 786h
3
Landscape Arch
$60.00/h
$27,900.00 465h
4
Project Designer
$45.00 /h
$23,040.00 612h
5
Clerical
$25.001h
$1750.00 70h
6
Keeter
$100.001h
$18,000.00 180h
7
Structural
$80.00 /h
$2,000.00 25h
8
Interp
$80.00 /h
$4 800.00 60h
9
Wetlands
$80.00 /h
$4,800.00 60h
10
HGF
$80.00 /h
$6,000.00 75h
11
Fountain
$60.00 /h
$2,100.00 35h
12
Landscape Architect
$60.00 /h
$8,040.00 134h
13
Project Engineer
$60.00/h
$240.00 4h
Page 1
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Resource Hours Estimate
Preliminary Design - Tasks I & II
Page 1
7/14/96
7/21/96
7/28/96
8/4196
8/11/96
8/18/96
8125/96
9/1/96
918/96
9/15/96
9/22/96
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
I
TASK
Revise Program Diagram
70h
Princ
6h
Project Mgr
32h
Project Designer
32h
TASK II
Site Design
Site Plan / Layout
238h
102h
Princ
20h
Project Mgr
30h
Landscape Arch
30h
Project Designer
32h
38h
Clerical
32h
8h
Keeler
30h
Interp
32h
28h
Wetlands
32h
28h
Site Grading and Drainage Plans
166h
34h
Princ
5h
Project Mgr
I
32h
13h
Landscape Arch
32h
13h
Project Designer
32h
8h
Clerical
20h
Keeter
30h
Structural
15h
Planting Plans
84h
56h
Princ
10h
Landscape Arch
32h
28h
Clerical
10h
Project Mgr
32h
28h
Fountain Preliminary Design
168h
84h
Princ
30h
Landscape Arch
32h
40h
Keeter
32h
13h
Structural
10h
Fountain
32h
3h
Project Mgr
32h
28h
Architectural Plans and Elevations
92h
40h
3h
Princ
10h
Project Mgr
15h
Landsc Arch
20h
Page 1
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Resource Hours Estimate
Preliminary Design - Tasks 1 & II
Page 2
7/14/96
7/21/96
7/28/96
814/96
8/11/96
8/18/96
8/25/96
9/1/96
9/8/96
9/15/96
9/22/96
Keeter
15h
HGF
32h
40h
3h
Signage and Graphics Program
Directional Signage
64h
16h
Landscape Arch
32h
8h
Project Mgr
32h
8h
Regulatory Signage
92h
8h
Keeter
30h
Landscape Arch
30h
Project Mgr
32h
I 8h
Event Spaces /Feature ID
62h
3h
Keeter
30h
Project Mgr
32h
3h
Kiosts
32h
3h
Project Mgr
32h
3h
Marketing Element Board
62h
8h
Project Mgr
30h
Landscape Arch
32h
8h
Alternative Marks
64h
Landscape Arch
32h
Project Mgr
32h
Drawings and Sketches
Project Cross Sections
Princ
Landscape Arch
Project Designer
Project Mgr
Project Perspetive Sketches
Phnc
Landscape Architect
Project Designer
Project Mgr
Update Overall Illustrative
Princ
Landscape Architect
Project Designer
Project Mgr
HARP COMMISSION /MISC. MEETINGS
August 7, 1996 - Public Meeting
8h
Project Engineer
4h
Landscape Architect
4h
Page 2
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Resource Hours Estimate
Preliminary Design - Tasks I & II
Page 3
7114/96
7/21/96
7/28196
8/4/96
8/11/96
8/18/96
8125/96
911/96
9/8/96
9/15/96
9/22/96
Princ
August 13, 1996 - Commission
8h
Princ
4h
Project Mgr
4h
September 9, 1996 - Commission
4h
Princ
4h
Project Mgr
October 8, 1996 - Commission
Princ
Project Mgr
November 11, 1996 - Commission
Princ
Project Mgr
Total
70h
238h
110h
8h
322h
182h
73h
39h
317h
212h
Page 3
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Resource Hours Estimate
Preliminary Design - Tasks I & 11
Page 4
9/29/96
10/6/96
10/13/96
10/20/96
10/27/96
11/3/96
11/10/96
Total
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
TASK
Revise Program Diagram
70h
Princ
6h
Project Mgr
32h
Project Designer
32h
TASK II
Site Design
Site Plan / Layout
340h
Princ
20h
Project Mgr
30h
Landscape Arch
30h
Project Designer
70h
Clerical
40h
Keeter
30h
Interp
60h
Wetlands
60h
Site Grading and Drainage Plans
200h
Princ
5h
Project Mgr
45h
Landscape Arch
45h
Project Designer
40h
Clerical
20h
Keeter
30h
Structural
15h
Planting Plans
140h
Princ
10h
Landscape Arch
60h
Clerical
10h
Project Mgr
60h
Fountain Preliminary Design
8h
260h
Princ
30h
Landscape Arch
8h
80h
Keeter
45h
Structural
10h
Fountain
35h
Project Mgr
60h
Architectural Plans and Elevations
135h
Princ
10h
Project Mgr
15h
Landscape Arch
20h
Page 4
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Resource Hours Estimate
Preliminary Design - Tasks I & II
Page 5
9129196
1016196
10/13/96
10/20/96
10/27/96
1113/96
11/10196
Total
Keeler
15h
HGF
75h
Signage and Graphics Program
Directional Signage
80h
Landscape Arch
40h
Project Mgr
40h
Regulatory Signage
100h
Keeler
30h
Landscape Arch
30h
Project Mgr
40h
Event Spaces/Feature ID
65h
Keeler
30h
Project Mgr
35h
Kiosts
35h
Project Mgr
35h
Marketing Element Board
70h
Project Mgr
30h
Landscape Arch
40h
Alternative Marks
16h
80h
Landscape Arch
8h
40h
Project Mgr
8h
40h
Drawings and Sketches
Project Cross Sections
64h
128h
48h
240h
Princ
16h
24h
40h
Landscape Arch
16h
40h
24h
80h
Project Designer
16h
24h
40h
Project Mgr
16h
40h
24h
80h
Project Perspetive Sketches
130h
120h
100h
80h
430h
Princ
10h
10h
Landscape Architect
40h
40h
20h
100h
Project Designer
40h
40h
40h
40h
160h
Project Mgr
40h
40h
40h
40h
160h
Update Overall Illustrative
120h
50h
170h
Princ
,
10h
10h
Landscape Architect
30h
30h
Project Designer
40h
10h
50h
Project Mgr
40h
40h
80h
HARP COMMISSION /MISC. MEETINGS
August 7, 1996 - Public Meeting
8h
Project Engineer
4h
La ndscape Architect
4h
Page 5
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Resource Hours Estimate
Preliminary Design - Tasks 1 & II
Page 6
9129196
1016/96
10/13/96
10/20/96
10/27/96
1113/96
11110196
Total
Princ
August 13, 1996 - Commission
8h
Princ
4h
Project Mgr
4h
September 9, 1996 - Commission
4h
Princ
4h
Project Mgr
October 8, 1996 - Commission
4h
4h
Princ
4h
4h
Project Mgr
November 11, 1996 - Commission
4h
4h
Princ
4h
4h
Project Mgr
I
Total
88h
132h
48h
130h
124h
220h
134h
2443h
Page 6
SECTION THREE
PREI_IMINAR Y DESIGN
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
SECTION SEE
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Overview
The next major portion of work described previously in Section Two is Preliminary Design.
During this critical phase DSW, the City of Pueblo and the HARP Commission will continue to
work on a variety of related and often over - lapping work efforts. This section is intended to
outline and describe known additional services, projects, tasks and other related items which the
DSW team of consultants, may be asked to provide in addition to the Scope of Work described
in Section Two.
1. Private- Sector Engagement
DSW has included below a detailed proposal from Leland Consultant Group to assist the HARP
Commission and its Private Sector Sub - Committee on defining the financial feasibility and local
interest in developing the HARP private development. Following is the proposed Scope of
Services, schedule of compensation and estimate of fees for this work effort.
Leland Consulting Group Scope of Services
Based on our recent meetings with the HARP Private Sector Sub - Committee, we are further
defining our role in future aspects of the HARP private sector engagement process. To augment
and further refine the development program and economic analyses we have prepared, it is time to
initiate the engagement process with local developers /investors, brokers, lenders, property owners
and other affected "stakeholders ". As we have discussed, this initial engagement effort will
accomplish two things: 1) it will provide us with valuable local input with regard to the
development program and economic assumptions we have formulated; and 2) it will begin an
educational process designed to convey to potential developers the expectations for involvement
in the HARP project.
At our last meeting with the Private Sector Sub - Committee on July 9, the Leland Consultant
Group (LCG) discussed a timetable for key events related to marketing the private sector
development opportunities. Within this timetable, there are two distinct phases of work that
relate directly to our involvement in the project:
1) A "pre- marketing" effort during which the private sector engagement process is initiated,
local input from interested parties is obtained, various public sector development issues
are addressed, and preliminary project marketing/information packages are prepared.
Since this effort is a continuation of the market and economic services we have been
providing to the City of Pueblo (the City) and DSW, we propose that it be completed
under the existing subcontract agreement between DSW and LCG.
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Three Design Studios West, Inc.
Additional Services, Temis and Conditions Page 1
2) An economic and development advisory effort in which Leland Consulting Group would
act as a direct advisor to the City during the pre - development period. In this capacity, we
would manage all aspects of the private sector engagement process. Because this advisory
effort represents a distinct role for LCG, separate from the design process, we propose
that it be completed under a separate contract agreement between LCG and either the City
or the HARP Commission.
The balance of this proposal details these two phases of work and outlines the terms and
conditions of Leland Consulting Group's engagement.
SCOPE OF WORK
PHASE I: PRE- MARKETING SERVICES
Task 1: Refine Private Sector Development Program
Subtasks
Conduct weekly development opportunity workshops and individual interviews with
potential "stakeholder" groups:
• Bankers/lenders
• Developers /investors
• Brokers
• Property owners
Note: These workshops and interviews are designed to gather local input regarding the
development program and economic assumptions used to date, as well as educate interested
parties as to the expectations for development within the HARP project area.
Update market information utilized in the formulation of the private sector development
program. Factors to be updated include:
• Economic and demographic indicators
• Tourism trends
• Residential and commercial market trends
• Hotel /lodging market trends
Coordinate with DSW and project architects to refine development programming issues
such as:
• Building massing/configuration
• Minimum/maximum densities
• Minimum quality levels
• Potential elevations
• Project theme /image
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Three Design Studios West, Inc.
Additional Services, Terms and Conditions Page 2
• Padsite development constraints and requirements (i.e., public elevators, access and/or
restrooms
• Other program factors which impact project economics
Establish periodic reporting system to communicate project information and analysis
results to:
• HARP Commission
• Private Sector Sub - Committee
• City Council
Note: It is imperative that, as the private sector engagement process is initiated, project
information is communicated to both the public and private sectors in a consistent, timely
manner. We will coordinate with the HARP Communications Sub- Committee to ensure that
information from our research is accurately conveyed to the public.
Task 2: Analysis of Private Sector Development Issues
Subtasks
Assist the City and the HARP project team in evaluating issues related to private sector
development within the HARP area. These issues might include:
• Transfer of ownership (sale vs. lease)
• Provision of guidelines and /or incentives for redevelopment
• Strategies for addressing adjacent property ownership
• Preparation of development /design guidelines
• Other issues, as identified
Conduct a preliminary analysis of fiscal impacts associated with the development of the
HARP project. Factors to be addressed include:
• Retail sales
• Sales tax revenues
• Value of new construction
• Property tax revenues
Note: From these estimates, the City will be able to evaluate the costsibenefuts of HARP private
sector development, and potentially determine the extent to which cost items, e.g., maintenance,
can be offset by project revenues.
Prepare technical memoranda summarizing findings and conclusions resulting from the
evaluation of various development issues.
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Three Design Studios West, Inc.
Additional Services, Temns and Conditions Page 3
Task 3: Preparation of Preliminary Project Marketing/Information Packages
Subtasks
Based on the work completed in Tasks 1 and 2, prepare preliminary project
marketing/information packages for each of the HARP private sector development
parcels. The following information will be included in the packages:
• Narrative project description
• Site plan/project schematic
• Market data/conditions
• Development opportunity
• Development procedures
• Prototypical economics
• Timetables /milestones
• Responsibilities
WORK PRODUCTS
• Oral communications in conference and during the work process, to convey issues and
conclusions which develop from our research;
• Weekly development opportunity "workshops" and /or individual interviews;
• Attendance at HARP Public Forum (August 7);
• Technical memoranda summarizing the results of the workshops /interviews; and
• Preliminary marketing/information packages for each of the HARP private sector
development sites.
PHASE IL• ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY SERVICES
As the City's development advisor, LCG will manage the private sector engagement process. In
this role, our responsibilities will include:
Formulating a marketing and sales plan for the HARP private sector development parcels,
to include:
• Parcelization plan (phasing of parcels /land uses)
• Sales commission schedule
• List of qualified developers and brokers
• List of qualified lenders
• Meetings with qualified developers, brokers and lenders
• Determination of land sale prices and terms
• Managing design of marketing materials for HARP project
• Determination of developer responsibilities
Assisting in preparation and evaluation of legal instruments related to private sector
development within the HARP area, such as:
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Three Design Studios West, Inc.
Additional Services, Terris and Conditions Page 4
• Statement of the Project
• Offer Form
• Preliminary Proposal/Statement of Qualifications (from developers)
• Phase Two Response (from developers)
• Statement of Financial Ability (from developers)
• Statement of Public Disclosure (from developers)
• Development and Disposition Agreement
• Reviewing development proposals and conducting negotiations with qualified
developers and lenders.
• Evaluating potential strategies for purchasing or tying up adjacent key parcels for
redevelopment.
• Coordinating with HARP Project Coordinator and City staff to address joint
public - private sector design/construction issues.
• Establishing evaluation milestones and a reporting and documentation system for the
private sector engagement process.
• Providing day -to -day development advice (assisting City staff and the project team
with problem solving, debt strategies and tactics, etc.).
WORK PRODUCTS
• Oral communications in conference and during the engagement process;
• Monthly reports to the HARP Commission, HARP Private Sector Committee and City
Council ; and
• Project notebook summarizing all activities associated with the private sector engagement
process.
BUDGET AND TIMING
Our professional fees will be based on the actual time spent at our standard hourly billing rates.
These hourly rates are as follows:
Principal/Project Manager (Bill Cunningham) $95
Principal/Managing Director (Dave Leland) $125
Word Processing (Clerical) $30
The estimated time to complete Phase I of the work scope is approximately ten to twelve weeks.
A breakdown of professional fees by work task is presented as follows:
HARP Preliminan Design - Section Three Design Studios west, Inc.
Additional Services, Terms and Conditions Page 5
Phase I: Pre - Marketing Services
Task 1: Refine Private Sector Development Program
Position
# of Hrs.
Hrly. Rate
Prof. Fees
Principal/Project Manager
60
$95
$5,700
Principal/Managing Director
8
$125
$1,000
Word Processing/Clerical
20
$30
$ 600
Architectural Support
25
$75
$1,875
Subtotal
$9,175
Task 2: Analysis of Private Sector Development Issues
Position # of Hrs. Hrly. Rate Prof. Fees
Principal/Project Manager 24 $95 $2,280
Principal/Managing Director 12 $125 $1,500
Subtotal $3,780
Task 3: Preparation of Preliminary Project Marketing/Information Packages
Position # of Hrs.
Principal/Project Manager 24
Principal/Managing Director 8
Word Processing/Clerical 20
Architectural Support 25
Subtotal
Reimbursable Expenses (10 %)
Total Not to Exceed
$20,581
The professional fee estimate above includes out -of- pocket expenses (travel, graphics, printing
and related expenses).
Phase II: Economic and Development Advisory Services
At this time, it is difficult to estimate the amount of time that will be required to address the work
tasks outlined in the Phase II scope. Our experience has shown that advisory services such as
these are determined primarily by the complexity of the project and the number and type of issues
that require attention. Before we proceed with work on Phase II, we can establish a budget (most
likely a not -to- exceed monthly amount) for the pre - development period (12 to 18 months).
Hrly. Rate Prof. Fees
$95 $2,280
$125 $1,000
$30 $ 600
$75 $1,875
$_5,755
$1,871
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Three Design Studios West, Inc.
Additional Services, Temps and Conditions Page 6
MIJ
TERMS OF PAYMENT AND OTHER CONDITIONS
We will submit monthly billings throughout the course of the engagement. All invoices are due
and payable upon delivery of our final written work product Interest will be charged at the rate
of one and one -half percent per month on the unpaid balance 15 days from the date of invoice. If
collection costs are incurred, attorney fees and court costs will be charged.
EXCLUSIVE USE BY CLIENT
This assignment is being prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Pueblo and its designated
agents relative to the subject property. Upon payment, the City of Pueblo shall hold exclusive
proprietary rights to the final work product(s).
PLACE OF CONTRACT
This contract is made and entered into in the State of Colorado and all matters pertaining to the
validity, construction and effect of this agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Colorado.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
If at any point during the course of this engagement, our findings lead us to a negative
conclusion(s) concerning the project, we will discuss our findings and alternative approaches with
you and reach an agreement on how we should proceed with the engagement.
SUMMARY
We look forward to continuing our working relationship with DSW and the City of Pueblo on the
HARP project. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please feel free to call either
Bill Cunningham or Anne Tankersley at (303) 893 -1616. We look forward to working with you.
Sincerely,
LELAND CONSULTING GROUP
Bill J. Cunningham
Principal
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Three
Additional Services, Terms and Conditions
Anne B.R. Tankersley
Principal
Design Studios West, Inc.
Page 7
.61..3
2. Phase One Construction Contract Procurement Support
DSW proposes to assist the City of Pueblo for the HARP Phase I construction contractor
prequalification and procurement process period from July through September 1996. The
total estimated cost for these services is estimated at $45,250 plus direct expenses. The work
elements to be performed during this period are listed below:
Construction Contractor Prequalification and Selection Process:
The work scope will include preparation of prequalification criteria, preparation and
issuance of the public notice requesting prequalification statements, assisting in the
qualification process, and addressing contractor questions during the bidding process.
Total ................ ............................... $19,110
Geotechnical Materials Testing Contract:
DSW will prepare and issue a Statement of Work requesting proposal from geotechnical
testing companies which will be required to provide material testing during the Phase I
Construction period.
Total .................. ............................... $4,780
Contract Addendum's and Modification's
DSW anticipates issuing four construction addendum's or contract modifications to (1)
address road lay out and alignment changes on Elizabeth at West 1 st Street; (2) address
questions and clarifications at the pre -bid conference; (3) Providing a gravity flow line
for a fountain at Victoria Street; and (4) shifting the HARP channel terminus at Victoria
Street to provide space for a gateway entrance.
Total ................ ............................... $21,360
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Three Design Studios West, Inc.
Additional Services, Tema and Conditions Page 8
3. Technical Assistance to the City of Pueblo, HARP Commission, and HARP
Sub - Committees.
Beginning July 1, 1996, DSW and it's team of consultants shall not provide professional
services to the City of Pueblo or the HARP Commission beyond those services outlined and
approved by contract. Additional services beyond those services outline by contract shall only
be provided by Work Release (See Attached) and shall be authorized, in writing, by Mr. Tom
Cvar, Director of Public Works. While we suspect that additional services may be required
throughout the course of Preliminary Design, we believe this method of contract
administration and authorization will clarify additional services scope and cost.
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Three Design Studios West, Inc.
Additional Services, Terms and Conditions Page 9
ADDITIONAL WORK REQUEST
DATE: JULY 15, 1996
PROJECT: Historic Arkansas Rivenvalk Project DSW PROJECT NUMBER: 9531
CITY CONTRACT NUMBER: K -36229 MODIFICATTON NUMBER: Two (2)
The undersigned agree that additional work must be completed as an integral part of the work
scope outlined in the Agreement for Professional Engineering Services. As provided, the Owner
has authorized additional work for the Consultant, Design Studios West Inc. (DSW), as provided
below:
A. Description of Additional Work:
B. Work shall be performed by:
C. Schedule of completion shall be:
D. Compensation:
E. Other terms and conditions:
Approved and Accepted:
By: By:
TOM CVAR DONALD H. BRANDES, JR.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS PRESIDENT
CITY OF PUEBLO DESIGN STUDIOS WEST, INC.
Date: Date:
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Three Design Studios West, hw.
Additional Services, Terms and Conditions Page 10
SECTION THREE ATTACHMENTS
MONTHLY DESIGN COST SUMMARY
PHASE I CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE
SUMMARY RESOURCE COST TABLE
RESOURCE HOURS ESTIMATE
HARP Preliminary Design - Section Three Design Studios West, Inc.
Additional Services, Terms and Conditions Page I 1
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Design Studios West
Monthly Design Cost Summary
= Total Cost To Date Consists Of Actual Costs Through June 1996
9531kc @sdtl or✓TRACK$XLS /PROJECT BREAK DOWNS Page 1 7/17196/9:22 PM
TOTAL COST
TO DATE'
Dec -95
Jan -96
Feb -96
Mar -96
Apr -96
May -96
Jun -96
Jul -96
(ESttmate 0ny1
Aug -96
(Es6mete ony)
Sep-96
(EsOmate onM
Oct-96
(E.0mate oNy)
Nov-96
(EStlmats Only)
8531.01
Phase I CO
$550,088
$45,864
$67,082
$69,216
$71,629
$96,568
$91,207
$63,523
$45,000
Subconsuttants
$335,886
$9,831
$45,719
$51,609
$50,768
$69,838
$44,969
$38,153
$25,000
DSW
$214,201
$36,033
$21,363
$17,607
$20,861
$26,730
$46,238
$25,370
$20,000
9531.02
Phase II DO / Preliminary D
$204,809
$0
$3,000
$2,492
$2,182
$3,830
$2,550
$11,755
$17,150
$54,335
348
332,330
$26,385
Subconsultants
$42,620
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,160
$23,900
$12,640
$1,920
$0
DSW
$162,189
$0
$3,000
$2,493
$2,182
$3,830
$2,550
$11,755
$12,990
$30,435
$36,160
$30,410
$26,385
9531.03
Phase III DD
$480
$0
so
$480
$0
$0
$o
$o
$o
Subconsultants
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
DSW
$480
$0
$0
$480
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
9531.04
Private Sector
$79,834
$0
$12,505
$17,649
$3,650
$22,620
$89
$831
$880
$7,203
$7,203
$7,203
$0
Subconsultants
$57,366
$0
$3,620
$11,661
$0
$20,705
$89
$211
$500
$6,860
$6,860
$6,860
$o
DSW
$22,467
$0
$8,885
$5,988
$3,650
$1,915
$0
$620
$380
$343
$343
$343
$0
9531.05
GOCO
$32,358
$0
$2,878
$12,881
$12,563
$972
$3,265
$0
$0
Subconsultants
$1,418
$0
$0
$0
$1,418
$0
$0
$0
$0
DSW
$30,942
$0
$2,678
$12,881
$11,146
$972
$3,265
$0
$0
9131.06
Subcommittee
$16,582
$o
$2,818
$1,705
$475
$4,256
$5,819
$1,409
$100
Subconsultants
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
DSW
$16,582
$0
$2,818
$1,705
$475
$4,256
$5,819
$1,409
$100
9531.07
Phase 1 Construction Adm.
$58,096
$0
$2,678
$1,610
$0
$0
$0
$0
$14,360
$35,760
$3,688
30
$0
Subconsuttants
$15,718
$0
$2,678
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,340
$8,700
$0
$o
$0
DSW
$42,378
$0
$0
$1,610
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,020
$27,060
$3,688
TOTALS
$942,246
$45,864
$90,759
$106,033
$90,499
$128,246
$102,930
$77,518
$77,490
$97,298
$59,691
$39,533
$26,385
Total Authorized To Date
$689,000
Difference
$253,248
= Total Cost To Date Consists Of Actual Costs Through June 1996
9531kc @sdtl or✓TRACK$XLS /PROJECT BREAK DOWNS Page 1 7/17196/9:22 PM
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Phase / Construction Administration
July - September 1996
ID
Task Name
Duration
% Com .
Cost
July August
September
23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25
1 8 15 22
1
PHASE I DESIGN
32d
I 15%
$6,040.00
7/1 7/17
p ;
7/18: , 7/24
Fr
7/25 r � -;
7/25
7130
7W
7/1 7/1
7/2 7/2
7/3 /5
71 x-7." _
1 r ,? 7 4
7125
7 1
7129
5
7130
7/30
2
Drawings and Specification
-- - 13d
-- 38%
$0.00
3
Final Package Review & Configuration
5d
0%
'
$0.00
4
Printing and Binding of Final Packages
g g g
3d'
0 %
$ 0.00
5
Stamp Drawings/Specifications --
- - Id� -
0%
$0.00
6
Deliver Packages To City - - --
-- I d t - -- 0%
I Od 0%
1 Od 0%
t
63d 8%
— - - Id �- - 100%
Id 100%
$0.00
7
Final Package Complete
Phase I Cost Estimate
PIIASE I CONTRACTOR PROCURMEN
Prepare Prequalificaiton Criteria
$0.00
8
$6,040.00
9
10
11
$13,070.00
'
7/30
7130
,� I� ic�,1 127
81 eb 19
8/2 ' 9/3
9/4 i' 19
$1,050.00
12
Prepare Advertisement for Contractor 1
$540.00
13
i
-- p Per,, �-
Issue Ad vertisement In News a Joun
Advertisement Published
Issue Request For Qualifications
- -- - - -
3d
Sd
1 Od
4d
Od
20d
t - -- ---
I 100%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
$300.00
$0.00
14
15
$360.00
16
17
Evaluate Requests For Qualifications
Issue Invitation To Bid
$3,700.00
$0.00
18
Contractor Bid Period
$4,040.00
19
Preconstruction Confzrence
ld
0%
$2,120.00
20
Bids Due To City
Od
0 °16
=$() .00
21
Evaluate Responses
5d I
$960.00
22
Prepare City Council Resolution
4d
- --
10%
$0.00
Project: HARP PHASE I
Date: 7/17/96 / Mark Austin
File: PlConstruction
Task „irk ' ,,_ Milestone Float
Progress Summary
Page 1
Historic Arkansas Riverwa/k Project
Phase 1 Construction Administration
July- September 1996
ID
Task Name
Duration % Comp.
Cost
July u ust
September October Nove
23 0 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25
1 1 8 1 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10
23
City Council Sleeting Approval
Issue Notice of Award --
— — — — Cp
Contractor Insurance i Bond Preparation i
Od 0 ° fi
- — - 1 d 0%
10d
- -- -- 0%
Id , 0%
- t 0 °�
Od
20d 0%
6d 0%
- fi- — 0 °h
5d
- -- — -
t d 0%
6d 0%
5d i 0%
1 d I 0%
6d 0%
5d 1 0%
$0.00
'
7,31
7/31
/9
9/10 9110
9/11 !24
9/26 9/26
.9/25
'
8/
SR
8/ 5 8/15
8/12 ..; /16
8/19
8/20 .- ,'i�,,,, 8/26
8/27 8/27
24
$0.00
25
$0.00
$0.00
26
Issue Notice To PTOCeed To Contractor
- - NST -- —
PRASE I CONSTRUCTION START
CONTRACT ADDENDUMIMODIFICATIOI
27
$0.00
$21,360.00
I
29
30
Gravity Fountain Feed Line
- - -
$5,680.00
31
- - — - --
Prepare Change
Issue Change - - - -- --
g
Victoria Street Gateway
$5,440.00
— —
32
$240.00
33
$5,880.00
34
35
Prepare Change
Issue Change
Preconstruction Conference
$5,640.00
$240.00
$7,520.00
36
37
Prepare Precon Addendum
$7,040.00
38
Issue Precon Addendum ! i
Elizabeth / West 1 St. Alignment
1d
6d
5d
tdi
�
23d
5d
J 0%
f 0 °k
0%
0%
—
0%
0 %
$480.00
39
I
$2,280.00
40
�
Prepare Addendum
Issue Addendum
$2,040.00
41
$240.00
42
—
$4,780.00
$2,260.00
43
- -� - -`—
GEOTECHNICAL TESTING CONTRACT
44
Prepare Geotechnical SOW
Project: HARP PHASE I
Date: 7/17/96 / Mark Austin
File: PIConstruction
Task "' Milestone Float
Progress Summary �.
Page 2
Historic Arkansas Rtverwalk Project
Phase I Construction Administration
July- September 1996
Jul
Aug ust
Se ternbe I October Nove
ID
Task Name
Duration
% Comp.
Cost
23 30 7 14 21 28 1
4 11 1 18 25
1 8 15 22 29 6 13 120 1 27 L 1 10
46
Print / Distribute Geotech SOW
5d;
0%
$1,320.00
817
8/13
- - --
5d',
� -_ - - --
0%
8/14 8/20
46
Geotech Proposal
p Preparation �
$240.00
3d i
0%
$121 123
8126
47
Review/ Evaluate Proposals i
$960.00
48
Award Geotechnical Contract
J 5d
0%
$0.00
Project: HARP PHASE I
Task
Milestone ♦ Float
Date: 7/17/96 / Mark Austin
File: PlConstruction
Progress
Summary
Page 3
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Phase I Construction Administration
Summary Resource Cost Table July - September 1996
Name
Page 1
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Resource Hours Estimate - July - September 1996
Phase I Construction Administration
Page 2
6/30/96
7/7/96
7/14/96
7/21/96
7128196
8/4196
8111196
8/18/96
8126/96
9/1196
Preconstruction Conference
32h
Austin
8h
Sellards and Grigg
8h
Lonco
8h
Nelson
8h
Bids Due To City
Evaluate Responses
16h
Austin
!
16h
Prepare City Council Resolution
City Council Meeting /Approval
Issue Notice of Award
Contractor Insurance / Bond Preparation
Issue Notice To Proceed To Contractor
PHASE I CONSTRUCTION START
CONTRACT ADDENDUM /MODIFICATIONS
Gravity Fountain Feed Line
Prepare Change
I
68h
16h
Nickle
I
24h
16h
Keeter
I
12h
Nelson
16h
Austin
I
8h
Sellards and Grigg
8h
Issue Change
4h
Austin
4h
Victoria Street Gateway
Prepare Change
52h
48h
Nelson
16h
24h
Nickle
16h
24h
Sellards and Grigg
12h
Austin
8h
Issue Change
4h
Austin
4h
Preconstruction Conference
Prepare Precon Addendum
116h
Austin
40h
Nelson
40h
Sellards and Grigg
24h
Lonco
8h
Ch2M Hill
2h
RMH
2h
Page 2
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Resource Hours Estimate - July - September 1996
Phase I Construction Administration
Page 3
6/30196
7/7/96
7/14/96
7/21/96
7/28196
8/4/96
8/11/96
8118/96
8/25196
9/1/96
Issue Precon Addendum
8h
Austin
I
8h
Elizabeth / West 1 St. Alignment
Prepare Addendum
36h
8h
Nelson
32h
8h
Austin
4h
Issue Addendum
4h
Austin
4h
GEOTECHNICAL TESTING CONTRACT
Prepare Geotechnical SOW
36h
Austin
24h
Carrie
4h
Sellards and Grigg
4h
Lonco
4h
Print / Distribute Geotech SOW
28h
Austin
4h
Carrie
24h
Geotech Proposal Preparation
4h
Austin
4h
Review / Evaluate Proposals
16h
Austin
16h
Award Geotechnical Contract
Total
88h
8h
42h
196h
216h
188h
60h
28h
Page 3
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Resource Hours Estimate - July - September 1996
Phase I Construction Administration
Page 4
9/8/96
9/15196
9122/96
Total
PHASE 1 DESIGN
Drawings and Specification
Final Package Review & Configuration
Printing and Binding of Final Packages
Stamp Drawings/Specifications
Deliver Packages To City
Final Package Complete
Phase I Cost Estimate
112h
Austin
j
60h
Nelson
24h
Carrie
f
24h
PSI
4h
PHASE I CONTRACTOR PROCURMENT
Prepare Prequalificaiton Criteria
24h
Austin
I
8h
Carrie
8h
PSI
Sh
Prepare Advertisement for Contractors
16h
Austin
8h
Carrie
8h
Issue Advertisement In Newspapers, Journals
48h
Austin
24h
Carrie
24h
Advertisement Published
Issue Request For Qualifications
8h
Carrie
8h
Evaluate Requests For Qualifications
58h
Austin
32h
Carrie
8h
Sellards and Grigg
8h
Lonco
8h
PSI
2h
Issue Invitation To Bid
Austin
Carrie
Contractor Bid Period
64h
Austin
40h
Sellards and Grigg
8h
Lonco
8h
Nelson
Sh
Page 4
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Resource Hours Estimate - July - September 1996
Phase I Construction Administration
Page 5
9/8/96
9/15/96
9/22/96
Total
Preconstruction Conference
i
32h
Austin
8h
Sellards and Grigg
8h
Lonco
8h
Nelson
8h
Bids Due To City
Evaluate Responses
16h
Austin
16h
Prepare City Council Resolution
City Council Meeting /Approval
Issue Notice of Award
Contractor Insurance / Bond Preparation
Issue Notice To Proceed To Contractor
PHASE I CONSTRUCTION START
CONTRACT ADDENDUM/MODIFICATIONS
Gravity Fountain Feed Line
Prepare Change
84h
Nickle
40h
Keeler
12h
Nelson
16h
Austin
i
8h
Setlards and Grigg
`
8h
Issue Change
4h
Austin
4h
Victoria Street Gateway
Prepare Change
100h
Nelson
40h
Nickle
40h
Sellards and Grigg
12h
Austin
8h
Issue Change
4h
Austin
4h
Preconstruction Conference
Prepare Precon Addendum
116h
Austin
40h
Nelson
40h
Sellards and Grigg
24h
Lonco
8h
Ch2M Hill
2h
RMH
2h
Page 5
Historic Arkansas Riverwalk Project
Resource Hours Estimate - July - September 1996
Phase I Construction Administration
Page 6
9/8/96
9115196
9/22196
Total
Issue Precon Addendum
8h
Austin
I
8h
Elizabeth / West 1 St. Alignment
Prepare Addendum
44h
Nelson
4ph
Austin
4h
Issue Addendum
4h
Austin
4h
GEOTECHNICAL TESTING CONTRACT
Prepare Geotechnical SOW
36h
Austin
24h
Carrie
j
4h
Sellards and Grigg
4h
Lonco
4h
Print / Distribute Geotech SOW
4
28h
Austin
4h
Carrie
24h
Geotech Proposal Preparation
4h
Austin
4h
Review / Evaluate Proposals
16h
Austin
16h
Award Geotechnical Contract
Total
826h
Page 6